Re: Review request for python-durationpy

Hey! I've just reviewed this tiny one. Could you please grab one of these: * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2321898 - python-rlp - A Python implementation of Recursive Length Prefix encoding * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2321899 - python-eth-keys - A common API for Ethereum key operations * https://b

Fedora eln compose report: 20241105.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-eln-20241104.n.0 NEW: Fedora-eln-20241105.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 19 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of

Re: Fedora 42: The Answer to Life, The Universe and Everything

Michael J Gruber wrote: > silly name. It's just unhelpful. And as soon as we tag a name on a > release, some people will use it instead of the release number, adding > to the confusion. Yes, I remember this happening frequently, especially on the user list. It was annoying to have to google ever

Re: Fedora 42: The Answer to Life, The Universe and Everything

Hi Stephen, Btw.. On Monday, 2024-11-04 10:52:18 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > For the sake of keeping the conversation in one place, I do ask that > you reply on the Discussion thread, rather than on Fedora Devel, > please. This devel@lists does harmful Reply-To munging, so.. probably not.

Re: Tcl/Tk 9.0.0 rebase

On Monday, November 4, 2024 5:43:35 AM Eastern Standard Time Florian Weimer wrote: > The -ansi option requests C89 mode, and C89 does not have an inline > keyword. In C89, “static inline;” would have been a variable of type > int called “inline”, so the compiler's suggestion is technically > corr

Re: Fedora 42: The Answer to Life, The Universe and Everything

Hi, On Monday, 2024-11-04 10:52:18 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > I’d like to propose that we consider bringing back the old Fedora > codenames just this once and declare the release “Fedora 42 (Adams)”, > ideally with a few subtle nods snuck in to the artwork for the > release. +42! > When

Re: Package with no dependencies?

On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 9:45 PM Chris Adams wrote: > > I have aisleriot installed to play solitaire card games now and then. > After upgrading to Fedora 41 and doing a "dnf autoremove", it no longer > runs, because libguile-3.0.so.1 is no longer present. Looking at it > more though... the package

Re: Fedora 42: The Answer to Life, The Universe and Everything

On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 г. 20:53:13 GMT+3, Liam Proven wrote: > There are, however, tons of excellent 42-themed designs out there. > Many involve whales and bowls of petunias, among other things, and of > course the slogan "Life, the Universe, and Everything." Dolphins and > mice often feature, too. How

Package with no dependencies?

I have aisleriot installed to play solitaire card games now and then. After upgrading to Fedora 41 and doing a "dnf autoremove", it no longer runs, because libguile-3.0.so.1 is no longer present. Looking at it more though... the package somehow has NO dependencies. When I rebuild it in mock, I ge

Re: Fedora 42: The Answer to Life, The Universe and Everything

On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 05:53:13PM +, Liam Proven wrote: > On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 at 15:52, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > I’d like to propose that we consider bringing back the old Fedora > > codenames just this once and declare the release “Fedora 42 (Adams)”, > > ideally with a few subtle nods

Re: Fedora 42: The Answer to Life, The Universe and Everything

On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 8:27 PM Joe Doss wrote: > On 11/4/24 10:32 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: > > To be honest, I think we should bring back codenames overall, but I'll > > take the one-off for now. > > I am with you Neal. I loved codenames back in the day. Especially Fedora > 17's Beefy Miracle! ;) >

Review request for python-durationpy

Hi, python-durationpy is a new dependency of python-kubernetes, so I need to package it in order to continue updating python-kubernetes. I am happy to review a package in return if it also helps someone else get unblocked. Bugzilla URL: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2314132 Spec

Re: Fedora 42: The Answer to Life, The Universe and Everything

On 11/4/24 10:32 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: To be honest, I think we should bring back codenames overall, but I'll take the one-off for now. I am with you Neal. I loved codenames back in the day. Especially Fedora 17's Beefy Miracle! ;) Joe -- Joe Doss j...@solidadmin.com -- _

Re: Fedora 42: The Answer to Life, The Universe and Everything

Amazing suggestion :-) On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 12:52 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > I posted this discussion on Fedora Discussion[1] last week, but I'd > like to forward this discussion to devel-list for wider consideration. > For the sake of keeping the conversation in one place, I do ask that >

