--
Matthias Runge
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https
Hi there,
python-roman changed from python to zpl-2.1
Matthias
--
Matthias Runge
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https
On 02/07/2023 17:51, Matthias Runge wrote:
Hi there
in one of my recent builds, I came across this error on i686 [1].
Transaction test succeeded.
Running transaction
warning: /etc/hosts created as /etc/hosts.rpmnew
Error unpacking rpm package shadow-utils-2:4.13-7.fc39.i686
error: unpacking
[1]
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/7079/102847079/mock_output.log
--
Matthias Runge
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https
On 31/10/2022 19:23, Jerry James wrote:
Hi all,
One hurdle is that the current fontawesome-fonts maintainer doesn't
seem to have time to work on the package:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1857488#c9. I'm willing
to help out with that, but would prefer to see somebody with more
On 06/07/2022 13:55, Ali Erdinc Koroglu wrote:
Hello, I can take the rest thank you.
FAS: aekoroglu
Thank you!
I did not hand all packages over, such as python-django-nose, or
python-django-piston because they should already be retired, but it
still looks somewhat existing in pkgdb. Upstre
On 06/07/2022 10:50, Simon de Vlieger wrote:
I don't know if I can apply as I am a relatively new maintainer but I'd like to
help out by taking over the following packages:
- python-django-robots
- python-django-pagination
- python-django-contact-form
My FAS username is: `supakeen`.
Hi Simo
On 19/04/2022 15:00, Matthias Runge wrote:
Hello there,
Re-iterating on this email, also including de...@lists.fp.o
you may or may not know, I have been maintaining python-django for quite
some time in the past, some time as part of my job. My role changed and
I really can not dedicate
> Am 20.01.2022 um 09:57 schrieb Pierre-Yves Chibon :
>
> Good Morning Everyone,
>
> The packagers listed here have been receiving a daily email asking them to
> either adjust their bugzilla or their FAS account so the email address in FAS
> matches an existing bugzilla account.
>
> Having a b
On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 11:25:42AM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Django4.0
>
> == Summary ==
> Update Django to version 4.0.
>
> == Owner ==
> * Name: [[User:mrunge| Matthias Runge]]
> * Email: mru...@redhat.com
>
>
> ==
more than welcome to either become a
co-maintainer here or to take this package over. It has been low
maintenance in the past, where it required updates from time to time.
Ah, now that I opened up the package on src.fp.o, I see you are already
there. Awesome!
how that happened...
>
> Fixed.
Thank you.
--
Matthias Runge
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/pr
y 18.
> So, go for it!
Done: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Project_Wiki:Changes/Django4.0
Thanks!
--
Matthias Runge
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
in Fedora could use more helping hands.
Upstream is very good at providing insights, timelines etc and also
keeps it secured. That also means, there are regular updates.
Matthias
[1] https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/dec/07/django-40-released/
[2] https://www.djangoproject.com/download/
--
> On Sun, 26 Dec 2021 at 23:32, Reon Beon via devel
> wrote:
> Update?
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8455
>
>
> I am going to be overly blunt here. Messages like this do NOT help.
> 1. Most of the people who are paid to work on this are on break for 1/2 of
> December and so
e to the cache storing the sources.
For just local builds, this step is not necessary. You could run
fedpkg mockbuild
Hope that helps,
Matthias
--
Matthias Runge
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscrib
On 31/12/2020 16:10, Martin Gansser wrote:
this means that jack-audio-connection-kit has been replaced by
pipewire-jack-audio-connection-kit ?
- package pipewire-jack-audio-connection-kit-0.3.13-4.fc33.i686 conflicts
with jack-audio-connection-kit provided by
jack-audio-connection-kit-1
On 04/12/2020 12:01, PGNet Dev wrote:
unbound upstream release version is now a 1.13
Fedora packages
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/unbound
are several versions behind.
no response from maintainer in months, re updates, @
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860887
anyone
On 22/09/2020 09:21, Andrea Perotti wrote:
> Hi,
> is anyone in contact with Gratien D'Haese?
>
> I'm opening this thread and this bugzilla[0] as per policy [1].
>
> I've noticed that on Fedora `rear` package is stuck at 2.4, while
> upstream released rear 2.6 [2].
>
> Also you can see there
On 30/03/2020 17:41, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> The only problem of GitLab is that Fedora - for years - was not able to
> package it. I'm not a able to judge where the packaging problem is/was,
> any more info? Are we going invest into packaging it?
