> Hi
>
> Some time ago I've started working on updating to scotch-7.x, with some
> initial test builds here [1]. To finalize the update, I'd like to gather
> some opinions (potentially affected maintainers in CC):
Hi all.
Hi Sandro.
PETSc is ready/tested for Scotch-7* with the release 3.18.1
T
-builds/)
On 24/05/20 12:49, Felix Schwarz wrote:
>
> Am 24.05.20 um 11:49 schrieb Antonio Trande:
>> Can i include all dependent packages without related permissions? (i'm
>> not the maintainer of `R-argon2` `borgbackup` `gtkhash`)
>>
>> https://bodhi.fedoraproject
Can i include all dependent packages without related permissions? (i'm
not the maintainer of `R-argon2` `borgbackup` `gtkhash`)
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-628ff99cfc#comment-1383812
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot or
On 23/05/20 14:42, David Schwörer wrote:
> On 5/22/20 2:26 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
>> Scratch build:
>> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=44816285
>
> My initial try of rebuilding in copr for easier testing failed.
>
> I had to add
> export OMP
Scratch build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=44816285
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84
GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
Hi all.
Sundials will be updated to the release `5.3.0` on Rawhide, not before
next 7 days.
Involved packages:
dolfin
octave
python-steps
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84
GPG key server: https://keys.o
On 16/05/20 19:39, Antonio Trande wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> `libb2-0.98.1` has been required on F31 [1] and EPEL7 [2]; it expects a
> soname bump, so all dependent packages need to be rebuilt:
>
> $ repoquery --whatrequires libb2-devel --disablerepo=*
> --enablerepo=*-source
>
.src
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84
GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing lis
On 15/05/20 14:57, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 7:57 AM Petr Pisar wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 06:30:04AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 6:15 AM Petr Pisar wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, May 15, 2
Hi all.
`uglify-js` is no longer needed for me, so i'm orphaning it again.
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84
GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP di
That buld was performed by "merlinm" users. You can ask him for more details.
>
> -- Petr
>
>
> _______
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraprojec
_
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproje
roject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
>
> sagitter: uglify-js, apbs
>
I need these packages. I will take them.
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84
GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp
On 10/05/20 14:28, Igor Raits wrote:
> On Sun, 2020-05-10 at 14:14 +0200, Antonio Trande wrote:
>> Hi all.
>
> Hi Antonio,
>
>> `zipper` library will be upgraded to the release 1.0.1 with a soname
>> bump in a week.
>
> Thanks a lot for announcing this.
Hi all.
`zipper` library will be upgraded to the release 1.0.1 with a soname
bump in a week.
Dependent packages:
COPASI
libCombine
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84
GPG key server: https://keys.o
Hi all.
`CMake3` on EPEL7 has been updated to the release 3.17.1; it's available
for testing.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-b6a455afdf
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84
GPG ke
t:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
On 22/04/20 13:34, Mark Knoop wrote:
> At 12:00 on 22 Apr 2020, Antonio Trande wrote:
>> Hi all.
>>
>> Any idea about why this error comes out on F32+ and not on F31?
>>
>> ```
>> ui.cc:2086:12: error: 'iswalnum' was not declared in this scope;
~~~
|isaalnum
make: *** [Makefile:1601: ui.o] Error 1
```
GitHub ticket: https://github.com/crawl/crawl/issues/1372
Build on F31: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=43635124
Build on F33: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=43636815
--
---
Antonio T
:1.3.0-11.fc33.src
> mrpt-0:1.4.0-17.fc33.src
> pioneer-0:20200203-1.fc33.src
> vkmark-0:2017.08-0.8.20180123git68b6f23.fc32.src
>
> I will take care of the rebuilds and any fallout/updates that need to
> happen.
>
> Rich
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto &
> Maybe a
> Requires: (hdf5-mpich-devel if hdf5-devel)
> for the petsc-mpich-devel could help - but I am not sure about this one.
> I am neither sure that this is sufficient, nor whether this is the right
> place to do this.
>
> Thanks for getting this all fixed,
> David
On 06/04/20 16:19, David Schwörer wrote:
> On 4/5/20 6:06 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
>> On 04/04/20 19:23, David S wrote:
>>> On 4/4/20 4:38 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
>>>> Hi all.
>>>>
>>>> `MUMPS-5.3.0` [1] `PETSc-3.13.0` [2] and `Sundial
On 04/04/20 19:23, David S wrote:
> On 4/4/20 4:38 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
>> Hi all.
