On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 06:43:09PM -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> Problem 6: package hyperscan-devel-5.4.1-8.fc42.x86_64 from fedora requires
> hyperscan(x86-64) = 5.4.1-8.fc42, but none of the providers can be installed
> - package vectorscan-5.4.11-9.fc42.x86_64 from fedora obsoletes hyperscan <
OLD: Fedora-eln-20250318.n.0
NEW: Fedora-eln-20250319.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 36
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 471.51 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 12:05 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> * TOPIC: #3377 cmake 4.0 breaks compatibility, was updated without a Change
> Request (@zbyszek:fedora.im, 17:15:59)
> * AGREED: (+5, 0, 0) (@zbyszek:fedora.im, 17:38:44)
> * AGREED: We ask releng to untag cmake-4.0.x b
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250318.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250318.n.2
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 78
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 917.25 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0
On 3/18/25 18:22, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 11:14 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 09:13:44PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
cmake-3.31.6-1.fc43 /
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2665333
is the latest cmake-3.x build and koji
On 3/11/25 1:29 AM, Ben Beasley wrote:
In one week, 2025-03-18, or slightly later, in collaboration
with Scott Logan (FAS: cottsay), I plan to update spatialindex from
1.9.3 to 2.1.0 in F43/Rawhide[1].
I just merged this side tag[1].
It turns out that qgis started to FTBFS after I announced a
On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 4:14 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> yeah, sorry about that. This is fixed now.
Thank you for the quick fix, Kevin!
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send
On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 11:14 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 09:13:44PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > cmake-3.31.6-1.fc43 /
> > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2665333
> > is the latest cmake-3.x build and koji shows it doesn't have any tag
On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 09:13:44PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 02:59:09PM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 12:05 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > wrote:
> > > * TOPIC: #3377 cmake 4.0 breaks compatibility, was updated without a
> > >
On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 02:59:09PM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 12:05 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> > * TOPIC: #3377 cmake 4.0 breaks compatibility, was updated without a Change
> > Request (@zbyszek:fedora.im, 17:15:59)
> > * AGREED: (+5, 0, 0) (@zbyszek:fe
The Fedora Linux 42 beta was released today[[1]]. The Fedora CoreOS `next`
stream
has been rebased and is currently rolling out. This is a preview of what is
coming
to the `testing` and `stable` streams when Fedora Linux 42 is released in the
coming
months.
For more information about Fedora 42
Text Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2025-03-18/fesco.2025-03-18-17.00.log.txt
HTML Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2025-03-18/fesco.2025-03-18-17.00.log.html
Text Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_m
Hello,
I've opened a non-responsive ticket for squeekboard, maintained by David
Bold [1].
Whilst David was somewhat responsive in earlier PRs, the experience was
still a little .. strange. They merged the first batch of two PRs I
submitted without *any* direct communication whatsoever (even when
On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 06:43:09PM -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> Problem 2: installed package kf5-kitinerary-23.08.5-3.fc41.x86_64 requires
> libpoppler.so.140()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
> - installed package kf5-kitinerary-23.08.5-3.fc41.x86_64 requires
> libpoppler.so
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00 UTC in #meeting:fedoraproject.org
on Matrix.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2025-03-18 17:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
On 2025/03/18 11:35, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
At the technical level, you may be completely right. But at the level
of the organization of the work in the distro, this change is very
disruptive.
Yes, I am not arguing that the pushing of my PR without a change
proposal was a bad idea
On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 10:55:21AM +0100, Cristian Le via devel wrote:
> On 2025/03/18 0:56, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
>
> > Cristian Le via devel wrote:
> > > Coming back to `LIB_SUFFIX` and `*_INSTALL_DIR`, those should have never
> > > been added globally [2]
> > Why not?
>
> All of those,
The mesa-freeworld issue is probably caused by a bad mirror, 25.0.1 is present
in the base repo
https://ftp.icm.edu.pl/pub/Linux/dist/rpmfusion/free/fedora/development/42/Everything/x86_64/os/repoview/mesa-va-drivers-freeworld.html
As for steam, it's a known issue
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sh
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250317.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250318.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 5
Dropped packages:4
Upgraded packages: 156
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 4.20 MiB
Size of dropped packages
I have checked the rpmfusion repo's for F42 and they are ready for beta release
$ sudo dnf repoclosure --check rpmfusion-free-updates-testing --check
rpmfusion-free --check rpmfusion-nonfree-updates-testing --check
rpmfusion-nonfree --newest
Updating and loading repositories:
Repositories load
20 matches
Mail list logo
