On 15 Jan 2014 02:11, "David Airlie" wrote:
>
>
> > >
> > > On 14 Jan 2014 06:04, "David Airlie" < airl...@redhat.com > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > I've gotten a build tag f21-llvm for attempting to rebase rawhide
to llvm
> > > > 3.4
> > >
> > > Assuming there aren't any major s
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:54 PM, David Airlie wrote:
>
>
> >
> >
> > On 14 Jan 2014 06:04, "David Airlie" < airl...@redhat.com > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I've gotten a build tag f21-llvm for attempting to rebase rawhide to
> llvm
> > > 3.4
> >
> > Assuming there aren't any major st
On 14 Jan 2014 06:04, "David Airlie" wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've gotten a build tag f21-llvm for attempting to rebase rawhide to llvm
3.4
Assuming there aren't any major stumbling blocks, are there any plans to
back port llvm 3.4 to f20 (like was done for llvm 3.3 in f19)?
I need clang 3.4 for m
On 2 May 2013 16:59, "Chris Adams" wrote:
>
> Once upon a time, John5342 said:
> > I think USB sticks will become much more usable when Fedora allows
booting
> > from iso images like some other distributions already do. Currently the
> > standard way involves co
On 2 May 2013 15:15, "John Reiser" wrote:
>
> On 05/01/2013 06:37 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>
> > Why are we tied to DVD-5, 4.7GB (4.3GiB) at all?
> > Do we distribute DVDs?
>
> Yes. Check with Fedora Ambassadors in EMEA.
>
> > If so couldn't we use a newer DVD standard?
>
> That would reduce cove
On 15 Apr 2013 14:16, "Pierre-Yves Chibon" wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2013-04-15 at 07:43 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > Richard Hughes wrote:
> >
> > > Is there any guidance as when to trim %changelog down to size? Some
> > > packages have thousands of lines of spec file dating back over 15
> > > years whi
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Eugene Pivnev wrote:
> I can't find lightd, package in Fedora - just lightdm greeters:
> http://img687.imageshack.us/img687/679/screenshotac1e1cb8.png
> I'm wrong?
When you search for "Applications" (the default) the results only show
certain user visible packages
On 2 Apr 2013 20:48, "Pete Travis" wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> The docs team has begun assembling release notes for Fedora 19, and I've
been thinking over hardware requirements.
>
> Historically, we have cited the CPU, storage, and especially memory
requirements for the default installation - a basic GN
On 28 Feb 2013 14:48, "Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski" <
domi...@greysector.net> wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, 13 February 2013 at 15:26, John5342 wrote:
> > On 13 Feb 2013 09:37, "Jens Petersen" wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > &
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Christoph Wickert
wrote:
> Am Montag, den 18.02.2013, 23:34 + schrieb John5342:
>> On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Christoph Wickert
>> wrote:
>> > Despite of the question whether it's right or wrong it's a manual
>>
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Christoph Wickert
wrote:
> Despite of the question whether it's right or wrong it's a manual
> process and we cannot rely it really happens. On the other hand changing
> the script to not close any bugs which are ON_QA is easy.
>
> So what is so bad about ignoring
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Jens Petersen wrote:
>> Are there any plans to bring this to F18?
>
> Good question
>
>> There was talk about bringing 3.1 to F17 including some support from
>> the Mesa guys but then nothing actually happened. I would really
>> like it if I could go through F18 w
On 13 Feb 2013 09:37, "Jens Petersen" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I spend a little time recently working on the llvm package trying
> to fix a few Fedora bugs that have been open for a while...
>
> I also think we should really get llvm-3.2 into Fedora 19.
> I have done a few tests and scratch builds in
>
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 10:16 PM, John5342 wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Jamie Nguyen wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Having some trouble for this package review request:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877705
>>
>> It has been app
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Jamie Nguyen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Having some trouble for this package review request:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877705
>
> It has been approved, but I can't set the fedora-cvs flag. This has
> worked in the past, but maybe something to do with
On Oct 27, 2012 7:46 PM, "Michel Alexandre Salim"
wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> (originally posted to test@; Adam Williamson suggested it might be
> more appropriate here)
>
> Ever since I started tracking Fedora 18, Google Music Manager is no
> longer installable,
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, John5342 wrote:
>
>>> Why is redhat-rpm-config not a dependancy dragged in by rpm-build?
