No, I most certainly did not write the quoted statement. (My contribution has solely been suggesting that they get upstream on board; or, failing that, find a convincing argument for the Fedora package maintainer to diverge from upstream.)
-- Ed Marshall <e...@logic.net> http://esm.logic.net/ On Jan 9, 2012, at 8:03 AM, Przemek Klosowski <przemek.klosow...@nist.gov> wrote: > On 01/09/2012 09:08 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 02:42:10AM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >>> no, maybe you should read AND try to understand >> >> This kind of behaviour isn't acceptable within the project. Treat your >> fellow community members with respect. You're expected to follow the >> Fedora Code of Conduct >> (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Community_working_group/Code_of_Conduct) >> while using project resources. >> > > For the record, it was Ed Marshall <e...@logic.net> who wrote the quoted > sentence. In any case, I join Matthew in asking everyone to stay excellent, > and keep the discussion on topic and friendly in tone. > > Regarding the merits of hiding the SSH version, in my opinion it's > counterproductive: the scanners might as well say "Oh, lookee here, they're > hiding the SSH version, presumably because they don't patch, so let's try all > the exploits". > > If you do insist, how about > > perl -i.bak -pe 's/OpenSSH_5.8/ClosedSSH_1/g' /usr/bin/sshd > > Disclaimer: untested, fragile, contents may settle, do not iron while wearing > clothes. > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
