Re: miniz SONAME bump

On Tuesday, 22 July 2025 at 22:37, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski via devel wrote: [...] > I have provenpackager privileges, so I'll do the necessary rebuilds and > adjustments in a side tag. Affected packages are listed below: > Pencil2D > ags > attract-mode >

Re: Mid-August expiration of some H264 patents

On Friday, 01 August 2025 at 20:23, Mateus Rodrigues Costa wrote: > As you might know the H264 situation isn't very good under Linux due > to patents. We are fully aware of the situation and I think this is not the appropriate place to discuss patents. Rest assured that the Multimedia SIG is read

miniz SONAME bump

Hi, I've become a co-maintainer of miniz recently, because it's a dependency of one of my other packages and the (previously sole) maintainer was in a much similar position. My interest in the package was to fix it to provide pkgconfig file for easy detection. It turned out that it's provided by u

openapv SONAME bump in Rawhide

Hi, I'm updating openapv to 0.2.0.0 release in Rawhide only (at this time). There don't seem to be any consumers, so no packages need a rebuild. This release brings in only new APIs, so if anyone is using it outside Fedora, a simple rebuild should suffice. Upstream release notes: https://github.co

Re: Windows Secure Boot certificate expiration (June 2026)

On Wednesday, 09 July 2025 at 14:38, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > Your problem is: > https://github.com/fwupd/fwupd/wiki/LVFS-Triaged-Issue:-dbx-efivarfs-IO-error Thanks. I went into firmware setup and reset the SecureBoot keys and now the update is not showing as available at all. I'm not sure I un

Re: Windows Secure Boot certificate expiration (June 2026)

On Wednesday, 09 July 2025 at 14:06, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Wed, Jul 9 2025 at 11:28:19 AM +02:00:00, Gerd Hoffmann > wrote: > > Problem with that is not so much linux, but that a KEK update has never > > happened before so there are chances that bios vendors messed up things > > and updati

Re: Datacenter move update - 2025-07-03 01:00UTC

On Wednesday, 09 July 2025 at 12:01, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 09. 07. 25 v 11:49 Michal Schorm napsal(a): > > Thoughts with disclaimer - I have zero technical experience in this area. > > > > As I see it, the problem is: > > - we have a service(s) running on good will, volunteer work and > > do

gitg license update

License tag for gitg has been updated from GPL-2.0-or-later to GPL-2.0-or-later AND GPL-3.0-or-later AND LGPL-2.0-or-later AND MIT Additional licenses were found after code review. Regards, Dominik -- Fedora https://fedoraproject.org Deep in the human unconscious is a pervasive need for a logi

Re: F43 Change Proposal: Drop i686 support (system wide)

On Wednesday, 25 June 2025 at 16:19, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > With Wine solved, it sounds like Steam is the only remaining concern. It is not. There are tons of Linux-native games, e.g. from GOG (gog.com) that people like myself have purchased and want to play. Many of them were built as 32-b

Re: Preview of declarative Maven builds available in rawhide

Hi! On Friday, 13 June 2025 at 18:21, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > I'm excited to announce the preview availability of declarative Maven > RPM builds in Fedora 43 -- a new approach to RPM packaging for > Maven-based Java projects [...] > This feature is currently in preview. So far, a single package

Re: Remove openh264?

On Tuesday, 10 June 2025 at 09:22, drago01 wrote: > The whole topic would have been much easier if we didn't decide to remove > hardware de/encoders a few releases ago. > > The number of users needing openh264 would shrink significantly. Unfortunately, hardware based decoding in FFmpeg is tied to

Re: PWG+OpenPrinting annual joint meetup May 2025

Hi, Zdenek! On Monday, 19 May 2025 at 10:43, Zdenek Dohnal wrote: > Hi all, > > I attended annual PWG (Printer Working Group) and OpenPrinting meetup which > was held in May virtually via Webex. > > From the things discussed there I would mention the most interesting ones > (more detailed notes

Re: Self Introduction: John Whitington

Hello, John! On Wednesday, 30 April 2025 at 14:12, John Whitington wrote: > Hello everyone, > > (Per > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Joining_the_Package_Maintainers/ > > > )

Re: GDM dropped support for running X11 sessions in F42 without a Change?

