OLD: Fedora-eln-20241011.n.0
NEW: Fedora-eln-20241012.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 248
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
Hi all,
vxl-3.5.0 is coming to rawhide. It includes a soname bump so I'll also
rebuild the dependencies along with it (they're all neuro-sig packages).
I did an impact check on COPR and they all build fine:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/ankursinha/vxl350/monitor/
- InsightToolkit
- ali
On Fri, 2024-10-11 at 21:29 +0200, Michal Ambroz wrote:
> Hello Miro,
> Thank you very much for the tool - I am adding it to toolbox.
>
>
>
> I actually love the new pyproject macros, but in the past there were some
> discrepancies between
> Fedora and EPEL where not everywhere the situation wa
Hi folks,
I pushed an update of add-det to Rawhide. It contains a rewrite of the
handler for pyc files (*). The new code should resolve an irreproducibility
that affects a large number of python packages, in particular those with
lots and lots of python files. If you see any issues with building a
Hello Miro,
Thank you very much for the tool - I am adding it to toolbox.
I actually love the new pyproject macros, but in the past there were some
discrepancies between
Fedora and EPEL where not everywhere the situation was ready there to switch
to pyproject macros.
Please have you checked re
* Christian Walde [11/10/2024 12:05] :
>
> What do you mean it doesn't represent a problem?
Just that. You are free to license your Perl distributions under
whatever license you wish to use. This is a good thing.
The only issue I had at one point was that I couldn't update
perl-MooX-Role-Paramete
> On 9 Oct 2024, at 18:52, recoveredem...@riotgames.com wrote:
>
> Are you sure you want to install it on your workstation. The good
> habit is to NOT install builddeps and NOT running
> rpmbuild directly, but running
The point of RPMs is that I can install and uninstall.
The point of mock is t
> On 9 Oct 2024, at 12:22, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> wrote:
>
> You can do this with mock, too. Have you tried mock shell? You can edit
> the code using your favourite editor in /var/lib/mock//root/...
> and re-running the build command inside mock shell from another
> terminal.
But th
Hi,
I am going to update astyle to the latest 3.6.3 version that changes
ABI and also changes soname. The 2 dependent packages (codeblocks and
kdevelop) will be rebuilt in a side-tag.
Dan
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedo
On Thu, Oct 10 2024 at 05:36:25 PM +02:00:00, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
I wished Fedora would focus more on making Measured Boot by default a
thing (other distros are working towards that, for example SUSE has
been investing in that), but Fedora is not precisely leading in this
effort right now.
On Fri, 2024-10-11 at 09:43 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Do, 10.10.24 17:22, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2024-10-10 at 17:29 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > > On Mi, 09.10.24 11:12, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > This was again
Hello,
I have released libxc 7.0.0 yesterday, and will update libxc in a side tag of
rawhide. Although there are some ABI changes, the API is the same as in version
6.2.2.
According to repoquery, the following packages are affected
$ sudo repoquery --whatrequires "libxc.so.12()(64bit)"
[sudo] p
What do you mean it doesn't represent a problem?
If it weren't a problem for you, as per fedora policies, then you wouldn't have
needed to take any action. You taking action is physical proof that it presents
a problem.
> I'm not sure there's anything to resolve, really.
Just tell me what lice
* Christian Walde [11/10/2024 08:26] :
>
> I am the maintainer of Throwable-SugarFactory.
Hello, Christian.
> Having been linked this i get to learn that people are now
> experiencing consequences because of choices i made in good faith,
> without me having been approached in good faith or even A
Hot news:
- Many times I had to open PR and convert the license tag for package despite the fact that I already converted it
previously. That is because a maintainer keeps the spec file somewehere else (in upstream) and on release just copy it
to dist-git. If this is your workflow please sync u
Hi,
Some discussion raised in (not very active) PHP SIG mailing list
and other information about PHP stack
1/ new library version and compat package
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/php-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/CG2XDGT3OT6GFAAZORMZ45VYSQYHN27L/
In short: some packages
> I have just orphaned perl-MooX-Role-Parameterized.
>
> Newer versions of the application depend on the Perl module MooX::BuildClass.
> This module is part of the Throwable-SugarFactory distribution and licensed
> under CC0. This license is allowed in Fedora for content but not for code.
I am
On Do, 10.10.24 17:22, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-10-10 at 17:29 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Mi, 09.10.24 11:12, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote:
> >
> > >
> >
> > This was again a reference to the fact that IPA folks aren't willing
> > to restrict their allo
18 matches
Mail list logo
