On Thu, 11 Sep 2025 09:00:03 -0500
Richard Shaw wrote:
> I think this one was more accidental but it looks like in the latest build
> pystring changed the SONAME from providing .. to just
> :
>
> $ repoquery --repoid=rawhide --whatprovides "libpystring.so.1.1.4()(64bit)"
> Last metadata expirati
On Mon, 8 Sep 2025 16:22:52 +0200
Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 8, 2025 at 3:19 PM Dan Horák wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > with the rebase of libatomic_ops to the latest upstream release 7.8.4 I
> > went through the consumers of this library and reviewed the
Hi,
with the rebase of libatomic_ops to the latest upstream release 7.8.4 I
went through the consumers of this library and reviewed the need for
libatomic_ops there. Upstream discourages the use of libatomic_ops in
new(er) projects, because better alternatives exist in form of C11 or C+
+14 standa
On Wed, 13 Aug 2025 12:14:16 +0200
Dominic Hopf via devel wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I'm currently trying to take care of
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2385207 but get stuck in
> understanding what happened here as the package itself got its last update
> on 2024-10-28. Since then t
On Tue, 12 Aug 2025 09:15:00 +0200
Dan Horák wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Aug 2025 15:51:47 -0600
> Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
> > On 8/11/25 15:48, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2789421 just landed
> > > in
> >
On Mon, 11 Aug 2025 15:51:47 -0600
Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 8/11/25 15:48, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2789421 just landed in
> > rawhide with a soname bump. This is breaking deps on a number of my
> > packages.
> > Can this get untagged
On Fri, 8 Aug 2025 16:29:32 +0200
Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 8, 2025 at 3:56 PM Dan Horák wrote:
> >
> > a F-42 mock build on my s390x machine run fine, so I suspect it's a
> > parallelism issue ... I mean g-ir-scanner starting before the glycin
> > lib
On Fri, 8 Aug 2025 15:16:54 +0200
Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 8, 2025 at 3:09 PM Dan Horák wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 8 Aug 2025 14:58:49 +0200
> > Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I had seen this issue intermitt
On Fri, 8 Aug 2025 14:58:49 +0200
Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I had seen this issue intermittently before, but now it is preventing
> builds of glycin (update to 1.2.3 and fixes for missing dependencies)
> on Fedora 42. Until recently, retrying builds made it pass after a few
> tries, b
On Thu, 31 Jul 2025 07:47:00 -0600
Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 7/28/25 03:12, Dan Horák wrote:
> > On Mon, 28 Jul 2025 10:40:03 +0200
> > Florian Weimer wrote:
> >
> >> * Dan Horák:
> >>
> >>> On Sun, 27 Jul 2025 21:34:12 +0200
> >>&
On Wed, 30 Jul 2025 08:40:14 +0200
Sandro Mani wrote:
>
> On 28.07.25 11:12, Dan Horák wrote:
> > On Mon, 28 Jul 2025 10:40:03 +0200
> > Florian Weimer wrote:
> >
> > So there was a 64-bit instruction bundle at the patched offset, and that
> > may have bee
On Thu, 31 Jul 2025 08:40:51 +0200
Dan Horák wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jul 2025 22:07:40 -0600
> Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
> > On 7/30/25 00:40, Sandro Mani wrote:
> > >
> > > On 28.07.25 11:12, Dan Horák wrote:
> > >> On Mon, 28 Jul 2025 10:40:03 +0200
&
On Wed, 30 Jul 2025 22:07:40 -0600
Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 7/30/25 00:40, Sandro Mani wrote:
> >
> > On 28.07.25 11:12, Dan Horák wrote:
> >> On Mon, 28 Jul 2025 10:40:03 +0200
> >> Florian Weimer wrote:
> >>
> >> So there was a 64-bit
On Tue, 29 Jul 2025 09:46:11 +0200
Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> per
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FoomaticRipRejectsUnknownValues
> I've got feedback about turning RPM scriptlet into systemd service to
> have the change applied even on immutable systems, like bootable
> containe
On Mon, 28 Jul 2025 10:40:03 +0200
Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Dan Horák:
>
> > On Sun, 27 Jul 2025 21:34:12 +0200
> > Sandro Mani wrote:
> >
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> scotch is currently FTBFS on ppc64le (affects the current 7.0.7, the
> >>
On Sun, 27 Jul 2025 21:34:12 +0200
Sandro Mani wrote:
> Hi
>
> scotch is currently FTBFS on ppc64le (affects the current 7.0.7, the
> previous 7.0.6, as well as the new 7.0.8 release), failing with [1]
>
> gmake[2]: *** [src/libscotch/CMakeFiles/ptscotchf_h.dir/build.make:77:
> src/include/pt
On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 17:51:15 +0100
Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 at 15:36, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 at 10:21, Michael Catanzaro
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> With Wine solved, it sounds like Steam is the only remaining concern.