On Friday, 11 April 2025 at 10:01, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: [...] > Yes, that sounds like an accurate description of how things would have gone, > had somebody started the process! But it seems that this window has > closed already, because of the decision to release F42 on Thursday. Reve

Re: Soname bump: libcamera

On Thursday, 10 April 2025 at 17:57, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski via devel wrote: > On Thursday, 10 April 2025 at 17:14, Milan Zamazal wrote: > > I created side tag f43-build-side-109750 and built libcamera there > > (without libpisp for now). > > > > Wi

Re: Soname bump: libcamera

On Thursday, 10 April 2025 at 17:14, Milan Zamazal wrote: > I created side tag f43-build-side-109750 and built libcamera there > (without libpisp for now). > > Wim, would you like to rebuild pipewire-plugin-libcamera there when you > have some time? > > libcamera-apps fails to build due to using

GDM dropped support for running X11 sessions in F42 without a Change?

Hello! It has been mentioned in various places [1][2] that GDM has dropped support for running X11 session in F42. However, I cannot find the corresponding Change in the F42 Change list [3]. Has this been done without raising a Change? If yes, I'd argue that it should be reverted and done in F43 w

License change: ags

Hi! I did a license review of the ags package (to get rid of the LicenseRef-* tags) and arrived at this new SPDX expression for the ags package: Artistic-2.0 AND LicenseRef-Fedora-UltraPermissive AND FTL AND MPEG-SSG AND Apache-2.0 AND MIT-Khronos-old AND Zlib AND MIT AND BSD-2-Clause AND CC0-1.0

Re: License change: scummvm/scummvm-tools

On Tuesday, 04 March 2025 at 23:55, Christian Krause wrote: > Hi, > > scummvm-2.9.0: > - added: BSL-1.0 > - now: > License: GPL-3.0-or-later AND LicenseRef-Callaway-LGPLv2+ AND > LicenseRef-Callaway-BSD AND LicenseRef-Callaway-OFL and > LicenseRef-Callaway-MIT and ISC and Catharon AND Apache

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On Tuesday, 25 February 2025 at 02:33, maxw...@gtmx.me wrote: > Report started at 2025-02-25 01:00:06 UTC > > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure > that the package should be retired, pleas

Fedora CI tests in yasm

Hello, Martin. You added Fedora CI test gating to the yaml package, but the fedora-ci.koji-build.tier0.functional test fails each time due to: https://osci-jenkins-1.ci.fedoraproject.org/job/fedora-ci/job/dist-git-pipeline/job/master/483701/console ... ERROR: Failed to discover tests, TMT metadata

Re: WRT "Add explicit BR: libxcrypt-devel"

On Monday, 03 February 2025 at 12:13, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hello Björn. > > I just realized you pushed a commit like this to all Pythons < 3.13: > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python3.12/c/14bc16980718d47128c25af68f33f1e249f0a36d?branch=rawhide > > It says "Add explicit BR: libxcrypt-de

Unretirement: tachyon

Hello! I want to unretire tachyon: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/tachyon It was previously maintained by myself. I orphaned it when I thought I had no users for it, but it turns out I need it again. Unretirement review request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2338688 Regards, D

License change: SDL2_sound

Hello! As part of updating SDL2_sound to 2.0.4, I reviewed the licensing of the code and the full license is now: Zlib AND LGPL-2.1-or-later AND ( MIT OR Unlicense ) AND LicenseRef-Fedora-Public-Domain Before, it was: Zlib AND LicenseRef-Callaway-LGPLv2+ Regards, Dominik -- Fedora https://fed

Re: Discussion on what to do with SvtAv1DecApp

Hi! On Tuesday, 31 December 2025 at 14:33, yoong jin wrote: > with the retirement of `SvtAv1DecApp` , and its libraries in the > version bump of `svt-av1` from `2.1.0` to `2.3.0` , we should migrate > applications from it. impact checks from running [copr > builds](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.o

Re: Self Introduction: Matrew File

Hello, Matrew! On Thursday, 02 January 2025 at 14:13, Matrew File wrote: > I'm a long-time user of Fedora Workstation and an amateur Linux system > administrator. My main interest is in the media processing > infrastructure and desktop experience on the Linux platform. I'm > looking forward to par