>
> Please make us 100% confident we are not goin
On 30/03/2020 16:23, Till Maas wrote:
For transparency, we have published the full User Story list which is
linked within the blog and for ease of searching is here:
https://hackmd.io/@My419-DISUGgo4gcmO1D6A/HJB74lcL8
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/council-disc...@
On 15/02/2020 21:12, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> I was (probibly poorly) maintaining tinymce for a while because we used
> it for askbot. We no longer do need it so I am going to orphan it and
> hope someone out there has more time and energy to give it the love it
> needs.
>
> There's
On 08/12/2019 02:52, Dakota Williams via devel wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I'm working on bringing cutelyst to Fedora for my personal project.
> Formally, I'm a C/C++ developer, but have a strong interest in RPM
> packaging.
>
> I've had some packaging experience through work by backporting glib2,
> udi
On 02/12/2019 14:37, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> IIUC, effectively "new branches" means "EPEL branches" since normal
> Fedora branches are all created automatically.
>
> So to rephrase this
>
> * Should someone who is not the maintainer be able to declare
> that the maintainer must acc
On 27/09/2019 00:04, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 26. 09. 19 22:06, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
"C" == Christopher writes:
C> With version-controlled package sources, changelogs in SPEC seem so
C> obsolete to me. They are already problematic today when they conflict
C> due to changes in multiple b
py:
I believe, I am Marcos sponsor; thus I went ahead and merged the PRs.
IIRC, he moved on to something unrelated to OpenStack, thus I'd make
sense to at least grant commit access to the OpenStack related packages.
Matthias
--
Matthias Runge
_
PEL updates for a few years now,
> I'm happy to take this one on.
Yes, I sponsored Flavio a while back, but I'm sure he won't have the
time to dedicate the necessary love to his packages.
Matthias
--
Matthias Runge
___
devel mail
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 10:58:45PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> python-case mrunge
Thank you for pointing this out, it is fixed in rawhide.
Matthias
--
Matthias Runge
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscr
it seems there hasn't been any
significant contribution to this over the past 4 years. I may have been
too optimistic with my available time for this.
Any interests?
Matthias
--
Matthias Runge
___
devel mailing list -- devel@list
.
>
> I would like to see the package retired.
>
> python-autopep8, python-pytest-pep8, spyder, python-hacking:
>
> Would you mind switching to pycodestyle?
autopep8 now uses pycodestyle. I should update autopep8 over the
next fe
> DM> project gets created.
> I'm sure there could be. But I'd go further and say that we should set
> that on all existing repositories and then let folks opt out if they
> wish.
Yes,
that is a good suggestion. It'd prevent som
On 11/11/2018 21:19, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses for these package
maintainers are no longer valid. I'm starting the unresponsive
maintainer policy to find out if they are still interested in
maintaining their packages (and if so, have them update their
On 04/10/2018 14:43, Neal Gompa wrote:
Hey all,
I've been trying to get in touch with Matthias Runge (mrunge) over the
last couple of days (for getting python-celery into EPEL7 for Pagure
5). However, his email address listed in FAS bounces with "unable to
connect" errors.
Does
On 20/09/2018 21:30, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 at 18:17, Jonathan Underwood
In the process of orphaning a few packages lately, I noticed that the
user "cicku" (Christopher Meng) still had commit or admin privelidges
on the package. That user hasn't been active for a couple
>
I briefly contacted Björn, and he promised to get back here.
Matthias
--
Matthias Runge
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https:/
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 11:51:34AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 22.8.2018 10:59, Matthias Runge wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > sorry for the late notice; Django 2.1 was recently released, and
> > I intend to update Django in F29 to version 2.1.
> >
> > A
I'll merge rawhide into
F29.
Matthias
--
Matthias Runge
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct
Hello,
I'm intending to either orphan or better retire the following
packages.
python-wordpress-xmlrpc
python-mozbase
pymunin
feedstail
All of them can be considered dead upstream, and haven't seen
a release for loong time.
Takers? Otherwise I'll retire them in a week.
Matthi
rch-linux-aur-repository-found-contain-malware/
This is a different issue. While we can not be sure this won't happen in
Fedora, I'd like to focus on one question/issue per thread.
Matthias
--
Matthias Runge
___
devel mailing list
contact. It has
probably been more than 12 months.
Matthias
--
Matthias Runge
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedor
ge has been fundamentally broken since Fedora 24."
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372948
>
>
> The main admin (togdog) usually give permission to commit if you ask
> him , at least did to me .