>>
>>
>> I imagine because rpmbuild is in fact useful for building packages
>> other than fo
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:14 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
>
> I was building a package and not getting any debuginfo packages, and
> luckily rdieter was around to tell me (again) that I was missing the
> redhat-rpm-config package.
>
> Why is redhat-rpm-config not a dependancy dragged in by rpm-build?
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
> You know what was the painless part of this re-install? After firing up
> google
> chrome, I didn't need to reinstall anything for it. It's all synced with
> gmail.
>
> I find myself wishing that all my fedora packages could be restored ju
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 15:33, Jamie Nguyen wrote:
> Yes. Since the emails don't necessarily match up, I don't think you
> can rely on querying the database. Not only is it less efficient, it
> can break too! (In most cases the emails probably will match up
> anyway, but you can't rely on it.)
It
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 13:54, Nils Philippsen wrote:
> This disables normal non-programmable tab-completion for me.
>
> Also, if you want the (other) default settings, you need to
> "$include /etc/inputrc" on the first line of ~/.inputrc. It would really
> help if we shipped documentation for thi
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 03:34, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> A bad autocomplete can cause you to sit 3-4 minutes
> as DNS or other things time out.
Ctrl+C will cancel the command and the completion with it. It's not
ideal if you are typing a long command but it certainly avoids waiting
3-4 minute
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 19:33, Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Sunday, November 20, 2011 02:14:09 PM drago01 wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> > Steve Grubb wrote:
>> >> For example, if a 32 bit library is installed, which application is left
>> >> - the 64 or 32 bit one?
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 15:27, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Anything that directly or indirectly uses QtWebKit or QtScript also requires
> execmem, unless we disable the JavaScript JIT, which we used to do, but got
> users complaining about the slowness.
>
> See also:
> https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cg
On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 15:31, valent.turko...@gmail.com
wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 4:28 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>> Hi KDE devels,
>> I can't find kdeedu and marble in KDE websvn, have I missed something?
>>
>> http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/KDE/kdeedu/ - is now a dead link. Is th
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 14:47, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 2:16 AM, Christoph Frieben
> wrote:
>> 2011/9/8 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson":
>>> On behalf of the systemd convertion team Just wanted to say thanks to
>>> Tom "Spot" Callaway he's been on fire today packaging submitted unit
>
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 21:12, Chris Adams wrote:
> In any case, instead of arguing semantics, can you answer my actual
> question? How many systems hang when floppy.ko is loaded? If it is a
> large number, it should be easy to point to lots of data.
Ok, just some very approximate stats for a g
I don't use this package, I only took it over in order to get another
package in which has since become irrelevant and most importantly
although i know plenty about java (and ant) i have no clue at all
about maven so this package could really do with a better owner.
The package currently has only
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 14:23, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 14:37:16 +0100,
> Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 08:09:51AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>> > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 14:26:39 +0100,
>> > Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Or just add flopp
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 18:22, Nathan O. wrote:
> I am not able to submit packages as an update through bodhi web interface
> nor via fedpkg update. I have the package in F15, but I am trying to send it
> to F16 and both ways give me the error that "newlisp not tagged as an update
> candidate"
>
>
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 03:29, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In the cmake version residing in rawhide, the UseSWIG.cmake file is
> broken. Upstream is aware of this. I've also filed a bug with fedora
> here[1].
>
> I'd like to find a temporary solution to this. gdcm cannot build in
> rawhide, an
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 02:06, Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
> John5342 wrote:
>
>> I forget which one exactly contains the mp3 plugin
>
> gstreamer-plugins-ugly, I believe
>
>> i just install all of them and then i don't have to worry about any
>> other forma
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 22:59, Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
>
> John5342 wrote:
>
> > Hence xine-lib-extras-freeworld should make no difference to amarok when
> > using the default backend anyway. You probably want gstreamer-plugins-* in
> > f15+ (or whenever phonon-b
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 19:02, Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
> Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> > there's one third-party KDE-Platform-based application still using
> > xine-lib for the foreseeable future: Kaffeine.