License change: libxmp

Hello! As of libxmp-4.6.1, upstream removed all LGPLv2+ code and the full license is now: 0BSD AND BSD-3-Clause AND ISC AND MIT AND LicenseRef-Fedora-Public-Domain It was "BSD and LGPLv2+ and MIT and Public Domain" before the automated SPDX conversion. Regards, Dominik -- Fedora https://fedora

Re: Revocation of provenpackager access from pbrobinson

On Wednesday, 18 December 2024 at 20:15, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 02:28:09PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: [...] > > This is not recent example, but really bad example of PP's work IMHO: > > > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/c/c31c7edb6913eb7417ee68c59997548df2943d

Re: Revocation of provenpackager access from pbrobinson

On Saturday, 14 December 2024 at 23:17, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Sat, Dec 14, 2024 at 3:41 AM Gary Buhrmaster > wrote: > > > > On Sat, Dec 14, 2024 at 1:33 AM Josh Stone wrote: > > > > > As a result of more than a month of debate in the latest > > > private FESCo ticket on his conduct, the Com

SONAME bump: live555 2024.11.28

Hello! Latest live555-2024.11.28 comes with an SONAME bump from 114 to 116. The only consumer seems to be vlc, which I'll rebuild in a side-tag (f42-build-side-101736) and submit together as an update. This is rawhide only for now. Regards, Dominik -- Fedora https://fedoraproject.org Deep in t

Re: Self introduction: Romain Geissler (1A)

Hello, Romain. On Sunday, 08 December 2024 at 18:15, Romain GEISSLER via devel wrote: [...] > I was suggested that maybe I should go one step further and > ask to enter the packager group, so here I am. Welcome to Fedora! Thanks for your contributions so far. We're looking forward to many more in

Re: Building mixxx for ppc64le (f40)

Hi! On Monday, 02 December 2024 at 12:51, Luis Correia wrote: > Hi, > > so, I went through and tried to push this to Fedora and opened a bug for > Package Review. Thanks! > Thing is, this mixxx package depends on faad2 and ffmpeg-devel, which as > far as I know, aren't available in Fedora. faa

License change for clpeak

Hi all, clpeak 1.1.3, which has just landed in Rawhide, is changing its license from Unlicense to Apache-2.0. Upstream commit: https://github.com/krrishnarraj/clpeak/commit/65e572451330b4673712dfec352842f3123a9258 Regards, -- Fedora https://fedoraproject.org Deep in the human unconscious is a

Re: Building mixxx for ppc64le (f40)

On Friday, 29 November 2024 at 09:44, Luis Correia wrote: > If I could get help in moving to Fedora, I'm more then happy to do it. Sure. Once the package is submitted for review, please block the MultimediaSIG tracker bug and one of the SIG members will try to do the review as soon as they can. >

Re: Building mixxx for ppc64le (f40)

On Thursday, 28 November 2024 at 23:03, Luis Correia wrote: > Hi, > > I was running the build processes for Mixxx 2.4.2 release on RPMFusion Instead of updating it in RPM Fusion, please move it over to Fedora. All its mandatory dependencies are in Fedora already. The only optional one that is mis

Re: Removal of xmlif from xmlto

Hello, Ales. On Monday, 25 November 2024 at 16:35, Ales Nezbeda wrote: > I have recently took over maintenance (both in upstream and > downstream) of xmlto package. [...] > Afaik, xmlif is not packaged in fedora (nor other distributions like > Arch) in itself and since it is not really a dependenc

Re: Retiring schroedinger

On Friday, 22 November 2024 at 14:16, Leigh Scott wrote: > $ sudo dnf repoquery --whatrequires 'libschroedinger-1.0.so.0()(64bit)' > Updating and loading repositories: > Repositories loaded. > libquicktime-0:1.2.4-60.124.20210720git2729591.fc41.x86_64 > lives-0:3.2.0-19.fc41.x86_64 Dirac codec sup

tinyxml2 ABI change

Please note that the upcoming tinyxml2 10.0.0 update is accompanied by an ABI bump to 10, but it's still API compatible. All consumers build fine in COPR[1], so I'll proceed rebuilding them in the side-tag f42-build-side-100118 shortly: $ fedrq wrsrc -F name -s tinyxml2 Macaulay2 (build-only) ags