Right, I can second tha
Hello,
the subject says it, I'm intending to retire
python-openstack-nose-plugin. It is old,
very old. Last commit upstream was 2012.
Any takers, otherwise I'd retire it in a week.
Matthias
--
Matthias Runge
___
devel mailing lis
ontributors and developers. For usage
questions, please use us...@lists.fedoraproject.org
When asking a question there, please include more input:
- what did you do, how did you...
- what went wrong, what was expected
Thank you,
Matthias
--
Matthias Runge
__
correct behavior.
Same here, I' cusious if anyone has been able to get it working
properly? In best case, has someone written about it?
I'm fiddling around with adding/removing unbound forwards depending on
connected networks here and there, but it's still quite hacky.
Matthia
remove the python3
package and will provide that through the copr as well.
Best,
Matthias
[1] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mrunge/Django2/
--
Matthias Runge
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an ema
On 24/12/17 09:58, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I did the rebuilds yesterday.
>
> totpcgi, python-django-dynamite, libappindicator failed to rebuild for
> unrelated reasons, bugs have been filed:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1528774,
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/
On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 08:30:20PM +0100, Matthias Runge wrote:
> Now this has gone back and forth. The system worked more or less ok.
> Maybe it is more about the changes (and communication) of a
> specific provenpackager?
After sleeping a night over this, I should have put it in differ
and he didn't even
try to contact me, neither via irc, nor email or bugzilla.
So, maybe this is just caused by the behaviour of a single person?
Matthias
--
Matthias Runge
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 10:26:11AM +0100, Matthias Runge wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 09:56:28AM +0100, Lumir Balhar wrote:
> > On 12/05/2017 04:27 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > Maybe a Fedora Change coordinating this would be nice?
>
> probably a good idea.
T
t; unneeded python2-django-wahtnots anyway and only keep the ones used by
> > the apps.
Yes, this makes sense.
Going the safe route, we should add the python2 package based on
django-1.11.x and current apps would continue to work.
Thoughts?
Best,
Matthias
--
Matthias Runge
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
; would mean dependent packages would have until April 2020 to drop Python 2.
> If that would help, let me know and I'll package it.
Interesting idea, but how would you handle the mandatory python2 package
for it then? Would that require some FPC decision?
t it in bugzilla and
make your bug a blocker for[1].
Thank you,
Matthias
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1494761
--
Matthias Runge
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
is available, but it's not a priority. Send a message once the build
is done.
- it would be great, if there is a possibility to trigger rebuilds on
dependent packages, like rebuild required packages after ABI bump.
Thanks,
Matthias
[1] http
ttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410594
I'll take this one, could you please have a look at this here?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1402319
Thank you
--
Matthias Runge
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To uns
commit access to this or that repository.
In my experience, that always helps; as a personal preference, I tend
to ignore requests from someone without context.
Matthias
--
Matthias Runge
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsub
On 27/12/16 22:02, Matthias Runge wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have 2 easy Python reviews up for swapping
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1408869
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1408868
>
> One depends on the other, both are easy picks.
> Matth
anilaclient
> python-swiftclient
>
> These are victims of python-oslo-sphinx, needs a new release:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1408503
>
I just went ahead and pushed a fix Pete.
Matthias
--
Matthias Runge
___
deve
Hello,
I have 2 easy Python reviews up for swapping
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1408869
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1408868
One depends on the other, both are easy picks.
Matthias
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fe
Hello,
due to lack of time, and because I don't use it any more, I'm hereby
orphaning python-ladon. It's a low maintenance package.
Feel free to pick it up.
Matthias
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email t
Hello,
license for python-gevent-websocket changed from BSD to ASL 2.0.
As additional note, upstream changed their repository, the author stayed
the same.
Matthias
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
23 f22 )
> > rpms/python-oslo-messaging -- OpenStack common messaging library (
> > master f24 f23 f22 )
> > rpms/python-websockify -- WSGI based adapter for the Websockets
> > protocol ( master f24 f23 f22 epel7 el6 )
> >
> > kevin
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 24/02/16 17:08, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> I no longer need these packages in Fedora (they were there to
> support Review Board which is now only in EPEL due to Django
> incompatibilities), so I've orphaned them.
>
> I will continue to maintain t
Hello,
Django-1.9 was released some time ago, currently we have
Django-1.8 in rawhide, f23 and f22.
It makes sense to upgrade, if we want fedora to stay a development platform.