> >>
> >> I think we c
On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 18:30:39 +0100
Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 at 18:21, Dan Horák wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 17:51:15 +0100
> > Peter Robinson wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 at 15:36, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> > > >
On Wed, 04 Jun 2025 06:59:07 -
"Martin Gansser" wrote:
> have set %global _lto_cflags %{nil} as you suggested.
> [1] https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/ErrorReports/gdb.txt
sounds like the installed glibc debuginfo doesn't match the installed
runtime glibc rpm. Be aware that debuginfos are us
On Mon, 26 May 2025 14:29:48 -0400
"Steven A. Falco" wrote:
> On 5/26/25 02:01 PM, Dan Horák wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 May 2025 12:48:20 -0500
> > Richard Shaw wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 12:46 PM Dan Horák wrote:
> >>
> >>>
On Mon, 26 May 2025 12:48:20 -0500
Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 12:46 PM Dan Horák wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 26 May 2025 08:11:58 -0500
> > Richard Shaw wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 8:10 AM Dan Horák wrote:
> > >
On Mon, 26 May 2025 08:11:58 -0500
Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 8:10 AM Dan Horák wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 26 May 2025 07:50:07 -0500
> > Richard Shaw wrote:
> >
> > > The following packages are affected and will be rebuilt in a side-tag:
>
On Mon, 26 May 2025 07:50:07 -0500
Richard Shaw wrote:
> The following packages are affected and will be rebuilt in a side-tag:
>
> f3d
> gmsh
> kicad
> netgen-mesher
> prusa-slicer
> python-cascadio
> smesh
>
> The only problems were smesh, which is already FTBFS and not needed by any
> other
On Sun, 25 May 2025 10:36:55 -
"Ian McInerney" wrote:
> Was this change coordinated at all with the maintainers of other display
> managers? Because I updated my install from F41 to F42, and now lightdm is
> not displaying any background and the logs are stating:
>
> [+0.29s] DEBUG: backgr
On Thu, 15 May 2025 12:40:13 +0200
Michal Ruprich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've re-added the original wget as wget1 in Rawhide and also in F41 and
> F42 (updates now in Bodhi). wget binary is provided by wget1-wget
> subpackage. Once these updates get to the compose, if you want to start
> using wget
On Tue, 6 May 2025 17:03:41 -0700
Kevin Fenzi via devel-announce
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today, 2025-05-06, we have removed inactive packagers
> from the packager group.
>
> rpms/usbmon
Desnes (desnesn) in our team will be taking this
Dan
--
On Tue, 6 May 2025 17:03:41 -0700
Kevin Fenzi via devel-announce
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today, 2025-05-06, we have removed inactive packagers
> from the packager group.
>
> Packages that have been orphaned are:
>
> rpms/64tass
> rpms/d52
> rpms/z80asm
> rpms/z80dasm
taking those "retro" tools a
On Tue, 6 May 2025 12:24:56 -0600
Al Stone wrote:
> On 06 May 2025 20:11, Dan Horák wrote:
> > Hi Al,
> >
> > On Tue, 06 May 2025 18:04:20 -
> > "Al Stone" wrote:
> >
> > > I'm orphaning this package (1) I just don't have
Hi Al,
On Tue, 06 May 2025 18:04:20 -
"Al Stone" wrote:
> I'm orphaning this package (1) I just don't have time for it, and (2) I'm
> still not entirely sure how I became the maintainer for it -- I never
> requested it, but it showed up on my list quite some time ago and I never got
> aro
On Tue, 6 May 2025 11:26:02 +0200
Pavol Sloboda wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am currently working on rebasing a package that creates a shared library
> and I want to place it in %{_libdir}/x/y/z. I am using the
is using %{_libdir}/x/y/z necessary? What are the reasons?
