OLD: Fedora-eln-20241005.n.0
NEW: Fedora-eln-20241006.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:10
Upgraded packages: 81
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 51.62 MiB
Size of dropped packages:40.07 MiB
> On 5 Oct 2024, at 18:32, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On the other hand, the error message you're seeing is from the IMA plugin. So
> I assume you've enabled rpm-plugin-ima?
This a f39 aarch64 upgraded to f40 then f41 with no customisations.
(There are no f40 or f41 iso so i have to do this d
On Sat, 5 Oct 2024 19:28:10 +0200
Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 5, 2024, 18:16 Barry Scott wrote:
>
> > I'm starting to work on a systemd run0 bug.
> > And hit this issue.
> >
> > : 13:10:22 armf41 ~/rpmbuild.d/systemd/SPECS
> > : [1] barry $ rpm -i ~/systemd-256.6-1.fc41.src.rpm
> >
On Sat, Oct 5, 2024, 18:16 Barry Scott wrote:
> I'm starting to work on a systemd run0 bug.
> And hit this issue.
>
> : 13:10:22 armf41 ~/rpmbuild.d/systemd/SPECS
> : [1] barry $ rpm -i ~/systemd-256.6-1.fc41.src.rpm
> error: ima: could not apply signature on
> '/home/barry/rpmbuild.d/systemd
I'm starting to work on a systemd run0 bug.
And hit this issue.
: 13:10:22 armf41 ~/rpmbuild.d/systemd/SPECS
: [1] barry $ rpm -i ~/systemd-256.6-1.fc41.src.rpm
error: ima: could not apply signature on
'/home/barry/rpmbuild.d/systemd/SOURCES/.abignore;67012ce2': Operation not
permitted
error
On Fri, Oct 4, 2024, at 9:51 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> Problem 4: package python3-fb-re2-1.0.7-18.fc41.x86_64 from fedora
>> requires libre2.so.9()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
>> - problem with installed package python3-fb-re2-1.0.7-15.fc40.x86_64
>> -
On Sat, Oct 5, 2024 at 3:45 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 01:20:40PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > It's fairly normal these days that the users are self-contained and
> > otherwise local, *except* for login credentials. This use-case is
> > important to support b
On Суб, 05 кас 2024, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 12:17:14PM -0400, David Cantrell wrote:
The common use case for this is the Fedora laptop user which in nearly every
case is going to have one local user account.
I have always split /home from the rest of the syste
On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 01:20:40PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> It's fairly normal these days that the users are self-contained and
> otherwise local, *except* for login credentials. This use-case is
> important to support because this is pretty much how business laptops
> need to work.
>
> In the l
On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 12:17:14PM -0400, David Cantrell wrote:
> The common use case for this is the Fedora laptop user which in nearly every
> case is going to have one local user account.
>
> I have always split /home from the rest of the system and I know others do
> as well. I would rather s
10 matches
Mail list logo
