input-remapper in EPEL

2024-09-19 Thread Alexander Ploumistos
Hello, Would anyone be interested in building and maintaining input-remapper in EPEL? I got a request for that earlier today[1], but as I wrote in the bug report, I haven't been using RHEL for a while now and I haven't kept up with what's valid and what's not in terms of rpm macros and such. Any v

Orphaning/retiring truth

2024-09-19 Thread Orion Poplawski
I'm planning on retiring truth soon unless someone wants to take it over. It has been FTBFS for a long time and I have been unsuccessful at updating it and no longer have any time to dedicate to it. I'm not aware of anything that needs it. -- Orion Poplawski he/him/his - surely the least imp

Re: Location of available packages and versions for EPEL 10?

2024-09-19 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 9/19/24 14:31, Ron Olson wrote: Hey all- Dunno if there’s a better place to ask, but as part of trying to build Swift for EPEL 10 I’ve been running into some old issues that were resolved because of later versions of other packages (e.g. clang, python); is there somewhere a place that I ca

Fedora 41 compose report: 20240919.n.1 changes

2024-09-19 Thread Fedora Branched Report
OLD: Fedora-41-20240917.n.0 NEW: Fedora-41-20240919.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added images:3 Dropped images: 3 Added packages: 3 Dropped packages:15 Upgraded packages: 151 Downgraded packages: 1 Size of added packages: 55.32 MiB Size of dropped packages:9.52 MiB

Re: chicken-and-egg scenario with EPEL 10

2024-09-19 Thread Ron Olson
Thanks very much! I’ll give that a try immediately. On 19 Sep 2024, at 16:27, Fabio Valentini wrote: On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 11:16 PM Ron Olson wrote: That sounds a lot easier than what I’ve been trying to do; do you happen to have an example, or a script that shows your process so I can u

Re: chicken-and-egg scenario with EPEL 10

2024-09-19 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 11:16 PM Ron Olson wrote: > > That sounds a lot easier than what I’ve been trying to do; do you happen to > have an example, or a script that shows your process so I can use it as a > starting point? I’ve never created any side tags before so the whole process, > as you

Re: chicken-and-egg scenario with EPEL 10

2024-09-19 Thread Ron Olson
That sounds a lot easier than what I’ve been trying to do; do you happen to have an example, or a script that shows your process so I can use it as a starting point? I’ve never created any side tags before so the whole process, as you described it, is new to me. :\ On 19 Sep 2024, at 15:46, Fa

Re: chicken-and-egg scenario with EPEL 10

2024-09-19 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 5:20 PM Stephen Smoogen wrote: > > > > On Thu, 19 Sept 2024 at 11:07, Ron Olson wrote: >> >> Hi all- >> >> I’m trying to get Swift packaged for EPEL 10 but have an interesting >> situation that I presume has been seen before, so am hoping for some >> guidance. >> >> Sinc

Location of available packages and versions for EPEL 10?

2024-09-19 Thread Ron Olson
Hey all- Dunno if there’s a better place to ask, but as part of trying to build Swift for EPEL 10 I’ve been running into some old issues that were resolved because of later versions of other packages (e.g. clang, python); is there somewhere a place that I can find what is available in EPEL 10 a

[HEADS-UP] dracut-103 soon in Fedora Rawhide

2024-09-19 Thread Pavel Valena
Hi! $SUBJ PRs: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/dracut/pull-request/65 https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/dracut/pull-request/64 Please let me know if anything breaks! Regards, Pavel -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To uns

Re: "tunneler" package is broken - should it get removed?

2024-09-19 Thread Artur Frenszek-Iwicki
> Sorry, but I don't really have interest in taking care of that package. [...] > So it would be great if this could either be fixed by somebody, or removed > completely. I'd be willing to take this over. Let me see if I can contact Lubomir. A.FI. -- _

Re: "tunneler" package is broken - should it get removed?

2024-09-19 Thread Thomas Huth
On 19/09/2024 15.27, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 19. 09. 24 v 14:49 Thomas Huth napsal(a):  Hi everyone! The "tunneler" game in Fedora is broken since at least Fedora 38. I reported the issue last year here:  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248493 ... but apparently it is not maint

Re: chicken-and-egg scenario with EPEL 10

2024-09-19 Thread Stephen Smoogen
On Thu, 19 Sept 2024 at 11:07, Ron Olson wrote: > Hi all- > > I’m trying to get Swift packaged for EPEL 10 but have an interesting > situation that I presume has been seen before, so am hoping for some > guidance. > > Since 5.9 Swift has required a previous version of Swift to build; 5.8 is > the

chicken-and-egg scenario with EPEL 10

2024-09-19 Thread Ron Olson
Hi all- I’m trying to get Swift packaged for EPEL 10 but have an interesting situation that I presume has been seen before, so am hoping for some guidance. Since 5.9 Swift has required a previous version of Swift to build; 5.8 is the last version that builds by itself. Now I’d like to packag

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

2024-09-19 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 8:00 AM wrote: > > Dear all, > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: >ELN SIG on 2024-09-20 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern >At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat > > The meeting will be about: > TASK: Work with QA on update grouping, handling mass rebuild-type

Re: "tunneler" package is broken - should it get removed?

