On Wed, 04 Jun 2025 06:59:07 -
"Martin Gansser" wrote:
> have set %global _lto_cflags %{nil} as you suggested.
> [1] https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/ErrorReports/gdb.txt
sounds like the installed glibc debuginfo doesn't match the installed
runtime glibc rpm. Be aware that debuginfos are us
On Mon, 26 May 2025 14:29:48 -0400
"Steven A. Falco" wrote:
> On 5/26/25 02:01 PM, Dan Horák wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 May 2025 12:48:20 -0500
> > Richard Shaw wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 12:46 PM Dan Horák wrote:
> >>
> >>>
On Mon, 26 May 2025 12:48:20 -0500
Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 12:46 PM Dan Horák wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 26 May 2025 08:11:58 -0500
> > Richard Shaw wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 8:10 AM Dan Horák wrote:
> > >
On Mon, 26 May 2025 08:11:58 -0500
Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 8:10 AM Dan Horák wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 26 May 2025 07:50:07 -0500
> > Richard Shaw wrote:
> >
> > > The following packages are affected and will be rebuilt in a side-tag:
>
On Mon, 26 May 2025 07:50:07 -0500
Richard Shaw wrote:
> The following packages are affected and will be rebuilt in a side-tag:
>
> f3d
> gmsh
> kicad
> netgen-mesher
> prusa-slicer
> python-cascadio
> smesh
>
> The only problems were smesh, which is already FTBFS and not needed by any
> other
On Sun, 25 May 2025 10:36:55 -
"Ian McInerney" wrote:
> Was this change coordinated at all with the maintainers of other display
> managers? Because I updated my install from F41 to F42, and now lightdm is
> not displaying any background and the logs are stating:
>
> [+0.29s] DEBUG: backgr
On Thu, 15 May 2025 12:40:13 +0200
Michal Ruprich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've re-added the original wget as wget1 in Rawhide and also in F41 and
> F42 (updates now in Bodhi). wget binary is provided by wget1-wget
> subpackage. Once these updates get to the compose, if you want to start
> using wget
On Tue, 6 May 2025 17:03:41 -0700
Kevin Fenzi via devel-announce
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today, 2025-05-06, we have removed inactive packagers
> from the packager group.
>
> rpms/usbmon
Desnes (desnesn) in our team will be taking this
Dan
--
On Tue, 6 May 2025 17:03:41 -0700
Kevin Fenzi via devel-announce
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today, 2025-05-06, we have removed inactive packagers
> from the packager group.
>
> Packages that have been orphaned are:
>
> rpms/64tass
> rpms/d52
> rpms/z80asm
> rpms/z80dasm
taking those "retro" tools a
On Tue, 6 May 2025 12:24:56 -0600
Al Stone wrote:
> On 06 May 2025 20:11, Dan Horák wrote:
> > Hi Al,
> >
> > On Tue, 06 May 2025 18:04:20 -
> > "Al Stone" wrote:
> >
> > > I'm orphaning this package (1) I just don't have
Hi Al,
On Tue, 06 May 2025 18:04:20 -
"Al Stone" wrote:
> I'm orphaning this package (1) I just don't have time for it, and (2) I'm
> still not entirely sure how I became the maintainer for it -- I never
> requested it, but it showed up on my list quite some time ago and I never got
> aro
On Tue, 6 May 2025 11:26:02 +0200
Pavol Sloboda wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am currently working on rebasing a package that creates a shared library
> and I want to place it in %{_libdir}/x/y/z. I am using the
is using %{_libdir}/x/y/z necessary? What are the reasons?
Dan
> /etc/ld.so
On Tue, 8 Apr 2025 10:55:15 +0200
Lukas Javorsky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The GNU project `sharutils` raised a question in upstream mailing list if
> there is still a need for this package. [1]
>
> I identified multiple packages that still depend on sharutils (some of them
> are crucial for Fedora), so
On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 17:48:49 -0400
Peter Martuccelli wrote:
> Hi Davide,
>
> Please work with Dan, Cc'd, on any issues for Doug.
ack, I believe most of Doug's packages are Infiniband related and
should have a backup maintainer at Red Hat, but I will check closer on
Friday when I am back at work
On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 15:45:54 -
"William Roberts" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We are updating mbedtls package from version 2.28.8 to 3.6.2 since 2.28 has
> reached end of life.