Dan
> /etc/ld.so
On Tue, 8 Apr 2025 10:55:15 +0200
Lukas Javorsky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The GNU project `sharutils` raised a question in upstream mailing list if
> there is still a need for this package. [1]
>
> I identified multiple packages that still depend on sharutils (some of them
> are crucial for Fedora), so
On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 17:48:49 -0400
Peter Martuccelli wrote:
> Hi Davide,
>
> Please work with Dan, Cc'd, on any issues for Doug.
ack, I believe most of Doug's packages are Infiniband related and
should have a backup maintainer at Red Hat, but I will check closer on
Friday when I am back at work
On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 15:45:54 -
"William Roberts" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We are updating mbedtls package from version 2.28.8 to 3.6.2 since 2.28 has
> reached end of life.
> The summary of SONAME changes for the package is below.
and as we learned there are API changes too, headers being renam
On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 12:09:59 +
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
>
> This is a Fedora 40 build which fails, whereas the almost exact same
> builds of this package worked fine in F41/42/43.
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=129681254
>
> I'm having a hard time trying to work
On Thu, 27 Feb 2025 08:44:25 +
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> When doing scratch builds (only from Pagure pull requests?) we get
> this strange error on s390x builders:
>
> GenericError: Downloaded file
> http://kojipkgs-cache03.s390.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/1737/129631737/ocaml-gettext
On Sun, 16 Feb 2025 11:53:27 +0100
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> Hello, Martin.
> You added Fedora CI test gating to the yaml package, but the
> fedora-ci.koji-build.tier0.functional test fails each time due to:
> https://osci-jenkins-1.ci.fedoraproject.org/job/fedora-ci/job/dist-git-pi
On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 09:32:06 +0100
Clement Verna wrote:
> cross posting from
> https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/gating-fedora-updates-on-fedora-coreos-ci/144566
>
> Hi all,
>
> Last year, the Fedora CoreOS working group implemented CI testing [1] for
> Bodhi updates on a set of critical p
On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 16:58:15 +0900
Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> Hello:
>
> As of 2025-02-10 16:55 JST (= UTC+9), something seems wrong
> with kerbelos login.
>
>
> * fedpkg build fails with
>
> $ fedpkg build
> (gssapi auth failed: requests.exceptions.HTTPError: 500 Server Error:
> Internal Server
On Tue, 04 Feb 2025 09:20:24 -0500
"Colin Walters" wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 25, 2025, at 4:05 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>
> > So yeah, having a package with a sysusers file and files owned by the
> > users or groups defined therein works fine. (This was already possible
> > before
On Mon, 6 Jan 2025 19:56:27 -0700
Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 1/6/25 08:48, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 06, 2025 at 12:17:09PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >>
> >> valgrind works by interpreting each instruction, so yes the overhead
> >> is rather large. On the other hand I really a
On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 10:21:51 +0100
Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 22. 12. 24 v 17:18 Miro Hrončok via devel-announce napsal(a):
> > colm filiperosset, jtaylor
> >
>
>
> Chm, can some package be this unlucky?
>
> https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/colm
>
> https://koschei.fedoraproject.org
On Wed, 18 Dec 2024 22:36:36 +0100
Dan Horák wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am going to update astyle to the latest 3.6.6 version that changes
> ABI and also changes soname. The 2 dependent packages (codeblocks and
> kdevelop) will be rebuilt in a side-tag.
at the end I have updated also
Hi,
I am going to update astyle to the latest 3.6.6 version that changes
ABI and also changes soname. The 2 dependent packages (codeblocks and
kdevelop) will be rebuilt in a side-tag.
