On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 02:06:15PM -0500, R P Herrold wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jan 2018, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>
> > What needs to be done for this ? I see my package "libvirt" present
> > in its UI
> >
> > https://apps.fedoraproject.org/kosc
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 05:56:47PM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 23/01/18 15:38 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > We could deactivate -z defs for F28 and reactivate it after the branch
> > for F29, giving packagers more time to fix issues.
>
> I think that might be a good idea (given how late
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 02:04:26PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 01/23/2018 01:49 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 04:24:31PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > > I updated redhat-rpm-config to instruct ld to reject linking shared
> > > o
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 04:24:31PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> I updated redhat-rpm-config to instruct ld to reject linking shared objects
> with undefined symbols. Such undefined symbols break symbol versioning
> because the are not necessarily bound to the correct symbol version at run
> time
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 08:55:03AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 05:36:56PM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > * Removes exectuable bit (and shows warning) for files where there are no
> > shebang
>
> The way this is written implies that ordinary (eg ELF) executables
> wi
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 01:19:26PM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On 18 December 2017 at 13:08, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 09:55:26AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >> I think we should be concerned by this kind of behaviour on the part of
> >> the supplier of our def
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 10:42:17AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-12-18 at 12:34 -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
> > Once upon a time, Adam Williamson said:
> > > As part of a tie-in with an American TV show, Mozilla thought it'd be a
> > > great idea to silently install a cryptically-name
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 12:34:46PM -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Adam Williamson said:
> > As part of a tie-in with an American TV show, Mozilla thought it'd be a
> > great idea to silently install a cryptically-named addon in all(?)
> > Firefox deployments. Which can't be turned o
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 05:22:32PM +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 11/21/2017 04:12 PM, David Tardon wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 01:54:13PM +, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> > > On 21 November 2017 at 10:43, Igor Gnatenko
> > > wrote:
> > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > > > Hash
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 11:52:14AM +0100, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:
> Am Montag, den 13.11.2017, 11:02 +0100 schrieb Igor Gnatenko:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm interested why we still don't have this flag in our CFLAGS? It
> > seems that
> > other distributions like openSUSE enable it by default an
On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 04:17:20PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 08-11-17 16:06, Solomon Peachy wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 03:53:32PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > > >I don't think static linking against libcups is common enough to be a
> > > >serious concern - CUPS is
On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 08:32:50AM -0500, Solomon Peachy wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 07:45:28AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > It will. Previously, it was licensed under GPLv2 + LGPLv2 with Apple
> > exceptions. Now it is ASL 2.0 across the board. GPLv2 projects can not
> > link to the newer ver
A number of packages that I maintain have GPG signatures provided alongside
the sources for new releases. Is there any best pratice approach / RPM macro
magic for verifying the GPG signature of sources during build, or are
packagers just (re)inventing the wheel each time ?
Regards,
Daniel
--
|:
On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 08:17:11AM -0400, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
>
> I'm trying to build ceph-12.2.0 for f28, So far the build has failed twice
> on armv7hl during %install trying to install a file that was seeminlyly
> successfully built.
>
> That's two different files. The first time it was c
On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 10:17:34PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 04:08:35PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 04:48:42PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 10:14:26PM +, Zbi
On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 10:14:26PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Hello Fedora Python package maintainers!
>
> This is an announcement of a mass package renaming:
> Python 2 binary packages will be renamed to python2-*.
>
> This will happen soon after the F27 branching on August 15th
This ceph build finished building in koji 12+ hours ago:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=942742
but it still in f27-pending. Is there something stuck that prevents
it going into f27, and thus inherited into f27-build ?
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o-
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 01:39:50PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> binutils 2.29 introduced an optimization which requires that in the
> general case, applications and libraries linking against a DSO will have
> to be rebuilt when the DSO change the implementation of functions (i.e.,
> changes to a
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 12:57:32PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 12:53 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY
> wrote:
> > trying to build ceph-12 on f27 armv7hl.
> >
> > It builds on everything x86_64, aarch64, s390x, and i686 (w/o java), but
> > on armv7hl the build fails, reporting out
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 12:45:27PM +0200, Michael Stahl wrote:
> On 16.07.2017 14:10, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Debarshi Ray wrote:
> >> How about reliable online updates of running applications as a
> >> benefit?
> >
> > Upgrading RPM applications online just works. I do it all the time. The KDE
>
On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 05:17:44PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 03:42:15PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 03:31:30PM -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2017-07-10 at 00:46 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 01:29:01PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > If I look at this from my POV as the upstream maintainer of a graphical
> > application wishing to make it widely available to users of many distros.