> The summary of SONAME changes for the package is below.
and as we learned there are API changes too, headers being renam
On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 12:09:59 +
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
>
> This is a Fedora 40 build which fails, whereas the almost exact same
> builds of this package worked fine in F41/42/43.
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=129681254
>
> I'm having a hard time trying to work
On Thu, 27 Feb 2025 08:44:25 +
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> When doing scratch builds (only from Pagure pull requests?) we get
> this strange error on s390x builders:
>
> GenericError: Downloaded file
> http://kojipkgs-cache03.s390.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/1737/129631737/ocaml-gettext
On Sun, 16 Feb 2025 11:53:27 +0100
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> Hello, Martin.
> You added Fedora CI test gating to the yaml package, but the
> fedora-ci.koji-build.tier0.functional test fails each time due to:
> https://osci-jenkins-1.ci.fedoraproject.org/job/fedora-ci/job/dist-git-pi
On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 09:32:06 +0100
Clement Verna wrote:
> cross posting from
> https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/gating-fedora-updates-on-fedora-coreos-ci/144566
>
> Hi all,
>
> Last year, the Fedora CoreOS working group implemented CI testing [1] for
> Bodhi updates on a set of critical p
On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 16:58:15 +0900
Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> Hello:
>
> As of 2025-02-10 16:55 JST (= UTC+9), something seems wrong
> with kerbelos login.
>
>
> * fedpkg build fails with
>
> $ fedpkg build
> (gssapi auth failed: requests.exceptions.HTTPError: 500 Server Error:
> Internal Server
On Tue, 04 Feb 2025 09:20:24 -0500
"Colin Walters" wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 25, 2025, at 4:05 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>
> > So yeah, having a package with a sysusers file and files owned by the
> > users or groups defined therein works fine. (This was already possible
> > before
On Mon, 6 Jan 2025 19:56:27 -0700
Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 1/6/25 08:48, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 06, 2025 at 12:17:09PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >>
> >> valgrind works by interpreting each instruction, so yes the overhead
> >> is rather large. On the other hand I really a
On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 10:21:51 +0100
Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 22. 12. 24 v 17:18 Miro Hrončok via devel-announce napsal(a):
> > colm filiperosset, jtaylor
> >
>
>
> Chm, can some package be this unlucky?
>
> https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/colm
>
> https://koschei.fedoraproject.org
On Wed, 18 Dec 2024 22:36:36 +0100
Dan Horák wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am going to update astyle to the latest 3.6.6 version that changes
> ABI and also changes soname. The 2 dependent packages (codeblocks and
> kdevelop) will be rebuilt in a side-tag.
at the end I have updated also
Hi,
I am going to update astyle to the latest 3.6.6 version that changes
ABI and also changes soname. The 2 dependent packages (codeblocks and
kdevelop) will be rebuilt in a side-tag.
Dan
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedo
On Thu, 28 Nov 2024 22:03:42 +
Luis Correia wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was running the build processes for Mixxx 2.4.2 release on RPMFusion
>
> It ran fine, except in F40 for ppc64le, in where some dependency doesn't
> exist in Everything.
this is likely an outdated metadata issue between RPMFusio
On Tue, 26 Nov 2024 08:10:57 -0700
Jerry James wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 7:53 AM Dan Horák wrote:
> > On Mon, 25 Nov 2024 18:03:37 +
> > Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> >
> > > I'd like some help to identify the issue behind Siril being FTB on
On Mon, 25 Nov 2024 18:03:37 +
Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> I'd like some help to identify the issue behind Siril being FTB only on F40:
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2590137
>
> The error behind the failure is:
>
> ```
> /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/ccPj3YgU.ltrans25.l
On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 11:19:38 +0100
Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2024, 11:03 Dan Horák wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > seems ImageMagick 7.1.1.40 comes with an ABI change
> >
> > it drops libMagickWand-7.Q16HDRI.so.10(VERS_10.0)(64bit)
> > and h
On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 17:17:02 +0100
Eike Rathke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Monday, 2024-11-11 17:12:19 +0100, Eike Rathke wrote:
>
> > Then with v128.4.0 on 2024-10-28 also on f40
> > (no link here anymore, I excluded ppc64le on f40 to get the build out).