Re: Applications with AppData and not visible in the software center

On Thursday, 17 October 2024 at 09:42, Milan Crha wrote: > On Thu, 2024-10-17 at 09:37 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > wrote: > >   org.mozilla.firefox.desktop > > Hi, > the references the app [1], thus as long as the > Firefox has its withou

Re: Applications with AppData and not visible in the software center

On Thursday, 17 October 2024 at 09:16, Vít Ondruch wrote: [...] > Just out of curiosity, do we still have some FF extensions or are they > broken, because I can't see any in G-S. I maintain three: mozilla-noscript, mozilla-ublock-origin and mozilla-privacy-badger They all have: ... org.mozi

Re: Applications with AppData and not visible in the software center

On Thursday, 17 October 2024 at 08:45, Milan Crha wrote: > On Wed, 2024-10-16 at 18:53 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Maybe changing the .desktop file is harmless and good thing after > > all. > > Hi, > if I'm not mistaken, changing the .desktop filename is not a problem, > as long as all the

Re: f41 dnf builddeps fails to parse systemd.spec

On Wednesday, 09 October 2024 at 00:23, Barry wrote: > > On 8 Oct 2024, at 21:08, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > > > Dne 08. 10. 24 v 7:09 odp. Barry Scott napsal(a): > >> Now I have systemd .src.rpm installed next I needed the build deps > >> so that I can do a rpmbuild. > > > > Are you sure you wa

Re: undefined-non-weak-symbol only with fedora-review

On Monday, 23 September 2024 at 19:26, Andrew Bauer wrote: > I'm performing a new package review on php-pecl-redis6: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238342 > > It's a pretty simple package, but there are about ~160 > undefined-non-weak-symbol warnings in rpmlint produced during the

[SONAME BUMP] live555 upgrade from 2024.05.05 to 2024.09.20

Hello! live555 is getting updated to 2024.09.20 in rawhide and it comes with an SONAME bump (.112 to .114). The only dependent package is vlc and the rebuild will be done as part of FFmpeg upgrade in the same side-tag (f42-build-side-96586). Regards, Dominik -- Fedora https://fedoraproject.org

Re: clean/safe rm of pcre1 (8x) from F40 distro & devel?

On Friday, 05 July 2024 at 22:40, pgnd wrote: [...] > checking @ upstream > > https://gitlab.com/drobilla/sord/-/releases > > Sord 0.16.16 (Released 8 months ago) > !!Port sord_validate to pcre2 > > i don't yet know > > (1) why sord maintainer hasn't picked this u

Re: Error loading shared libraries: libMellowPlayer.Application.so: cannot open shared object file

On Friday, 05 July 2024 at 16:16, Martin Gansser wrote: > Thank you for your answer. > > Finally, I have a question about compiling, here I get error messages > [2] with the requirement. How can solve this? > > [1] https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/ErrorReports/mellowplayer.spec > [2] https://koj

Re: Error loading shared libraries: libMellowPlayer.Application.so: cannot open shared object file

On Friday, 05 July 2024 at 09:01, Martin Gansser wrote: > Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > On Thursday, 04 July 2024 at 17:00, Martin Gansser wrote: > > > when remove the RPATH i get this error message [1]: > > > [...] > > > ERROR 0002: fi

Re: Error loading shared libraries: libMellowPlayer.Application.so: cannot open shared object file

On Thursday, 04 July 2024 at 17:00, Martin Gansser wrote: > when remove the RPATH i get this error message [1]: [...] > ERROR 0002: file '/usr/bin/MellowPlayer' contains an invalid rpath '/usr/' > in [/usr/lib64/mellowplayer:/usr/] The complaint is about /usr, not /usr/lib64/mellowplayer. You n

Re: Error loading shared libraries: libMellowPlayer.Application.so: cannot open shared object file

On Thursday, 04 July 2024 at 11:15, Martin Gansser wrote: > Hi, > > When I start MellowPlayer, I get the following error message: > MellowPlayer: Error loading shared libraries: libMellowPlayer.Application.so: > cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory > > I have compiled Mellow

Re: oneapi-level-zero requires cloned spdlog-populate

On Tuesday, 02 July 2024 at 12:17, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote: > I've pushed a new build of level-zero (of an upstream release which has my > system spdlog support patch upstreamed): > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/oneapi-level-zero/c/328c4a33aa05d4ccf5b697cf2e67188750663913?branch=rawhide > .

