Fedora eln compose report: 20250409.n.0 changes

2025-04-08 Thread Fedora ELN Report
OLD: Fedora-eln-20250408.n.0 NEW: Fedora-eln-20250409.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 22 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of

Heads-up: planning to retire iptables-epel

2025-04-08 Thread Michel Lind
Dear all, We have an EPEL-only package, iptables-epel, that provides the legacy packages dropped by the main iptables package in RHEL/CentOS 9 and above. It has recently come to light that this package is not necessary in most cases: if you're using a stock CentOS/RHEL kernel, it's built with CON

Re: Heads-up: openshadinglanguage 1.14.5.0 coming to Rawhide

2025-04-08 Thread Ben Beasley
On Tue, Apr 8, 2025, at 7:41 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 6:35 AM Ben Beasley wrote: >> In one week, 2025-04-15, or slightly later, I plan to update >> openshadinglanguage from 1.13.12.0 to 1.14.5.0 in F43/Rawhide[1]. > > I've slept too many times since then, but isn't this on

Schedule for Tuesday's FESCo Meeting (2025-04-08)

2025-04-08 Thread Fabio Alessandro Locati via devel
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00 UTC in #meeting:fedoraproject.org on Matrix. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2025-04-08 17:00 UTC' Links to all issues to be

Re: Is 'sharutils' still needed in Fedora?

2025-04-08 Thread Stephen Smoogen
On Tue, 8 Apr 2025 at 04:57, Lukas Javorsky wrote: > Hi, > > The GNU project `sharutils` raised a question in upstream mailing list if > there is still a need for this package. [1] > > As others mentioned uudecode and uuencode are still used in a lot of places. I thought at one time they were out

Re: Heads-up: openshadinglanguage 1.14.5.0 coming to Rawhide

2025-04-08 Thread Richard Shaw
On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 6:35 AM Ben Beasley wrote: > In one week, 2025-04-15, or slightly later, I plan to update > openshadinglanguage from 1.13.12.0 to 1.14.5.0 in F43/Rawhide[1]. > I've slept too many times since then, but isn't this one of the main reasons OpenImageIO could not be upgraded to

Heads-up: openshadinglanguage 1.14.5.0 coming to Rawhide

2025-04-08 Thread Ben Beasley
In one week, 2025-04-15, or slightly later, I plan to update openshadinglanguage from 1.13.12.0 to 1.14.5.0 in F43/Rawhide[1]. This is an ABI-incompatible update that changes the SONAME version from 1.13 to 1.14. There are also API changes[2], but all dependent packages are compatible without

Re: Is 'sharutils' still needed in Fedora?

2025-04-08 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 08/04/2025 10:55, Lukas Javorsky wrote: if there is still a need for this package uuencode is still useful for getting binary data from Fedora Koji (coredumps or preprocessed TU files after the compiler ICEs). -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) -- _

Re: Is 'sharutils' still needed in Fedora?

2025-04-08 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 10:55:15AM +0200, Lukas Javorsky wrote: > Hi, > > The GNU project `sharutils` raised a question in upstream mailing list if > there > is still a need for this package. [1] > > I identified multiple packages that still depend on sharutils (some of them > are > crucial for

Re: Is 'sharutils' still needed in Fedora?

2025-04-08 Thread Petr Pisar
V Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 10:55:15AM +0200, Lukas Javorsky napsal(a): > The GNU project `sharutils` raised a question in upstream mailing list if > there is still a need for this package. [1] > > I identified multiple packages that still depend on sharutils (some of them > are crucial for Fedora), so

Re: Is 'sharutils' still needed in Fedora?

2025-04-08 Thread Dan Horák
On Tue, 8 Apr 2025 10:55:15 +0200 Lukas Javorsky wrote: > Hi, > > The GNU project `sharutils` raised a question in upstream mailing list if > there is still a need for this package. [1] > > I identified multiple packages that still depend on sharutils (some of them > are crucial for Fedora), so

Is 'sharutils' still needed in Fedora?

2025-04-08 Thread Lukas Javorsky
Hi, The GNU project `sharutils` raised a question in upstream mailing list if there is still a need for this package. [1] I identified multiple packages that still depend on sharutils (some of them are crucial for Fedora), so I wanted to raise this question with you and find out if these requirem

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20250408.n.0 changes

2025-04-08 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250407.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250408.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 7 Dropped packages:2 Upgraded packages: 184 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 1.62 MiB Size of dropped packages