>
> That was https://koji.fedoraproject.org/ko
Hi,
seems ImageMagick 7.1.1.40 comes with an ABI change
it drops libMagickWand-7.Q16HDRI.so.10(VERS_10.0)(64bit)
and has libMagickWand-7.Q16HDRI.so.10(VERS_10.2)(64bit) instead.
This sounds wrong ...
Dan
--
___
devel mailing list -- d
On Tue, 29 Oct 2024 11:08:50 +0200
Susi Lehtola wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> it appears rpm has now deprecated the old %patch syntax in rawhide, which
> means
> that any old-style expressions
>
> %patch0 -p1 -b .overflow
>
> must now be written as
>
> %patch 0 -p1 -b .overflow
or as
%patch -P 0 -p1
On Sun, 27 Oct 2024 23:34:13 -0700
Luya wrote:
> Thanks for checking. Would you mind pushing the remaining built for update.
the retry for F-41 went smoothly ->
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-0dc37badbe
Dan
--
__
On Sun, 27 Oct 2024 13:31:17 -0700
Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> Hello team,
>
> Blender failed to build on Fedora 41 ppc64 architecture [1] while
> succeeding on Rawhide [2].
killed due OOM situation, I would retry, maybe there was another build
running on the same builder ...
Hi,
I am going to update astyle to the latest 3.6.3 version that changes
ABI and also changes soname. The 2 dependent packages (codeblocks and
kdevelop) will be rebuilt in a side-tag.
Dan
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedo
On Sat, 5 Oct 2024 19:28:10 +0200
Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 5, 2024, 18:16 Barry Scott wrote:
>
> > I'm starting to work on a systemd run0 bug.
> > And hit this issue.
> >
> > : 13:10:22 armf41 ~/rpmbuild.d/systemd/SPECS
> > : [1] barry $ rpm -i ~/systemd-256.6-1.fc41.src.rpm
> >
On Thu, 12 Sep 2024 20:45:29 -0500
Richard Shaw wrote:
> I have a report[1] of an issue with wsjtx installing on aarch64 only:
>
> Problem: cannot install the best update candidate for package
> wsjtx-2.7.0-3.fc40.aarch64
> - nothing provides libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) needed by
> wsjtx-2.7
On Wed, 11 Sep 2024 17:33:49 +0200
Petr Pisar wrote:
> V Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 08:24:41AM -0700, Ron Olson napsal(a):
> > Hey all, I’m trying to get bdftopcf built for EPEL 10 but it’s failing with
> > the aforementioned error (No matching package to install:
> > 'pkgconfig(xorg-macros) >= 1.8). I
On Mon, 9 Sep 2024 16:24:03 +0200
Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 09. 09. 24 v 4:15 odp. Scott Talbert napsal(a):
> > On Fri, 6 Sep 2024, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Bellow is list of packages that have licenses that are neither valid as
> >> Callaway nor as SPDX. I.e. the license cannot be v
Hi,
I am going to update astyle to the latest 3.6.1 version that changes
ABI and also changes soname. The 2 dependent packages (codeblocks and
kdevelop) will be rebuilt in a side-tag.
