On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 08:54:42PM +0800, Honggang LI wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 08:27:52AM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> >On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 at 22:26, Honggang LI wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > After input my FAS accout and passwor
On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 08:27:52AM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 at 22:26, Honggang LI wrote:
>
> Hi,
> After input my FAS accout and password, I got this error message.
>
>After input where? What place did you get
Hi,
After input my FAS accout and password, I got this error message.
=
500 Internal Server Error
Could not convert return value of the view callable function
pyramid_fas_openid.view.verify_openid into a response object. The value
returned was None. You may have
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 01:24:02PM -0400, Charalampos Stratakis wrote:
> usnic-tools honli
RPATH had been removed from build usnic-tools-1.1.2.1-8.fc35 .
thanks
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an ema
Hi,
https://mirrors.tuna.tsinghua.edu.cn/fedora/releases/33/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/r/
Let take packages start with 'r' for example. There are 841 x86_64
packages and 247 i686 packages availeble for Fedora-33. That means
only 29% components have x86_64 and i686 build available at the same
t
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 09:47:36AM -, Martin Gansser wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the koji build for vdr-live fails on s390x arch with the following error
> message:
>
> Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests)
> <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
> R
On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 03:17:47PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > I'm one of package maintainers of rdma-core. There is a patch
> > applied without any maintainers' review/approve. I had sent two emails
> > to patch committer to ask him/her to push the change to upstream.
> > But never get respon
On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 02:39:22PM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> On Monday, 09 November 2020 at 14:23, Honggang LI wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 08:03:59AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 8:03 AM Honggang LI wrote:
> >
On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 08:03:59AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 8:03 AM Honggang LI wrote:
> >
> > hi
> >
> > I'm one of package maintainers of rdma-core. There is a patch
> > applied without any maintainers' review/approve. I had se
hi
I'm one of package maintainers of rdma-core. There is a patch
applied without any maintainers' review/approve. I had sent two emails
to patch committer to ask him/her to push the change to upstream.
But never get response.
The patch maybe useful or fix something. But the divergence between
ups
Hi,
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Koji/GarbageCollection
I need to untag/delete fabtests-1.11.1rc1-1.fc34 and
libfabric-1.11.1rc1-1.fc34, which was built by me. I tried to untag
them, but I don't have the permission.
$ koji untag-build -v f34 fabtests-1.11.1rc1-1.fc34
untagging fabtests-1.11.1r
On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 03:56:03PM +0200, Petr Viktorin wrote:
>
> Judging from the file name, mem_alloc.cpython-38-x86_64-linux-gnu.so is a
> Python module. If that's so, you shouldn't link it using gcc, but use a
> Python import statement to load it.
> Is there some reason to link it using gcc?
On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 02:59:32PM +0800, Honggang LI wrote:
>
> I think I know how to avoid link pyverbs without libpython3.9. I will
> fix this for rdma-core (fc33).
I confirmed this patch fix this issue. However, upstream wants all shared
ELFs have fully described linking. That
On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 11:31:23PM -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 5/31/20 6:37 PM, Honggang LI wrote:
> > We have to compile/build the module before we can import it from a
> > python3 shell. The problem is how to compile the modules without pass
> > "-lpython3.9
On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 09:37:39AM +0800, Honggang LI wrote:
> On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 10:30:32AM -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> > On 5/31/20 1:24 AM, Honggang LI wrote:
> > > As you see, "-lpython3.9" or "-lpython3.9d" library must be provided to
> >
On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 10:30:32AM -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 5/31/20 1:24 AM, Honggang LI wrote:
> > As you see, "-lpython3.9" or "-lpython3.9d" library must be provided to
> > the linker. Otherwise, a lot of "undefined reference to xxx" error
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 06:47:35PM +0200, Petr Viktorin wrote:
>
>
> On 2020-05-18 03:53, Honggang LI wrote:
> > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 02:12:00PM -0400, Charalampos Stratakis wrote:
> > > rdma-coredledford honli jwilson
> >
> > rdma-core pyv
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 02:12:00PM -0400, Charalampos Stratakis wrote:
> rdma-coredledford honli jwilson
rdma-core pyverbs must be linked with libpython38. For example,
build]$ nm ./python/pyverbs/mem_alloc.cpython-38-x86_64-linux-gnu.so | grep -w
U | grep PyInterpreterState_GetID
On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 11:04:53PM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> FYI:
>
> rdma-core 26.1-1.fc32 dropped support for %arm:
>
> # 32-bit arm is missing required arch-specific memory barriers,
> ExcludeArch: %{arm}
>
> This broke dependecies for the arm package of openmpi
> (https://bugzilla.redh
On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 02:40:29PM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> On Monday, 09 December 2019 at 14:15, Honggang LI wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 12:17:43PM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> > wrote:
> [...]