Dan
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedo
On Thu, 28 Nov 2024 22:03:42 +
Luis Correia wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was running the build processes for Mixxx 2.4.2 release on RPMFusion
>
> It ran fine, except in F40 for ppc64le, in where some dependency doesn't
> exist in Everything.
this is likely an outdated metadata issue between RPMFusio
On Tue, 26 Nov 2024 08:10:57 -0700
Jerry James wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 7:53 AM Dan Horák wrote:
> > On Mon, 25 Nov 2024 18:03:37 +
> > Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> >
> > > I'd like some help to identify the issue behind Siril being FTB on
On Mon, 25 Nov 2024 18:03:37 +
Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> I'd like some help to identify the issue behind Siril being FTB only on F40:
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2590137
>
> The error behind the failure is:
>
> ```
> /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/ccPj3YgU.ltrans25.l
On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 11:19:38 +0100
Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2024, 11:03 Dan Horák wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > seems ImageMagick 7.1.1.40 comes with an ABI change
> >
> > it drops libMagickWand-7.Q16HDRI.so.10(VERS_10.0)(64bit)
> > and h
On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 17:17:02 +0100
Eike Rathke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Monday, 2024-11-11 17:12:19 +0100, Eike Rathke wrote:
>
> > Then with v128.4.0 on 2024-10-28 also on f40
> > (no link here anymore, I excluded ppc64le on f40 to get the build out).
>
> That was https://koji.fedoraproject.org/ko
Hi,
seems ImageMagick 7.1.1.40 comes with an ABI change
it drops libMagickWand-7.Q16HDRI.so.10(VERS_10.0)(64bit)
and has libMagickWand-7.Q16HDRI.so.10(VERS_10.2)(64bit) instead.
This sounds wrong ...
Dan
--
___
devel mailing list -- d
On Tue, 29 Oct 2024 11:08:50 +0200
Susi Lehtola wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> it appears rpm has now deprecated the old %patch syntax in rawhide, which
> means
> that any old-style expressions
>
> %patch0 -p1 -b .overflow
>
> must now be written as
>
> %patch 0 -p1 -b .overflow
or as
%patch -P 0 -p1
On Sun, 27 Oct 2024 23:34:13 -0700
Luya wrote:
> Thanks for checking. Would you mind pushing the remaining built for update.
the retry for F-41 went smoothly ->
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-0dc37badbe
Dan
--
__
On Sun, 27 Oct 2024 13:31:17 -0700
Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> Hello team,
>
> Blender failed to build on Fedora 41 ppc64 architecture [1] while
> succeeding on Rawhide [2].
killed due OOM situation, I would retry, maybe there was another build
running on the same builder ...
Hi,
I am going to update astyle to the latest 3.6.3 version that changes
ABI and also changes soname. The 2 dependent packages (codeblocks and
kdevelop) will be rebuilt in a side-tag.
Dan
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedo
On Sat, 5 Oct 2024 19:28:10 +0200
Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 5, 2024, 18:16 Barry Scott wrote:
>
> > I'm starting to work on a systemd run0 bug.
> > And hit this issue.
> >
> > : 13:10:22 armf41 ~/rpmbuild.d/systemd/SPECS
> > : [1] barry $ rpm -i ~/systemd-256.6-1.fc41.src.rpm
> >
On Thu, 12 Sep 2024 20:45:29 -0500
Richard Shaw wrote:
> I have a report[1] of an issue with wsjtx installing on aarch64 only:
>
> Problem: cannot install the best update candidate for package
> wsjtx-2.7.0-3.fc40.aarch64
> - nothing provides libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) needed by
> wsjtx-2.7
On Wed, 11 Sep 2024 17:33:49 +0200
Petr Pisar wrote:
> V Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 08:24:41AM -0700, Ron Olson napsal(a):
> > Hey all, I’m trying to get bdftopcf built for EPEL 10 but it’s failing with
> > the aforementioned error (No matching package to install:
> > 'pkgconfig(xorg-macros) >= 1.8). I
On Mon, 9 Sep 2024 16:24:03 +0200
Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 09. 09. 24 v 4:15 odp. Scott Talbert napsal(a):
> > On Fri, 6 Sep 2024, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Bellow is list of packages that have licenses that are neither valid as
> >> Callaway nor as SPDX. I.e. the license cannot be v
Hi,
I am going to update astyle to the latest 3.6.1 version that changes
ABI and also changes soname. The 2 dependent packages (codeblocks and
kdevelop) will be rebuilt in a side-tag.