>>
>> `MUMPS-5.3.0` [1] `PETSc-3.13.0` [2] and `Sundials-5.2.0` [3] are coming
>> on Rawhide; these updates will need rebuilds of dependent packages:
>>
> [:snip:]
>
/sagitter/ForTesting/build/1327319/
[3] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=43020532
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84
GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/
signature.asc
Description: OpenP
'm using devel to communicate this so other who are also hit by that
> know what's going on.)
>
> Thanks,
Same issue for me, building `notepadqq` on Fedora 33:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=42772712
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagit
On 10/03/20 19:31, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 6:17 PM Antonio Trande wrote:
>>
>> Hi all.
>>
>> libIDL missing on F32. Please, fix it.
>
> It has been fixed for builds, it will be fixed in the next compose.
>
> Out of interest whic
Hi all.
A new release of `python-cclib` package has been reviewed for unretiring
process: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9313
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84
GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/
sig
Hi all.
libIDL missing on F32. Please, fix it.
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84
GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
Hi all.
I wish to claim the python-cclib package's mantainership.
New review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808571
Best regards
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84
GPG key server: https://k
Hi all.
I have two new packages ready for the review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808573
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808571
I'm available to review other packages in return.
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject do
Hi all.
Antimony (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/antimony) is an orphan
package since today.
Feel free to take it.
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84
GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/
sig
e Fedora packaging experience under their belt, given some of
> the complexities involved and the criticality of libffi to the whole
> platform.
>
> Thanks!
>
> AG
>
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x7B3
On 19/01/20 19:51, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 7:47 PM Antonio Trande wrote:
>>
>> Hi all.
>>
>> Avogadro(1) package supports Python2 only.
>> My intention is to retire this package on Fedora 32+; at the same time,
>> Avogadro2 wi
:
Avogadro(1) --> retired
Avogadro2 will have (avogadro-1.3.0 does not exist but will obsolete
any 1.2.0 release):
%if 0%{?fedora} > 31
`Epoch: 1`
`Obsoletes: avogadro < 0:1.3.0-1`
`Provides: avogadro = 1:%{version}-%{release}`
%endif
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto &#x
Ticket: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9137
On 31/12/19 12:33, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 31. 12. 19 12:12, Antonio Trande wrote:
>> The review is complete. Please, add me as maintainer.
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1780849
>
> https://pagure.i
The review is complete. Please, add me as maintainer.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1780849
On 07/12/19 12:51, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 07. 12. 19 12:46, Antonio Trande wrote:
>> I'm interested.
>
> Cool. At this point, it would need a new package review (pymo
erge commit.
>
> "git revert HEAD -m 1" does what you want, I think.
> "-m 1" tells git to restore to the state of the epel7 branch, not the
> master branch, which was merged into epel7.
>
> Fabio
It's working..
Thank you very much.
--
---
On 21/12/19 21:38, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 9:30 PM Antonio Trande wrote:
>>
>> On 21/12/19 21:19, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>>> On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 9:11 PM Antonio Trande
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi all.
>&g
On 21/12/19 21:19, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 9:11 PM Antonio Trande wrote:
>>
>> Hi all.
>>
>> Please, can you help me to remove this last commit on EPEL7 branch?
>>
>> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/petsc4py/c/e47fbb3ef419b7
Hi all.
Please, can you help me to remove this last commit on EPEL7 branch?
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/petsc4py/c/e47fbb3ef419b7be939108c2b1deff3f105bfdbc?branch=epel7
(I wish top return to the 3.11.0 release of petsc4py)
Regards.
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sag
Hi all.
`pymol` is currently a "dead package". I prepared a new src-rpm to
review it.
Review ticket: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1780849
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84
G
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1780849
On 07/12/19 12:51, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 07. 12. 19 12:46, Antonio Trande wrote:
>> I'm interested.
>
> Cool. At this point, it would need a new package review (pymol was
> retired more than 8 weeks ago). Feel free
gt;>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1754678
>
> Unfortunately, pymol needs an active maintainer. Since it is retired,
> any Fedora packager can request it to be unretired and become the owner
> of it.
>
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto &#
Add me as maintainer please.
On 28/11/19 19:07, Jan De Luyck wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> Due to time constraints in my private life (which have changed a lot
> lately) I'm going to orphan Notepadqq.
>
> If anybody is interested?
>
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora P
$ repoquery --release rawhide --disablerepo=*
--enablerepo=updates-source --enablerepo=fedora-source --whatrequires
python2-scons
minicomputer-0:1.41-26.fc31.src
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84
GPG key ser
> python-socksipychain
> python-subprocess32
> python-volatility
> python2-more-itertools
> python2-pluggy
> python2-pytest
> rocket-depot
> seafile
> seafile-client
> seahorse-adventures
> shedskin
> slingshot
> squeal
> sx
> system-config-ht
rchives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7
GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digita
gt; https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sag
Hi all.
