ind it, for $10 I can easily get another 8GB anyway.
Regards
Chris Jones
[image: linux.png]
<>--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
when I feel the need to, I go
about it by whatever other means is necessary to avoid anything to do with
floppies.
That's not to say that the Linux kernel should not support floppy drives.
That's an entirely different discussion really.
Regards
Chris Jones
[image: linux.png]
<>
This looks like a very interesting project mate. I'm very interested in
becoming a co-maintainer. ;-)
*Cheers,
Chris Jones**
*
* *
“Oh, so they have internet on computers now?” — Homer Simpson
* *
Signature powered by
<http://r1.wisestamp.com/r/landing?promo=4&des
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 11:08 +1000, Chris Jones wrote:
> > Some of us do watch movies also, which of course requires an X
> > session.
>
> Not really. mplayer has several outputs which function without an X
> sessio
Some of us do watch movies also, which of course requires an X session.
Cheers
Chris Jones
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
ch a dick for not even thinking of that!
The problem is, I use Ubuntu/APT also, so sometimes I can confuse
myself as to which system (yum/apt) does what.
Nice work.
Cheers
Chris Jones
This message was sent using IMP, the Inter
bout 5-10sec
> pass.
>
> Tom
I'd suggest you purchase a new card reader. You do realize you can
pick them up for around $10?
If I had a card reader with that much drama just to get it to operate,
it'd be out the door in no time!
Cheers
Chris Jones
--
tp://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/4.0.8/VirtualBox-4.0-4.0.8_71778_fedora15-1.i686.rpm
yum install VirtualBox-4.0-4.0.8_71778_fedora15-1.i686.rpm
Or for 64bit:
~$ su
wget
http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/4.0.8/VirtualBox-4.0-4.0.8_71778_fedora15-1.x86_64.rpm
yum install VirtualBox-
lization technology becomes more and more involved
and frequent on users systems, particularly with advanced Linux users,
I think there needs to be a strong focus on ensuring that all releases
run in virtualized environments without any major issues. ie.
Virtualbox.
Perhaps a dedicated tea
mage editing package) in under 10MB.
Perhaps someone can shed some light on this and perhaps more effort
put into bringing down the size of java packages, if possible?
Regards
Chris Jones
This message was sent using IMP, th
Regarding whether G3 should even have a fallback mode; of course it should.
At least until it becomes stable. That's a no-brainer.
Regards
--
PHOTO RESOLUTIONS - Photo - Graphic - Web
C and L Jones - Proprietors
ABN: 98 317 740 240
WWW: http://photoresolutions.freehostia.com
@: chrisjo...@com
es and include the updates in their repos. Because I can see that the
current Firefox inclusion model, not only for Fedora but Ubuntu too, is
seriously going to generate issues when Mozilla speeds up the release cycle
of Firefox.
Regards
Chris Jones
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproje
be able to find packages which are not installed on the current system.
Thanks,
Jeff
Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't "yum info jansson" give you this?
Regards
Chris Jones
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
h
5 is really
not that far off.
Thanks to all for the information. ;-)
Regards
Chris Jones
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
-Original Message-
From: drago01 [mailto:drag...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 8:12 PM
Subject: Re: Gnome-Shell and F14
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Chris Jones
wrote:
>
>
>
>
> From: drago01 [mailto:drag...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011
From: drago01 [mailto:drag...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 7:47 PM
Subject: Re: Gnome-Shell and F14
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Chris Jones
wrote:
Is the final Gnome-Shell going to be made available for Fedora 14 or solely
for Fedora 15?
The later
Is the final Gnome-Shell going to be made available for Fedora 14 or solely
for Fedora 15?
Is yes for F14, what sort of time frame would we be looking at for
availability?
CD99E035AC72E359508CD3A58A335BD6
--
PHOTO RESOLUTIONS - Photo - Graphic - Web
C and L Jones - Proprietors
-Original Message-
From: devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[mailto:devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Orion Poplawski
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2011 7:06 AM
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
Subject: firefox/xulrunner-bin confusion
Fired up top on my F-15
the next recipient of a new kernel version?
Regards
Chris Jones
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
So it seems that Audacious is not as flexible between its own different
version releases? What is with that?
Surely that much can't change between releases to make the plug-ins fail
between versions?
--
Chris Jones
PHOTO RESOLUTIONS - Photo - Graphic - Web
C and L Jones - Proprietors
AB
Agreed with others, I can't see Network Manager having issue with SELinux.
Can you post SELinux reporting details?
