Il 20/08/24 20:11, Ankur Sinha ha scritto:
> Hi Mattia,
>
> Thanks for this.
>
> I had a small query about the removal of folks from groups---are they
> not also removed from other packager groups?
>
> For example, I noticed we had folks in the neuro-sig packager group that
> had been removed from
On 20/08/2024 02.56, Michael Berry wrote:
> Hi! I don't have much of a resume but I am a long time
> user/enthusiast/activist of FOSS, and I recently filed a review request
> on an open source project I have been working on, a user friendly,
> robust btrfs backup program developed with Python. Here
Hi all,
I am planning to unretire tinyows[1], updating it to the current version
and reassociating it with its current upstream [2]. It will require a
re-review, of course.
Aside from some cruft in the specfile, the project is active and the
software pairs well with the likes of mod_mapcache, ma
I've already updated dnsviz to use python-cryptography in f41/f42 using
upstream patches from dnsviz.
On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 1:34 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I've just orphaned m2crypto. I and a couple of other folks tried to
> fix it this cycle and it's too difficult for us to deal wit
Hey all,
I've just orphaned m2crypto. I and a couple of other folks tried to
fix it this cycle and it's too difficult for us to deal with. I have
no need for this anymore, and upstream is moribund and more or less
recommending people to port away from it.
Here's the list of reverse dependencies f
Hi Mattia,
Thanks for this.
I had a small query about the removal of folks from groups---are they
not also removed from other packager groups?
For example, I noticed we had folks in the neuro-sig packager group that
had been removed from the packager group due to inactivity. I went ahead
and rem
In accordance with FESCo's Inactive Packager Policy[1], packagers that have
been identified
as inactive have a ticket in the find-inactive-packagers repo[2]. One week
after the final release,
packagers who remain inactive will be removed from the packager group. (Note
that pagure.io is
one of th
Hi,
On 8/20/24 13:44, Jan Grulich wrote:
Hi,
út 20. 8. 2024 v 12:30 odesílatel Fabio Valentini
napsal:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 4:33 PM Marek Kasik wrote:
Hi,
I've fixed this issue and rebuilt Inkscape.
Unfortunately, I have issues with some other packages due to the
unannounced soname b
On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 10:56:08 GMT, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hi folks,
Hi all,
>
> I'm updating nifticlib to v3. This includes a soname bump in one of the
> shared libraries:
>
> libznz.so.2 -> libznz.so.3.
>
> Only `vips` and `xmedcon` depend on this particular shared library. vips
> builds fine w
There is also the main matrix room which is at #security:fedoraproject.org
which gets double duty use for security discussions as well as discussion
for the Security-Lab Spin. It's the evolution of the original security IRC
room. It's more of a general contact point for people in the Fedora
Commu
OLD: Fedora-41-20240819.n.0
NEW: Fedora-41-20240820.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:5
Upgraded packages: 60
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 462.39 MiB
Size of dropped packages:929.44 KiB
Over the weekend I released fbrnch version 1.5.
The most obvious change is that it now uses Bodhi API instead of PDC to
determine current active branches, but there are a bunch of other useful
improvements:
- 'clone': new --group option
- 'copr' defaults to no longer rebuilding nvr's & new
Hi,
út 20. 8. 2024 v 12:30 odesílatel Fabio Valentini
napsal:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 4:33 PM Marek Kasik wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've fixed this issue and rebuilt Inkscape.
> >
> > Unfortunately, I have issues with some other packages due to the
> > unannounced soname bump of re2. qt5-qtw
On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 12:54:52PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 18, 2024 at 5:23 PM Andrew Bauer
> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks everyone for the great responses.
> >
> > I'll certainly check out the Matrix room if I have to, but I was hoping I
> > could do this in a way that allows me to
Am 20.08.24 um 12:54 schrieb Fabio Valentini:
On Sun, Aug 18, 2024 at 5:23 PM Andrew Bauer
wrote:
Thanks everyone for the great responses.
I'll certainly check out the Matrix room if I have to, but I was hoping I could
do this in a way that allows me to directly reference any responses I get
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 41 Branched 20240820.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On Sun, Aug 18, 2024 at 5:23 PM Andrew Bauer
wrote:
>
> Thanks everyone for the great responses.
>
> I'll certainly check out the Matrix room if I have to, but I was hoping I
> could do this in a way that allows me to directly reference any responses I
> get via link in the following new package
On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 4:33 PM Marek Kasik wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've fixed this issue and rebuilt Inkscape.
>
> Unfortunately, I have issues with some other packages due to the
> unannounced soname bump of re2. qt5-qtwebengine needs to be rebuilt due
> to that but it fails. I watch the
> https://sr
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20240819.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20240820.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:8
Upgraded packages: 64
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 462.48 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Hello folks,
Following @t0xic0der and @humaton’s talk on the Git forge ARC investigation
during Fedora Linux Release Party 40 and more recently, @humaton’s talk on the
topic during Flock To Fedora 2024 - we have opened up our ARC investigation to
all contributors within the Fedora Project. Plea
On pondělí 19. srpna 2024 10:23:09, SELČ Michael J Gruber wrote:
> Pavel Raiskup venit, vidit, dixit 2024-08-19 08:24:44:
> > Hello Michael,
> >
> > On pátek 16. srpna 2024 11:31:15, SELČ Michael J Gruber wrote:
> > > Pavel Raiskup venit, vidit, dixit 2024-08-16 11:06:21:
> > > > On čtvrtek 15. sr
21 matches
Mail list logo
