Expand usage of Profile-Guided Optimization (PGO) and LLVM BOLT across Fedora packages

2024-10-21 Thread Alexander Zaitsev
(Warning: it's a cross-posting from https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/expand-usage-of-profile-guided-optimization-pgo-and-llvm-bolt-across-fedora-packages/133724 since there was a suggestion to do this cross-post. I don't know how much of the discussion should be copied here so I just copie

Fedora eln compose report: 20241022.n.0 changes

2024-10-21 Thread Fedora ELN Report
OLD: Fedora-eln-20241021.n.0 NEW: Fedora-eln-20241022.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 3 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:5 Upgraded packages: 41 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 2.53 GiB Size of dropped packages:6.38 MiB

Re: Improvements in name resolution, DNS and HTTPS RR and SVCB future usage

2024-10-21 Thread Petr Menšík
On 21/10/2024 14:51, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Mo, 21.10.24 12:38, Petr Menšík (pemen...@redhat.com) wrote: Okay. It might be better than D-Bus, but having to make separate connections for every single resolution is still a bit wasteful. Uh. I mean, if you want, kep the connections around a

Re: Improvements in name resolution, DNS and HTTPS RR and SVCB future usage

2024-10-21 Thread Petr Menšík
Not sure I follow here. Chrony is default NTP implementation on Fedora AFAIK. Not systemd-timesyncd or timedatex. Chrony does not use varlink interface, does it? On 21/10/2024 15:11, Michael Catanzaro wrote: On Mon, Oct 21 2024 at 02:51:56 PM +02:00:00, Lennart Poettering wrote: I know you d

hdf5 1.14.5 update coming to Rawhide this week

2024-10-21 Thread Orion Poplawski
I will be updating hdf5 to 1.14.5 later this week, probably starting on Friday. This is a soname bump. I will be doing the build in a side tag and building all deps: CheMPS2 Field3D InsightToolkit LabPlot OpenMolcas R-Rsolid alembic avogadro2-libs caffe cantera cgnslib diffoscope dolfin freefe

Re: Fedora 41 compose report: 20241021.n.0 changes

2024-10-21 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2024-10-21 at 22:04 +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > Fedora Branched Report wrote on 2024/10/21 21:23: > > OLD: Fedora-41-20241018.n.0 > > NEW: Fedora-41-20241021.n.0 > > > > = SUMMARY = > > Added images:1 > > Dropped images: 10

Re: Tcl/Tk 9.0.0 rebase

2024-10-21 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 03:36:44PM -0400, Garry T. Williams wrote: > On Monday, 14 October 2024 15:39:05 EDT Jaroslav Škarvada wrote: > > NP, I will setup Copr > > I am trying to test changes to deal, but I don't know how to tell my > local mock command to get tcl-devel from your copr. Can you he

Re: Tcl/Tk 9.0.0 rebase

2024-10-21 Thread Garry T. Williams
On Monday, 14 October 2024 15:39:05 EDT Jaroslav Škarvada wrote: > NP, I will setup Copr I am trying to test changes to deal, but I don't know how to tell my local mock command to get tcl-devel from your copr. Can you help? -- Garry T. Williams -- ___

Introducing Community Linux Engineering (“CLE”)

2024-10-21 Thread Brendan Conoboy
Hi everybody, The “CPE” name is a commonly used identifier in the Fedora and CentOS communities. Inside Red Hat, it meant a specific set of individuals and roles reporting into common management. We recently had a reorg that brought it and other community roles together. There is a new name for th

Re: Fedora 41 compose report: 20241021.n.0 changes

2024-10-21 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 10:04:03PM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > > What happened with these dropped live isos? > > Quick take a look at these seems to indicate that at least some of these are > due to disk space shortage, so > > * some upgraded packages increased install size significantly? > *

Michel's package orphaning thread - part 1: xonsh

2024-10-21 Thread Michel Lind
Dear all, Between different work and personal commitments, and evolving interest over time, I sometimes find myself overstretched when it comes to maintaining packages, and some of these packages (and needless to say, their users) deserve more TLC. As such, as I announced on Mastodon - https://ha