Dan
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedo
On Tue, 3 Sep 2024 13:43:20 +0200
Dan Horák wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Sep 2024 14:25:34 +0300
> Yanko Kaneti wrote:
>
> > Hello
> >
> > On Tue, 2024-09-03 at 11:14 +, Martin Gansser wrote:
> > > when I try to build the rawhide package for shotcut-24.08.29
On Tue, 03 Sep 2024 14:25:34 +0300
Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> Hello
>
> On Tue, 2024-09-03 at 11:14 +, Martin Gansser wrote:
> > when I try to build the rawhide package for shotcut-24.08.29-1.fc42, it
> > fails [1] on i686
> >
> > [1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12287890
Hi,
isn't there a problem with rpminspect-data-fedora used in the bodhi
automated tests? My recent build of s390utils failed on stuff that was
no problem 2 weeks ago. Does rpminspect-data-fedora need branching?
See eg. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-bb726e3bd3
and https://bod
On Wed, 14 Aug 2024 16:30:09 +0200
Sandro via devel wrote:
> On 14-08-2024 15:32, Ben Beasley wrote:
> > Given the timing and the complexity of the dependency chains involved
> > here, I used provenpackager privilege to start rebuilding grpc in both
> > F42 and F41, which will unblock many of t
On Mon, 12 Aug 2024 10:46:35 +0100
Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> On Sun, Aug 11, 2024 23:28:33 GMT, Dan Horák wrote:
> > On Sun, 11 Aug 2024 22:07:28 +0100
> > Ankur Sinha wrote:
> >
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > > I was working o
On Sun, 11 Aug 2024 22:07:28 +0100
Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I was working on fixing the FTBFS on libtpcmisc and while I got it to
> build on x86_64, my builds on ppc64le/aarch64/s390x all fail with these
> errors where it cannot find the standard includes (math.h/stdint.h) and
those a
Hi,
I am going to update astyle to the latest 3.5.2 version that changes
ABI and also changes soname. The 2 dependent packages will be rebuilt
in a side-tag.
$ dnf --repoid=rawhide-source --arch=src repoquery --whatrequires astyle-devel
Last metadata expiration check: 0:26:36 ago on Sat Jul 6 1
On Tue, 25 Jun 2024 11:57:49 +0200
Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 24. 06. 24 v 20:03 Peter Robinson napsal(a):
> > On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 at 11:21, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >>
> >> Dne 21. 06. 24 v 18:27 Stephen Smoogen napsal(a):
> >>> On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 at 07:27, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> So what is t
On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 17:11:07 +
Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
>
> Messaggio originale
> 24/06/24 18:21, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto:
>
> >
> > I personally don't see why entering a otp once a week is such a
> > burden... but it does seem to be. ;(
> >
>
> Once a week? Wh
On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 16:53:22 -
"Leigh Scott" wrote:
>
> > I personally don't see why entering a otp once a week is such a
> > burden... but it does seem to be. ;(
> >
> > kevin
>
> It isn't just once.
>
> 1. kerberos
> 2. Web login on infra, bugzilla, bodhi, devel list and accounts
>
>
On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 11:21:30 -0400
Ron Olson wrote:
> Hey all-
>
> I’m trying to monitor some builds and once they’re done they disappear from
> “Active”, but when I switch to “All” I see, well, everything, including for
> previous dates.
>
> Is it possible to specify a specific date to Koji
On Sat, 15 Jun 2024 13:24:09 -
"Felix Wang" wrote:
> zxing-cpp rebuild failed only on s390x with the following error [1], any clue
> on how to resolve this?
this is a compiler issue (ICE, internal compiler error), so ideally
report a bug against gcc. I can take a closer look on Monday.
On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 15:54:12 -0400
Andrew Heath wrote:
> I am running into an odd issue where I am trying to rebuild the latest
> version of the receptor package, and I able able to build on my local
> system using mock for F40, F39 and EPEL9 but when I try building the same
> RPMs in Koji one of
On Mon, 3 Jun 2024 14:22:37 +0200
Eike Rathke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> what did recently change in rawhide that the %{_buildrootdir} macro
> isn't expanded as in
new rpm landed? But shouldn't %{buildroot} be used instead of
%{_buildrootdir} anyway?
Dan
> + mkdir '%{_buildrootdir}/bi
On Thu, 16 May 2024 16:56:37 -0700
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today, 2024-05-16, we have removed inactive packagers
> from the packager group.
