Re: F42 Change Proposal: Enable Drm Panic (system-wide)

Am 16.07.24 um 09:26 schrieb Barry: On 15 Jul 2024, at 18:29, Jocelyn Falempe wrote: I will also check if I can patch VT_CONSOLE, so that it can be disabled on the kernel command line, instead of compile time, to avoid this gap. I'm currently preparing a test kernel, so that you can test o

Re: F42 Change Proposal: Enable Drm Panic (system-wide)

> On 16 Jul 2024, at 22:19, Michel Lind wrote: > > Server does not install Plymouth either AIUI; compare I have not installed server for a few releases, but have always dns removed plymouth* as one of my first config changes. Barry -- ___ devel mai

Re: F42 Change Proposal: Enable Drm Panic (system-wide)

> On 16 Jul 2024, at 12:49, Jocelyn Falempe wrote: > > i915, amdgpu, and nvidia are not yet supported, so you need to blacklist > them, in order to use simpledrm, if you want to see the panic screen. Let me know when amdgpu or i915 are supported then I can test. Barry --

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 03:36:22PM +0800, kefu chai wrote: > Hi folks, > > fmt 11.0.1 update will include soversion bump from .10 to .11. > > All dependent packages must be rebuilt in Rawhide. > > I've built the compatibility package of fmt10 and the regular fmt 11 > packages in the side tag of

Re: F42 Change Proposal: Enable Drm Panic (system-wide)

On Sun, Jul 14, 2024 at 08:24:58PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > Ian Pilcher writes: > > > On 7/13/24 4:32 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > >> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes: > > The idea for DRM_PANIC is nice, but I worry about the impact of > > disabling > > VT

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2024-07-16)

On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 02:15:28PM -0500, Michel Lind wrote: > = > # #meeting:fedoraproject.org: fesco > = > Forgot to include the links Text Log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-07-1

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2024-07-16)

= # #meeting:fedoraproject.org: fesco = Meeting started by @salimma:fedora.im at 2024-07-16 17:00:25 Meeting summary --- * TOPIC: Init Process (@salimma:fedora.im, 17:00:53) * TOPIC: #3232 Change: Mark Fedora KD

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in 2 weeks

On 7/16/24 12:18 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: php-symfony siwinski php-symfony-psr-http-message-bridge siwinski php-symfony3    remi, siwinski Can someone pick these up? I do not have any more capacity to take on packages. As the report will show these will break Mediawi

Package guidelines - installing podman container service as unprivileged user/Quadlets

Hello, I'm looking at packaging a couple of services that would be run via podman. I'd like for them to run as an unprivileged user. I've come across the concept of quadlets to use a systemd generator to create the service. I haven't found anything in the packaging guidelines on them, or handlin

List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in 2 weeks

Dear maintainers. Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages should be retired from Fedora 41 approximately one week before branching. 5 weekly reminders are required, hence the retirement will happen approximately in 2 weeks, i.e. around 2024-07-30. Policy:

Re: sbin-merge: what to do?

On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 11:51:28AM GMT, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 11:13 AM Adam Williamson > wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2024-07-16 at 08:08 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 05:07:57PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 08:23:05AM G

Re: Epel8 build with python > 3.6?

On 16. 07. 24 17:08, Mark E. Fuller via devel wrote: But the magic switch I need appears to be: %global __python3 /usr/bin/python3.12 And: %global python3_pkgversion 3.12 Some packages successfully build without this one, but the idea is: BuildRequires: python%{python3_pkgversion}-devel Bui

Re: Screen brightness keys not working

On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 at 12:29, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 7/15/24 9:50 PM, Iñaki Ucar wrote: > > It's the kernel. Going back to 6.9.6 fixes the issue... > > Ok, that is a good first step in debugging this. > > Can you run evtest with the working kernel and then check which > event node is g

Re: sbin-merge: what to do?