>
> kaffeine has begun to look kind of shabby. I always installed it, as xine
> appeared to h
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 23:37, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 02:00:57PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 08:01:06PM +1000, Chris Jones wrote:
> >
> > > I agree. As virtualization technology becomes more and more involved
> > > and frequent on users system
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 23:45, John5342 wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 23:37, William Cohen wrote:
>
>> I am attempting to rebuild oprofile for fedora 13. However koji is
>> converting the following in the spec file:
>>
>> BuildRequires: qt-devel
>>
>&
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 23:37, William Cohen wrote:
> I am attempting to rebuild oprofile for fedora 13. However koji is
> converting the following in the spec file:
>
> BuildRequires: qt-devel
>
> into a dependency on the qt3-devel rpm, which is wrong. There is a qt-devel
> for qt4 available. Why
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 19:19, Adam Litke wrote:
> Hello all. I am a new Fedora packager and am following the process to
> create a new package. The associated bugzilla is 638647 [1]. At this
> point I am trying to request a new SCM module for my package and have
> followed the documented steps
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 00:05, Paul F. Johnson
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It's been a while since I've done any sort of uploading and in that time
> my box died, has been rebuilt and is running happily on rawhide.
>
> Problem is my scripts for uploading have gone! I've followed the
> information on the wiki
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 23:17, Neal Becker wrote:
> Repository : :ext:nbec...@cvs.fedoraproject.org:/cvs/pkgs
> Module : rpms/mercurial/devel
> Working dir: ~/fedora/mercurial/devel/
>
>
>
> In directory .:
> Message: cvs [commit aborted]: correct above errors first!
> Message: Access deni
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 20:52, Zach Carter wrote:
> On Friday 16 July 2010 00:36:31 Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> > Any insight, tips or pointers would be much appreciated.
>>
>> You could modify the spec file to cat the config.log file on error,
>> which should give you more clues.
>
> Thanks for the
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 21:29, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> [john5342] ebook-tools: ebook-tools-libs-0.1.1-5.fc12.x86_64
False positive: libs subpackage contains license file and all other
ebook-tools.srpm derived packages depend on it.
--
There are 10 kinds of people in the wor
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 19:36, Mohammed Morsi wrote:
> Howdy,
> I've been scratching my head over this problem for the last few days and
> figured it was time to get some help.
>
> I'm trying to build Ruby on Rails v2.3.8 against Fedora 13 but am running
> into dependency issues. Namely the 'ru
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 21:47, Thomas Spura wrote:
> Am Tue, 22 Jun 2010 11:02:40 -0400
> schrieb David Malcolm :
>
> Hmm, I just tried to write a little script for that (based on the one
> from above), but I had some problems with bodhi.
>
> e.g. 'repoquery --requires bodhi' shows nothing (becaus
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 16:35, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 05:27:32PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
>> We don't generate deltas for packages with a size of >= 100MB
>> which kind of makes it useless for this case but it seems that delta
>> generation is to expensive to do for
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 13:40, Michal Nowak wrote:
> Run with gold was run first, build root was cleared afterwards and
> run with ld was run then. gold seems to be way slower.
May seem silly but where does the ccache live for mock builds and if
it is outside the buildroot was it cleared too?
--
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 19:00, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> John5342 wrote:
>> A simple way to encourage constructive input from users on both the
>> state of play and providing more bug reports might be to regularly
>> (perhaps even daily as soon as a significant update comes along)
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 16:20, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Mike McGrath wrote:
>
>> Alternatively, the KDE SIG could stop ignoring the problems that were
>> caused this week by the updates they released. Even an "I'm sorry I broke
>> your desktop" would go a long way. The update the busted my desktop
>>
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 01:03, Jesse Keating wrote:
> Unblocked orphan moodbar
I'll take this one. Amarok should be getting support for it again soon.
--
There are 10 kinds of people in the world: Those who understand binary
and those who don't...
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraprojec
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 18:51, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> Any way I can get bugzilla to search closed bugs again by default with
> quicksearch? I really miss it.
> Maybe I need to learn search templates - is there such a thing?
If you click the Quick Search help link on the front page it gives
som
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 19:40, Tim Niemueller wrote:
> Hello Fedora Developers.
>
> I'm trying to build an update for the Player robotics software for F-11.
> The very same spec file builds just fine for F-12 and rawhide. It worked
> just fine for the previous Player version with only minor spec c
51 matches
Mail list logo
