On Wed, 2024-12-18 at 02:19 +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> (*) The original announcement discussed behavior.
> That is basically conduct. And either there is
> a code for such behaviour (conduct) in which
> case the behaviour (conduct) can be measured
> against, or there is no such code, which me
OLD: Fedora-eln-20241217.n.0
NEW: Fedora-eln-20241218.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 29
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:9.81 MiB
Size of
On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 9:08 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Let me be clear - FESCo is *not* usurping CoC responsibilities.
From the currently available public information,
I disagree(*), but I trust the Council will
eventually review and clarify (as they seem to
have agreed to do).
Gary
(*) T
On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 10:03 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2024-12-16 at 15:42 -0500, David Cantrell wrote:
> > We neglected to make available the facts behind our decision quickly (In
> > some cases we were dealing with situations where reporters wanted to remain
> > anonymous
>
> This
On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 9:17 PM Leigh Scott wrote:
>
> I have already withdrawn my FESCo election votes as I don't think any of the
> candidates are fit to rule.
> --
Until we have an independent review of
what individuals knew, and when did they
know it, and what actions they took (or
did not t
On Fri, 2024-12-13 at 17:33 -0800, Josh Stone wrote:
> The Fedora Proven Packager Policy[1] reads: “Provenpackagers lend a
> hand
> when help is needed, always with a desire to improve the quality of
> Fedora. Prior to making changes, provenpackagers should try to
> communicate with owners of a pac
On Tue, 2024-12-17 at 21:09 +, Leigh Scott wrote:
> I have already withdrawn my FESCo election votes as I don't think any
> of the candidates are fit to rule.
the Committee voted – seven in favor, two against – to remove Peter
from the provenpackager
--
Sérgio M. B.
--
_
Yes, I agree that'd be the best way forward!
I, however, won't have cycles for its maintenance. On the other hand,
anybody who wants and has resources is welcome to package and maintain the
legacy packages and llvm 15 in the repositories.
On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 9:29 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <
I have already withdrawn my FESCo election votes as I don't think any of the
candidates are fit to rule.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduc
On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 9:20 PM Gary Buhrmaster
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 7:28 PM Matthew Miller
> wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure today of everything we need to do to make things right, but the
> > Council will work this week on immediate actions before the holiday, and
> > then longer-term
On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 7:28 PM Matthew Miller wrote:
> I'm not sure today of everything we need to do to make things right, but the
> Council will work this week on immediate actions before the holiday, and
> then longer-term in January.
Thank you for the update. I was especially
concerned abo
Hey everyone. I have a lot of thoughts on this, and they are hard to put in
order. The first one probably is "Oh god, please don't set everything on fire
right before the holidays". Close candidates, though, are:
* I know everyone involved here has Fedora's best interests and heart, and
works ha
Here's the final (mostly) failed list. I was able to fix butt with a simple
header include patch:
$ grep failed rebuild_status
butt: failed, fixed with patch
dillo: failed, config specifically looks for fltk 1.3.
flwkey: failed, config specifically looks for fltk 1.3.
giac: failed, non-trivial fix
On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 12:09 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
[snip]
> In some cases, if two
> individuals just can't get along and it begins to harm the project, it
> may become necessary to ask at least one of them to leave, at least
> temporarily, and may not even be clearcut who the guilty party is
Dne 17. 12. 24 v 14:37 Peter Robinson napsal(a):
On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 at 13:28, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 16. 12. 24 v 23:13 Miroslav Suchý napsal(a):
> Dne 16. 12. 24 v 7:03 odp. Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
>>
>> And based on my experience, I doubt this particular provenpackager
On Tue, Dec 17, 2024, 14:37 Peter Robinson wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 at 13:28, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>>
>> This is not recent example, but really bad example of PP's work IMHO:
>>
>>
>> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/c/c31c7edb6913eb7417ee68c59997548df2943dde
>>
>
> That was from
On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 at 13:28, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 16. 12. 24 v 23:13 Miroslav Suchý napsal(a):
> > Dne 16. 12. 24 v 7:03 odp. Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
> >>
> >> And based on my experience, I doubt this particular provenpackager
> >> status was stripped based on something like that.
> >>
> >
Dne 16. 12. 24 v 23:13 Miroslav Suchý napsal(a):
Dne 16. 12. 24 v 7:03 odp. Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
And based on my experience, I doubt this particular provenpackager
status was stripped based on something like that.
Sure, I guess we all agree that the line is fuzzy and probably not
very w
On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 01:49:27AM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 11:03 PM Adam Williamson
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2024-12-16 at 15:42 -0500, David Cantrell wrote:
> > > We neglected to make available the facts behind our decision quickly (In
> > > some cases we were dea
On 16/12/2024 21:43, Aoife Moloney via devel-announce wrote:
removed support for GPU Generations prior to the
12th Gen GPUs. This effectively means that any hardware released
before 2020 is no longer supported for OpenCL and oneAPI workloads.
If it removes such a huge list of hardware, a compat
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20241216.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20241217.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:4
Upgraded packages: 106
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 241.07 KiB
Size of dropped packages
Hi FESCo,
On behalf of FESCo, please accept our apology for how we communicated the
> news regarding the revocation of provenpackager privileges for Peter
> Robinson. This one was really difficult for us to figure out how best to
> communicate and we have made mistakes.
>
> We neglected to make a
On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 10:46 PM Kalev Lember wrote:
> I think Simone Caronni would be the best person for miniupnpc, but I can
> take it as well as a last resort if needed. I left it orphaned for now.
>
Taken, thanks.
--Simone
--
You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to
On 12/17/24 1:49 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
To be clear, none of the involved parties requested anonymity. The
FESCo ticket was filed privately to avoid pre-judgement on the mailing
list and so that FESCo could take their time discussing the issue. The
ticket just cannot be made public post-fact
24 matches
Mail list logo