Re: Improvements in name resolution, DNS and HTTPS RR and SVCB future usage

2024-10-21 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Mon, Oct 21 2024 at 02:51:56 PM +02:00:00, Lennart Poettering wrote: I know you don't like systemd-resolved, but maybe you can at least acknowledge that is does exist. The nice thing about IPC APIs is it's easy to reimplement them however you please, similar to how elogind reimplements man

Re: Fedora 41 compose report: 20241021.n.0 changes

2024-10-21 Thread Mamoru TASAKA
Fedora Branched Report wrote on 2024/10/21 21:23: OLD: Fedora-41-20241018.n.0 NEW: Fedora-41-20241021.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 10 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 79 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages

Re: X11 support removed from GDM 1:47.0-1

2024-10-21 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 20. 10. 24 v 17:59 Joe Doss napsal(a): On 10/20/24 4:19 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: Zoom and most commercial video conf platforms have been fine on Wayland for some time. I've used Zoom/Google Meet/MS Teams for a least a year or two without wayland issues. Unfortunately sharing part of my s

Re: Improvements in name resolution, DNS and HTTPS RR and SVCB future usage

2024-10-21 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mo, 21.10.24 12:38, Petr Menšík (pemen...@redhat.com) wrote: > > That's quite a misunderstanding. Varlink takes benefit of the fact > > that AF_UNIX connections are cheap, and it optimizes for that > > (i.e. there is no handshake protocol or so, like in D-Bus). i.e. if > > you want 7 DNS resolu

Fedora 41 compose report: 20241021.n.0 changes

2024-10-21 Thread Fedora Branched Report
OLD: Fedora-41-20241018.n.0 NEW: Fedora-41-20241021.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 10 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 79 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of

Blocker Bug Report 2024-10-21

2024-10-21 Thread Aoife Moloney
The Fedora Linux 41 Final Go/No-Go meeting is scheduled for this Thursday, 24th October, and we're hoping to release on the early target date[1] of 29th October. In order to do that, we need your help with our blocker bugs[2]. Below is a short summary of the current F41 Final blocker bugs. If you c

Re: Improvements in name resolution, DNS and HTTPS RR and SVCB future usage

2024-10-21 Thread Petr Menšík
On 21. 10. 24 11:53, Lennart Poettering wrote: On So, 20.10.24 18:33, Petr Menšík (pemen...@redhat.com) wrote: From what I read about Varlink.org, it requires answers to be delivered in the same order in which queries has came. That's quite a misunderstanding. Varlink takes benefit of the fac

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20241021.n.0 changes

2024-10-21 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20241020.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20241021.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 5 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 50 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 2.31 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B

Re: Improvements in name resolution, DNS and HTTPS RR and SVCB future usage

2024-10-21 Thread Lennart Poettering
On So, 20.10.24 18:33, Petr Menšík (pemen...@redhat.com) wrote: > From what I read about Varlink.org, it requires answers to be delivered in > the same order in which queries has came. That's quite a misunderstanding. Varlink takes benefit of the fact that AF_UNIX connections are cheap, and it op

Re: Improvements in name resolution, DNS and HTTPS RR and SVCB future usage

2024-10-21 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Sa, 19.10.24 08:55, Andrew Lutomirski (l...@mit.edu) wrote: > 2. D-bus and varlink. These are at least not tied to /etc, but, just like > /etc, they’re associated with the wrong namespace! > > Name resolution is part of *networking*, not filesystem. I should be able > to nsenter a network names

Re: Improvements in name resolution, DNS and HTTPS RR and SVCB future usage

2024-10-21 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fr, 18.10.24 16:27, Petr Menšík (pemen...@redhat.com) wrote: > Is there any API description of the Varlink API, which you are referring to? In Varlink introspection contains the documentation itself. i.e. here's what "varlinkctl introspect /run/systemd/resolve/io.systemd.Resolve io.systemd.Res

Re: What happened to the dnf makecache timer with dnf5?

2024-10-21 Thread Petr Pisar
V Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 10:46:35AM -0700, Gordon Messmer napsal(a): > On 2024-10-18 1:32 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: > > V Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 10:05:49AM -0700, Gordon Messmer napsal(a): > > > dnf < 5 includes /usr/lib/systemd/system/dnf-makecache.service and > > > ".timer" > > > to ensure that metadata