On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 11:13 AM Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Tue, 2024-07-16 at 08:08 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 05:07:57PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 08:23:05AM GMT, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > > > > > So… the question

Re: aarch64 iso images - can we link the Everything installer?

On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 at 17:19, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2024-07-16 at 09:28 +0200, Adam Samalik wrote: > > I noticed we're no longer link to aarch64 isos: > > https://fedoraproject.org/spins/kde/download > > Not even for Workstation: https://fedoraproject.org/workstation/download > > > > I

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On Tue, 2024-07-16 at 20:51 +0800, kefu chai wrote: > On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 5:48 PM Frantisek Zatloukal > wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 11:19 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel < > > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > > > > I've rebuilt some important dependent packages (spdlo

Re: aarch64 iso images - can we link the Everything installer?

On Tue, 2024-07-16 at 09:28 +0200, Adam Samalik wrote: > I noticed we're no longer link to aarch64 isos: > https://fedoraproject.org/spins/kde/download > Not even for Workstation: https://fedoraproject.org/workstation/download > > I heard it failed to build. Fair enough. > > But the Everything in

Re: sbin-merge: what to do?

On Tue, 2024-07-16 at 08:08 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 05:07:57PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 08:23:05AM GMT, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > > > So… the question now: should I pull the plug on the change for F41, > > > dump the si

Re: the sad state of installability tests

On Tue, 2024-07-16 at 09:19 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 4:06 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 08:55:03AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > This seems like overkill. Wouldn't the simplest valid installability > > > test just

Re: Epel8 build with python > 3.6?

Jul 16, 2024 17:03:22 Miro Hrončok : > On 16. 07. 24 13:28, Petr Pisar wrote: >> V Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 05:24:55AM -0400, Stephen Smoogen napsal(a): >>> So you are running into modularity issue there and I am guessing it is from >>> mock versus koji because koji gets around modularity with a hack.

Re: Epel8 build with python > 3.6?

On 16. 07. 24 13:28, Petr Pisar wrote: V Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 05:24:55AM -0400, Stephen Smoogen napsal(a): So you are running into modularity issue there and I am guessing it is from mock versus koji because koji gets around modularity with a hack. In mock you have to tell it to enable the modul

Re: aarch64 iso images - can we link the Everything installer?

On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 5:41 AM Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 at 08:28, Adam Samalik wrote: > > > > I noticed we're no longer link to aarch64 isos: > > https://fedoraproject.org/spins/kde/download > > Not even for Workstation: https://fedoraproject.org/workstation/download > > >

Re: F42 Change Proposal: Enable Drm Panic (system-wide)

Hi, > > > Do you expect to see the rest of the drivers supported by the time > > > Fedora 42 rolls around? Because if it only works with nouveau, it's > > > probably not worth enabling. > > > > I think it's a bit of a chicken and egg problem. If no distro enables > > it, there will be little inc

Re: F42 Change Proposal: Enable Drm Panic (system-wide)

On 16/07/2024 14:53, Neal Gompa wrote: On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 8:35 AM Jocelyn Falempe wrote: On 16/07/2024 14:05, Neal Gompa wrote: On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 7:49 AM Jocelyn Falempe wrote: I've made a test kernel build with drm_panic enabled (and VT_CONSOLE disabled): https://koji.fedo

Re: The future Fedora Copr "rolling" chroot cleanup policy

On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 3:44 AM Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > On pondělí 15. července 2024 16:32:45, SELČ Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 10:21 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > > > > > Dne 15. 07. 24 v 2:57 odp. Stephen Gallagher napsal(a): > > > > > > Instead of always keeping "Rawhi

Re: the sad state of installability tests

On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 4:06 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 08:55:03AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > This seems like overkill. Wouldn't the simplest valid installability > > test just be to test whether each subpackage *individually* could be > > installed?