> &
On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 11:04:53PM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> FYI:
>
> rdma-core 26.1-1.fc32 dropped support for %arm:
>
> # 32-bit arm is missing required arch-specific memory barriers,
> ExcludeArch: %{arm}
>
> This broke dependecies for the arm package of openmpi
> (https://bugzilla.redh
On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 12:17:43PM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> On Sunday, 08 December 2019 at 04:36, Doug Ledford wrote:
> > > On Dec 7, 2019, at 1:04 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > >
> > > FYI:
> > >
> > > rdma-core 26.1-1.fc32 dropped support for %arm:
> > >
> > > # 32-bit
I updated libfabric-1.8.0rc1 for fedora rawhide. please rebuild
packages depends on libfabric, as library version bump.
thanks
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fe
hi,
opensm-3.3.21 -> opensm-3.3.22 introduces a soname bump from 4 to 5.
So, please rebuild your packages depends on opensm-libs.
At least, these packages need to be rebuilt:
1 ibutils
2 libnodeupdown-backend-openib
3 openmpi
thanks
___
devel mailing l
hi,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1701070
https://github.com/linux-rdma/ibsim
ibsim emulates the fabric behavior by using MAD communication with the
SM/SA and the PerfMgr. This simple tool is ideally suitable for various
research, development, debug and testing tasks where IB subnet
hi,
I can't run fedora-review with rawhide VM. It always failed with
message like this:
INFO: Build completed
INFO: Installing built package(s)
INFO: Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, C/C++
Package basesystem-11-7.fc30.noarch contains no files
Package dbus-1:1.12.12-2.fc30.i686 contains no file
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 03:49:30PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Nov 2018 21:48:16 +0800, Honggang LI wrote:
>
> > hi,
> >
> > libocrdma had been merged into rdma-core in upstream, so libocrdma is
> > obsoleted by rdma-core.
> >
> > The
hi,
libocrdma had been merged into rdma-core in upstream, so libocrdma is
obsoleted by rdma-core.
The package owner Selvin tried to retire this package, but failed
with authentication.
We need someone who manages/maintains fedora package repos to retire
libocrdam for us.
thanks
On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 05:46:00PM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> I ran some check on latest compose and found that quite a few packages
> in repo can't be installed due to being obsoleted. What do we do about
> those packages? Should I submit b
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 09:29:58AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 08/22/2017 02:30 AM, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > On 2017-08-22, Honggang LI wrote:
> >> hi,
> >>
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404043#c41
> >> libibcm, libibumad, libibve
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 09:29:58AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 08/22/2017 02:30 AM, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > On 2017-08-22, Honggang LI wrote:
> >> hi,
> >>
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404043#c41
> >> libibcm, libibumad, libibve
hi,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404043#c41
libibcm, libibumad, libibverbs, librdmacm and ibacm had been replaced by
the new rdma-core package. Those five packages are sub-packages of the
new rdma-core package.
I had retired the f27 and rawhide branches of those five packages in
l
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 03:18:10PM +0800, Chenxiong Qi wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 3:10 PM, Honggang LI wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 02:28:26PM +0800, Chenxiong Qi wrote:
> >> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 11:42 AM, Honggang LI wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >&g
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 02:28:26PM +0800, Chenxiong Qi wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 11:42 AM, Honggang LI wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404043#c41
> >
> > As new rdma-core package had been imported to fedora-27, I
Hi,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404043#c41
As new rdma-core package had been imported to fedora-27, I'm working
on retire the old user space rdma stack packages. I only run the retire
command on branch 'f27' and 'master'. Branches older than f27 will be
kept.
For example:
==
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 05:12:41PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> Mmph, I forgot to mention two more things:
>
> If you still see localentry:0 build failures after this, please send me
> mail with a link to the build log. This should not happen.
>
hi,
It seems issue persists for rdma-core pp
36 matches
Mail list logo