--
Chris Jones
PHOTO RESOLUTIONS - Photo - Graphic - Web
C and L Jones - Proprietors
ABN: 98 317 740 240
WWW: http://photoresolutions.freehostia.com
@: chrisjo...@comcen.c
y have.
I certainly didn't ready it as a replacement proposal.
Good work Olaf. Keep up the good work.
For future reference, we need to encourage these sorts of development
projects. It's great for both Fedora and Linux.
Regards
--
Chris Jones
PHOTO RESOLUTIONS - Photo - Graphic - Web
ABN:
style DOS partitioning
setups on Linux.
Regards
--
Chris Jones
PHOTO RESOLUTIONS - Photo - Graphic - Web
ABN: 98 317 740 240
@: chrisjo...@comcen.com.au
WWW: http://photoresolutions.freehostia.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
of the "Graphics" group and creating a new
> "Design Suite" group?
>
> Is there a procedure for this? I mean like filing a ticket some place?
> --
I'm confused about the whole conversation. What exactly are you talking
about Bill when you refer to creat
user, the Fedora Development Team should
be very proud of what they've achieved with the Fedora and Anaconda
Installer.
Regards
Chris Jones
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
at).
> The full release version is penned in for Christmas (or there abouts).
>
> I have no problems helping package this behemoth!
>
> TTFN
>
> Paul
I'll say one thing for LibreOffice, there's certainly no shortage of
interest in it.
Cheers
--
Chris Jones
PHO
7;s much better and
much more stable.
Christoph, what on earth makes you think that gnome-rdp is obsolete and
has been replaced? Although they have a similar look, feel and function,
gnome-rdp and remmina are two completely different applications.
Regards
--
Chris Jones
-
bit as my primary operating system and have 32bit
Flash installed with wrapper inside Firefox 4.0 beta 4 and have no
problems.
There I ask the question, what is wrong with doing the same thing in
Fedora?
Regards
--
Chris Jones
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
my of FOSS here, but
they're not. And I think it's disgraceful that's how you're all painting
a unsubstantiated target on them.
My solution to a problem that never was; amend the policy guidelines and
move on to some more serious issues.
Regards
--
Chris Jones
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
e/Yahoo and Bing Search. Let's hope this changes in the future.
Regards
--
Chris Jones
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/12/2010 11:15 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> By network install, I meant using a local intranet-based HTTP or FTP
> server to install from.
Ok fair enough, I misunderstood what you meant. My apologies.
Regards
- --
http://home.comcen.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
It is common for iso size to be over the 700MB target size due to most
developers and testers doing their work in virtual machines these days.
Therefore, iso size is not an issue. And bringing it back down to below
the 700MB size limit for CD is always
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I recently acquired a Toshiba L655 laptop, fairly new stuff (both
> network card drivers have yet to be merged into the mainline kernel). I
> had issues getting Fedora installed, it had massive kernel panics
> related to AC
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 1:52 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
>
> This sounds interesting:
>
> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=ODQ3OQ
>
It's funny because I never really thought it was a problem on such a
large scale of systems. I had always though that it was something to
do with one of
2010/7/29 Michał Piotrowski :
> 2010/7/29 Chris Jones :
>>
>> I'm not going to pretend that I'm not pleased about the delay. I plan
>> to keep using G2 for as long as I possible can, long after the Gnome 3
>> release.
>
> Is it possible to disable gnome-s
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 12:36 AM, James Laska wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 16:27 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > It seems that Gnome 3 will be released in march 2011. How will this
> > affect Fedora 14? Gnome 3 was an important feature of F14.
> >
> > http://lwn.net/Articles/39
I'm sure there'd be enough time to squeeze in FF4.0. Assuming there's
no development delays with Mozilla.
Regards
--
http://home.comcen.com.au/foxmulder881/signature/details.html
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
It'll come through as an update in the updates repo, I suspect. There
might be a beta version included depending on its stability at the
time of a F14 release I guess.
Regards
--
Chris Jones
Freelance Photographic Imaging Professional
and Graphic Designer
ABN: 98 317 740 240
PHOTO RESOLU
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
> It is all listed at
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/TillMaas
>
> Rahul
Thanks mate.
Chris
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
What packages do you own/maintain? Listing them might be helpful.
Oh, and sorry to hear about your accident. And I hope you get better soon.
Regards
--
Chris Jones
Freelance Photographic Imaging Professional
and Graphic Designer
ABN: 98 317 740 240
PHOTO RESOLUTIONS - Photo - Graphic - Web
W
stic. If you can't
access your email and reply within 4 weeks then there's definitely
something going on there.