Dan
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedo
On Tue, 3 Sep 2024 13:43:20 +0200
Dan Horák wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Sep 2024 14:25:34 +0300
> Yanko Kaneti wrote:
>
> > Hello
> >
> > On Tue, 2024-09-03 at 11:14 +, Martin Gansser wrote:
> > > when I try to build the rawhide package for shotcut-24.08.29
On Tue, 03 Sep 2024 14:25:34 +0300
Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> Hello
>
> On Tue, 2024-09-03 at 11:14 +, Martin Gansser wrote:
> > when I try to build the rawhide package for shotcut-24.08.29-1.fc42, it
> > fails [1] on i686
> >
> > [1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12287890
Hi,
isn't there a problem with rpminspect-data-fedora used in the bodhi
automated tests? My recent build of s390utils failed on stuff that was
no problem 2 weeks ago. Does rpminspect-data-fedora need branching?
See eg. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-bb726e3bd3
and https://bod
On Wed, 14 Aug 2024 16:30:09 +0200
Sandro via devel wrote:
> On 14-08-2024 15:32, Ben Beasley wrote:
> > Given the timing and the complexity of the dependency chains involved
> > here, I used provenpackager privilege to start rebuilding grpc in both
> > F42 and F41, which will unblock many of t
On Mon, 12 Aug 2024 10:46:35 +0100
Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> On Sun, Aug 11, 2024 23:28:33 GMT, Dan Horák wrote:
> > On Sun, 11 Aug 2024 22:07:28 +0100
> > Ankur Sinha wrote:
> >
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > > I was working o
On Sun, 11 Aug 2024 22:07:28 +0100
Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I was working on fixing the FTBFS on libtpcmisc and while I got it to
> build on x86_64, my builds on ppc64le/aarch64/s390x all fail with these
> errors where it cannot find the standard includes (math.h/stdint.h) and
those a
Hi,
I am going to update astyle to the latest 3.5.2 version that changes
ABI and also changes soname. The 2 dependent packages will be rebuilt
in a side-tag.
$ dnf --repoid=rawhide-source --arch=src repoquery --whatrequires astyle-devel
Last metadata expiration check: 0:26:36 ago on Sat Jul 6 1
On Tue, 25 Jun 2024 11:57:49 +0200
Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 24. 06. 24 v 20:03 Peter Robinson napsal(a):
> > On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 at 11:21, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >>
> >> Dne 21. 06. 24 v 18:27 Stephen Smoogen napsal(a):
> >>> On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 at 07:27, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> So what is t
On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 17:11:07 +
Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
>
> Messaggio originale
> 24/06/24 18:21, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto:
>
> >
> > I personally don't see why entering a otp once a week is such a
> > burden... but it does seem to be. ;(
> >
>
> Once a week? Wh
On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 16:53:22 -
"Leigh Scott" wrote:
>
> > I personally don't see why entering a otp once a week is such a
> > burden... but it does seem to be. ;(
> >
> > kevin
>
> It isn't just once.
>
> 1. kerberos
> 2. Web login on infra, bugzilla, bodhi, devel list and accounts
>
>
On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 11:21:30 -0400
Ron Olson wrote:
> Hey all-
>
> I’m trying to monitor some builds and once they’re done they disappear from
> “Active”, but when I switch to “All” I see, well, everything, including for
> previous dates.
>
> Is it possible to specify a specific date to Koji
On Sat, 15 Jun 2024 13:24:09 -
"Felix Wang" wrote:
> zxing-cpp rebuild failed only on s390x with the following error [1], any clue
> on how to resolve this?
this is a compiler issue (ICE, internal compiler error), so ideally
report a bug against gcc. I can take a closer look on Monday.
