OLD: Fedora-eln-20250408.n.0
NEW: Fedora-eln-20250409.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 22
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
Dear all,
We have an EPEL-only package, iptables-epel, that provides the legacy
packages dropped by the main iptables package in RHEL/CentOS 9 and
above.
It has recently come to light that this package is not necessary in
most cases: if you're using a stock CentOS/RHEL kernel, it's built with
CON
On Tue, Apr 8, 2025, at 7:41 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 6:35 AM Ben Beasley wrote:
>> In one week, 2025-04-15, or slightly later, I plan to update
>> openshadinglanguage from 1.13.12.0 to 1.14.5.0 in F43/Rawhide[1].
>
> I've slept too many times since then, but isn't this on
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00 UTC in #meeting:fedoraproject.org
on Matrix.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2025-04-08 17:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
On Tue, 8 Apr 2025 at 04:57, Lukas Javorsky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The GNU project `sharutils` raised a question in upstream mailing list if
> there is still a need for this package. [1]
>
>
As others mentioned uudecode and uuencode are still used in a lot of
places. I thought at one time they were out
On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 6:35 AM Ben Beasley wrote:
> In one week, 2025-04-15, or slightly later, I plan to update
> openshadinglanguage from 1.13.12.0 to 1.14.5.0 in F43/Rawhide[1].
>
I've slept too many times since then, but isn't this one of the main
reasons OpenImageIO could not be upgraded to
In one week, 2025-04-15, or slightly later, I plan to update
openshadinglanguage from 1.13.12.0 to 1.14.5.0 in F43/Rawhide[1].
This is an ABI-incompatible update that changes the SONAME version from
1.13 to 1.14. There are also API changes[2], but all dependent packages
are compatible without
On 08/04/2025 10:55, Lukas Javorsky wrote:
if there is still a need for this package
uuencode is still useful for getting binary data from Fedora Koji
(coredumps or preprocessed TU files after the compiler ICEs).
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
--
_
On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 10:55:15AM +0200, Lukas Javorsky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The GNU project `sharutils` raised a question in upstream mailing list if
> there
> is still a need for this package. [1]
>
> I identified multiple packages that still depend on sharutils (some of them
> are
> crucial for
V Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 10:55:15AM +0200, Lukas Javorsky napsal(a):
> The GNU project `sharutils` raised a question in upstream mailing list if
> there is still a need for this package. [1]
>
> I identified multiple packages that still depend on sharutils (some of them
> are crucial for Fedora), so
On Tue, 8 Apr 2025 10:55:15 +0200
Lukas Javorsky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The GNU project `sharutils` raised a question in upstream mailing list if
> there is still a need for this package. [1]
>
> I identified multiple packages that still depend on sharutils (some of them
> are crucial for Fedora), so
Hi,
The GNU project `sharutils` raised a question in upstream mailing list if
there is still a need for this package. [1]
I identified multiple packages that still depend on sharutils (some of them
are crucial for Fedora), so I wanted to raise this question with you and
find out if these requirem
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250407.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250408.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 7
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 184
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 1.62 MiB
Size of dropped packages
13 matches
Mail list logo