[Re] Fedora 41 Mass Rebuild Notification - Scheduled for 2024-07-17

Hi all, Per the Fedora Linux 41 schedule [1], we will start a mass rebuild on 2024-07-17 for Fedora 41. We will be conducting this mass rebuild for the changes listed in: https://pagure.io/releng/issues?status=Open&tags=mass+rebuild This mass rebuild will be done in a side tag (f41-rebuild) and

Re: F42 Change Proposal: Enable Drm Panic (system-wide)

On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 8:35 AM Jocelyn Falempe wrote: > > > > On 16/07/2024 14:05, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 7:49 AM Jocelyn Falempe wrote: > >> > >> I've made a test kernel build with drm_panic enabled (and VT_CONSOLE > >> disabled): > >> > >> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 5:48 PM Frantisek Zatloukal wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 11:19 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel < > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > >> I've rebuilt some important dependent packages (spdlog) in this side >> tag, so technically we can merge this side tag today be

Last Call for F41 Self-Contained Changes Today

Hi Folks, Today is the last day to submit any self-contained change you would like to propose for Fedora Linux 41. Our submission guidance can be found >>here<< and the full schedule for F41 development can be found >>here<< <

Re: F42 Change Proposal: Enable Drm Panic (system-wide)

On 16/07/2024 14:05, Neal Gompa wrote: On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 7:49 AM Jocelyn Falempe wrote: I've made a test kernel build with drm_panic enabled (and VT_CONSOLE disabled): https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=120544794 I've backported a few patches, that are not in v6.10,

Re: Epel8 build with python > 3.6?

V Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 01:46:53PM +0200, Mark E. Fuller via devel napsal(a): > pytest is a red herring - it doesn't cause issues with python312. My build > with python 3.12 fails because the scons build detects python version 3.6, > not 3.12. Getting the detected version to >3.6 is my real problem

Re: F42 Change Proposal: Enable Drm Panic (system-wide)

On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 7:49 AM Jocelyn Falempe wrote: > > I've made a test kernel build with drm_panic enabled (and VT_CONSOLE > disabled): > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=120544794 > > I've backported a few patches, that are not in v6.10, like: > short panic description:

Re: Epel8 build with python > 3.6?

On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 at 07:30, Petr Pisar wrote: > > V Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 05:24:55AM -0400, Stephen Smoogen napsal(a): > > So you are running into modularity issue there and I am guessing it is from > > mock versus koji because koji gets around modularity with a hack. In mock > > you have to tell

Re: F42 Change Proposal: Enable Drm Panic (system-wide)

I've made a test kernel build with drm_panic enabled (and VT_CONSOLE disabled): https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=120544794 I've backported a few patches, that are not in v6.10, like: short panic description: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/135356/ kmsg panic_screen:

Re: Epel8 build with python > 3.6?

Jul 16, 2024 13:30:00 Petr Pisar : > V Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 05:24:55AM -0400, Stephen Smoogen napsal(a): >> So you are running into modularity issue there and I am guessing it is from >> mock versus koji because koji gets around modularity with a hack. In mock >> you have to tell it to enable the

Re: Epel8 build with python > 3.6?

V Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 05:24:55AM -0400, Stephen Smoogen napsal(a): > So you are running into modularity issue there and I am guessing it is from > mock versus koji because koji gets around modularity with a hack. In mock > you have to tell it to enable the module there are in. I don’t know the > s

Re: Screen brightness keys not working

Hi, On 7/15/24 9:50 PM, Iñaki Ucar wrote: > It's the kernel. Going back to 6.9.6 fixes the issue... Ok, that is a good first step in debugging this. Can you run evtest with the working kernel and then check which event node is generating key-presses for the brightness keys, that should help narr

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 11:19 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > I've rebuilt some important dependent packages (spdlog) in this side > tag, so technically we can merge this side tag today before the mass > rebuild starts. > Yeah, you're right, missing that woul

Re: aarch64 iso images - can we link the Everything installer?

On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 at 08:28, Adam Samalik wrote: > > I noticed we're no longer link to aarch64 isos: > https://fedoraproject.org/spins/kde/download > Not even for Workstation: https://fedoraproject.org/workstation/download > > I heard it failed to build. Fair enough. We do link the Server insta

Re: Epel8 build with python > 3.6?

So you are running into modularity issue there and I am guessing it is from mock versus koji because koji gets around modularity with a hack. In mock you have to tell it to enable the module there are in. I don’t know the syntax off hand but it is probably a command line flag. Stephen Smoogen, Red

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On 16/07/2024 11:10, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote: At this point, I'd probably say go ahead and build a new fmt 11 and fmt 10 compat in rawhide proper. There is a mass rebuild starting tomorrow which will take care of the rebuilds, and since you've introduced the compat package, there is no much h

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

Hello Kefu, At this point, I'd probably say go ahead and build a new fmt 11 and fmt 10 compat in rawhide proper. There is a mass rebuild starting tomorrow which will take care of the rebuilds, and since you've introduced the compat package, there is no much harm this can cause. On Tue, Jul 16, 20

Re: Why branched config pointed to rolling config?

On středa 14. února 2024 14:39:50, SELČ Mikhail Gavrilov wrote: > Why branched config pointed to rolling config? > > # ls -ln | grep fedora-40 > lrwxrwxrwx. 1 0 135 26 Jan 11 20:46 fedora-40-aarch64.cfg -> > fedora-rawhide-aarch64.cfg > lrwxrwxrwx. 1 0 135 23 Jan 11 20:46 fedora-40-i386.cfg -

Re: The future Fedora Copr "rolling" chroot cleanup policy

Thank you for the reply, Kevin. On úterý 16. července 2024 3:34:06, SELČ Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > This is a gentle heads-up (at least a year in advance) that we plan to > > address Fedora Copr storage consumption related to Fedora Rawhide > > builds. Currently, Raw

Re: The future Fedora Copr "rolling" chroot cleanup policy

On pondělí 15. července 2024 16:32:45, SELČ Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 10:21 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > > > Dne 15. 07. 24 v 2:57 odp. Stephen Gallagher napsal(a): > > > > Instead of always keeping "Rawhide" around as a separate buildroot, > > why not just rename it at Br

Announcing fmt library soversion bump

Hi folks, fmt 11.0.1 update will include soversion bump from .10 to .11. All dependent packages must be rebuilt in Rawhide. I've built the compatibility package of fmt10 and the regular fmt 11 packages in the side tag of f41-build-side-92475. following packages need to be rebuilt: 0ad arbor be

aarch64 iso images - can we link the Everything installer?

I noticed we're no longer link to aarch64 isos: https://fedoraproject.org/spins/kde/download Not even for Workstation: https://fedoraproject.org/workstation/download I heard it failed to build. Fair enough. But the Everything installer iso for aarch64 works fine, we just don't seem to link it fro

Re: F42 Change Proposal: Enable Drm Panic (system-wide)

> On 15 Jul 2024, at 18:29, Jocelyn Falempe wrote: > > I will also check if I can patch VT_CONSOLE, so that it can be disabled on > the kernel command line, instead of compile time, to avoid this gap. > > I'm currently preparing a test kernel, so that you can test on your own, and > report i

Re: F42 Change Proposal: Enable Drm Panic (system-wide)

> On 15 Jul 2024, at 18:29, Jocelyn Falempe wrote: > > Yes, but I don't think this happens often in practice. And in this case there > is little chance the kernel logs will help you much anyway, because when it > hangs, you don't have the call trace, and the last kernel log might be > unrela

Re: sbin-merge: what to do?

On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 05:07:57PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 08:23:05AM GMT, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > So… the question now: should I pull the plug on the change for F41, > > dump the side tag, and try again for F42? Or wait for some of the patches > > abov