Re: vote for systemd: Nay (now working but still Voting Nay)

Quoting Lennart Poettering : On Tue, 02.07.13 16:57, Jean-Marc Pigeon (j...@safe.ca) wrote: As expected the problem stand on a very small detail (within /etc/fstab) Note that in a systemd world fstab shouldn't really list any of the virtual file systems like procfs, sysfs, devpts,

Re: vote for systemd: Nay.

Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- A bientôt === Jean-Marc PigeonE-Mail: j...@safe.ca SAFE Inc.

Re: vote for systemd: Nay (now working but still Voting Nay)

y good news yesterday!, problem is fixed within kernel 3.10.0, maybe it is time to work on vzgot again?. Quoting Michal Schmidt : On 07/02/2013 04:08 PM, Jean-Marc Pigeon wrote: I was not expecting to have it fully working at the first attempt in my own container design, Would you be willin

vote for systemd: Nay.

path in the way we implement software in Fedora. To summarize, It is very easy to write code for an open platform, far more difficult to write code keeping the platform open. (but this is another story, maybe another time...:-}}). That's all folks :-} did I say "Nay" to systemd?. -- A bien

Re: Need some advices moving a fedora package from sysVinit to systemd

A bientôt === Jean-Marc PigeonE-Mail: j...@safe.ca SAFE Inc. Phone: (514) 493-4280 Clement, 'a kiss solution' to get rid of SPAM (at last) Clement' Home base <

Re: Need some advices moving a fedora package from sysVinit to systemd t

within systemctl such we could follow what is doing in (near) real time when trying to debug an application.service. -- A bientôt ======= Jean-Marc PigeonE-Mail: j...@safe.ca SAFE Inc. Phone: (51

Re: Need some advices moving a fedora package from sysVinit to systemd t

check for pid befor lock file is in place. A timer capability of some kind, would be nice?. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- A bientôt ===

Need some advices moving a fedora package from sysVinit to systemd t

focused on doing only one thing but extremely well). Hopefully I am wrong, (I must be too much "fine tuned" by using SysV since 1984 :-}). -- A bientôt ======= Jean-Marc PigeonE-Mail: j...@safe.ca SAFE Inc.

Re: fedpkg build version numbering discrepancy

??). As we are GIT now, I do not think putting "$Revision: 2.1.0.401 $" strings within spec is a good thing anymore. -- A bientôt == Jean-Marc Pigeon Internet: j...@sa

Re: fedpkg build version numbering discrepancy

rg > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- A bientôt ====== Jean-Marc Pigeon Internet: j...@safe.ca SAFE Inc. Phone: (514) 493-4280 Fax:

Re: fedpkg build version numbering discrepancy

Hello, On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 21:16 -0500, Matt McCutchen wrote: > On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 21:05 -0500, Jean-Marc Pigeon wrote: > > Let be straight and simple (package name doesn't > > matter here) > > > > 1) Spec file say version: 1.2.3 > >

Re: fedpkg build version numbering discrepancy

Hello, On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 16:16 -0800, Garrett Holmstrom wrote: > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Thomas Spura > wrote: > > On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 18:46:34 -0500 > > Jean-Marc Pigeon wrote: > >> rversion=2.1 > >> subversion=400 &g

Re: fedpkg build version numbering discrepancy

On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 16:27 -0700, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: > On 01/27/2011 04:10 PM, Jean-Marc Pigeon wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Hoping to be wrong. > > > > Today I was working on my package after a long time, > > I upgraded from version 2

fedpkg build version numbering discrepancy

ing "sources file" version! Did I missed something or we are in "easy mistake" situation??. -- A bientôt ====== Jean-Marc Pigeon