On 02/25/2014 04:45 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 02/25/2014 08:28 AM, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 02/25/2014 04:17 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 02/25/2014 08:14 AM, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 02/25/2014 03:46 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 02/25/2014 07:42 AM, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 02/25/2014 0
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47527
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47527/0001-Ticket-47527-Allow-referential-integrity-suffixes-to.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47591
I have two versions of a fix, one correcting the calls to
PL_strncasecmp, one replacing them by PL_strcasecmp, which I think is
safe in str2entry_fast.
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47591/0001-Ticket-47591-v1-entries-with-empty-object
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47521
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47521/0001-Ticket-47521-Complex-filter-in-a-search-request-doen.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
ts of 389-devel digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: RFC: New Design: Fine Grained ID List Size (Rich Megginson)
2. Re: RFC: New Design: Fine Grained ID List Size (Ludwig Krispenz)
--
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 10 Sep
-ldapmodify-operation-time.patch
On 04/19/2013 04:57 PM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/346
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/346/0001-Ticket-346-version-3-Slow-ldapmodify-operation-time-.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
The following fix does not provide a lock free syntax table, but
improves performance by drastically reducing the
syntax table lookups.
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/505
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/505/0001-Ticket-505-use-lock-free-access-name2asi-and-oid2asi.patch
Lud
justified to just change the lock type ?
Ludwig
Mark
On 12/07/2012 11:50 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
Hi Mark,
for ticket 507 you replaced rw locks with mutex locks, now for the
backend you replace mutex locks with rw locks ? any reason why these
are better here ?
Regards,
Ludwig
On 12/07
Hi Mark,
for ticket 507 you replaced rw locks with mutex locks, now for the
backend you replace mutex locks with rw locks ? any reason why these are
better here ?
Regards,
Ludwig
On 12/07/2012 05:48 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/509
https://fedorahosted.org/3
Hi,
On 11/29/2012 03:37 PM, John Dennis wrote:
On 11/29/2012 08:47 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
Hi,
I found an older post by KurtZeilenga:
http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-software/200501/msg00102.html
and I think RFC4517, 4.2.15. distinguishedNameMatch can be read that
the comparison
o "cn=user
two,dc=example,dc=com" would require to normalize the two cn parts by
applying the directory string match.
Regards,
Ludwig
On 11/29/2012 02:27 PM, John Dennis wrote:
On 11/29/2012 06:06 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
Hello,
i would like to get comments on
Hi,
why do you want to keep the old rw locks in ifdefs ?
Regards,
Ludwig
On 11/15/2012 07:05 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/507
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/507/0001-Ticket-507-use-mutex-for-FrontendConfig-lock-instead.patch
--
389-devel m
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/510
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/510/0001-Fix-for-ticket-510.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
13 matches
Mail list logo