A scratch-build to test can be found here:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12944336
Best,
Matthias
On 26/01/16 14:10, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> pencil
>
pencil did not had any release for a longer time (although they directly
recommend downloading a fedora 19 package, the latest build made by the
package maintainer was 2 years ago for f20.
Maybe it's time to retire it completely?
Matthias
--
On 15/12/15 15:07, Randy Barlow wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I've been attempting to contact the python-mongoengine
> maintainers, Yohan Graterol and Eduardo Javier Echeverria Alvarado,
> for some time with no response[0]. In addition to the two bugs I've
> filed, I've written e-mail to Yohan twice (on 201
15-09-20 (0 weeks ago)
> python-django-tinymce (maintained by: yuwang, mrunge)
> python-django-tinymce-1.5.2-2.fc21.noarch requires tinymce =
> 3.5.10-3.fc23
Those 3 package should imho just go away.
Any takers? Otherwise I'd retire them in 2 weeks.
--
Matthias
On 03/09/15 02:51, Pete Walter wrote:
> On 09/02/2015 01:00 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>> I was advised to ask on this list for help regarding setting up a copr
>>> repository.
>>
>> Why Copr and not Fedora official package? Is there something which
>> conflicts with Fedora's Packaging Guidelines [1]
e Review.
There is this process to become a co-maintainer. I think this is quite
useful:
The way this is intended (IMHO), is, to get an upstream
developer becoming a package maintainer for the specific component. That
person at first might not be the best person to maintain an rpm package.
But this
On 11/07/15 17:24, Haïkel wrote:
I fixed python-autopep8 as provenpackager.
Thank you! I had it on my plate and wanted to look at it today,
observing it was fixed already :D
Matthias
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
F
Hello,
I'm orphaning python-xhtml2pdf. It has been more or less dead upstream
for years.
Matthias
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On 26/02/15 19:06, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
> I would like to give away as many packages as I can to others who are
> interested. My current job keeps me pretty busy and I have been hanging
> on to them in hopes of finding the elusive free time that I don't get
> much of anymore. So if you t
on.
>
> > [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Pre_Beta
> See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Milestone_freezes :)
Yeah, but that wouldn't really help in testing this.
If I would build it now, and it get's submitted way later, it may be too
late in the game to
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 01:33:57PM +0100, Matthias Runge wrote:
> On 27/01/15 11:51, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> > Hello,
> >> ** A build containing latest Django will be pushed to f22 branch late in
> >> dev
> >> cycle. If we decide not to push Django-1.8, nothin
- anitya is the web app running at https://release-monitoring.org
> It is responsible for scraping upstream release sites looking for new
> releases.
> - the-new-hotness is a backend daemon that responds to fedmsg messages about
> upstream releases.
This is very cool! Thank you an
On 27/01/15 11:51, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> Hello,
>> ** A build containing latest Django will be pushed to f22 branch late in dev
>> cycle. If we decide not to push Django-1.8, nothing will be broken.
>> ** Django 1.8 final release is expected around April 1st, 2015: [2]
>
> Note that the “Change
On 23/01/15 16:59, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>>
>> sandbox -X will also add more protection.
>
> Unless I'm mistaken, sandbox -X hasn't worked in almost a year.
>
I gave it a try;
sandbox -X
/usr/bin/sandbox:
/usr/sbin/seunshare is required for the action you want to perform.
Sadly, a naive (a
On 22/01/15 15:17, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 03:08:28PM +0100, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
>> On Thu, 2015-01-22 at 14:49 +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>>> Unfortunately review swaps don't work for new packagers, before they are
>>> sponsored. They are encou
On 21/01/15 11:49, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
> I don't have a solution to bring extra resources to reviewing (which
> will be the ideal), but I'd like to propose an amendment to allow
> bringing packages even if no reviewers are available (the typical case).
>
> Step 6: ... If the proposed p
On 09/01/15 08:40, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
>
> - "I beleive this package is not suitable for an LTS release, so I'll
> block it" - is just hubris.
There are some fast moving packages out there, which are not suitable
for long running releases.
Of course, you're welcome to continue to support them
On 01/12/14 13:10, Alec Leamas wrote:
>> So we come back to the question: is any number better than no number
>> at all?
>> Even to get a trend?
>>
> Yes, I think so. Even a bad number can be used for trends and comparisons.
