Have taken python-oscrypto which was orphaned.
Benson
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/co
OLD: Fedora-eln-20250411.n.0
NEW: Fedora-eln-20250412.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 17
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 11:53:50AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> A few years ago we had the initalitive to get rid of problematic terms
> like "master"/"slave". Git changed its default branch name to 'main',
> we changed our default dist-git name to 'rawhide' (*). We al
On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 08:01:02AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
...snip...
>
> Two options have been floated:
> - a separate gdm-x11 package: certainly an option, but a bit of work,
> and upstream might drop the X11 code anyway.
I think thats a 's/might/will' ie, they are definitel
Howdy,
Back at Flock 2024 when we first started branching EPEL10 I set out on a
mission to get dnf5 into EPEL10. Now, about 6 months later, I'm happy to
announce that it is finally coming!
I'd like to especially thank David Cantrell and Marek Blaha for helping to
make all of the pieces align for
Em qui., 27 de mar. de 2025 às 09:00, Kamil Paral escreveu:
>
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 8:22 PM Mateus Rodrigues Costa
> wrote:
>>
>> Mine is the Epson L3150, it is connected to my Wifi network and
>
>
> I have an Epson L3160, I assume it should behave the same as yours. It's also
> connected t
Hi Peter,
Thanks for reaching out! Sure, let me know how I can help.
On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 1:17 AM Peter Boy Uni wrote:
> Hi Andrei,
>
> > Am 10.04.2025 um 23:27 schrieb Andrei Mititelu <
> andreimititel...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I'm Andrei, a 27 year old developer from Roma
On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 3:38 PM Ben Beasley wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2025, at 7:41 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 6:35 AM Ben Beasley
> wrote:
> >> In one week, 2025-04-15, or slightly later, I plan to update
> >> openshadinglanguage from 1.13.12.0 to 1.14.5.0 in F43/Rawhide[1]
Hi,
sdbus-cpp 2.1.0 is coming to rawhide. Its only dependent packages are dnf5
and xdg-desktop-portal-hyprland.
dnf5 has already been rebuilt in the side tag f43-build-side-109870. If
xdg-desktop-portal-hyprland is not built in the side tag within about a
week I'll ask a provenpackager to help
On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 7:54 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> A few years ago we had the initalitive to get rid of problematic terms
> like "master"/"slave". Git changed its default branch name to 'main',
> we changed our default dist-git name to 'rawhide' (*). We also
> adj
Hi folks,
A few years ago we had the initalitive to get rid of problematic terms
like "master"/"slave". Git changed its default branch name to 'main',
we changed our default dist-git name to 'rawhide' (*). We also
adjusted various terms in documentation in many places.
But some pockets of stale n
In one week, 2025-04-18, or slightly later, I plan to update rapidyaml
from 0.8.0 to 0.9.0 in F43/Rawhide[1]. This is an ABI-incompatible
update that changes the SONAME version. At the same time, I will update
c4core, a utility support library for rapidyaml, from 0.2.5 to 0.2.6 –
also with an S
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250410.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250411.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 10
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 62
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 6.39 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
OLD: Fedora-42-20250410.n.0
NEW: Fedora-42-20250411.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 7
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
On Fri, Apr 11 2025 at 09:41:50 +02:00:00, Jan Grulich
wrote:
I submitted the update to F41. I checked the changelog and didn't see
any breaking changes. I assume
it was bumped to 0.9.0 for the reason there is a Notifications v2
portal.
Alright and thank you!
Regards,
Tomi
--
_
On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 03:35:06PM -0400, Eduard Lucena wrote:
> Can we go ahead in time and let kevin to create the gdm-x11 package? We
> already know how this is going to be:
>
> - The SIG is going to say they don't have bandwidth, hands or time to
> support tickets with problems for x11
> - Kev
pá 11. 4. 2025 v 9:04 odesílatel Tomi Lähteenmäki napsal:
> On Fri, Apr 11 2025 at 08:35:01 +02:00:00, Jan Grulich <
> jgrul...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> It was actually done already last week. There was just no update submitted
> for Fedora 41.
>
>
> Yes the maintainer libportal merged the v0.9.1 u
On Fri, Apr 11 2025 at 08:35:01 +02:00:00, Jan Grulich
wrote:
It was actually done already last week. There was just no update
submitted for Fedora 41.
Yes the maintainer libportal merged the v0.9.1 update to F41 but didn't
do the update because there was that 0.9.0 build that was abandoned a
18 matches
Mail list logo