Re: HEADS UP: openssl engine-related FTBFS and Boost

On Tuesday, 02 July 2024 at 13:34, Iñaki Ucar wrote: [...] > One major concern is that I see this in a package that does **not** use the > engine API: > > /usr/include/boost/asio/ssl/detail/openssl_types.hpp:26:11: fatal error: > openssl/engine.h: No such file or directory >26 | # include >

Re: Guidance on individual packages requiring x86_64-v2 baseline ?

On Friday, 21 June 2024 at 01:47, Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 8:39 AM Neal Gompa wrote: [...] > I will also note that since that -v1 desktop/laptop > systems of the legacy architecture do not support > EPT, If you mean Extended Page Table here, then Wikipedia[1] says it was i

Re: Guidance on individual packages requiring x86_64-v2 baseline ?

On Thursday, 20 June 2024 at 19:50, Guinevere Larsen wrote: > On 6/20/24 2:27 PM, Björn Persson wrote: > > Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 11:52 AM Chris Adams wrote: > > > > Once upon a time, Stephen Gallagher said: > > > > > three) and recommend creation of a Fedora "Hard

Re: SPDX Statistics - Manchester Baby Edition

On Friday, 21 June 2024 at 09:24, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Hot news: > >  I sent lots of announces about automatic migrations. Miro Hrončok raised a > question. Feel free to join the discussion. Either here on legal ML. > >  Scancode-toolkit (very powerfull license scanner) and all its dependencie

Re: Guidance on individual packages requiring x86_64-v2 baseline ?

On Wednesday, 19 June 2024 at 17:17, drago01 wrote: > [...] at some point we need to do the cut and not being held back by old > / ancient hardware forever. What do you mean by "being held back"? What's being prevented by not requiring x86-64-v2 for all packages while allowing few select ones to h

Re: Guidance on individual packages requiring x86_64-v2 baseline ?

On Wednesday, 19 June 2024 at 10:39, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 9:29 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel > wrote: > > > > On 19/06/2024 09:13, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > > If Fedora cares > > > about optimal performance it should just declare we're going to stop > > > being held back b

Re: Koschei builds fail with "error: %patchN is obsolete", but no %patchN in the spec file

On Saturday, 15 June 2024 at 00:07, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > Hello, > > I found a moment to catch up on my package maintainer tasks and I > noticed that for the past 15 days fityk's rawhide builds started by > Koschei have been failing[1]. There are no build logs and the only > error I can sp

Re: Self-Introduction: Peter Pentchev

Hello, Peter! On Tuesday, 28 May 2024 at 08:23, Peter Pentchev wrote: [...] > If my packager group application is accepted, Have you gone through the other steps outlined in https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Joining_the_Package_Maintainers/ ? > I will try to > help severa

Re: Roseline Bassey - Community Architect Intern Introduction

Hello, Roseline! On Monday, 27 May 2024 at 17:26, Roseline Bassey wrote: [...] > I’m excited to bring my experience and skills and to contribute to and > support various Fedora teams and the broader community during my > internship. Welcome to Fedora! Regards, Dominik -- Fedora https://fedora

Re: Upgrading Xwayland to version 24.1.0 in Fedora 40

On Wednesday, 15 May 2024 at 19:00, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 6:23 PM Leigh Scott wrote: > > > > > On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 4:31 PM Olivier Fourdan > > > > > > > > Not directly related, but hopefully not entirely off-topic: > > > Are there plans to update the xorg-x11-serve

Re: GIMP 3.0 in F41?

On Monday, 13 May 2024 at 23:22, Nils Philippsen wrote: [...] > Let me try to clarify: Offering both major versions is mainly to cater > for existing projects people might have. It’s hardly a maintenance > burden as long as the dependencies are still available, at some point > this might change and

Re: GIMP 3.0 in F41?

On Monday, 13 May 2024 at 13:27, Dan Horák wrote: > On Mon, 13 May 2024 11:49:47 +0200 > Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: [...] > > Also, how did this pass review? > > > > License:LGPLv3+ > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gimp3/blob/rawh

Re: GIMP 3.0 in F41?

On Monday, 13 May 2024 at 12:14, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Mon, May 13, 2024, 11:50 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski < > domi...@greysector.net> wrote: > > > On Monday, 13 May 2024 at 01:00, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > On Sun, May

Re: GIMP 3.0 in F41?

