On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 6:59 PM Leigh Scott wrote:
>
> I have decided to orphan these packages as they are useless replacements for
> the nvidia driver provided libs.
> The rpmfusion 560+ driver will use the bundled libs.
>
> I believe it's time fedora dropped eglstream support.
>
Thanks for your
Przemek Klosowski via devel wrote:
> I just can't agree with this statement---both in some deep philosophical
> sense and in practical terms. F is for First! Yes, the changes are
> sometimes annoying---I miss my FreeCAD :(---but, overall, I think Fedora
> has a track record of consistently advancin
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> The approved/second/reworked version of this _did_ take lots of people's
> concerns into account. There were/are still some few people who still
> didn't like it for whatever reasons, but I think it's pretty clear that
> concerns were defintely heard. The change owners were ver
I have decided to orphan these packages as they are useless replacements for
the nvidia driver provided libs.
The rpmfusion 560+ driver will use the bundled libs.
I believe it's time fedora dropped eglstream support.
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/merge_requests/1386
Affected pac
Well put---and sorry for my coming late to the party and emailing
essentially the same observation before reading the thread to the end).
Very Respectfully
p
On 7/31/24 11:02, Simon Farnsworth via devel wrote:
On Wednesday 31 July 2024 10:53:37 BST Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 24. 07. 24 v 20:17 St
On 7/31/24 12:08, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
The relevant metric isn't how many people voted, but how many people
are eligible to vote - which is a much much larger number than 200.
Finding 20 out of the eligible voter pool is a pretty low bar.
For what it's worth, the Swiss requirement for a re
On Thu, 2024-08-01 at 07:46 -0600, Leo Sandoval wrote:
> > >
> > > Again, once we have something solid, I will share relevant links for
> > further community reviewing & testing.
> > >
> >
> > Any progress on this? We're gearing up to Flock and branching will be
> > the week after Flock...
> >
On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 9:24 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 9:13 AM Owen Taylor wrote:
> >
> > Hi Neal -
> >
> > Daniel's original suggestion here (make pkg-config always look in /app
> too) actually seems fine to me and simple, and I don't see any downsides.
> But certainly flatpa
On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 5:03 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 10:56 AM Leo Sandoval wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 4:11 AM Andrea Bolognani
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 11:02:57AM GMT, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> >> > On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 10:57:42AM G
On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 9:13 AM Owen Taylor wrote:
>
> Hi Neal -
>
> Daniel's original suggestion here (make pkg-config always look in /app too)
> actually seems fine to me and simple, and I don't see any downsides. But
> certainly flatpak-rpm-macros doesn't *just* modify RPM macros, it currently
On Thu, Aug 01, 2024 at 07:09:56AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 9:38 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> >
> > There have been a number of PRs[1] opened to workaround problems
> > with pkg-config not finding .pc files when dependencies have
> > been built in flatpak context.
> >
>
Hi Neal -
Daniel's original suggestion here (make pkg-config always look in /app too)
actually seems fine to me and simple, and I don't see any downsides. But
certainly flatpak-rpm-macros doesn't *just* modify RPM macros, it currently
also:
- Changes the installation prefix for Python by droppin
On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 9:38 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> There have been a number of PRs[1] opened to workaround problems
> with pkg-config not finding .pc files when dependencies have
> been built in flatpak context.
>
> Normally pkg-config would always find .pc files in any system
> dirs. ie
On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 10:56 AM Leo Sandoval wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 4:11 AM Andrea Bolognani wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 11:02:57AM GMT, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
>> > On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 10:57:42AM GMT, Leo Sandoval wrote:
>> > > Hi team,
>> > >
>> > > We (the Red Hat
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20240731.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20240801.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:4
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 55
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 26.67 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Dne 31. 07. 24 v 11:50 odp. Michal Ambroz napsal(a):
*# Bug 2246704 - Review Request: python-xlrd2 - Library to extract data from Microsoft Excel legacy spreadsheet files
*(xls)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2246704
I take this.
If you can do review of
https://bugzilla.redhat
Hot news:
* Big batch of GPL families was mass converted.
* Sent email about packages with problems (licenses neither in SPDX nor in
Callaway format).
* Still on todo list: convert Perl licenses (already announced) and Public
Domain, UltraPermissive, and Firmware.
Two weeks ago we had:
*
17 matches
Mail list logo
