On 07/20/2017 02:09 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
> On 18/07/17 22:55, Farkas Levente wrote:
>> On 07/18/2017 10:03 PM, David Sommerseth wrote:
>>> On 18/07/17 17:50, Farkas Levente wrote:
>>>> On 07/18/2017 03:55 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
>>>>> This
On 07/18/2017 10:03 PM, David Sommerseth wrote:
> On 18/07/17 17:50, Farkas Levente wrote:
>> On 07/18/2017 03:55 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
>>> This will result in the following:
>>> * OpenVPN 2.4 based clients will automatically upgrade to AES-256-GCM,
>>>
On 07/18/2017 03:55 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> This will result in the following:
> * OpenVPN 2.4 based clients will automatically upgrade to AES-256-GCM,
> regardless if they have --cipher in their configuration file or not.
> For OpenVPN v2.4 configurations not wanting this cipher upgrade, the
On 09/05/2014 09:27 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 20:53 +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
>
>>
>> system-config-lvm was removed from rhel7 while g-d-u is not able to
>> configure lvm. so it _definitely_ a step forward. and really not agree
>> with
On 09/05/2014 06:03 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Fri, 05.09.14 11:52, Matthias Clasen (mcla...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 15:55 +0200, Vratislav Podzimek wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 09:04 -0400, Bastien Nocera wrote:
- Original Message -
> Good n
On 06/16/2014 05:06 PM, drago01 wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Matthew Miller
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 09:11:43AM -0500, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
Been using yum-cron for years with good results.
If yum is being phased out, I'll want a dnf-cron replacement
>>> Already ex
is this version of eclipse be ported to rhel dev tools for rhel-6 and
rhel-7?
On 05/06/2014 09:50 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> One of the biggest offenders (Eclipse) is now happily compiling(always has
> been running fine) with Java 8 and while looking at fixing it many other
> issues has be
On 05/15/2013 02:48 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Wed, 15.05.13 07:45, Dan Williams (d...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
Is anything waiting on NetworkManager-wait-online in your install? That
target is really intended for servers where you want to block Apache or
Sendmail or Database f
On 04/28/2013 10:58 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Eugene Pivnev wrote:
>
>> As I'm trying to create gtk-/gnome-/kde*-free environment (QtDesktop) -
>> I tested - what about Fedora without them?
>> So:
>> 1. yum remove gtk3:
>> ...
>> * gvfs
>> * qt-mobility
>> * qtwebkit
>> * ffmpeg
>> * ffmpeg-libs
>>
On 10/26/2011 10:45 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> I forgot to add that it's probably a good idea to recompile any
> package that was compiled against the -13 glibc package.
>
> Strictly speaking, any package that uses a function that is defined
> with __THROW or __NTH in the glibc header file
On 10/07/2011 09:25 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 02:51:26PM -0400, Tom Callaway wrote:
>> On 10/06/2011 04:54 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 3:28 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth
>>> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 4:54 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> If I re
On 10/05/2011 05:42 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> right; for large ext4 fs use (or testing), try
>>
>> # mkfs.ext4 -E lazy_itable_init=1 /dev/blah
>>
>> this will cause it to skip inode table initialization, and speed up mkfs a
>> LOT.
>> It'll also keep sparse test images smaller.
>>
>> IMHO this s
On 10/05/2011 01:19 AM, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> On 10/03/2011 06:33 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> On 10/3/11 5:13 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 04:11:28PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
testing something more real-world (20T ... 500T?) might still be
interesting.
On 10/05/2011 12:47 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 11:38:18PM +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
>> On 10/04/2011 05:30 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>>>> XFS has been proven at this scale on Linux for a very long time, is all.
>>>>
>>
On 10/04/2011 05:30 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>> XFS has been proven at this scale on Linux for a very long time, is all.
>>
>> the why rh do NOT support it in 32 bit? there're still system that
>> should have to run on 32 bit:-(
>
> 32-bit machines have a 32-bit index into the page cache; on x86,
On 10/04/2011 01:03 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Large filesystem support for ext4 has languished upstream for a very
> long time, and few in the community seemed terribly interested to test it,
> either.
why? that's what i simple do not understand!?...