> > The question is whether it is
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 03:31:30PM -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-07-10 at 00:46 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > > = System Wide Change: Graphical Applications as Flatpaks =
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Graphical_Applications_as_Fl
> > > atpaks
>
On Sat, Jul 08, 2017 at 02:40:42PM +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
> Broken deps for x86_64
> --
> [mingw-atkmm]
> mingw32-atkmm-2.24.2-3.fc26.noarch requires mingw32(libglibmm-2.4-1.dll)
> mingw64-atkmm-2.24.2-3.fc26.noarch r
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 11:03:09AM +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
> t...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> > floppy-support bruno 162 weeks ago
>
> So are floppies now definitely a thing of the past according to Fedora?
This message is simply Fedora is saying that
On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 05:25:18PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was told [1] that /usr/bin/qemu-kvm is obsolete, and that the right
> thing is to use 'qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm', and that Arch and
> Gentoo and qemu upstream don't support /usr/bin/qemu-kvm. Fedora prov
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 07:11:21AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> Some folks may have noticed that there have been no completed rawhide
> composes in a while (13 days as of today).
>
> This has been due to a variety of bugs and issues, along with pungi now
> failing composes that don'
On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 09:07:25AM -0400, Christian Schaller wrote:
> Hi, not sure why Spot hasn't chimed in, but yes this
> has been run through legal. Tom and I where on the same
> email thread with the laywers.
For clarity someone with authority presumably ought to remove "MP3 Support"
from the
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 11:29:42PM +0100, James Hogarth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It was pointed out on IRC to me tonight that there are actually a
> reasonable number of packages that still depend on net-tools[0].
>
> This has been deprecated for a long time now and we really should
> strive to have ever
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 11:48:06PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 27 April 2017 at 23:04, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 04:32:09PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> >> Their approach means that any harm caused by "sudo pip install X" can
> >&
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 04:32:09PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 27 April 2017 at 11:47, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 7:13 AM, Charalampos Stratakis
> >> At the present time, running sudo pip3 in Fedora is not safe.
> >> Pip shares its installation directory with dnf, can
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 01:16:56PM +, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> On 20 March 2017 at 09:50, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>
> > > I've already described this multiple times trying to use different
> > > descriptions/analogies about well known *glibc NSS ABI issue*.
&g
On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 01:38:31AM +, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> On 18 March 2017 at 22:26, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> > I read through the whole thread and I still don't understand why
> > packaging glibc-static in Fedora is not a good thing.
> >
>
> I've already described this multiple tim
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 09:56:50AM -0700, Josh Stone wrote:
> On 03/14/2017 05:05 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > If glibc-static was removed from Fedora and that change propagated to
> > RHEL I know of companies that might stop being customers of Red Hat.
>
> Even if Fedora removed it, we could st
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:32:35AM -0400, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
>
> On 03/15/2017 05:17 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >
> > Sure, if udev maintainers are willing to ship the kvm rule by default,
> > that's fine with me for reason you suggest. I simply don'
M, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> >>>> On 03/14/2017 04:29 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >>>> I guess if you volume/bind mount the device into the container you could
> >>>> see an issue,
> >>>> but most containers that deal with /dev/kvm are go
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 11:38:51PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 08:29:00PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 08:09:00PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > Re: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 08:09:00PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Re: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431876
>
> Currently if you install a minimal-ish, non-"Virtualization Host"
> Fedora, then the permissions on the /dev/kvm device are:
>
> crw---. 1 root root 10, 232 Mar
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 06:31:46AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> Hello,
> as per subject, what is the stance on dropping anything there from a
> rpm ? Either marked as %{config} or not ?
>
> My naive reading of the Packaging guidelines is that nothing should be
> dropped in there by a package, but th
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 04:24:16PM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> On Friday, 24 February 2017 at 15:31, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 08:48:43AM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > > On 23 February 2017 at 12:24, Do
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 08:48:43AM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On 23 February 2017 at 12:24, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> wrote:
> > On Thursday, 23 February 2017 at 14:23, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> > I have nothing against delivering latest and greatest software to our
> > users and thi
On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 02:45:08PM +, David Howells wrote:
> Hi,
>
> gcc and cross-gcc currently dynamically load the isl-0.14 shared library -
> which means that rpm-build doesn't automagically detect a:
>
> libisl.so.13()(64bit)
>
> but, rather, the gcc binary rpm must include a:
>
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 09:10:30AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> Before I start hacking up something nasty I figured it's better to ask: how
> do I build both py2 and py3 bindings from a package using autotools (i.e.