I wish to maintain libcutl, recently orphaned.
Ticket #8882: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8882
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7
GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/
signature.asc
Descriptio
=1759306
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7
GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing lis
the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/future/pull-request/5
--
*--Antonio Trande*
*mail*: mailto:sagit...@fedoraproject.org
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le
a good indicator if we need to fix
> something in borg.
>
> Felix
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7
GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/
signature.
:15.
R-argon2-0:0.2.0-6.fc31.src
borgbackup-0:1.1.10-4.fc32.src
gtkhash-0:1.2-1.fc32.src
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7
GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
mypaint-0:1.2.1-20.fc30.src
On 28/08/19 13:08, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 28. 08. 19 13:02, Antonio Trande wrote:
>> I guess we need to keep `python2-reportlab` and `python2-scons`.
> For what?
>
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproj
ft an exception request.
>
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7
GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
libgnustep-base.so.1.25()(64bit)
> unar-1.10.1-12.fc31.x86_64
> libgnustep-base.so.1.25()(64bit)
>
> You'd need to rebuild unar too.
>
> On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 1:01 PM Antonio Trande wrote:
>>
>> Scratch build:
Scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=37267892
On 25/08/19 12:38, Antonio Trande wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> 'gnustep-base' package will be pushed on Rawhide in 10 days.
>
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fed
tes Source
764 kB/s | 7.6 MB
00:10
Fedora rawhide - Source
719 kB/s | 7.6 MB
00:10
Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:02 ago on dom 25 ago 2019, 12:37:41.
*openvpn-auth-ldap-0:2.0.3-28.fc31.src
*
*raidem-0:0.3.1-39.fc31.src
*
--
-
Hi all.
'python-devel-2.7.5-86.el7' requires 'python(2)-rpm-macros > 3-30' on
EPEL7 ppc64le only?
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=36879492&volume=DEFAULT&name=root.log&offset=-4000
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sa
Thank you Robert.
On 08/08/19 20:45, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> On Thursday, 8 August 2019 19:11:32 CEST Antonio Trande wrote:
>> Hi all.
>>
>> Please, can anyone explain to me why an EPEL7 branch for sundials2
>> cannot be created?
>>
>> https://src.fe
Hi all.
Please, can anyone explain to me why an EPEL7 branch for sundials2
cannot be created?
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/sundials2/branches?branchname=master
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/14973
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedorapr
Hi all.
Package review of Sundials2:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1733704
Available to reviewing another package in return.
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7
GPG key server: https://keys.o
-- Forwarded message -
From: Antonio Trande
Date: Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 3:27 AM
Subject: Re: MUMPS-5.2.1 coming on rawhide
To: Adam Williamson
I had rebuilt all them including the bootstrap step of Clp of course.
10 days have passed since then, i have erased those rebuilds.
This
On 30/07/19 19:35, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, 2019-07-21 at 11:10 +0200, Antonio Trande wrote:
>> Hi all.
>>
>> MUMPS-5.2.1 is coming on Rawhide.
>> Involved packages have been rebuilt on Copr for testing:
>> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sagitter/
command completely.
>
> Do this in rawhide (Fedora 31+) only.
>
> Thanks...
>
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7
GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
Hi all.
MUMPS-5.2.1 is coming on Rawhide.
Involved packages have been rebuilt on Copr for testing:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sagitter/ForTesting/builds/
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7
GPG
elines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7
GPG key server: https://keys
Hi all.
If someone knows William Moreno, please contact him to close this bug
ticket:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1600316
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7
GPG key server: https://keys.fedorap
:0.4.4-1.fc31.src
moose-0:3.1.4-5.fc31.src
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7
GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
Hi all.
Sundials 4 is coming on Rawhide branch.
Dependent packages are Octave (rebuilt) and neuron (not ready for recent
Sundials).
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7
GPG key server: https://keys.fedorap
s/sundials/release-history
[2]
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sagitter/ForTesting/build/885954/
Any disagreement?
Best regards.
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7
GPG
t; planned first.
>
> Regards,
> --
> Jerry James
> http://www.jamezone.org/
>
Batch rebuild complete:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sagitter/ForTesting/builds/
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x6e033
edoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
Add me, please.
My FAS: sagitter
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7
GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/
sig
Dear list.
I see often this "packaging style" of the documentation files:
%doc %{_docdir}/%{name}/html
Is it correct tagging an absolute path with %doc?
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7
G
Thank you, Todd.