On Monday, 13 May 2024 at 01:00, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 4:59 PM Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > > > > > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gimp3 > > > > What the heck? This should have been gimp2 for the old version, not > gimp3 for the new version... Also, how did this pass rev

Re: Self Introduction: Susan LeGendre-McGhee

Hello, Susan. On Thursday, 09 May 2024 at 20:53, Susan LeGendre-McGhee wrote: > Hey all, > > I'd like to introduce myself to the community. @bgurney reviewed and > approved my first package at > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2273535. As such, I'm now > looking for someone to sponsor

Re: PWG+OpenPrinting meetup 2024

On Tuesday, 07 May 2024 at 18:40, Zdenek Dohnal wrote: > Hi all, > > I've joined the mentioned meetup to see what are the changes from the last > year and proposal what to do in the future. Thanks, Zdenek. Your summaries are very useful as usual! Regards, Dominik -- Fedora https://fedoraproje

Re: Self Introduction: Jan André Reuter

Hello, Jan! On Friday, 03 May 2024 at 11:29, Jan Andre Reuter wrote: [...] > I decided to learn a bit about the packaging and open a PR to update > it to the latest release. I have still a lot to learn, but I'm eager > to learn more about the packaging and everything around it. Welcome to Fedora.

GIMP 3.0 in F41?

Hi! I noticed that GIMP 3.0 is scheduled[1] for release in June. It'd be nice to have it in F41. Are there any plans to do so? Do the maintainers (Cc'd) need any help? [1] https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gimp/-/issues/10373#timeline Regards, Dominik -- Fedora https://fedoraproject.org Deep in

Re: [HEADS-UP] openexr so name bump heading Rawhide and f40

On Friday, 26 April 2024 at 15:47, Ben Beasley wrote: > Josef, > > I finished rebuilding everything in the side tag f41-build-side-88169. > Please create the Bodhi update. > > The packages cinelerra-gg and olive are RPMFusion packages, so there is > nothing to do in Fedora; any coordination you w

Re: Self Introduction: Łukasz W.

Hello, Łukasz. On Sunday, 21 April 2024 at 20:37, Łukasz Wojniłowicz wrote: > Hi all, > > @decathorpe reviewed my first package positively at > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2271100 > and now I'm looking for somebody to sponsor me. My official request for > sponsorship is at https:

soname bump: live555 2024.03.08 coming to rawhide

Hello! Latest live555-2024.03.08 comes with an SONAME bump from 107 to 112. The only consumer seems to be vlc, which I'll rebuild in a side-tag (f41-build-side-87311) and submit together as an update. This is rawhide only. Regards, Dominik -- Fedora https://fedoraproject.org Deep in the human

Re: ld: error: triggering the generation of an executable stack

On Wednesday, 20 March 2024 at 01:27, Orion Poplawski wrote: > With a recent update, plplot is failing to build with: > > cd /builddir/build/BUILD/plplot-5.15.0/redhat-linux-build/examples/fortran > && /usr/bin/cmake -E cmake_link_script CMakeFiles/x16af.dir/link.txt > --verbose=1 > /usr/bin/gfort

Re: gloox soname bump

On Tuesday, 19 March 2024 at 09:41, David Bold wrote: > > Hi Fedorians, > > > > I intend to update gloox to 1.0.28 which comes with a soname bump. > > 0ad and uwsgi depend on gloox [0]. > > > > I have successfully rebuild both in copr [1]. > > > > I will rebuild gloox in the following side tags:

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F39 to F40

Hi! On Wednesday, 21 February 2024 at 08:11, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Do you want to make Fedora 40 better? Please spend 1 minute of your > time and try to run: [...] > In case you hit dependency issues, please report it against the > appropriate package. I did run `dnf system-upgrade` and it reve

Re: Introduction

Hello, Patrice! On Monday, 19 February 2024 at 13:55, Patrice Peterson via devel wrote: > Hello to all and sundry! > > I've been a Fedora user for close to ten years but I've never been involved > with the project itself, aside from reporting a few bugs here and there. > Been using Linux for ~20