> AM_PATH_PYTHON)?
>
> So far my idea revolves around installing both python-de
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 11:55:38AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jan 2017 07:22:49 -0500 (EST)
> Charalampos Stratakis wrote:
>
> > Python 3 started failing on i686, x86_64 and arm only.
> >
> > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17313924
> >
> > The failures come from
On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 11:03:50AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> # Overview
>
> For many years, Fedora has supported multilib by carrying parallel-installable
> libraries in /usr/lib[64]. This was necessary for a very long time in order to
> support 32-bit applications running on a 64-bit depl
On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 11:56:28AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> It might be different if we could build 32-bit sub-packages in the 64-bit mock
> environment, but the tools are *really* not equipped to handle that today (in
> particular because Fedora doesn't do cross-compilation; we just sp
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 11:19:06AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Do we need to support running current Fedora releases in kernels which are
> older than the initial Fedora kernel for that release?
That is important if we wish to allow a Fedora container of version X
to be run on a host with Fedor
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 12:19:45PM +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> On ti, 13 joulu 2016, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> > On ti, 13 joulu 2016, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Dne 12.12.2016 v 16:02 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a):
> > > > On 12/12/2016 04:53 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > > > > So se
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 03:13:51PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 09:11:06AM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > I expect we'd also rebase the virtualization stack in any .1 release,
> > or even in the middle of a release if Fedora switched to a year
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 06:41:27PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Michael Catanzaro
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2016-12-05 at 16:10 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> >> It was by design, though — for a while, when a schedule slipped, we
> >> planned the next schedule as 6 or 7
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 11:32:43AM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> On Monday, 10 October 2016 at 11:07, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > On 10/07/2016 06:43 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> >
> > > I was made aware that EOL software with known security bugs that will
> > > not b
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 11:01:56AM +0200, Michael Šimáček wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently got a few failed build alerts with suspicious errors about
> missing commands/libs in the buildroot, despite the builddep step had
> succeeded. The root.log always contains "Skipping packages with conflicts"
> li
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:00:32AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> Hi,
>
> To be clear, the problem is that a small handful of package maintainers
> (including Bastien) are collectively "responsible" for all of the GNOME
> and freedesktop components in Fedora (including fprintd), and it's
> simp
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 09:01:27AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 07:34:04AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I propose to carry out a mass bug filing with the bug title: "Remove
> > webkitgtk/webkitgtk3 dependency" (depending on which package is
> > depe
On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 12:27:33PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 08/08/2016 09:23 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > For example, activities related
> > to package content in dist-git generate notices to maintainers, and
> > the discovered flaw would not allow an attacker to circumvent these or
> >
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 02:19:49AM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 10:54 PM, Solomon Peachy wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 10:19:07PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> >> Still not reasonable for Fedora, I think. Red Hat, and RHEL, can
> >> manage registered licensing
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 02:09:24PM +0200, Jan Synacek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to compile the latest version of Warzone2100 on rawhide,
> but I'm getting this error:
>
> g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -DYY_NO_INPUT -D_REENTRANT
> -I/usr/include/SDL2 -I/usr/include/libpng16 -I/usr/include/
On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 09:48:24AM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> "Daniel P. Berrange" writes:
>
> > More typical though is that you have a directory containing an fullish
> > install tree of a non-native architecture and you just want to chroot
> > into that.
On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 12:10:03PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > On 07/05/2016 10:57 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> >> If you need to run an i686 virtual machine based on Rawhide, my
> >> experience is that it's more likely than not
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 11:30:38AM -0400, Kaleb KEITHLEY wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone have a good/working autoconf test for checking for
> deprecated readdir_r (for Fedora 25) ?
>
> I'm not having much luck. (Have tried AC_COMPILE_IFELSE, among other
> things.)
