Fedora eln compose report: 20241029.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-eln-20241028.n.0 NEW: Fedora-eln-20241029.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 12 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of

libcap update to 2.71

Hello all, I'll be updating libcap from 2.70 to 2.71 in rawhide[1]. No breaking ABI changes. Best, Carlos R.F. [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2321892 OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ___ devel mail

Re: Slower builds on non-x86_64 arches - number of cores?

On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 05:49:56PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Kevin Fenzi: > > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 09:07:59AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > >> * Kevin Fenzi: > >> > >> > As a side note, I removed s309x from the noarch_arches when that was > >> > going on, but I have readded it a whil

[Canceled] Schedule for Tuesday's FESCo Meeting (2024-10-29)

I see nothing that needs discussion this week, so I'm canceling the FESCo meeting. Everyone can spend the time celebrating Fedora 41! For next week, zbyszek already volunteered to chair. = Discussed and Voted in the Ticket = Change: Update Zlib-ng to version 2.2.x https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3

Re: libtool issue with EPEL10

On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 3:18 AM Orion Poplawski wrote: > I'm trying to build netcdf in EPEL10 but the test suite is failing to > run with: > > /builddir/build/BUILD/netcdf-c-4.9.2/build/ncgen3/.libs/lt-ncgen3: error > while loading shared libraries: libnetcdf.so.19: cannot open shared > object fi

Re: FYI Koji 1.35 changed how side tag newRepo works

Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > fedpkg build --target=... --wait-build= Neither "man fedpkg" nor "fedpkg build --help" mention a "--wait-build" option. Michael McLean wrote: > In most cases where folks are using the wait-repo command, they would > probably be better off passing either `--wait-repo`

Re: Slower builds on non-x86_64 arches - number of cores?

* Kevin Fenzi: > On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 09:07:59AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: >> * Kevin Fenzi: >> >> > As a side note, I removed s309x from the noarch_arches when that was >> > going on, but I have readded it a while back. (So noarch builds could >> > also happen on s390x). Also, changes in k

Re: Slower builds on non-x86_64 arches - number of cores?

On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 09:07:59AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Kevin Fenzi: > > > As a side note, I removed s309x from the noarch_arches when that was > > going on, but I have readded it a while back. (So noarch builds could > > also happen on s390x). Also, changes in koji 1.35 meant that srp

Re: Build failure on F41 ppc64

On Sun, 27 Oct 2024 23:34:13 -0700 Luya wrote: > Thanks for checking. Would you mind pushing the remaining built for update. the retry for F-41 went smoothly -> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-0dc37badbe Dan -- __

Gating failure: Guest couldn't be provisioned: Artemis resource ended in 'error' state

We're getting a test failure on a glibc rawhide update with this error message: [2024-10-28 13:59:52] [+] [worker_0] [artemis] [047a0fb2-c07a-486e-b097-cd0483c1447a] guest event log: https://artifacts.dev.testing-farm.io/2bde30f4-6c08-4f8d-8272-59b4bb061333/work-ciltnyfm1l/047a0fb2-c07a-486e-b09

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20241028.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20241027.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20241028.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 95 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size

glibc Features/UsrMove transition

We received a downstream report that our glibc debuginfo is broken because we never implemented Features/UsrMove: Move all to /usr So far, we relied on the symbolic links in the filesystem package to to produce the correct paths upon installat

Re: Slower builds on non-x86_64 arches - number of cores?

* Kevin Fenzi: > As a side note, I removed s309x from the noarch_arches when that was > going on, but I have readded it a while back. (So noarch builds could > also happen on s390x). Also, changes in koji 1.35 meant that srpm build > tasks just use noarch_arches, so they too can happen on s390x. I