--
Levente
On 10/04/2011 01:03 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 10/3/11 5:53 PM, Farkas Levente wrote:
>> On 10/04/2011 12:33 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>> On 10/3/11 5:13 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 04:11:28PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>&g
On 10/04/2011 12:33 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 10/3/11 5:13 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 04:11:28PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> I wasn't able to give the VM enough memory to make this succeed. I've
>> only got 8G on this laptop. Should I need large amounts of memor
hi,
the same problem happened against which i try to discuss earlier.
gstreamer-java is pure java package so it'd have to package as a noarch
package. which is true and can be working. but it has a subpackage
gstreamer-java-swt which is depend on eclipse-swt but still arch
independent. but when i t
On 08/08/2011 07:48 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
Sounds good ... can you give us an update and ballpark timeline of
RAID-5 on btrfs as well if you don't mind?
>>>
>>> It requires the larger than page size blocksize work which is slated
>>> for 3.2, I'm not sure what Chris has in mind speci
On 08/08/2011 04:07 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
>> On 08/08/2011 08:55 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Matej Cepl wrote:
On 8.8.2011 14:44, Josef Bacik wrote:
> I appreciate those who will continue to use it a
On 07/13/2011 11:14 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Manuel Escudero wrote:
>> Today I'll be switching from BTRFS to Ext4 again because of the troubles
>> I've been having with
>> the New Linux Filesystem. As BTRFS is going to be the Default in F16 I
>> wanted the develope
On 07/03/2011 10:34 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> FWIW, I think we should actually run autoreconf -i -f in ALL specfiles as a
> matter of policy, even if we aren't changing anything, the same way we
> require Java JARs to be rebuilt from source.
please no!
curently most of the fedora packages can be
On 06/17/2011 02:01 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> I'm following the procedure at:
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
>
> Does anyone know how to contact Jeroen van Meeuwen? He is not answering
> e-mails at his listed address or the following Bugzilla report
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 05:25, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Kevin Kofler said:
>> Newsflash: the network service is DEPRECATED!!! That's what NetworkManager
>> is for.
>
> Newsflash: NM doesn't replace the network service yet. Maybe when NM
> can do everything ifup/ifdown can do, the d
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 14:17, Harald Hoyer wrote:
> Am 03.04.11 13:17, schrieb Remi Collet:
>> Le 03/04/2011 12:31, Farkas Levente a écrit :
>>
>>>>>> the real bottleneck is not the rpmbuild itself (with ccache it cab be
>>>>>> very fast), but
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 17:30, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> On Monday 18 January 2010, Seth Vidal wrote:
>> On Mon, 18 Jan 2010, Farkas Levente wrote:
>> > the real bottleneck is not the rpmbuild itself (with ccache it cab be
>> > very fast), but the mock surroundings. s
On 10/12/2010 09:53 AM, Gilboa Davara wrote:
>
>>
>> the other point of richards is what the whole fedora community and
>> redhat should have to understand: "most users like ubuntu rather then
>> fedora/redhat". why? because:
>> -... better is what most user like. period.
>
> Following your simpl
On 10/11/2010 06:09 PM, Jon Masters wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 17:39 +0200, Gilboa Davara wrote:
>
>> Comparing the Ubuntu 10.04 DVD installer (which I use a couple of weeks
>> ago) to Fedora 13 DVD installer is like comparing the Cessna to a Boeing
>> 747.
>> Sure, both can accomplish the sam
On 10/08/2010 08:51 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Friday, October 08, 2010 01:09:32 pm Farkas Levente wrote:
>> On 10/08/2010 07:57 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
>>> On 10/8/10 10:52 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
>>>> rhel-6 beta2's
>>>> nss-3.12.6-3.el6.x86_
On 10/08/2010 08:49 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 08:09:32PM +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
>> On 10/08/2010 07:57 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
>>> On 10/8/10 10:52 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
>>>> rhel-6 beta2's
>>>> nss-3.12.6-3.el6
On 10/08/2010 04:03 PM, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote:
> In most cases I try sync all branches if there no real reasons to make
> differences.
