OLD: Fedora-eln-20250102.n.0
NEW: Fedora-eln-20250103.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 20
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 37.16 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
Hi Matrew,
Welcome to Fedora
On Thu, Jan 2, 2025, at 4:13 PM, Matrew File wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I'm a long-time user of Fedora Workstation and an amateur Linux system
> administrator. My main interest is in the media processing
> infrastructure and desktop experience on the Linux platform.
Hello!
As of libxmp-4.6.1, upstream removed all LGPLv2+ code and the
full license is now:
0BSD AND BSD-3-Clause AND ISC AND MIT AND LicenseRef-Fedora-Public-Domain
It was "BSD and LGPLv2+ and MIT and Public Domain" before the automated
SPDX conversion.
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora https://fedora
On Thursday, January 2, 2025 5:17:06 PM EST Björn Persson wrote:
> Steve Grubb wrote:
> > * Remove the package and verify audit events exist for account and group
> > deletion (see above ausearch command).
>
> I was under the impression that it's common practice to leave user
> accounts and groups
Steve Grubb wrote:
> * Remove the package and verify audit events exist for account and group
> deletion (see above ausearch command).
I was under the impression that it's common practice to leave user
accounts and groups behind when packages are removed. The rationale I've
seen is that if the us
On Thu, Jan 02, 2025 at 12:12:10PM -0600, Michel Lind wrote:
> libkdumpfile 0.5.4 => 0.5.5 involves bumping its soname from 10 to 12
> (not quite semantic versioned, this one).
>
> This is also the last release with the deprecated Python bindings, which
> no other package in Fedora repos currently
libkdumpfile 0.5.4 => 0.5.5 involves bumping its soname from 10 to 12
(not quite semantic versioned, this one).
This is also the last release with the deprecated Python bindings, which
no other package in Fedora repos currently use, and those are already
removed upstream in favor of `pykdumpfile`:
Hello,
I would recommend a change to the testing description. See below...
On Tuesday, December 24, 2024 11:01:11 AM EST Aoife Moloney via devel-
announce wrote:
> Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPMSuportForSystemdSysusers
> Discussion thread -
> https://discussion.fedoraproject.or
On 25-01-01 21:49, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
Hello and Happy New Year!
I've just finished reviewing python's one. Could you please review
that one when time permits?
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2324137 python-eth-keyfile - Tools for
handling the encrypted keyfile format used to store private keys
Thanks, I raised this PR:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rabbitmq-server/pull-request/10
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
nbdkit - Flexible, fast NBD server with plu
On Thu, Jan 2, 2025 at 4:16 PM the Mulhern wrote:
>
> Not knowing how or why you use it or to what you are seeking an alternative:
>
> > cargo binstall git-delta
>
> Got me a useful executable called "delta" in my cargo directory.
>
> Thanks for mentioning it. It seem useful.
Just beware that whi
Yes, sounds like a good idea. Back then we pushed this patch because
of some specific OpenStack networking configuration AFAIK
On Thu, Jan 2, 2025 at 4:04 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
>
> I just wanted to raise the visibility of this one as it was filed a
> couple of weeks ago by the upstream m
I just wanted to raise the visibility of this one as it was filed a
couple of weeks ago by the upstream maintainer and seems serious:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2333072
The patch in question was apparently created by John Eckersberg and
added by Peter Lemenkov back in 2014-2016.
I am working to unretire python-angr. This also involves unretiring
python-cle and python-pyvex, as well as introducing a few other
dependencies. Here are the relevant bugs:
angr: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2335205
Dependencies:
cart: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2
As a Rawhide user, I am afraid that this will make packaged G-S
extensions harder to use. Currently, there are G-S version checks which
can be overridden and in the worst case, such extension is broken. But
the generated versions will prevent update of G-S for undefined period
of time.
Vít
According to
https://patchew.org/linux/20230908235115.2943486-1-npha...@gmail.com/, there is
no reason to use zbud/z3fold zpool allocators now comparing to zsmalloc, which
has became the default in upstream kernel.
But Fedora still uses zbud:
$ grep CONFIG_ZSWAP_ZPOOL /boot/config-6.12.6-200.f
Greetings,
I'm a long-time user of Fedora Workstation and an amateur Linux system
administrator. My main interest is in the media processing infrastructure and
desktop experience on the Linux platform. I'm looking forward to participating
in Fedora Packaging efforts, starting with revived suppo
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250101.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250102.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:6
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 10
Dropped packages:7
Upgraded packages: 128
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 4.34 MiB
Size of dropped packages
I've just realized that the unretirement process requires a formal
announcement on @devel, so here we are.
I'm in the process of unretire Java-WebSocket. The reason is to be able
to unbundle the sources from LibreOffice, since starting from 25.2.0.0
LO defaults are to use system's provided Java
19 matches
Mail list logo
