On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 05:07:45PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > Much like libtest, the mass rebuild has inadvertently bumped the soname > of libnfs. libnfs 6 was in dist-git but had never been built for > Rawhide (there were some attempts in side tags, but they all seem to > have been garbage collected). The mass rebuild built it, so now libnfs > has gone from 5.x to 6.x and soname libnfs.so.14 to libnfs.so.16. This > actually does include a major API change, see upstream: > Would a policy requiring that packages like these have the commit reverted make sense?
If it's rpmautospec, then the release number need to be manually fiddled with, but it seems better than having a potential land mine. Best regards, -- _o) Michel Lind _( ) identities: https://keyoxide.org/5dce2e7e9c3b1cffd335c1d78b229d2f7ccc04f2 README: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Salimma#README
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