>
> That said, let's not limit this discussion to the "download counter"
ttps://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On 13/11/14 14:33, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 03:20:03PM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
>> ocaml-pa-do
>
> This package was rewritten upstream. I've not tried to package the
> new version. The version packaged in Fedora Rawhide is orphaned, so I
> guess you may as well remov
On 12.11.2014 19:12, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm also using luksCrypt! So this is the crucial info! How did you
resolv your issue? Is there a quick fix for now and what needs to be
fixed in Fedora so that Fedora 21 has this issue fixed out of the
box?
I am using lukscrypt as well, but
nything in a week, we will be setting the point of
> contact on these packages to orphan.
I don't see a reason, why we need to wait for a week here, and I think,
we can solve this situation immediately.
Matthias
- --
Matthias Runge
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Versio
On 16/10/14 15:32, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> There are no Django applications that are part of the install sets of
> any of the Products or Spins so far as I am aware, so the risk to the
> Project deliverable dates would be minimal. I'd suggest bringing it to
> FESCo for a more complete risk-anal
On 16/10/14 14:40, Kalev Lember wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We seem to have a number of broken dependencies in F21 that have gone
> unfixed for a quite some time. Not sure what's up with them; the
> maintainers are supposed to get daily notifications to make sure these
> don't go unnoticed.
>
> Does any
On 16/10/14 14:25, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Matthias Runge wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> in Fedora 21, we have Django-1.6. Django-1.7 was released a few weeks
> ago. As we're in feature freeze, but still pre-beta. I'd
Hello,
in Fedora 21, we have Django-1.6. Django-1.7 was released a few weeks
ago. As we're in feature freeze, but still pre-beta. I'd like to ask for
opinions, if an upgrade to Django-1.7 would be still acceptable.
I have a copr available containing Django-1.7 [1]
Thoughts?
Matthias
[1] https:
On 24/09/14 21:36, Till Maas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that mulitple packages own /etc/bash_completion.d/ even though
> it is nowadays part of the filesystem package. From what I read from the
> Guidelines, it is not clear to me whether it is prohibited or not.
> Should it be fixed? Here is a cur
On 24/09/14 19:01, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> ...snip...
>
> Fedora Infrastructure only runs it on RHEL6 currently.
>
> I don't know off hand if it runs on newer django, but can take a look.
>
> It would be nice to get it running on rhel7/epel7.
>
> kevin
>
>
Kevin, I totally agree.
askbot ups
On 24/09/14 19:54, Máirín Duffy wrote:
>> E.g. in June, flights to Boston are US$ 850 vs US$ 1400 in August. Maybe
>> it's a good idea to move the conference out of main holiday season?
>
> Are you located in EMEA or APAC? Because Flock alternates between North
> America and EMEA I think partially
On 23/09/14 14:23, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Django 1.4 and 1.5 have been retired from the Fedora collection in
> Fedora 21 in favor of the two supported branches, 1.6 and 1.7.
>
Thank you Stephen,
I'm guilty to have missed to send this heads-up mail.
> On 09/23/2014 07:34 AM, Fedora Branched
On 22/09/14 17:18, Haïkel wrote:
> Proposals are supposed to provide travel costs from pre-determined
> airports at the *targeted* period.
> If I trust informations from the proposals, SLC would be too expensive
> to cover travel expenses for EMEA folks.
>
A brief look revealed, a trip e.g. to Cap
On 22/09/14 02:36, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> (Sorry for top-posting)
>
> I've been informed that there is an *official* poll coming shortly from the
> Flock Planning Committee. Please disregard this thread and await that poll.
>
>
To make it a bit more complicate: could we have more specifi
ng to older branches, please keep our stable updates policy in
mind [1].
Thanks,
Matthias
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Stable_Releases
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code
st common issues and will report them.
HTH,
Matthias
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process
[2] https://github.com/derekp7/snebu/blob/master/snebu.spec
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
pull/86
> it 'just' need a new release :)
>
It's those links are broken here[1] as well.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Using_the_package_database#Bugzilla_Acls
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On 04/15/2014 01:08 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 04:54:33PM -0400, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
AFAIK you can't have 2 mod_wsgi's, each one compiled against a
different Python major.minor, loaded by Apache at the same time for
various reasons. So the best solution would IMO be to creat
kage anyways, as older Django versions will be retired sooner or
later.
If you require help, please contact me off list.
Thanks,
Matthias
[1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-django-1.6.2-1.fc20
[2] https://www.matthias-runge.de/2014/03/26/fedora-django-1-6/
--
M
thias
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
1 - 100 of 245 matches
Mail list logo