>
>
> More details available in https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/11901
>
> Packages that have been orphaned are:
>
> rpms/xarchive
On Mon, 13 May 2024 11:49:47 +0200
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> On Monday, 13 May 2024 at 01:00, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 4:59 PM Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gimp3
> > >
> >
> > What the heck? This should have be
On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 09:49:34 +0200
Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Richard W. M. Jones:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 02:21:56PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >> * Richard W. M. Jones:
> >>
> >> >> I don't want us to have RPM spec file hacks just to get RISC-V to
> >> >> install in the correct locat
On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 10:55:34 +0100
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
>
> Anyone got any idea about this build failure?
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=116395331
>
> [+] All set and ready to build.
> clang: warning: -Wl,-z,relro: 'linker' input unused
> [-Wunused-command-line
Hello Aditi,
On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 22:31:41 +0530
Aditi Mishra wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I'm very new to open-source world however I'm willing and passionate
> candiate to work with you all. I had worked in the field of linux
> scheduler area as an intern. Willing to learn fedora packing and
Hi,
I have updated astyle to the latest 3.4.13 version that changes ABI,
but keeps soname. The 2 dependent packages were successfully rebuilt in
a side-tag.
[dan@talos ~]$ sudo dnf --repoid=rawhide-source --arch=src repoquery
--whatrequires astyle-devel
codeblocks-0:20.03-21.20240128svn13434.fc
On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 08:47:14 -0400
Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 8:45 AM Dan Horák wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 12:41:48 + (UTC)
> > rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> >
> > > According to [the schedule][1], Fedora 40 Candidate Beta-1.
On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 12:41:48 + (UTC)
rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> According to [the schedule][1], Fedora 40 Candidate Beta-1.9 is now
> available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
> testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
> https://fedorap
On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 17:07:08 +0100
Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 4:33 PM Mamoru TASAKA
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello, all:
> >
> > After investigating the recent Fedora-Security-Live livespin compose failure
> > on F-41, it is found that this is caused because:
> >
> > - Recently on
On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 15:46:46 +
Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote:
> Thanks, lynis is fixed, cowsay will be momentarily.
and mt-st is fixed as well
Dan
>
>
>
> --
> Gwyn Ciesla
> she/her/hers
>
> in your fear, seek only peace
On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 09:57:58 +
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xnvme/adduser
>
> I try to add karlowich (https://accounts.fedoraproject.org/user/karlowich/)
> but his name doesn't appear in the username field even though he's
> in the packager group. Why?
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 12:29:00 +
Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 at 12:07, David Abdurachmanov
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 12:49 PM Dan Horák wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 10:42:52 +
> > > "Richard W.M.
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 10:42:52 +
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 10:27:53AM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > Hi Richard,
> >
> > > A quick note that you may be seeing pull requests for riscv64 changes
> > > against your packages, like these examples:
> > >
> > > https://s
On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 07:02:28 -0600
"W. Michael Petullo" wrote:
> Building the current version of my opengrm-ngram package on Koji fails
> with the error "virtual memory exhausted: Cannot allocate memory"
> as indicated below. This happens only for i686; all of the other
> architectures build. Is
Hi,
I am in process of updating sg3_utils to the latest 1.48 version that
brings a soname bump. The dependent packages will be rebuilt in a
sidetag. All the deps build fine in my testing.
sudo dnf --repoid=rawhide repoquery --whatrequires sg3_utils-libs
ddpt-0:0.97-8.fc40
ledmon-0:0.97-4.fc40
li
On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 13:11:55 +0100
Sandro Mani wrote:
>
> On 06.02.24 8:50 AM, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 8:52 PM Daniel P. Berrangé
> > wrote:
> >> On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 05:34:06PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
> >
Hi,
could someone in the mingw team look at mingw-libgsf / libgsf (please
see the bug forwarded below)? If I see right, then the standalone
mingw-libgsf package should be retired as there are mingw builds from
the regular libgsf package, which seems to be regularly updated.