Regards
--
Chris Jones
Photographic Imaging Professional and Graphic Designer
ABN: 98 317 740 240
Photo Resolutions - Photo Printing, Editing and Restorations
Web: http://pho
maintainers could grow co-maintainers
> without going through the complicated AWOL-process.
>
> --
> sven === jabber/xmpp: s...@lankes.net
> --
Sounds reasonable enough to me.
Regards
--
Chris Jones
Photographic Imaging Professional and Graphic Designer
ABN: 98 317 740 240
Photo
for other willing
developers to take over development of unplanned orphaned and
unmaintained code from unresponsive developers/maintainers and
co-maintainers?
Regards
--
Chris Jones
Photographic Imaging Professional and Graphic Designer
ABN: 98 317 740 240
Photo Resolutions - Photo Printing
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Nicu Buculei wrote:
>
>
> I just added him to the Design Team group so his alias should start
> working.
>
> --
> nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com/
>
>
Thanks. Yes it is now working correctly.
Regards
-
ectly and every time I send an email to that
address as a test, it bounces. What's going on or what am I doing
wrong?
Regards
--
Chris Jones
Photographic Imaging Professional and Graphic Designer
ABN: 98 317 740 240
Photo Resolutions - Photo Printing, Editing and Restorations
Good to hear.
Chris
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Firefox 3.6.4 has come through the Ubuntu repos already. I would have
thought that 3.6.4 would be through the Fedora sets by now. Has it not yet
arrived?
Regards
--
Chris Jones
Photographic Imaging Professional and Graphic Designer
ABN: 98 317 740 240
Photo Resolutions - Photo Printing
I'd be interested if you're still after some help mate. Let me know.
Regards
--
Chris Jones
Photographic Imaging Professional and Graphic Designer
ABN: 98 317 740 240
Photo Resolutions - Photo Printing, Editing and Restorations
Web: http://photoresolutions.freehostia.com
Email:
He's probably just out of the game. Considering he's been inactive for 8
months now.
Regards
--
Chris Jones
Photographic Imaging Professional and Graphic Designer
ABN: 98 317 740 240
Photo Resolutions - Photo Printing, Editing and Restorations
Web: http://photoresolutions.free
able
to take care of it better than yourself. Good move.
Regards
--
Chris Jones
Photographic Imaging Professional and Graphic Designer
ABN: 98 317 740 240
Photo Resolutions - Photo Printing, Editing and Restorations
Web: http://photoresolutions.freehostia.com
Email:
--
devel mailing list
Right, so they're still using libpng* but the more updated version. I read
the original post as not using libpng at all and using another library as an
alternative. Sorry, my misunderstanding.
--
Chris Jones
Photographic Imaging Professional and Graphic Designer
ABN: 98 317 740 240
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
I'm curious as to what Debian/Ubuntu are using as a replacement for
libpng10?
--
Chris Jones
Photographic Imaging Professional and Graphic Designer
ABN: 98 317 740 240
Photo Resolutions - Photo Prin
I was under the impression that a timeout is intentional/used only if
another operating system is detected upon installation. ie. Windows. If no
other operating system is detected, then there's no point having a timeout.
--
Chris Jones
Photographic Imaging Professional and Graphic Designe
So what's the actual bug? I've read through the tracker list and I still
can;t for the life of me detect an actual bug, but rather an annoyance for a
select few. However, I do agree that there should be a delay increase for
GRUB timeout. More so like that of Debian, Ubuntu etc.
--
C
derecho y dé pecho a mi valor.»
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
Although I am not familiar with what you've mentioned, is there a point for
the change? I'm curious,
--
Chris Jones
Photographic
the
time of installation. Although I can't remember what disro it was at the
time. But Fedora does seem to have this continuing issue from release to
release. I never seem to experience it with Ubuntu, Debian etc. What's the
story with Fedora and its ignorant grub config upon instal
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> >
>
**
I'm happy to test it out. If your interested, send me an email with some
more details. As others have mentioned, we need more information.
--
Chris Jones
Photographic Imaging Professi
r. And for those
who do want to learn it, do exactly that--learn it. It just takes time. Be
patient.
I think there's more important things to focus on regarding Linux
development.
--
Chris Jones
Photographic Imaging Professional and Graphic Designer
ABN: 98 317 740 240
Photo Resolutions
Web: ht
good because it gives us, the user, choice.
Which is what Linux is all about after all.
Cheers.
--
Chris Jones
Photographic Imaging Professional
ABN: 98 317 740 240
Photo Resolutions
http://photoresolutions.freehostia.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
59 matches
Mail list logo
