On 07/25/2015 11:18 AM, Remi Collet wrote:
Le 24/07/2015 15:49, Florian Festi a écrit :
The freshly released rpm-4.12.90 aka rpm-4.13.0-alpha is going to hit
rawhide soon. The two major new features are:
* Boolean (aka rich) dependencies to support more complicated relation
between packages
Hi,
a list of things that usually break with each new gcc (like fortran
modules) would be nice to avoid a lot of pain with debugging. Does it
already exist?
WxGTK keeps a string WX_BUILD_OPTIONS_SIGNATURE currently saying "2.8
(no debug,Unicode,compiler with C++ ABI 1002,wx containers,compat
Hi,
I have a packaging question. Package gnuplot contained binary
/usr/bin/gnuplot-wx. Subpackage gnuplot-qt contained binary
/usr/bin/gnuplot-qt with roughly the same functionality using different
GUI. Now it is time to declare qt default and wxGTK obsolete.
/usr/bin/gnuplot-qt should be in
Hi,
libcdio license changed to GPLv3+ in version 0.93. Cdrkit (GPLv2) in
Fedora reverted to use old cdda-paranoia instead of libcdio-paranoia. I
am not aware of any other legal issues.
Dependent packages will need a rebuild after the rebase.
Fero
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraprojec
On 06/26/2014 10:31 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jun 2014 18:19:32 +0200
Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi,
Given that no-one seems to know how to contact deji, I'd like to
request the takeover of scotch.
as a fesco member I can ack this.
We will be orphaning his packages and you can pick up scot
On 09/26/2013 09:36 AM, Dan Horák wrote:
Missing support for s390/s390x is a problem for us (with my red hat
on). Is there no fallback implementation?
Does is OpenBLAS fail completely when CPU not listed above is found?
Because for Power7 and up anything written for Power < 7 will work.
On 09/26/2013 05:33 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Susi Lehtola wrote:
OpenBLAS, ATLAS, ACML and MKL only ship one monolitchic library, so this
is not really an option.
FYI, the author of netlib-java filed an issue with OpenBLAS for that:
https://github.com/xianyi/OpenBLAS/issues/296
Unfortunately,
On 09/25/2013 09:47 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Frantisek Kluknavsky wrote:
People with interest in secondary architectures might oppose that.
Which architectures are the problem? OpenBLAS currently supports:
| 2. Supported Architecture
|
|X86 : Pentium3 Katmai
On 09/23/2013 08:02 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Of course, this means that it is a very poor choice for our de-facto default
LAPACK/BLAS. (Only the reference implementation is worse. Yet, we build some
stuff even against that!)
I'd suggest filing a Change to make OpenBLAS the default for F21 (when
On 09/22/2013 09:27 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
G.
Please don't [to ATLAS upstream, not Susi] do this. It breaks all
sorts of scenarios, especially virtual machine migration or simply
moving hard disks from one physical machine to another.
Arrange your code so it chooses the best availa
On 09/22/2013 09:32 PM, Susi Lehtola wrote:
I might mention that OpenBLAS (successor to GotoBLAS) is in Fedora,
which is often 2x faster than ATLAS. But, it's only available on ix86
and x86_64. It does have runtime CPU detection, though for the 20-odd
CPUs supported.
Could you please add more
On 09/22/2013 05:33 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Any guidelines or suggestions as to whether to link to the serial or
threaded library?
For some not yet known reason, threaded library built in koji does not
work (fails at pthread_create). My local mockbuild works without any
problem. Use ser
On 09/23/2013 02:46 PM, Susi Lehtola wrote:
Well, it's not too hard to understand why ATLAS does things the way it
does. It's already in the acronym: Automatically Tuned Linear Algebra
Software. You generate a library that is optimal for your processor. In
comparison, GotoBLAS (OpenBLAS) has been
-llapack.
I am sorry, have a nice day and happy rebuilding.
Frantisek Kluknavsky
PS:
DSDP
MUMPS
MUMPS-openmpi
Macaulay2
R-RScaLAPACK
SuperLU
apbs
armadillo
arpack
cp2k
cp2k-mpich
cp2k-mpich2
cp2k-openmpi
cp2k-smp
csdp
csdp-tools
ergo
freefem++
freefem++-glx
freefem++-mpi
ga-mpich2
ga-openmpi
Another question. It seems that number of threads is still set at build
time, adaptive number of threads might come in the future. Fedora right
now uses the default - the number of cpu cores of builder machine. Which
number is appropriate? Is it meaningful to ship such a parallel library
at all
On 09/13/2013 03:44 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 09/13/2013 06:26 AM, Susi Lehtola wrote:
On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 15:24:28 +0300
Susi Lehtola wrote:
On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 14:16:46 +0200
Frantisek Kluknavsky wrote:
Atlas currently bundles Lapack. I want to update Atlas to 3.10.1
and unbundle
and not
its own Blas implementation.
Frantisek Kluknavsky
PS:
DSDP
MUMPS
MUMPS-openmpi
Macaulay2
R-RScaLAPACK
SuperLU
apbs
armadillo
arpack
cp2k
cp2k-mpich
cp2k-mpich2
cp2k-openmpi
cp2k-smp
csdp
csdp-tools
ergo
freefem++
freefem++-glx
freefem++-mpi
ga-mpich2
ga-openmpi
grass-libs
gretl
gsl
iml
On 08/21/2013 04:16 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 08/21/2013 04:01 PM, Frantisek Kluknavsky wrote:
On 08/21/2013 03:35 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
there are no f20 mock configurations on released Fedora releases in
place
Is fedpkg mock-config problematic?
No. fedpkg mockbuild for f20 and mock
://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//repos/f20-build/latest/x86_64
?
Thank you very much.
Frantisek Kluknavsky
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
. Please test.
Thank you very much.
Frantisek Kluknavsky
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
imagination
licq
mlt
mozplugger
openshot
psi
reinteract
sox-plugins-freeworld
terminatorX
xwax
- Can the whole issue be ignored?
- Does Fedora contain other implementations of lpc10?
Thank you very much.
Frantisek Kluknavsky
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
On 03/29/2013 11:22 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
What was the package?
GMP with configure 2.69 (apparently). Autoreconf -fi in use for a long time.
Thank you for the confirmation. What is the right course of action
expected from every affected packager? Add autoreconf -vfi and defer
contacting u
between discovery and filing of these bugs?
Thank you very much.
Frantisek Kluknavsky
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
bout
functionality. Just text, translation and modification.
Please, enlighten me.
Frantisek Kluknavsky
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
24 matches
Mail list logo