>
> Alternatively it would be n
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 10:21:18AM +0200, Michal Schmidt wrote:
> On 06/29/2016 12:03 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > The change to introduce a qemu-binfmt package has small upgrade
> > implications since anyone with qemu-user installed today, will loose
> > the binary for
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 04:54:42PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 06/29/2016 12:34 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 12:15:02PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > > On 06/29/2016 12:03 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > > Debian handles this
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 06:45:36AM -0700, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 3:03 AM, Daniel P. Berrange
> wrote:
> > For those who aren't familiar, QEMU actually provides two completely
> > different sets of emulators
> >
> > - system emulators -
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 09:39:11AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-06-29 at 11:34 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 12:15:02PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > > On 06/29/2016 12:03 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > > Debian
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 12:15:02PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 06/29/2016 12:03 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > Debian handles this by having several packages [1]
> >
> > - qemu-user - the dynamic linked qemu user binaries
> > - qemu-binfmt - binfmt rules reg
For those who aren't familiar, QEMU actually provides two completely
different sets of emulators
- system emulators - they emulate a full virtual machine and thus run
a full guest OS.
- user emulators - they emulate the Linux userspace ABI letting you
run non-native arch executables direct
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 07:09:33AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> glibc upstream, during development of the 2.24 release, introduced new
> symbol versions recvmsg@GLIBC_2.24, sendmsg@GLIBC_2.24 (and
> recvmmsg@GLIBC_2.24, sendmmsg@GLIBC_2.24 on 64-bit architectures), in order
> to fix some minor PO
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 01:41:20PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> Anyone understand what's going on here? Any program at all (even
> trivial ones) linked to tcmalloc crash during startup on ARM 32 bit.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312462
>
> At Tom's recommendation,
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 05:43:51PM +0100, Petr Spacek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm facing problems with new behavior in GCC 6.
>
> Let's assume we have trivial program like this:
>
> $ cat assert.c
> #include
> #include
>
> __attribute__((nonnull))
> int f(char *txt) {
> assert(txt != NUL
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 01:30:59PM +, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 13 January 2016 at 13:13, Reindl Harald wrote:
> > so there is no justification to declare one need to install from scratch
> > just because rpm which works for many years fine changes it's storage format
>
> I don't think anyon
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 09:02:08AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 8:58 AM, David Howells wrote:
> > Jan Kurik wrote:
> >
> >> let me inform you about changes in Fedora 24 schedule.
> >>
> >> There is a will to accommodate GCC6 compiler in F24 and use it to
> >> compile all the
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 12:19:24PM +0100, Jan Kurik wrote:
> = Proposed Self Contained Change: Astronomy Spin =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Astronomy_Spin
>
> Change owner(s):
> * Christian Dersch
>
> A Fedora Spin providing a complete toolchain for both amateur and
> professional a
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 01:20:49PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 12:45:28PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > Crickets ... https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/virt/
> >
> > The virt list has long been in an odd place. Fedora
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 12:45:28PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> Crickets ... https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/virt/
>
> The virt list has long been in an odd place. Fedora has best in class
> virt support, because so many virt developers use it. It also follows
> upstream very
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 11:25:00AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 16:04 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > > > I would like to propose that the no-bundled-libraries policy be
> > > > > amended as follows: "Any package that has an existing
> > > > > mechanism to
> > > > > l
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 09:18:16AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> Oh, yes! I was trying to find something like this all weekend for my Copr
> for reprepro. I have to make a patch to access apt-methods in /usr/lib64 on
> 64-bit systems, but on 32-bit systems it should remain /usr/lib.
>
> You just
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 02:07:50PM +0200, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> On 2015-07-29, 10:47 GMT, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> >> As I have thought for some time, I think we should have a team to keep
> >> packages and make migrations like gtk2 to gkt3, libgnome2, pyorbit,
> >> gnome-python2, pyhton2 to python
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 11:05:19AM -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > Isn't it true the install media ISOs are available indefinitely? And
> > if so the security cat is already out of the bag, so that's not a very
> > good argument. I'd say if we w
The new libvirt-sandbox release 0.6.0 pushed to rawhide has a minor API
change and corresponding soname bump of the library.
I'll likely push this update to stable branches too, as it fixes a number
of problems and I think its unlikely there are downstream apps linking
to its library beyond the in
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 09:54:16AM -0500, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> > or simply exempt signature checking if
> > the extension is on disk. They should check on download only.
>
> That would defeat the entire purpose; malware is very commonly
> sideloading extensions.
If we only exempt extensions in
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 12:47:27PM +0100, drago01 wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Nikos Roussos
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 6:30 AM, Michael Cronenworth
> > wrote:
> >
> > I'm sure those that need to know, know, but for those that haven't heard[1]
> > Mozilla's official Firefo
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 08:22:25AM -0500, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> Hi all,
> since the "Python 3 as a Default" change [1] has been accepted a while ago
> and is scheduled for F22, I'd like to share with you the status.
