2024-08-26 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora 41 Blocker Review Meeting

2024-08-25 Thread Adam Williamson
# F10 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2024-08-26 # Time: 16:00 UTC # Location: https://matrix.to/#/#blocker-review:fedoraproject.org?web-instance[element.io]=chat.fedoraproject.org Hi folks! It's time for a Fedora 41 blocker review meeting! We have 1 proposed blocker and 1 proposed freeze exception

Re: [SPDX] Mass license change - batch #2 of all remaining packages

2024-08-25 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Dne 25. 08. 24 v 5:26 odp. Fabio Valentini napsal(a): The parsec-tool conversion looks a bit strange. It's a Rust package, its License string should be trivially constructible from SPDX identifiers. It looks like it hasn't been updated in a while though, so it might predate the switch of defaults

Re: [SPDX] Mass license change - batch #2 of all remaining packages

2024-08-25 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Dne 25. 08. 24 v 1:20 odp. Alexander Ploumistos napsal(a): Hello Miroslav, I have opened issue #430 about inchi's license https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/issues/430 for the record , wasn't the tag going to be "LicenseRef-IUPAC-InChI-Trust"? Yes and no. Yes, the packa

Re: Heads-up: abseil-cpp 20240722.0 coming to F42/Rawhide and F41/Branched

2024-08-25 Thread Ben Beasley
These updates have been submitted to Bodhi and are waiting on OpenQA tests: F42: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-212edbea27 F41: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-5c6d8f4169 I was unable to rebuild credentials-fetcher because of https://bugzilla.redhat.com

Re: Packaging Guidelines: "Source File Verification" docs incomplete?

2024-08-25 Thread Björn Persson
Frank R Dana Jr. wrote: > unless we > want to tell packagers to use Seahorse to retrieve > upstream keys (and I'm assuming we don't), We want to tell them to get keys directly from upstream whenever possible, but if they must resort to searching keyservers, then they can use Seahorse, Kleopatra, t

Re: Packaging Guidelines: "Source File Verification" docs incomplete?

2024-08-25 Thread Björn Persson
Frank R Dana Jr. wrote: > Here's what the docs say: [...] > > Any detached signature file (e.g. foo.tar.gz.asc or foo.tar.gz.sig) > > must be uploaded to the package lookaside cache alongside the > > source code, while the keyring must be committed directly to the > > package SCM. > > Now, ev

Re: Packaging Guidelines: "Source File Verification" docs incomplete?

2024-08-25 Thread Gary Buhrmaster
On Sun, Aug 25, 2024 at 8:36 AM Frank R Dana Jr. wrote: > > Also, a yea/nay on whether I've correctly understood this point: > > > So, does that mean that remote keyrings should be listed at their source > > URL, > > BUT the `gpgkey-` file at that URL should be manually downloaded and > > `git ad

Review Request: fyi - Command line utility to send desktop notifications

2024-08-25 Thread Neel Chauhan
Hi, I have a package review which has been waiting for a few days. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2306164 Could one of you please review this package? Sorry for sending yet another review request. -Neel -- ___ devel mailing list -- dev

Re: Packaging Guidelines: "Source File Verification" docs incomplete?

2024-08-25 Thread Gary Buhrmaster
On Sun, Aug 25, 2024 at 8:26 AM Frank R Dana Jr. wrote: > I'd be happy to. (Believe me, the Edit button is _always_ > my first choice.) But the issue here is, unless we > want to tell packagers to use Seahorse to retrieve > upstream keys (and I'm assuming we don't), I don't > know what to tell th

Re: [SPDX] Mass license change - batch #2 of all remaining packages

2024-08-25 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sun, Aug 25, 2024 at 9:18 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Here is the second batch of changes for 1000 packages > (golang-github-danwakefield-fnmatch to perl-Image-Xbm) > > https://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/rest-of-callaway-batch2-normal-diff.txt > > Shorten version without the context is here: >

Re: Packages with problematic license tag (for SPDX conversion)

2024-08-25 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 4:08 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > As the SPDX Change slowly finishes I focused on the license that I regularly > report as: > > warning: not valid neither as Callaway nor as SPDX, please check (snip) I was finally able to set aside some time to look at this. > rust-bt

Re: [SPDX] Mass license change - batch #2 of all remaining packages

2024-08-25 Thread Alexander Ploumistos
Hello Miroslav, I have opened issue #430 about inchi's license, wasn't the tag going to be "LicenseRef-IUPAC-InChI-Trust"? -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fed

Re: Packaging Guidelines: "Source File Verification" docs incomplete?

2024-08-25 Thread Frank R Dana Jr.
Also, a yea/nay on whether I've correctly understood this point: > So, does that mean that remote keyrings should be listed at their source URL, > BUT the `gpgkey-` file at that URL should be manually downloaded and > `git add`-ed to the package repo? ...would be a help. Before I go and attempt t

Re: Packaging Guidelines: "Source File Verification" docs incomplete?

2024-08-25 Thread Frank R Dana Jr.
Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > Please consider > contributing to the docs to make it better (there is an > edit button there, as I recall). I'd be happy to. (Believe me, the Edit button is _always_ my first choice.) But the issue here is, unless we want to tell packagers to use Seahorse to retrieve upst

[SPDX] Mass license change - batch #2 of all remaining packages

2024-08-25 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Here is the second batch of changes for 1000 packages (golang-github-danwakefield-fnmatch to perl-Image-Xbm) https://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/rest-of-callaway-batch2-normal-diff.txt Shorten version without the context is here: https://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/rest-of-callaway-batch2-small-diff