On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 15:54:12 -0400
Andrew Heath wrote:
> I am running into an odd issue where I am trying to rebuild the latest
> version of the receptor package, and I able able to build on my local
> system using mock for F40, F39 and EPEL9 but when I try building the same
> RPMs in Koji one of
On Mon, 3 Jun 2024 14:22:37 +0200
Eike Rathke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> what did recently change in rawhide that the %{_buildrootdir} macro
> isn't expanded as in
new rpm landed? But shouldn't %{buildroot} be used instead of
%{_buildrootdir} anyway?
Dan
> + mkdir '%{_buildrootdir}/bi
On Thu, 16 May 2024 16:56:37 -0700
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today, 2024-05-16, we have removed inactive packagers
> from the packager group.
>
>
> More details available in https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/11901
>
> Packages that have been orphaned are:
>
> rpms/xarchive
On Mon, 13 May 2024 11:49:47 +0200
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> On Monday, 13 May 2024 at 01:00, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 4:59 PM Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gimp3
> > >
> >
> > What the heck? This should have be
On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 09:49:34 +0200
Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Richard W. M. Jones:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 02:21:56PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >> * Richard W. M. Jones:
> >>
> >> >> I don't want us to have RPM spec file hacks just to get RISC-V to
> >> >> install in the correct locat
On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 10:55:34 +0100
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
>
> Anyone got any idea about this build failure?
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=116395331
>
> [+] All set and ready to build.
> clang: warning: -Wl,-z,relro: 'linker' input unused
> [-Wunused-command-line
Hello Aditi,
On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 22:31:41 +0530
Aditi Mishra wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I'm very new to open-source world however I'm willing and passionate
> candiate to work with you all. I had worked in the field of linux
> scheduler area as an intern. Willing to learn fedora packing and
Hi,
I have updated astyle to the latest 3.4.13 version that changes ABI,
but keeps soname. The 2 dependent packages were successfully rebuilt in
a side-tag.
[dan@talos ~]$ sudo dnf --repoid=rawhide-source --arch=src repoquery
--whatrequires astyle-devel
codeblocks-0:20.03-21.20240128svn13434.fc
On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 08:47:14 -0400
Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 8:45 AM Dan Horák wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 12:41:48 + (UTC)
> > rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> >
> > > According to [the schedule][1], Fedora 40 Candidate Beta-1.
On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 12:41:48 + (UTC)
rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> According to [the schedule][1], Fedora 40 Candidate Beta-1.9 is now
> available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
> testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
> https://fedorap
On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 17:07:08 +0100
Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 4:33 PM Mamoru TASAKA
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello, all:
> >
> > After investigating the recent Fedora-Security-Live livespin compose failure
> > on F-41, it is found that this is caused because:
> >
> > - Recently on
On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 15:46:46 +
Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote:
> Thanks, lynis is fixed, cowsay will be momentarily.
and mt-st is fixed as well
Dan
>
>
>
> --
> Gwyn Ciesla
> she/her/hers
>
> in your fear, seek only peace
On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 09:57:58 +
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xnvme/adduser
>
> I try to add karlowich (https://accounts.fedoraproject.org/user/karlowich/)
> but his name doesn't appear in the username field even though he's
> in the packager group. Why?
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 12:29:00 +
Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 at 12:07, David Abdurachmanov
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 12:49 PM Dan Horák wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 10:42:52 +
> > > "Richard W.M.
