* Kevin Fenzi: > As a side note, I removed s309x from the noarch_arches when that was > going on, but I have readded it a while back. (So noarch builds could > also happen on s390x). Also, changes in koji 1.35 meant that srpm build > tasks just use noarch_arches, so they too can happen on s390x. I've been > watching things and so far this doesn't seem to be a problem.
I was recently bitten by “fedpkg srpm” (or “fedpkg build --scratch --srpm”) not yet using --arch noarch for constructing the source RPM. 8-/ > Also, longer term for ppc64le I have put in for budget next year to add > memory/faster disks and there is also possibly power10 on the horizon, > which I hope will be faster/biggger. Historically, Red Hat's POWER systems used desktop-class disks and had very poor I/O as a result. Builds can be quite I/O heavy, and minute-long hangs during initial package installation were not uncommon. These systems are supposed to be use with a SAN, but I don't think we have that. Thanks, Florian -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