Output attached and posted in
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/7704
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7
GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/
fedpkg_test.tar.xz
D
On 10/04/19 05:50, Jerry James wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 4:21 AM Antonio Trande wrote:
>> We can complete the coin-or-Bonmin, coin-or-Couenne, coin-or-Dip,
>> coin-or-OS reviews before, of course.
>>
>> Let me check them.
>
> I had hoped to get a COPR set
On 09/04/19 22:29, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 4/9/19 9:27 AM, Antonio Trande wrote:
>> On 08/04/19 19:45, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
>>> Em seg, 8 de abr de 2019 às 10:09, Antonio Trande
>>> escreveu:
>>>>
>>>> Hi all.
>>>
>&g
On 08/04/19 19:45, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
> Em seg, 8 de abr de 2019 às 10:09, Antonio Trande
> escreveu:
>>
>> Hi all.
>
> Hi,
>
> Just a guess that it was the same issue as for me a few days ago. But it
> might
> be something else, li
On 09/04/19 06:31, Jerry James wrote:
> Hi Antonio,
Hi Jerry.
>
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 12:26 PM Antonio Trande <mailto:anto.tra...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> Hi all.
>>
>> Updates of coin-or-Sample/CoinUtils/Ipopt packages are coming on
>> Rawhide; invo
Builds tested on Copr:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sagitter/ForTesting/builds/
Let me know if any problem comes out before commit these changes.
Best regards.
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7
GPG
uld not execute import_srpm: Fail to upload files. Server returns
status 408
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7
GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/
signature.asc
Description:
Hello.
Please, take a look to this issue
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680315
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7
GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/
signature.asc
Description: OpenP
://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sagitter/ForTesting/builds/
OpenImageIO is OK
aeskulap-0:0.2.2 does not built for a known bug
(https://github.com/jenslody/aeskulap/issues/14)
ctk updated si OK
gtatool-2.2.2 compile but some tests are failing (upstream informed)
orthanc is OK
vxl is OK
--
---
Antonio Trande
Hi all.
I abandoned qblade packaging because upstream is unresponsive (as always).
Currently, qblade does not compile with gcc9.
Upstream project: https://sourceforge.net/projects/qblade/
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org
min
> rights to add you to it. Sorry.
>
> @sagitter, would you please be able to add Artur as a co-maintainer?
>
Done.
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7
GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.o
_
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives
://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7
GPG key s
raproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedo
Thank you Hans.
On 20/11/18 09:58, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 17-11-18 12:18, Antonio Trande wrote:
>> Regarding https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libtimidity/pull-requests,
>> please i need permissions to build libtimidity on epel7 branch.
>>
>> On 15/
Regarding https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libtimidity/pull-requests,
please i need permissions to build libtimidity on epel7 branch.
On 15/11/18 13:22, Antonio Trande wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Please, take a look to
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=
Hello!
Please, take a look to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1630466
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libtimidity/pull-requests
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x5E212EE1D35568BE
GPG key ser
Hi all.
I'm going to update HDF to the release 4.2.14 on f29+.
If your need to test it before, this is the scratch build just done on
fc30: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=30641568
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot or
"IBM to acquire Red Hat in deal valued at $34 billion"
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/10/28/ibm-is-reportedly-nearing-deal-to-acquire-red-hat.html
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x5E212EE1D35568BE
G
Hello everyone.
In reference to the bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1639646, is anyone else ran
into this problem with OpenMPI recently?
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x5E212EE1D35568BE
GPG key ser
Hi all.
I'm orphaning 'mozilla-requestpolicy' package.
Feel free to adopt it.
Best regards.
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x5E212EE1D35568BE
GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/
signature.asc
Des
python2-twitter-0:3.3-5.fc29.noarch
python2-vertica-0:0.7.4-1.fc30.noarch
rho-0:0.0.34-2.fc29.noarch
sagemath-0:8.2-4.fc29.src
sagemath-0:8.2-4.fc29.x86_64
tracer-0:0.7.0-3.fc29.src
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x5E212EE1D35568
Hi all.
I'm going to retire the packages 'nini' and 'smuxi' on rawhide within
24h since now. Both upstream project look like over.
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x5E212EE1D35568BE
GPG key ser
te to XZ.
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7712
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x5E212EE1D35568BE
GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
situation of these packages in a middle-term scenario in
respect of Python2 removal proposal?
Best regards.
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x5E212EE1D35568BE
GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/
signature.as
What's your FAS account?
On 23/08/2018 03:16, Manas Mangaonkar wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Kindly assign it to me.
>
> On Wed, 22 Aug 2018, 23:32 Antonio Trande, <mailto:anto.tra...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Hello everyone.
>
> I'm leaving the mainte
1 - 100 of 333 matches
Mail list logo