Thanks,
On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 23:55:43 -0800
l...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
>
>
> On 2024-02-01 11:26 p.m., Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 2:04 AM Mamoru TASAKA
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Luya Tshimbalanga wrote on 2024/02/02 10:25:
> > >> Hello team,
> > >>
> > >> It appears a change within %{
On Sun, 28 Jan 2024 15:57:15 -0600
Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 28, 2024 at 9:55 AM Ben Beasley wrote:
>
> > Blender already excludes i686:
> >
> >
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/blender/blob/8088da10c20e53ab0e1dd5de6fd3a2344bd288aa/f/blender.spec#_207
> >
> > So does prusa-slicer:
On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 11:03:21 +
Peter Robinson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Tried twice, same error, aarch64 build bails out with
>
> There's at least one known ICE on aarch64 for gcc-14 so I suggest
> checking if it looks related.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259937
and I have o
On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 17:56:40 +0100
Lumír Balhar wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Today I found out an interesting difference between Koji and COPR.
> autowrap package has this in its specfile:
>
> Requires: python%{python3_pkgversion}-Cython%{?_isa}
>
> Which is incorrect for noarch package but hold on. T
On Thu, 18 Jan 2024 22:15:18 +
Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 at 19:07, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >
> > I'll be building boost, tbb, and the packages that depend on them in
> > the f40-build-side-81691
> > side tag over the next few hours (in advance of the mass rebuild tomorrow
On Wed, 03 Jan 2024 10:47:12 +0100
Florian Weimer wrote:
> This changed was originally planned and approved for Fedora 39. It
> reduces startup time somewhat for large objects with lots of function
> and object pointers in global data.
>
> It should be a transparent change, internal to the tool
On Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:30:04 -0500
Steve Dickson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> When building an nfs-utils rpm in rawhide
> I get the following errors:
>
> xml.c: In function ‘junction_parse_xml_buf’:
> xml.c:293:15: error: implicit declaration of function ‘xmlParseMemory’
> [-Werror=implicit-function-de
On Tue, 07 Nov 2023 13:13:12 -
"David Bold" wrote:
> Thanks Dan, I will have a go at your machine + mock to reproduce and debug.
I can confirm we have a problem, bout++-5.1.0-1 (latest in rawhide
branch) builds OK under F-38 mock, but fails in Rawhide mock. Some
tests won't complete, like be
On Tue, 07 Nov 2023 11:19:23 -
"David Bold" wrote:
> > On Tue, 07 Nov 2023 10:17:06 -
> > David Schwörer >
> >
> > if you mean strange as ppc64le, then it's in the output just because I
> > was updating a rawhide/ppc64le system, but the problem exists on all
> > arches. The libmpi_cxx.
On Tue, 07 Nov 2023 10:17:06 -
David Schwörer wrote:
> MUSIC is an independent package, that just happens to fail to build from
> source after a new openmpi has been landed. bout++ is affected as well, and I
> would be unhappy if it would be obsoleted by openmpi.
>
> I think having more ti
On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 07:48:38 -0600
Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 10/28/23 13:36, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > I'm going to start building openmpi 5.0.0 and its requirements (pmix
> > 4.2.7, prrte 3.0.2) and dependencies in a side-tag starting tomorrow.
> > Notable changes are:
> >
> > * Dropping s
On Sun, 1 Oct 2023 14:21:23 +0200
Julian Sikorski wrote:
> Am 01.10.23 um 10:17 schrieb Julian Sikorski:
> > Am 01.10.23 um 09:37 schrieb Dan Horák:
> >> On Sun, 1 Oct 2023 09:32:10 +0200
> >> Julian Sikorski wrote:
> >>
> >>> Am 30.09.2
On Sun, 1 Oct 2023 09:32:10 +0200
Julian Sikorski wrote:
> Am 30.09.23 um 09:09 schrieb Julian Sikorski:
> > Hello,
> >
> > mame package uses mame -validate as %check step. It has recently started
> > to cause problems on rawhide/aarch64:
> > - I had to cancel 0.258 build after 16 hours [1]
> >
On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 19:01:07 +0200
"Kai A. Hiller" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I started a build with `fedpkg build`, but after 43h and counting I
> don‘t think it will finish anymore. Is there a way to terminate the
> build? The build is
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10615476
it shouldn't be the default for a
"random" project.
