Re: updates for "Change: Replace Redis with Valkey"

2025-05-03 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 5/3/25 9:29 PM, Robby Callicotte via devel wrote: On Saturday, May 3, 2025 2:38:25 AM Central Daylight Time deepika Sharma wrote: The redis folks have recently moved away from their source-available license (RSAL) in favor of AGPLv3[1] for Redis 8. Just wanted to point this out. I don't thin

Re: updates for "Change: Replace Redis with Valkey"

2025-05-03 Thread Robby Callicotte via devel
On Saturday, May 3, 2025 2:38:25 AM Central Daylight Time deepika Sharma wrote: > The change to replace Redis with Valkey is primarily motivated by licensing > and community support concerns. Redis recently moved to a more restrictive > source-available license (RSAL), which has implications for o

Fedora eln compose report: 20250504.n.0 changes

2025-05-03 Thread Fedora ELN Report
OLD: Fedora-eln-20250503.n.0 NEW: Fedora-eln-20250504.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 7 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of

Re: apcupsd: co-maintainers needed

2025-05-03 Thread Germano Massullo
I added you as admin. Thank you -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Gui

Unannounced / uncoordinated soname bump: magma

2025-05-03 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hi all, The update to magma 2.9.0 that landed in rawhide a few hours ago bumped the soname for libmagma.so (from `libmagma.so.2.8.0()(64bit)` to `libmagma.so.2.9.0()(64bit)`) which was not announced or coordinated with dependent packages. The only directly impacted package seems to be "python-tor

Re: rpmautospec issue - RPMAUTOSPEC: unresolvable merge

2025-05-03 Thread Leigh Scott
Thanks, that fixed it. -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines:

Re: Bugs that maintainers don't respond to

2025-05-03 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sat, May 3, 2025 at 7:15 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Dne 03. 05. 25 v 4:33 odp. Chris Adams napsal(a): > > What do you do with bugs that never get addressed in any way? I've got > > a few bugs that I've been testing and rolling over to newer Fedora > > releases for years, with little or no ma

Re: Bugs that maintainers don't respond to

2025-05-03 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, May 03, 2025 at 09:33:01AM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > What do you do with bugs that never get addressed in any way? I've got > a few bugs that I've been testing and rolling over to newer Fedora > releases for years, with little or no maintainer response (not even > bothering to CLOSE WONT

Re: rpmautospec issue - RPMAUTOSPEC: unresolvable merge

2025-05-03 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga
On 2025-05-03 00:55, Leigh Scott wrote: How do you fix this? Changelog * Fri May 02 2025 Leigh Scott - 0.6.0-11 - RPMAUTOSPEC: unresolvable merge https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2708589 See docs.pagure.org Peculiarities of rpmautospec — rpmautospec documentation

Re: Bugs that maintainers don't respond to

2025-05-03 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Dne 03. 05. 25 v 4:33 odp. Chris Adams napsal(a): What do you do with bugs that never get addressed in any way? I've got a few bugs that I've been testing and rolling over to newer Fedora releases for years, with little or no maintainer response (not even bothering to CLOSE WONTFIX). It's still

Re: Bugs that maintainers don't respond to

2025-05-03 Thread Leigh Scott
Since abrt was added to fedora I barely bother looking at them, they rarely include steps to reproduce the issue. auto-closing old bugs is the best way to clear the trash. -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an

Bugs that maintainers don't respond to

2025-05-03 Thread Chris Adams
What do you do with bugs that never get addressed in any way? I've got a few bugs that I've been testing and rolling over to newer Fedora releases for years, with little or no maintainer response (not even bothering to CLOSE WONTFIX). It's still a bug, so I don't like to close it... but if nobody

Re: Any Ruby folks interested in bringing back Taskjuggler?

2025-05-03 Thread Benson Muite
On Wed, Apr 30, 2025, at 4:47 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote: > On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 13:44:05 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> Seems this is the failing test suite, right? >> https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/ankursinha/rubygem-taskjuggler/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08910683-rubygem-taskjuggler/bu

rpmautospec issue - RPMAUTOSPEC: unresolvable merge

2025-05-03 Thread Leigh Scott
How do you fix this? Changelog * Fri May 02 2025 Leigh Scott - 0.6.0-11 - RPMAUTOSPEC: unresolvable merge https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2708589 -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe se

Re: updates for "Change: Replace Redis with Valkey"

2025-05-03 Thread deepika Sharma
The change to replace Redis with Valkey is primarily motivated by licensing and community support concerns. Redis recently moved to a more restrictive source-available license (RSAL), which has implications for open-source use and integration into certain ecosystems. In contrast, Valkey is a com