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 10:42:52 +
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 10:27:53AM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > Hi Richard,
> >
> > > A quick note that you may be seeing pull requests for riscv64 changes
> > > against your packages, like these examples:
> > >
> > > https://s
On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 07:02:28 -0600
"W. Michael Petullo" wrote:
> Building the current version of my opengrm-ngram package on Koji fails
> with the error "virtual memory exhausted: Cannot allocate memory"
> as indicated below. This happens only for i686; all of the other
> architectures build. Is
Hi,
I am in process of updating sg3_utils to the latest 1.48 version that
brings a soname bump. The dependent packages will be rebuilt in a
sidetag. All the deps build fine in my testing.
sudo dnf --repoid=rawhide repoquery --whatrequires sg3_utils-libs
ddpt-0:0.97-8.fc40
ledmon-0:0.97-4.fc40
li
On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 13:11:55 +0100
Sandro Mani wrote:
>
> On 06.02.24 8:50 AM, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 8:52 PM Daniel P. Berrangé
> > wrote:
> >> On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 05:34:06PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
> >
Hi,
could someone in the mingw team look at mingw-libgsf / libgsf (please
see the bug forwarded below)? If I see right, then the standalone
mingw-libgsf package should be retired as there are mingw builds from
the regular libgsf package, which seems to be regularly updated.
Thanks,
On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 23:55:43 -0800
l...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
>
>
> On 2024-02-01 11:26 p.m., Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 2:04 AM Mamoru TASAKA
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Luya Tshimbalanga wrote on 2024/02/02 10:25:
> > >> Hello team,
> > >>
> > >> It appears a change within %{
On Sun, 28 Jan 2024 15:57:15 -0600
Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 28, 2024 at 9:55 AM Ben Beasley wrote:
>
> > Blender already excludes i686:
> >
> >
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/blender/blob/8088da10c20e53ab0e1dd5de6fd3a2344bd288aa/f/blender.spec#_207
> >
> > So does prusa-slicer:
On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 11:03:21 +
Peter Robinson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Tried twice, same error, aarch64 build bails out with
>
> There's at least one known ICE on aarch64 for gcc-14 so I suggest
> checking if it looks related.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259937
and I have o
On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 17:56:40 +0100
Lumír Balhar wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Today I found out an interesting difference between Koji and COPR.
> autowrap package has this in its specfile:
>
> Requires: python%{python3_pkgversion}-Cython%{?_isa}
>
> Which is incorrect for noarch package but hold on. T
On Thu, 18 Jan 2024 22:15:18 +
Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 at 19:07, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >
> > I'll be building boost, tbb, and the packages that depend on them in
> > the f40-build-side-81691
> > side tag over the next few hours (in advance of the mass rebuild tomorrow
On Wed, 03 Jan 2024 10:47:12 +0100
Florian Weimer wrote:
> This changed was originally planned and approved for Fedora 39. It
> reduces startup time somewhat for large objects with lots of function
> and object pointers in global data.
>
> It should be a transparent change, internal to the tool
On Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:30:04 -0500
Steve Dickson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> When building an nfs-utils rpm in rawhide
> I get the following errors:
>
> xml.c: In function ‘junction_parse_xml_buf’:
> xml.c:293:15: error: implicit declaration of function ‘xmlParseMemory’
> [-Werror=implicit-function-de
On Tue, 07 Nov 2023 13:13:12 -
"David Bold" wrote:
> Thanks Dan, I will have a go at your machine + mock to reproduce and debug.
I can confirm we have a problem, bout++-5.1.0-1 (latest in rawhide
branch) builds OK under F-38 mock, but fails in Rawhide mock. Some
tests won't complete, like be
On Tue, 07 Nov 2023 11:19:23 -
"David Bold" wrote:
> > On Tue, 07 Nov 2023 10:17:06 -
> > David Schwörer >
> >
> > if you mean strange as ppc64le, then it's in the output just because I
> > was updating a rawhide/ppc64le system, but the problem exists on all
> > arches. The libmpi_cxx.
On Tue, 07 Nov 2023 10:17:06 -
David Schwörer wrote:
> MUSIC is an independent package, that just happens to fail to build from
> source after a new openmpi has been landed. bout++ is affected as well, and I
> would be unhappy if it would be obsoleted by openmpi.
>
> I think having more ti
On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 07:48:38 -0600
Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 10/28/23 13:36, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > I'm going to start building openmpi 5.0.0 and its requirements (pmix
> > 4.2.7, prrte 3.0.2) and dependencies in a side-tag starting tomorrow.
> > Notable changes are:
> >
> > * Dropping s
1 - 100 of 707 matches
Mail list logo