Dan
> František
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 3:39 PM Dan Horák wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 15:13:58 +0200
> > Frantisek Lachman wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Petr,
> >
On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 15:39:50 +0200
Frantisek Lachman wrote:
> Thanks Vít for the link!
>
> I am honestly not sure how CI should do this (and don't want to be the
> one who decides..;)
>
> If CI does not need to have the source in the lookaside cache, Packit
> does not need to store anything in
On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 15:13:58 +0200
Frantisek Lachman wrote:
> Hi Petr,
>
> we would like to avoid storing the archive in the lookaside cache before
> approving but the problem is that the CI on the PR (mainly the scratch
> build) does not work without the archive being in the lookaside cache
> a
On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 08:51:16 -0600
Jerry James wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 10:02 PM Jerry James wrote:
> > I looked at blueprint-compiler tonight, and found 2 bugs with the
> > handling of bitfields. Sadly, fixing those still doesn't make the
> > test suite pass, so there is at least one m
On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 10:08:57 -0600
Jerry James wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 10:03 AM Lyes Saadi
> wrote:
> > I have a noarch package which faces an issue with one of its arches
> > (s390x), and which happens to have multiple noarch packages depending on
> > it, and they won't build either i
On Sat, 2 Sep 2023 21:07:07 +0900
Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> Hello, all:
>
> Looks like currently rawhide buildroot seems weird state, mainly
> on ppc64le, but sometimes also on other arches:
>
> e.g.
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=105650426
^^^ nothing suspicious in the jou
Hi,
seems there is an issue with the test results presented in bodhi, please
see https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-94f22746e1
bodhi thinks fedora-ci.koji-build.rpmdeplint.functional failed (it's
"red"), but when I click on the test in bodhi testing farm say "passed".
What can b
On Mon, 10 Jul 2023 10:38:18 +0200
Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have recently installed Fedora Rawhide via netinstall and there are
> some questionable packages installed by default, such as:
>
> cpp
> libtomcrypt
> libxcrypt-compat
> exiv2
>
> and I wonder what is the mechanism, which pull
On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 13:24:53 +0200
Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 1:18 PM Dan Horák wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 12:50:13 +0200
> > Sandro wrote:
> >
> > > On 21-06-2023 10:51, Dan Horák wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > >
On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 12:50:13 +0200
Sandro wrote:
> On 21-06-2023 10:51, Dan Horák wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have met a package that uses %autorelease and wanted to add a suffix
> > to the release for my local test build that doesn't have to be
> > compliant
Hi,
I have met a package that uses %autorelease and wanted to add a suffix
to the release for my local test build that doesn't have to be
compliant with the official versioning, but just differentiate interim
builds. It's quite common to append eg. ".rhbz123456" or similar
suffices. It looks to me
On Thu, 15 Jun 2023 18:40:39 +0200
Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 01. 06. 23 22:16, Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote:
> > I've taken ownership of libreoffice for the time being, at least to keep
> > the lights on. Co-maintainers, as always, welcome.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Could you please prioritize making it b
On Mon, 12 Jun 2023 15:47:31 +0100
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 05:45:35PM -, Reon Beon via devel wrote:
> > Or is some software keeping it back?
>
> Lack of people doing the work, usually.
that plus squirrel is being used by (at least) codeblocks, they had
plan to
On Tue, 06 Jun 2023 18:55:36 +
Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> I'm forking this proposal off from the other thread, as it got buried
> under tons of posts.
>
> Shall we set up a libreoffice-sig to coordinate and ensure that
> libreoffice and all dependencies are properly maintained and upd
On Tue, 6 Jun 2023 06:15:29 -0500
Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 4:17 AM Dan Horák wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 6 Jun 2023 11:00:39 +0200
> > Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> >
> > > On Tuesday, 06 June 2023 at 10:55, Dan Horák wrote
1 - 100 of 689 matches
Mail list logo