>
> The proposed change [1] mentions several goals that should be reached to
commit 66c057970a6e2c4c7951ed0391f1438e6ab2c7f5
Author: Daniel P. Berrange
Date: Mon Dec 15 15:39:00 2014 +
Update to 1.2.11 release
perl-Sys-Virt.spec |5 -
sources|2 +-
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Sys-Virt.spec b
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 12:28:54PM -0500, Radek Holy wrote:
> Please share with me the use cases, not the description of the "install"
> command. Think twice before you share something because I believe it's
> not as easy as it might seem. As an example I think it might be something
> like:
>
> -
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 08:28:45PM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi all,
>
> as the Fedora 21 schedule[1] states the Final change freeze is upon
> us. As of now only updates that fix an accepted Final Blocker bug or
> Freeze exception will be a
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 03:20:31PM +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> Libtool upstream was able to cut the new release!
>
> I'll rebase the Rawhide package probably by the end of the next week or
> so, if there are no objections.
>
> Upstream maintainer calls this update fearless :) and that it needs
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 11:43:29AM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 23 October 2014 09:56, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > The upgrade can last one hour (more or less).
>
> An hour?! Most of my offline updates take a few tens of seconds with
> F21. Is this on fairly up-to-date SSD hardware? Are any sp
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 03:59:46PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Is there a good description of ELF shared library symbol versioning best
> practices somewhere?
>
> In particular, under what conditions do you need to create a new section in
> the versioning file given to the linker's --version-scr
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 08:07:14AM -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Richard W.M. Jones said:
> > Changing the default /bin/sh is going to break the world.
>
> [citation needed]
>
> Anything that depends on bash as /bin/sh is already getting Fedora
> specific. Debian/Ubuntu don't us
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 11:09:37AM +, Fedora Branched Report wrote:
> Broken deps for armhfp
> [libvirt]
> libvirt-lock-sanlock-1.2.7-2.fc21.armv7hl requires sanlock >= 0:2.4
> libvirt-lock-sanlock-1.2.7-2.fc21.armv7hl requires
> libsanlock_client.so.1
> Broken deps for i386
> ---
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 02:52:27PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses
> for this package maintainer is no longer valid. I'm starting the
> unresponsive maintainer policy to find out if they are still interested
> in maintaining their packages (and if so
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 11:21:43AM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> DJ Delorie wrote:
>
> > > Welcome to the 21st century!
> >
> > Do we have different eyes and brains than we did last century?
> > Because otherwise, excessively wide paragraphs are just as hard to
> > read now as they were then.
>
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 10:39:56PM +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm orphaning lcms, this package has seen few security issue and upstream
> claim it's deprecated over lcms2
>
> # repoquery --whatrequires liblcms.so.1 --source
> entangle-0.5.3-2.fc20.src.rpm
FYI the repo you're poi
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 09:52:36AM +0200, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-04-27 at 23:02 +0100, Andrew Price wrote:
> > On 24/04/14 15:13, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > > We probably should make setjmp()-freeness a requirement for
> > > all code included in Fedora.
> >
> > Would it b
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 10:20:36PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Wed, 02.04.14 09:12, quickbooks office (quickbooks.off...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> > [CHANGE PROPOSAL] The securetty file is empty by default
> >
> > All the info has been sitting here @
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Chang
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 12:06:31PM -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> If libvirt/qemu-system-x86_64 starts before vino-server (which is
> common since we don't leave the vnc access on all the time). Then vino
> only listens on ipv6 instead of ipv4 and ipv6. At that point no one can
> connect to
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 12:06:31PM -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> Hello,
>
> So I've found a 'bug'. I have a group of developers who use
> vagrant/libvirt to develop against. We use VNC since we are a
> distributed team to connect to each other's desktops/workstations for
> when we're at th
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 04:19:29PM +0100, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 02:50:12PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 09:38:56AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > Personally, I don't think %check is a good idea at all.
> >
&g
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 02:53:55PM +, Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 21/02/14 14:51, Alexander Todorov wrote:
>
> >I want to track which packages *DO NOT* have any tests and later be able
> >to focus on creating them (be it working with volunteers, GSoC
> >participants or whoever is willing to step up
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 04:22:42PM +0200, Alexander Todorov wrote:
> Hi guys,
> (note: devel, packaging and test lists) previously I've done a
> little experiment and counted how many packages are likely to have
> upstream test suites and how many don't:
> http://atodorov.org/blog/2013/12/24/upstre
1 - 100 of 309 matches
Mail list logo