>
> After made some changes in origin/master and commit is I also must do
> for each available branches something similar:
> fedpkg switch-bran
On 10/08/2010 07:57 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On 10/8/10 10:52 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
>> rhel-6 beta2's
>> nss-3.12.6-3.el6.x86_64
>> anyway yesterday morning i was not able to build, but afternoot after a
>> new cert ie: fedora-packager-setup i was able to bu
On 10/08/2010 07:19 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On 10/8/10 9:57 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
>> On 10/08/2010 04:28 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>>> On Friday, October 08, 2010 09:15:08 am Farkas Levente wrote:
>>>> On 10/08/2010 03:53 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>>>
On 10/08/2010 04:28 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Friday, October 08, 2010 09:15:08 am Farkas Levente wrote:
>> On 10/08/2010 03:53 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>>> On Thursday, October 07, 2010 04:25:45 am Thomas Spura wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 11:19:21 +0200
On 10/08/2010 03:53 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Thursday, October 07, 2010 04:25:45 am Thomas Spura wrote:
>> On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 11:19:21 +0200
>>
>> Farkas Levente wrote:
>>> hi,
>>> while try to make a scratch build i always got:
>>> --
hi,
while try to make a scratch build i always got:
-
# fedpkg scratch-build
Could not log into koji: Opening a SSL connection failed
-
even if i try to remove .fedora.cert and fedora-packager-setup (so it's
not a certi
hi,
why i not like the idea of systemd?
it's something that dramatically change the system behavior. period.
this is different from all other/previous unix/linux system.
there're many config scripts, programs and third party packages which
are assume the old setup.
such basic changes need years for
hi,
=~ no longer working in bash. just try this little line:
-
if [[ "abc" =~ "abc.*" ]]; then echo inside; else echo outside; fi
-
this give "inside" up to fedora-12, but it gives
"outside" in fedora-13.
imho it's a serious changes since all
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> On Thursday 27 May 2010, Farkas Levente wrote:
>> are you sure rhel is defined on rhel-5? imho not by default!
>
> AFAIK, it's defined in the EPEL build system.
>
> Kevin Kofler
>
--
Levente "Si vis p
On 05/21/2010 01:24 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>> This is also wrong because we want 0%{?rhel} <= 5.
>>
>> To avoid having to specify negation I'd also reverse the condition:
>>
>> %if 0%{?rhel} >= 5 || 0%{?fedora}
>> BuildRequires: tcp_wrappers-devel
>> %else
>> BuildRequires
On 04/28/2010 06:40 PM, Jon Masters wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 16:54 +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
>
>> now as ppc was removed from primary arch i try to build gstreamer-java
>> as a noarch packages. until now it was not possible because of this jdk
>> bug on ppc:
>&g
On 04/28/2010 07:58 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 06:54:14PM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 04:54:18PM +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
>>
>>> now as ppc was removed from primary arch i try to build gstreamer-java
>>> as a noar
hi,
now as ppc was removed from primary arch i try to build gstreamer-java
as a noarch packages. until now it was not possible because of this jdk
bug on ppc:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468831
http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190
http://icedtea.classpath.org/
On 01/18/2010 04:10 PM, Seth Vidal wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 18 Jan 2010, Farkas Levente wrote:
>
>> the real bottleneck is not the rpmbuild itself (with ccache it cab be
>> very fast), but the mock surroundings. suppose there is build which
>> takes about 2 minutes and in
On 01/18/2010 03:49 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 01/18/2010 09:38 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
>> hi,
>> we use mock for local package build, but it's very slow. now we install
>> a new host just for mock wit
hi,
we use mock for local package build, but it's very slow. now we install
a new host just for mock with 8core, ram disks etc. it seems it still
slow. first of all most of the time mock use only one 1 core of the cpu.
is there any way to speed up different part of the mock build process?
thanks
47 matches
Mail list logo
