Re: Orphaning naev, naev-data

On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 10:25:38PM +, Jonathan Dieter wrote: > Hey everyone, > > Naev now has a new dependency on lyaml which is not yet in Fedora. I > don't really play the game anymore, so I'm orphaning it. There are two > packages, naev (the game) and naev-data (the game data files). If

F42 FTBFS: disagreement between /usr/include/linux/if_packet.h and /usr/include/netpacket/packet.h

Hi, Anyone encounter build problems in Rawhide (F42) related to redefinition of struct sockaddr_ll and struct packet_mreq between kernel headers and glibc? This compiled OK until F42, but is now failing. Not quite sure whether a fix is needed somewhere for this or whether this particular package

Fedora eln compose report: 20250125.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-eln-20250124.n.1 NEW: Fedora-eln-20250125.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:238 Upgraded packages: 45 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 94.04 KiB Size of dropped packages:242.02

Orphaning naev, naev-data

Hey everyone, Naev now has a new dependency on lyaml which is not yet in Fedora. I don't really play the game anymore, so I'm orphaning it. There are two packages, naev (the game) and naev-data (the game data files). If anyone's interested, go ahead and grab it! Thanks, Jonathan -- _

Re: Inadvertent mass-rebuild triggered soname bump in libnfs

On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 12:16:39PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2025-01-24 at 12:02 -0600, Michel Lind wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 05:07:45PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > Much like libtest, the mass rebuild has inadvertently bumped the soname > > > of libnfs. libnfs 6 was i

Re: Inadvertent mass-rebuild triggered soname bump in libnfs

On Fri, 2025-01-24 at 15:21 -0500, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > > On 1/24/25 14:46, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 06:57:57PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 6:02 PM Simo Sorce wrote: > > ...snip... > > > > > > Sorry, thanks. I forgot to note that ELN h

Re: Inadvertent mass-rebuild triggered soname bump in libnfs

On 1/24/25 14:46, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 06:57:57PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 6:02 PM Simo Sorce wrote: ...snip... Sorry, thanks. I forgot to note that ELN has a different %{dist} tag structure than Fedora. We include a "buildroot number" i

Re: Inadvertent mass-rebuild triggered soname bump in libnfs

On Fri, 2025-01-24 at 12:02 -0600, Michel Lind wrote: > On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 05:07:45PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Much like libtest, the mass rebuild has inadvertently bumped the soname > > of libnfs. libnfs 6 was in dist-git but had never been built for > > Rawhide (there were some atte

Re: Inadvertent mass-rebuild triggered soname bump in libnfs

On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 06:57:57PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 6:02 PM Simo Sorce wrote: ...snip... > > Sorry, thanks. I forgot to note that ELN has a different %{dist} tag > structure than Fedora. We include a "buildroot number" in the %{dist} which > we bump before

Re: [rfc] mass package change to introduce sysusers.d configs

On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 02:07:07PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 08:55:12AM +, Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 at 20:52, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > > > wrote: > > Is there a list of those packages? > > > > The first batch: > > > https:

ELN SIG meeting minutes for 24 Jan

Text Log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2025-01-24/eln.2025-01-24-17.01.log.txt HTML Log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2025-01-24/eln.2025-01-24-17.01.log.html Text Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matri

Re: Inadvertent mass-rebuild triggered soname bump in libnfs

On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 05:07:45PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > Much like libtest, the mass rebuild has inadvertently bumped the soname > of libnfs. libnfs 6 was in dist-git but had never been built for > Rawhide (there were some attempts in side tags, but they all seem to > have been garbage co

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired next week

On 1/24/25 04:56, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 24. 01. 25 6:13, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: On 1/23/25 03:30, Miro Hrončok wrote: qm-dsp    tartina qm-vamp-plugins   valtri https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/qm-dsp/pull-request/3 https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/qm-vamp-plugin

Re: Inadvertent mass-rebuild triggered soname bump in libnfs

On Fri, 2025-01-24 at 02:41 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 05:07:45PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Much like libtest, the mass rebuild has inadvertently bumped the soname > > of libnfs. libnfs 6 was in dist-git but had never been built for > > Rawhide (there were so

Re: [rfc] mass package change to introduce sysusers.d configs

Some of these packages might have the same issue as softhsm/opendnssec as they use the same user, but, currently user GECOS is different on both packages, causing systemd-sysuers to fail (or warn). IMHO, an approach similar to SPDX change should be made. Rafael On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 11:08 AM

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired next week

On Fri, 2025-01-24 at 10:56 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 24. 01. 25 6:13, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > > On 1/23/25 03:30, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > qm-dsp    tartina > > > qm-vamp-plugins   valtri > > > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/qm-dsp/pull-request/3 > > https:/

Re: [rfc] mass package change to introduce sysusers.d configs

On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 08:55:12AM +, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 at 20:52, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > Is there a list of those packages? > > The first batch: > > https://in.waw.pl/~zbyszek/fedora/sysusers_mass_spec_change_v1.diff.html ^ Those are the ones I have

Re: glibc issues: undefined symbol: _ZGVbN4v_cosf

* Iñaki Ucar: > Are there any issues with glibc in rawhide? I see build failures with > this error message in x86_64 and aarch64. See > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=128414652 I'm looking into it. It now reproduces on rawhide as well, not just ELN. Thanks, Florian -- ___

Re: glibc issues: undefined symbol: _ZGVbN4v_cosf

On 24. 01. 25 11:05, Iñaki Ucar wrote: Hi, Are there any issues with glibc in rawhide? I see build failures with this error message in x86_64 and aarch64. See https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/ taskinfo?taskID=128414652 https

glibc issues: undefined symbol: _ZGVbN4v_cosf

Hi, Are there any issues with glibc in rawhide? I see build failures with this error message in x86_64 and aarch64. See https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=128414652 Best, -- Iñaki Úcar -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedorapr

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired next week

On 24. 01. 25 6:13, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: On 1/23/25 03:30, Miro Hrončok wrote: qm-dsp    tartina qm-vamp-plugins   valtri https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/qm-dsp/pull-request/3 https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/qm-vamp-plugins/pull-request/2 (Those two should be

HEADS UP: cgnslib-4.5.0 landing in rawhide

Hi I'll be updating to cgnslib-4.5.0 in rawhide, building to the f42-build-side-104235 side tag. I'll also be rebuilding the following dependencies: gmsh paraview vtk Thanks Sandro -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To uns

wcstools and libpasastro FTB after mass rebuild

wcstools and libpasastro have incompatible code with GCC15 c++23. I'm in touch with libpasastro developer, while wcstools developer can only be reached out via email (but never had reply in previous attempts). I have managed to write patches to make them use c99 standard and workaround the rema

Re: [rfc] mass package change to introduce sysusers.d configs

On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 at 20:52, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Hi! > > In accordance with > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Mass_package_changes/, > I plan to do a "mass package change" to add sysusers.d config files for > all packages > which currently call 'useradd' and 'groupadd

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20250124.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250123.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250124.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:3 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 6 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 196 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 10.47 MiB Size of dropped packages:0

orphaned grib_api

Dear all, I have orphaned the grib_api package for Fedora (which is now also FTBFS since the F42 mass rebuild), both due to lack of time and since grib_api has now been unmaintained upstream for over 6 years. It is replaced by eccodes for those architectures that supports it. Upstream writes