Re: Fedora 42: The Answer to Life, The Universe and Everything

On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 at 13:10, Björn Persson wrote: > Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > We would need to get legal clearance to use "Adams" I presume. > > We could choose something less likely to cause legal trouble, such as > "Deep Thought", "Life, The Universe and Everything", "The Answer", > "Arthur

Re: Fedora 42: The Answer to Life, The Universe and Everything

Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > We would need to get legal clearance to use "Adams" I presume. We could choose something less likely to cause legal trouble, such as "Deep Thought", "Life, The Universe and Everything", "The Answer", "Arthur Dent" ... Björn Persson pgpT0qR_v6V4T.pgp Description: Open

Re: Fedora 42: The Answer to Life, The Universe and Everything

On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 at 15:52, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > I do ask that > you reply on the Discussion thread, rather than on Fedora Devel, > please. P.S. it won't let me log in -- it always takes me to the signup page instead -- so I can't. Discourse is, er, not great if you know how proper email

Re: Fedora 42: The Answer to Life, The Universe and Everything

On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 at 15:52, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > I’d like to propose that we consider bringing back the old Fedora > codenames just this once and declare the release “Fedora 42 (Adams)”, > ideally with a few subtle nods snuck in to the artwork for the > release. Nice idea. Speaking as a f

Re: Tcl/Tk 9.0.0 rebase

On 04. 11. 24 17:26, Jaroslav Škarvada wrote: I am going to add compat Tcl/Tk 8.6 packages, because IMHO porting of the packages to Tcl/Tk 9 will take significant time and maybe some of the packages will never be ported. But IMHO it will also require changes in the affected packages, at least cha

Re: Fedora 42: The Answer to Life, The Universe and Everything

On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 at 11:26, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 10:52:18AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > I posted this discussion on Fedora Discussion[1] last week, but I'd > > like to forward this discussion to devel-list for wider consideration. > > For the sake of keepin

DNF5 CVE-2024-1929 is it fixed?

We got a question about CVE-2024-1929 on discuss.fedora.org . It's raised as https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2267893 and there is a claim in the report that upstream committed a fix. If that is the case can this bug be closed as fixed? If it's not fixed i

Re: Fedora 42: The Answer to Life, The Universe and Everything

Am Mo., 4. Nov. 2024 um 17:33 Uhr schrieb Neal Gompa : > > On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 11:26 AM Daniel P. Berrangé > wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 10:52:18AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > I posted this discussion on Fedora Discussion[1] last week, but I'd > > > like to forward this di

Re: Fedora 42: The Answer to Life, The Universe and Everything

On Mon, Nov 4 2024 at 10:52:18 AM -05:00:00, Stephen Gallagher wrote: For the sake of keeping the conversation in one place, I do ask that you reply on the Discussion thread, rather than on Fedora Devel, please. Heh, that was a good joke! -- ___ de

Re: Fedora 42: The Answer to Life, The Universe and Everything

On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 11:26 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 10:52:18AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > I posted this discussion on Fedora Discussion[1] last week, but I'd > > like to forward this discussion to devel-list for wider consideration. > > For the sake of ke

Re: Fedora 42: The Answer to Life, The Universe and Everything

On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 10:52:18AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > I posted this discussion on Fedora Discussion[1] last week, but I'd > like to forward this discussion to devel-list for wider consideration. > For the sake of keeping the conversation in one place, I do ask that > you reply on the

Re: Tcl/Tk 9.0.0 rebase

I am going to add compat Tcl/Tk 8.6 packages, because IMHO porting of the packages to Tcl/Tk 9 will take significant time and maybe some of the packages will never be ported. But IMHO it will also require changes in the affected packages, at least changing the BuildRequires to the compat Tcl/Tk ver

Re: Fedora 42: The Answer to Life, The Universe and Everything

+1000 42 is one of the most quoted pop culture refs in tech that I know of. We nerds don't reference pop culture a lot so we should celebrate it when we can! Langdon On Mon, Nov 4, 2024, 10:52 Stephen Gallagher wrote: > I posted this discussion on Fedora Discussion[1] last week, but I'd > like

Re: Fedora 42: The Answer to Life, The Universe and Everything

On Mon, Nov 4, 2024, 17:01 Peter Lemenkov wrote: > Hello All! > Stephen, that's an amazing idea! You have my +1. > I also think it's an amazing idea and +1 from me as well. -- Kalev -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsub

Re: PSA: tuned breaks boot loader entries for systemd-boot

On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 4:31 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 4:20 PM Jaroslav Škarvada wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 3:02 PM Ian Pilcher wrote: > > > > > > On 11/4/24 7:42 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > Oof ... the fact that tuned mangles bootloader parameters was

Re: Fedora 42: The Answer to Life, The Universe and Everything

Hello All! Stephen, that's an amazing idea! You have my +1. On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 6:52 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > I posted this discussion on Fedora Discussion[1] last week, but I'd > like to forward this discussion to devel-list for wider consideration. > For the sake of keeping the conver

Fedora 42: The Answer to Life, The Universe and Everything

I posted this discussion on Fedora Discussion[1] last week, but I'd like to forward this discussion to devel-list for wider consideration. For the sake of keeping the conversation in one place, I do ask that you reply on the Discussion thread, rather than on Fedora Devel, please. """ The number “4

Re: PSA: tuned breaks boot loader entries for systemd-boot

On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 4:20 PM Jaroslav Škarvada wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 3:02 PM Ian Pilcher wrote: > > > > On 11/4/24 7:42 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > Oof ... the fact that tuned mangles bootloader parameters wasn't > > > mentioned at all in the Change Proposal to enable it by def

Re: PSA: tuned breaks boot loader entries for systemd-boot

On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 3:02 PM Ian Pilcher wrote: > > On 11/4/24 7:42 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Oof ... the fact that tuned mangles bootloader parameters wasn't > > mentioned at all in the Change Proposal to enable it by default. To me > > that would have been a no-go. (I already voted -1 for

[Testdays] Call for Fedora Linux 42 testing events

Hi Fedora users, developers, and friends! It's time to start thinking about Test Days for Fedora 42. For anyone who isn't aware, a Test Day is an event usually focused around IRC for interaction and a Wiki page for instructions and results, with the aim being to get a bunch of interested users an

Re: PSA: tuned breaks boot loader entries for systemd-boot

On 11/4/24 7:42 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote: Oof ... the fact that tuned mangles bootloader parameters wasn't mentioned at all in the Change Proposal to enable it by default. To me that would have been a no-go. (I already voted -1 for this change for other reasons, but these bootloader shenanigans

Re: PSA: tuned breaks boot loader entries for systemd-boot

On Sat, Nov 2, 2024 at 1:05 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > I was installing a new kernel today and I was, to put it mildly, > slightly surprised when the initrd wouldn't load :( > It turns out that tuned installs /usr/lib/kernel/install.d/92-tuned.install > which uses sed to mangle 'ini

FESCo meeting cancelled this week

Hi folks, We have no tickets tagged for the meeting and no ticket resolutions to announce. The meeting tomorrow is cancelled. Enjoy/suffer the U.S. presidential elections in peace ;) Zbyszek -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org T

Review swaps

Hello All! I found out that I am lagging behind my Erlang packaging schedule and need some help with reviewing. In exchange I'll review your stuck packages. Pick any of these: * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2303752 erlang-rebar3-riak_pb_msgcodegen - A riak_pb message compiler for rebar3 (a dependen

Re: strange reproducibility problem with QImage

On Sun, Nov 03, 2024 at 11:02:16AM -0500, Ben Beasley wrote: > Kevin’s observation about floating-point rounding and runtime dispatch is an > excellent one in general. > > Those two CPU’s should, as far as I can tell, be dispatched to the same SIMD > implementations in this case. > > Skimming

Re: Tcl/Tk 9.0.0 rebase

* Garry T. Williams: > On Saturday, 2 November 2024 23:24:50 EDT Garry T. Williams wrote: >> I am trying to port deal to tcl 9.0.0 and I am stuck. >> >> My package required many changes mostly changing certain int variables >> to type Tcl_Size (aka long). I got down to only one error compiling >

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20241104.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20241103.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20241104.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 2 Dropped packages:5 Upgraded packages: 128 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 690.24 KiB Size of dropped packages

Re: Pkg installation failure when system recommends to install it on 'command not found'

Dne 01. 11. 24 v 20:13 Samuel Sieb napsal(a): On 2024-11-01 08:51, Leo Sandoval wrote: On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 11:58 PM Samuel Sieb > wrote:     On 10/31/24 1:11 PM, Leo Sandoval wrote: > so it fails trying to install the dependency pc-conf with version > 6