2024-09-19 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 19. 09. 24 v 14:49 Thomas Huth napsal(a):  Hi everyone! The "tunneler" game in Fedora is broken since at least Fedora 38. I reported the issue last year here:  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248493 ... but apparently it is not maintained anymore, since there was no reacti

Re: cppcheck orphaned

2024-09-19 Thread Gwyn Ciesla via devel
I've taken this, as I do use it, but will happily pass it to one of the existing co-maintainers if they'd prefer. --  Gwyn Ciesla she/her/hers   in your fear, seek only peace  in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie Sent with Proton Mail secure e

"tunneler" package is broken - should it get removed?

2024-09-19 Thread Thomas Huth
Hi everyone! The "tunneler" game in Fedora is broken since at least Fedora 38. I reported the issue last year here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248493 ... but apparently it is not maintained anymore, since there was no reaction to the bug report, though I even attached a p

Re: Updating xorg-x11-server

2024-09-19 Thread Simone Caronni
> xorg-x11-server is ready, I just fixed last issue which was with > Nouveau drive > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-video-nouveau/-/merge_requests/10 As mentioned in the thread, I'll proceed. Thanks. -- You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight

Re: "The Bugzilla review bug creator didn't match the requester in Pagure."

2024-09-19 Thread Ming Lei
On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 7:37 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 07:26:52PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 7:15 PM Richard W.M. Jones > > wrote: > > > > > > My sponsoree(?) Min Lei has a completed review request: > > > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sh

Re: "The Bugzilla review bug creator didn't match the requester in Pagure."

2024-09-19 Thread Ming Lei
On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 7:28 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 7:18 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > My sponsoree(?) Min Lei has a completed review request: > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2305524 > > > > However creating the new branch is a problem: > > > >

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

2024-09-19 Thread sgallagh
Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: ELN SIG on 2024-09-20 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat The meeting will be about: Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/10881/ -- ___ devel m

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20240919.n.0 changes

2024-09-19 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20240917.n.1 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20240919.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 3 Dropped packages:11 Upgraded packages: 256 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 438.46 KiB Size of dropped packages

Re: "The Bugzilla review bug creator didn't match the requester in Pagure."

2024-09-19 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 07:26:52PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 7:15 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > My sponsoree(?) Min Lei has a completed review request: > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2305524 > > > > However creating the new branch is a problem: >

Re: "The Bugzilla review bug creator didn't match the requester in Pagure."

2024-09-19 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 7:18 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > My sponsoree(?) Min Lei has a completed review request: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2305524 > > However creating the new branch is a problem: > > https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/67376 > "The Bugzil

Re: "The Bugzilla review bug creator didn't match the requester in Pagure."

2024-09-19 Thread Ming Lei
On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 7:15 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > My sponsoree(?) Min Lei has a completed review request: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2305524 > > However creating the new branch is a problem: > > https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/67376 > "The Bugzil

"The Bugzilla review bug creator didn't match the requester in Pagure."

2024-09-19 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
My sponsoree(?) Min Lei has a completed review request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2305524 However creating the new branch is a problem: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/67376 "The Bugzilla review bug creator didn't match the requester in Pagure." This is spec

Re: Fedora Docs Issue (Java Packaging Howto)

2024-09-19 Thread Peter Boy
> Am 19.09.2024 um 11:50 schrieb Marián Konček : > > Hi, I am reaching here because I didn't know where else to get attention to > my issue with Fedora Docs website: > https://gitlab.com/fedora/docs/docs-website/docs-fp-o/-/issues/9 > > It is blocking further development of Java packaging doc

Fedora Docs Issue (Java Packaging Howto)

2024-09-19 Thread Marián Konček
Hi, I am reaching here because I didn't know where else to get attention to my issue with Fedora Docs website: https://gitlab.com/fedora/docs/docs-website/docs-fp-o/-/issues/9 It is blocking further development of Java packaging docs. -- Marián Konček -- __

cppcheck orphaned

2024-09-19 Thread Susi Lehtola
Hi, I have orphaned cppcheck due to lack of time and use on my part. tdawson is an admin, while sgrubb and c72578 have commit rights. Susi -- Susi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lis

pcc orphaned

2024-09-19 Thread Susi Lehtola
Hi, I have orphaned the portable C compiler (pcc) package in Fedora due to lack of time and since I don't really use it. The package appears to have stopped working at some point (BZ#2263907) and the upstream server http://pcc.ludd.ltu.se/ appears to have died in March and is still not up. Susi -