Any movement on this? MyGUI is in the process of being unretired and
once it is I'd like to get to work packaging openMW ASAP. Am I good to
use a double precision build linked statically, or should I wait?
On 6/8/25 21:28, Cristian Le via devel wrote:
On 8 June 2025 21:01:03 CEST, Claire R wr
On Sat, Jun 14, 2025 at 1:21 AM Peter Hutterer wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 10:05:32AM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > V Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 03:27:49PM +1000, Peter Hutterer napsal(a):
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > A tricky (for me) packaging question:
> > > xkeyboard-config 2.45 upstream changed
This is the first batch of bugs reported regarding the use of systemctl to
signal daemons in logrotate postrotate scripts.
Prerequisite for systemctl kill:
- selinux-policy: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2369644
Cases where the ExecReload action of the daemon's unit file sends the
On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 10:05:32AM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
> V Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 03:27:49PM +1000, Peter Hutterer napsal(a):
> > Hi all,
> >
> > A tricky (for me) packaging question:
> > xkeyboard-config 2.45 upstream changed the installation directory to
> > make future multi-version installs
"Do you use Flatpaks? If yes, please rank your preference for the
flatpak collection you prefer to use"
But in fact there is no "no" and it's mandatory to give a preference
even if you don't use them? Even if you do use them maybe you don't
actually care about where they come from...
"How do yo
On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 2:39 PM Aoife Moloney via devel-announce
wrote:
> [2] https://fedoraproject.limequery.com/333434?lang=en
One question reads: "Do you use Flatpaks? If yes, please rank your
preference for the flatpak collection you prefer to use"
It is not possible to answer No to this que
On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 11:10:22AM +, Dave Love wrote:
> I want to get something built for epel10 that I realize is orphaned
> (only) in EPEL. What's the correct procedure to adopt it in EPEL? The
> docs don't seem to cover that case. Does one just submit a releng
> ticket for the EPEL branc
Why have one when you can have two surveys ;-)
We also have the Flock to Fedora event survey[1] live too! This survey is
for everyone - whether you attended in person, joined us online or gave
Flock a skip this year. We want to hear your feedback from wherever your
position may have been for Flock
Hi all,
During the opening remarks at Flock to Fedora[1], we launched this year's
Fedora User and Contributor survey[2]. This survey is intended to help the
Fedora Project Leadership and others who are interested in understanding
our community and project ecosystem better, in order to help us mak
On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 9:33 PM Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>
> > Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski via devel
> > writes:
>
> > What do colon (:) and at (@) signs mean? What is "parent" or "mod"?
> > What are "profiles" in Maven options? None of this is explained, so
> > it's difficult to s
On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 9:21 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski via
devel wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> On Friday, 13 June 2025 at 18:21, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> > I'm excited to announce the preview availability of declarative Maven
> > RPM builds in Fedora 43 -- a new approach to RPM packaging for
> > Mav
> Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski via devel
> writes:
> What do colon (:) and at (@) signs mean? What is "parent" or "mod"?
> What are "profiles" in Maven options? None of this is explained, so
> it's difficult to start using this if someone has no experience with
> Maven.
I've always fe
Hi!
On Friday, 13 June 2025 at 18:21, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> I'm excited to announce the preview availability of declarative Maven
> RPM builds in Fedora 43 -- a new approach to RPM packaging for
> Maven-based Java projects
[...]
> This feature is currently in preview. So far, a single package
Hi all,
I'm excited to announce the preview availability of declarative Maven
RPM builds in Fedora 43 -- a new approach to RPM packaging for
Maven-based Java projects that focuses on simplicity, consistency, and
future automation. This functionality is already usable today, though
it is still unde
On 25-06-12 17:18, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 12. 06. 25 17:02, Łukasz Wojniłowicz wrote:
Thanks. I wrote that, because bugzilla mentioned python-click. I
didn't know that bugzilla wasn't working properly. It's confusing.
So the bugzilla says "nothing provides python3.13dist(click) needed by
pyth
I want to get something built for epel10 that I realize is orphaned
(only) in EPEL. What's the correct procedure to adopt it in EPEL? The
docs don't seem to cover that case. Does one just submit a releng
ticket for the EPEL branches, contact the maintainer to get
co-maintainership, or what?
--
V Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 03:27:49PM +1000, Peter Hutterer napsal(a):
> Hi all,
>
> A tricky (for me) packaging question:
> xkeyboard-config 2.45 upstream changed the installation directory to
> make future multi-version installs possible. Traditionally files were
> installed in /usr/share/X11/xkb wi
17 matches
Mail list logo
