On Sun, 22 Jan 2023 at 05:44, Casper wrote:
>
> This bug is rare and I'm not able to reproduce it, actually.
>
it's not what you asked for, but you mention fping and the last commit
on fping addresses an issue with name resolution
https://github.com/schweikert/fping/commit/8dc0b7f39a09f0745ba3082
indeed, this is why a proposal is to change the way grub measure things.
For example introducing a new PCR, for example PCR10, and a new command,
"extend", that replay a command into the PCR without actually executing it.
This would mean for your above example, if we only limit to the last line,
Another idea is to measure the initrd and the boot configuration, for
example taking a hash of the grub configuration and initrd and
extending a PCR register.
To make it work across upgrades, the grub configuration could be put
into a git repository. Each commit hash is computed using the TPM and
Ian
here are 2 bugs
autofs : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565293
nfs-utils : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565310
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.f
Hello guys,
with F28 I tried to use autofs and nfs.
I had the following error “Too many levels of symbolic links”
I had to change SELinux mode to permissive to be able to make autofs usable ...
But I also discovered that by default mount.nfs and autofs are using NFSv4 and
cannot switch to NF
Hi,
My apologies in advance if this is the wrong place.
I am the developper for Recoll, a full-text search application, which has
been packaged for Fedora for a long time.
I have a small but steady rivulet of users asking for CentOS or Enterprise
Linux Recoll packages. In consequence, there are
Jos Vos :
[...]
> On a new laptop that I used successfully with the F22 Live image for
> several times (using the wired Ethernet), I now installed F23
> and there I can't get the RTL8111/8168/8411 wired Ethernet working:
> after a while trying to get an address I get:
>
> Nov 12 17:29:38 localhos
_
>>> devel-announce mailing list
>>> devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce
>>> --
>>> devel mailing list
>>> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>> https://admin.fedoraproj
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> bing
> wdfs
Hi Adam,
I just took ownership of bing and wdfs.
Thanks!
--
Jean-Francois Saucier (djf_jeff)
GPG key : 0xA9E6E953
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
o work something out and
update my wiki with the result.
Thanks!
--
Jean-Francois Saucier (djf_jeff)
GPG key : 0xA9E6E953
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
y checks are correct for the moment on my review
template. The checklist need to be validated against a current version
of the guideline to be sure everything is OK. But, in the end, I would
also like to have a section that describe best practices that, while
not in the guideline directly, should
e any
comment, I will be happy to receive them.
I plan to put up some scripts to automate part of the review process
as soon as I have the time to finish them.
Thank you!
--
Jean-Francois Saucier (djf_jeff)
GPG key : 0xA9E6E953
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
and give the choice of an advanced mode like the current one. When you
boot the CD/DVD, you could easily add the new choice in the list
(Install, Install (advanced features), Boot from hard drive, etc).
--
Jean-Francois Saucier (djf_jeff)
GPG key : 0xA9E6E953
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
ped up and help you. Currently, it took someone
to find out that no bug was fix for a long period of time to know that
you don't check them anymore.
I think that PA is an important part of a default Fedora system and
knowing that nobody currently monitor bugs and fix them seems a little
bit a
Rahul Sundaram writes:
> I haven't looked closely at this specific case but the general idea is
> that if a project A is modifying B and not discussing those
> modifications at all with B, then we end up having duplicated code
> instead of having project B being enhanced by A's contributions.
Ankur Sinha writes:
> Becoming a package maintainer will need you to go through the links that
> Stanislav has provided. I guess you can ask Terje Røsten , who
> submitted the spec etc. to take over the review and package it (if you
> don't want to do it yourself)
Thanks, I'll try this, then,
Hello again,
I am told that I need to add the FE-NEEDSPONSOR to the blocked bugs list
for the review request. If I understand well, this is so that I can find a
sponsor to become a Fedora package maintainer.
Maybe I'm being a bit dense here, and not doing it the right way, but my
primary hope w
Hello,
Recoll is a desktop text search program, and it's been in other
distributions repositories for quite a long time but it's not in Fedora.
I am the Recoll developer.
Could someone tell me if I need to do something to advance the review
request or if there is simply no interest ?
Review req
osition.
>
> regards, tom lane
> It's also worth noting what other distributions do, do they honor the
> upstream names or pre/postpend some sort of identifier?
If I check in the Ubuntu Lucid repository, orafce is packaged as
postgresql-8.3-orafce, same f
19 matches
Mail list logo
