Fedora eln compose report: 20240927.n.0 changes

2024-09-26 Thread Fedora ELN Report
OLD: Fedora-eln-20240926.n.0 NEW: Fedora-eln-20240927.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 44 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of

Re: Change proposal for dnf in F41

2024-09-26 Thread Petr Pisar
V Thu, Sep 26, 2024 at 03:55:24PM +0200, Joachim Backes napsal(a): > Hi, > > For  some dnf editions, I was able to delete a package by "dnf erase > package". But as of F41 Beta, I must use > the dnf command: "dnf remove package". > Since Fedora 41, Fedora uses DNF5. It's not a different edition,

Re: PyPI and pypi_source changes

2024-09-26 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 26. 09. 24 15:57, Miroslav Suchý wrote: If you maintain a package from PyPI, I wanted to give you a heads-up. It took me two hours to resolve this issue today as it started with "why Packit did not created new PR when upstream has new version". And quick check shows that about one thousand p

PyPI and pypi_source changes

2024-09-26 Thread Miroslav Suchý
If you maintain a package from PyPI, I wanted to give you a heads-up. It took me two hours to resolve this issue today as it started with "why Packit did not created new PR when upstream has new version". And quick check shows that about one thousand packages may be affected. It seems that PyPI

Change proposal for dnf in F41

2024-09-26 Thread Joachim Backes
Hi, For  some dnf editions, I was able to delete a package by "dnf erase package". But as of F41 Beta, I must use the dnf command: "dnf remove package". 1. Why the command name "erase" is no more possible? 2.  The F41 messages stll are of old style. As example if removing evolution, I get the

Mock v5.7 released (and mock-core-configs v41.3)

2024-09-26 Thread Pavel Raiskup
Hello maintainers! I'm glad to announce the release of Mock v5.7, the chroot build environment manager for building RPMs! This update introduces a new mode for "hermetic" builds, a new `--scrub-all-chroots` option to help clean Mock's `/var` data, enhancements to the ccache plugin, several config

Fedora 41 compose report: 20240926.n.0 changes

2024-09-26 Thread Fedora Branched Report
OLD: Fedora-41-20240925.n.0 NEW: Fedora-41-20240926.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 11 Added packages: 5 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 93 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 17.00 MiB Size of dropped packages:559.96 KiB

Re: Rebuilding tesseract dependents in F42 for soversion change

2024-09-26 Thread Michael J Gruber
Am Mi., 25. Sept. 2024 um 20:49 Uhr schrieb Michel Lind : > > Dear all, > > This PR: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/tesseract/pull-request/6 > was recently merged and built: > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-41b92bf172 > > It backports a PR that's merged upstream to change

Re: Self Introduction: Alexey Lunev (xbt573)

2024-09-26 Thread Felix Schwarz
Hey, Am 25.09.24 um 20:43 schrieb Alexey Lunev: I'm planning to contribute software that i like, but it is currently unavailable in repos (gdu, navidrome, openmw). Oh, navidrome would be nice. Thank you for joining the Fedora packager community. Felix --

Re: Some perl modules not added to Anitya?

2024-09-26 Thread Michal Konecny
Hi Chris, release-monitoring.org never added packages from Fedora automatically. If they are there somebody else must have already add them. There was an idea to integrate release-monitoring.org to package workflow, but this was never implemented. You need to add them manually with the Fedora

Re: BuildRequires environment-modules seems required for projects that build against openmpi/mpich

2024-09-26 Thread Sandro
On 26-09-2024 01:10, Marcin Dulak wrote: I noticed some of my builds started to fail due to environment-modules not being installed anymore in the build root. Only builds from and including f41 succeed. Builds for f39, f40, epel9, epel10 fail. Is this expected? In the case below of 1.https://koj