Re: Introduction

On Wednesday, 07 February 2024 at 15:31, Luis Correia wrote: > The package already exists, under RPM Fusion free (most updated is a beta > version) > > I'll at least keep it up to date with new releases We know it exists. Neal is saying you should move it from RPM Fusion to Fedora. As far as I k

Re: FYI: AFL++ now builds a GCC plugin

On Tuesday, 06 February 2024 at 12:54, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=113035034 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262539 > > The new AFL++ (American Fuzzy Lop, a fuzzing tool) in Rawhide appears > to be building a GCC plugin, contai

Re: Retirement of sundials2 seqan seqan2 wise2

Hi! On Saturday, 03 February 2024 at 22:01, Antonio T. sagitter wrote: > Hi all. > > Following packages will be retired in Rawhide branch: [...] > wise2 (unmaintained by upstream, no longer needed in Fedora), > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/wise2 Can you drop my name from Bugzilla Assignee

Re: Heads-up: abseil-cpp 20240116.0 coming to F40/Rawhide

Hello, Ben. On Sunday, 28 January 2024 at 19:43, Ben Beasley wrote: > In one week, 2024-02-04, or slightly later, I plan to update abseil-cpp from > 20230802.1 to 20230116.0 (Abseil LTS branch, Jan 2024)[1] in side tags for Correct me if I'm wrong, but this looks like a downgrade: $ rpmdev-vercmp

Re: Self Introduction: Jacek Migacz

Hello, Jacek! On Friday, 26 January 2024 at 20:46, Jacek Migacz wrote: > Dear Community! > > My name is Jacek Migacz; a software engineer from Poland. > I'm currently maintaining curl and emacs on Red Hat Enterprise Linux. > I am eager to learn from the collective wisdom of the community and > co

Re: HEADSUP boost and tbb rebuilds starting in a side tag

On Saturday, 20 January 2024 at 17:59, Tom Hughes via devel wrote: > On 20/01/2024 16:07, Jerry James wrote: > > > Upstream has this in src/tbb/CMakeLists.txt: > > > > if (CMAKE_SIZEOF_VOID_P EQUAL 8) > > set(TBB_PC_NAME tbb) > > else() > > set(TBB_PC_NAME tbb32) > > endif() > > > > Th

Re: F40 Change Proposal: Pytorch Release (Self-Contained)

On Friday, 12 January 2024 at 20:46, Tim Flink wrote: [...] > We're still working on AMD GPU support via ROCm - hopefully that will > be for F41. Is there a place where one can track progress and assist? I've got an AMD GPU and would be happy to help test things. Regards, Dominik -- Fedora htt

Re: intent to hand over or orphan several scientific packages and their build requirements

On Wednesday, 27 December 2023 at 23:26, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > Hello! > I intend to hand over primary maintainership of the following packages > or orphan them if nobody steps up: > arpack > chemtool > cp2k > elpa > inchi > python

Re: intent to hand over or orphan several scientific packages and their build requirements

I put @scitech_sig as the default bugzilla assignee for EPEL. Can you change the default assignee for Fedora to yourself? It looks like it didn't get reset after transferring the project to you. > On Wed, Dec 27, 2023 at 11:26 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > wrote: > >

Re: utf8cpp update to 4.0.5

On Thursday, 23 November 2023 at 17:44, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > Dear all, > I am in the process of updating utf8cpp (a header only package) > from 3.2.5 to 4.0.2 in rawhide. No rebuilds are necessary immediately, Upstream released 4.0.5 in the meantime, so re

intent to hand over or orphan several scientific packages and their build requirements

Hello! I intend to hand over primary maintainership of the following packages or orphan them if nobody steps up: arpack chemtool cp2k elpa inchi python-colorspacious python-fypp python-GridDataFormats python-gsd python-kaitaistruct python-mmtf python-mrcfile python-Pympler tachyon wxmacmolplt xdraw

Re: Self Introduction: Rafel Amer

Welcome to Fedora, Rafel! On Sunday, 10 December 2023 at 22:17, Rafel Amer Ramon wrote: >Hi, >my name is Rafel Amer and I'm professor at the Technical University of >Catalonia [1]https:/www.upc.edu. I teach Maths >and I use sagemath for my classes. After the sagemath package is >

Re: Help packaging PyTorch dependencies for Fedora

On Friday, 08 December 2023 at 16:34, Steve Grubb wrote: > On Friday, December 8, 2023 12:41:59 AM EST Jun Aruga (he / him) wrote: > > Congratulations for the PyTorch package! > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-torch > > > > I hope someone will announce this great achievement to the Fed

Re: Fedora Review Service and setting the AutomationTriaged keyword

On Saturday, 09 December 2023 at 19:32, Jakub Kadlcik wrote: > Hello, > a year ago I announced > > and > launched the Fedora Review Service >

Re: troff noise when grepping man page?

