Oh look, that's my copr. No complaints here! :)
(I'd have taken it myself, but didn't know if I'd have time to commit to it if
it broke.)
--
Ed Marshall
Felix qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.
https://esm.logic.net/
September 27, 2024 at 8:31 AM, "Clemens Lang&
On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 9:09 AM, Igor Gnatenko
wrote:
If you fixed package(s), found false positive, found missing packages
in list
or anything else -- please let me know.
I've updated fritzing.
--
Ed Marshall
Felix qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.
https://esm.logi
On 10/11/2017 08:57 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
pagure.io is for "upstream" projects and general trackers. This is a
replacement for fedorahosted.org and similar to github or gitlab.
src.fedoraproject.org is a pagure instance + a pagure dist git extension
( https://pagure.io/pagure-dist-git ). It is
assx2 package not have been pushed out, or
barring that, a copr for the updated package for people to try out on their
own if they need it today? Shouldn't breaking changes like this wait for
release boundaries? (Isn't that why we have relatively short release cycles
in the first place?)
; devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
--
Ed Marshall
Felix qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.
http://esm.logic.net/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Is it API-compatible?
--
Ed Marshall
http://esm.logic.net/
On Oct 23, 2014 1:13 PM, "Ralph Bean" wrote:
> There have been some people asking if we can update python-requests
> in f20 from 1.2.3 to 2.3.0.
>
> I'll create an update for it in a few days unless
Ah, cool, didn't realize failure output was stored anywhere. :) Thanks!
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Oct 2013 17:26:30 -0700
> Ed Marshall wrote:
>
> > It also looks like the checker doesn't deal with redirects:
> &
reach the server, to
> reduce the number of false alarms?
>
> --
> Björn Persson
>
> Sent from my computer.
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Fedora Code of Conduc
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 12:41 AM, Ales Kozumplik wrote:
> On 08/01/2013 02:36 AM, Ed Marshall wrote:
>
>> Also, consider cases where repository priorities are in use; a
>> lower-priority repo that's unreachable may cause unexpected/damaging
>> results for the adminis
catch this at the same time.
--
Ed Marshall
Felix qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.
http://esm.logic.net/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
by default and only
> use --enablerepo occasionally? Should they not be implemented as a
> direct repo. at all?
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.or
ora (at least in their
respective BZ entries); will updated versions of rpm be generally
available in F16 and RHEL6 at the time of F17's release?
--
Ed Marshall
Felix qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.
http://esm.logic.net/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admi
ng right
> because you have always some thing broken with the legitimation
> "but after that always will better" and sadly if this may be true
> for one piece the next goes down
>
> this way you will never ever in this life get things working fine
> at all and this should be the target and not making changes and
> development for its own
>
> the only result you have is the bad taste in the mouth
> "the question is not if anything is broken, the question is how
> many things are broken at the same time and hopefully most of
> them does not hurt too bad"
>
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
--
Ed Marshall
Felix qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.
http://esm.logic.net/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
No, I most certainly did not write the quoted statement.
(My contribution has solely been suggesting that they get upstream on board;
or, failing that, find a convincing argument for the Fedora package maintainer
to diverge from upstream.)
--
Ed Marshall
http://esm.logic.net/
On Jan 9, 2012
n good faith are uneducated.
--
Ed Marshall
Felix qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.
http://esm.logic.net/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
nsistent with upstream:
http://www.openssh.org/faq.html#2.14
--
Ed Marshall
Felix qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.
http://esm.logic.net/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi,
I'm not usually one for these self-intro posts, but "when in Rome". :)
I'm Ed Marshall, and I've been working with Fedora and Red Hat
distributions professionally for...well, for quite a few years now,
building RPMs for internal consumption and personal use as ne
17 matches
Mail list logo
