Fedora eln compose report: 20240926.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-eln-20240925.n.0 NEW: Fedora-eln-20240926.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:5 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 11 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of

Some perl modules not added to Anitya?

I added a batch of perl modules packages, all from CPAN, and I just noticed that while most were added to Anitya for release monitoring automatically, a handful were not. Is this something that gets missed now and then (and I should just add them manually), did I miss a step, or something else? P

BuildRequires environment-modules seems required for projects that build against openmpi/mpich

I was directed here from https://pagure.io/releng/issue/12359 I noticed some of my builds started to fail due to environment-modules not being installed anymore in the build root. Only builds from and including f41 succeed. Builds for f39, f40, epel9, epel10 fail. Is this expected? In the case b

Re: Self Introduction: Alexey Lunev (xbt573)

Hello and welcome! On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 9:43 PM Alexey Lunev wrote: > > Hi! I'm Alexey, Golang developer and intermediate Linux user, primarily > programming as hobby. Switched to Fedora about a month ago, and i want to make > it better :). I'm planning to contribute software that i like, but

Rebuilding tesseract dependents in F42 for soversion change

Dear all, This PR: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/tesseract/pull-request/6 was recently merged and built: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-41b92bf172 It backports a PR that's merged upstream to change the Tesseract SOVERSION from maj.min.patch to only maj.min (Tesseract fo

Self Introduction: Alexey Lunev (xbt573)

Hi! I'm Alexey, Golang developer and intermediate Linux user, primarily programming as hobby. Switched to Fedora about a month ago, and i want to make it better :). I'm planning to contribute software that i like, but it is currently unavailable in repos (gdu, navidrome, openmw). -- _

Re: Retire nodejs-diagnostic-language-server

25. syyskuuta 2024 16.39.38 GMT+03:00 Andreas Schneider kirjoitti: >Hi, > >I would like to retire nodejs-diagnostic-language-server. In case someone is >using it and want to maintain it, please speak up :-) It sounds like instead of retiring, orphaning would be the correct action here. For the

Re: Broken metalink for EPEL10

On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 11:01 AM Stephen Smoogen wrote: > > > > On Wed, 25 Sept 2024 at 11:53, Carl George wrote: >> >> On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 6:25 AM Zdeněk Žamberský wrote: >> >> To reiterate from the existing issue, EPEL 10 hasn't launched yet. >> It's open for packagers to add their package

Re: Broken metalink for EPEL10

On Wed, 25 Sept 2024 at 11:53, Carl George wrote: > On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 6:25 AM Zdeněk Žamberský > wrote: > > To reiterate from the existing issue, EPEL 10 hasn't launched yet. > It's open for packagers to add their packages, but it should not be > consumed yet (i.e. requesting it from mirro

Re: Broken metalink for EPEL10

On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 6:25 AM Zdeněk Žamberský wrote: > > I think they will probably close it as duplicate, but we'll see, thanks. > > On 24. 09. 24 13:17, Stephen Smoogen wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 24 Sept 2024 at 07:16, Mikolaj Izdebski > > wrote: > > > > Such issues can be reported to Fe

Re: Mock change - not installing documentation files in buildroot

On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 1:30 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > In Mock upstream we are right not discussing > > https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/pull/1462 > > Here is the summary: > > > Config files that uses DNF now contains `tsflags=nodocs` that tells RPM to > not > > install docume

Re: Mock change - not installing documentation files in buildroot

Am 25.09.24 um 1:29 PM schrieb Miroslav Suchý: In Mock upstream we are right not discussing https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/pull/1462 Here is the summary: > Config files that uses DNF now contains `tsflags=nodocs` that tells RPM to not > install documentation files. > Th

Retire nodejs-diagnostic-language-server

Hi, I would like to retire nodejs-diagnostic-language-server. In case someone is using it and want to maintain it, please speak up :-) Cheers Andreas -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email

Fedora 41 compose report: 20240925.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-41-20240924.n.0 NEW: Fedora-41-20240925.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:3 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 3 Dropped packages:5 Upgraded packages: 297 Downgraded packages: 1 Size of added packages: 474.80 KiB Size of dropped packages:61.24 MiB

Re: Mock change - not installing documentation files in buildroot

V Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 01:29:42PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý napsal(a): > In Mock upstream we are right not discussing > > https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/pull/1462 > > Here is the summary: > > > Config files that uses DNF now contains `tsflags=nodocs` that tells RPM to > > not > > i

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20240925.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20240924.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20240925.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 7 Dropped packages:6 Upgraded packages: 83 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 2.54 GiB Size of dropped packages

Mock change - not installing documentation files in buildroot

In Mock upstream we are right not discussing https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/pull/1462 Here is the summary: > Config files that uses DNF now contains `tsflags=nodocs` that tells RPM to not > install documentation files. > This results to smaller buildroot. For fedora-rawhide, wi