On Thursday, 30 November 2023 at 01:13, Chris Murphy wrote: > $ man 5 btrfs | grep enospc >enospc_debug, noenospc_debug > troff::870: warning: cannot select font 'C' > troff::888: warning: cannot select font 'C' > troff::905: warning: cannot select font 'C' > troff::924: warning: cannot sel

utf8cpp update to 4.0.2

Dear all, I am in the process of updating utf8cpp (a header only package) from 3.2.5 to 4.0.2 in rawhide. No rebuilds are necessary immediately, but I did rebuild all consumers in COPR[1]. Here are the results: Dependent packages: $ fedrq whatrequires --src --formatter name utf8cpp-devel antlr4-pr

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On Monday, 20 November 2023 at 10:48, Miro Hrončok wrote: > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure > that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: > https://fedorap

Re: Inactive packages removed from packager group

Hello, Carlos. On Sunday, 19 November 2023 at 15:20, Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez wrote: > Hi all, > I have been in the process of becoming a co-maintainer of *libcap*. But I > still need the sponsorship part of it. Hoping it is resolved before the 6 > weeks mark. I got the non-responsive issue appr

Re: F40 Change Proposal: Linker Error on Security Issues (System-Wide)

On Thursday, 16 November 2023 at 09:43, Nick Clifton wrote: > Hi Dominik, > > > Does the `--no-warn-rwx-segments` disable erroring out on both loadable > > rwx segments and tls rwx segments? > > Yes. > > At the time I wrote the feature I did consider having separate options > for the two tests,

Re: F40 Change Proposal: Linker Error on Security Issues (System-Wide)

Hi, On Monday, 13 November 2023 at 12:07, Aoife Moloney wrote: [...] > == Summary == > Change the system linker (ld.bfd) so that by default it will generate > an error message and fail if it is asked to create an executable > binary that contains one or more known security issues. These issues >

Re: Mysterious weak dependencies on qadwaitadecorations-qt5/qt6

On Tuesday, 26 September 2023 at 10:49, Jan Grulich wrote: > Hi, > > This is specified in the QAdwaitaDecorations package itself. > > See > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/qadwaitadecorations/blob/rawhide/f/qadwaitadecorations.spec#_31 > . Thanks, I forgot about Supplements. Regards, Dominik

Mysterious weak dependencies on qadwaitadecorations-qt5/qt6

Hello! I'm having hard time figuring out which package brought in the weak dependencies in my morning update: ... Installing weak dependencies: qadwaitadecorations-qt5 x86_64 0.1.1-1.fc38 updates 55 k qadwaitadecorations-qt6 x86_64 0.1.1-1.fc38 updates 62 k After the update completed, rpm says

Re: shotcut compilation fails with "error: ‘hasPro’ was not declared in this scope"

On Sunday, 24 September 2023 at 11:11, Martin Gansser wrote: > Hi, > shotcut compilation [1] fails with "error: ‘hasPro’ was not declared in this > scope" message [...] > In file included from /usr/include/qt6/QtGui/QTextCharFormat:1, > from > /home/martin/rpmbuild/BUILD/shotcut-

Re: libtommath minor soname bump

On Thursday, 07 September 2023 at 22:40, František Šumšal wrote: [...] > Both abipkgdiff and rpmsodiff seem to be happy, i.e. there were no > added/changed/removed symbols between 1.2.0 and 1.2.1, so the bump > should be safe. Excellent, this means the version update should be transparent to any p

Re: libtommath minor soname bump

On Thursday, 07 September 2023 at 11:13, František Šumšal wrote: > Hello, > > I plan to bump libtommath to 1.2.1 in Rawhide, which bumps the respective > shared library to libtommath.so.1.2.1. According to repoquery all > dependencies depend only on libtommath.1, so no rebuild should be necessar

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >