I've not updated it for a long time, and it's FTBFS on fedora42
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2341257
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Cod
BuildRequires: openmpi-devel
%description
Test
%prep
%build
%{_mpich_load}
echo mpich should be printed
%{_mpich_unload}
%{_openmpi_load}
echo openmpi should be printed
%{_openmpi_unload}
%files
%changelog
* Tue Sep 24 2024 Marcin Dulak 1.0.0-1
- initial version
Thanks for the %global macros.
How common in f36, and in general in fedora is the need for reducing the
optimization levels?
I don't have small examples to reproduce the failures, but both issues have a
Dockerfile that can be used to compile the programs and trigger the failures
(it takes 10 -
I have two packages where a workaround of reducing the compilation optimization
level avoids runtime failures:
1 Use of -O1 to avoid a numerical test error "zdot wrong"
https://github.com/GlobalArrays/ga/issues/249
2 Use of -fno-lto to avoid segmentation faults
https://gitlab.com/QEF/q-e/-/is
Thanks, performing the builds inside of the %build section instead of %prep
makes the "/builddir/build/BUILD/.package_note...: No such file or directory"
error go away. I updated https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2044028
accordingly.
___
deve
Thanks for the link.
The linked issue mentions "package-notes-srpm-macros-0.4-11.fc36"
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2043178#c18.
The above version is present now in my latest build of ga
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=81699099, but the
"/usr/bin/ld: cannot o
Initially the ga package (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ga) failed during
the f36 mass rebuild,
by failing on some numerical tests "zdot wrong".
The failed build is here
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1882845
However, when trying to reproduce the failure on koji with `
I noticed several, surprising to me email addresses, listed under "Email sent
to" when making changes to my bugzilla.redhat.com bugs.
For example this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1900680
The individual email recipients used for "Email sent to" are not included in
the given bu
FYI: elk developers have been informed about the upcoming libxc bugfix
release, and elk is tracked here
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1831479
GPAW is tracked here https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830675
I've orphaned exciting, since there was not much collaboration from th
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/exciting
Have not received upstream response about build problems:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1741509
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/htmlcleaner
Have not maintained it for a time long enough.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https:
Nobody took tcsh until now.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproje
What is the current policy about bundling in Fedora?
It turns out that the global arrays package, apart from being outdated, and no
response from the maintainer has been compiled with incompatible options
to the ones required by nwchem:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514542
If I d
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/openmx
No collaboration from developers requires constant adjusting of patches.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of C
Hi,
I have a problem with an unmaintained https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ga, a
dependency for https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nwchem.
Recently nwchem unbundled ga from its sources
https://github.com/nwchemgit/nwchem/issues/28, but that requires a recent ga
version, built
in a way that ma
Hi,
I would like qtpass is built for EPEL7, but the maintainer is not interested.
I provided a patch for EPEL7 build
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541439
How to proceed further?
Best regards,
Marcin
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 2:45 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 8:33 AM, Dridi Boukelmoune
> wrote:
> >> I really do like this. There are only two issues I have with it:
> >>
> >> 1. This seems to mandate that all packages must be named by their
> >> import path. My golang package (
Hi,
I have this small Python package for review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398369
I'm not sure about the latest Python packaging guidelines (python34 vs python3
on EL7/Fedora) concerning scripts,
so the review will require a couple of iterations.
Marcin
___
Hi,
I have this package waiting for review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394502
Marcin
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Thanks, I take yours gil.
On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Marcin Dulak wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have this review for exchange
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1156086
>
> Best regards,
>
> Marcin
>
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http
Hi,
I have this review for exchange
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1156086
Best regards,
Marcin
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On 11/13/2014 02:20 PM, Kalev Lember wrote:
Hi,
I would like to remove the packages that still have broken dependencies
in the F21 tree.
This is a followup to
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-October/203411.html
It makes little sense to ship something that cannot even be in
Hi,
Marcin Dulak: working with RedHat/Fedora systems for 6 years, and a
Linux user for about 10.
Here is my fist package: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973084
I have packaged several software for internal use, mostly python and
science oriented:
https://build.opensuse.org
23 matches
Mail list logo
