Hi,
I found fedora:40 container image does not contain util-linux-core.
Is it intentional?
I'd like some commands (findmnt in my case) included in the base image...
## fedora:39 container image has findmnt
$ podman run --rm quay.io/fedora/fedora:39 sh -c 'type findmnt; rpm -q
util-linux-core'
f
On Wednesday, 15 May 2024 at 19:00, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 6:23 PM Leigh Scott wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 4:31 PM Olivier Fourdan
> > > > >
> > > Not directly related, but hopefully not entirely off-topic:
> > > Are there plans to update the xorg-x11-serve
Hello maintainers,
We released a new version of Mock, the chroot build environment manager for
building RPMs, and a new version of mock-core-configs.
The notable changes are big performance improvements for bash completion,
many bugfixes, new Circle Linux 9 configs, and more.
Full release notes:
> On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 6:23 PM Leigh Scott wrote:
>
> Does this mean "I'm against it" or "it would involve retiring two
> legacy NVidia driver packages"?
>
> Fabio
I'm indifferent to the legacy drivers.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedo
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 6:23 PM Leigh Scott wrote:
>
> > On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 4:31 PM Olivier Fourdan > wrote:
> >
> > Not directly related, but hopefully not entirely off-topic:
> > Are there plans to update the xorg-x11-server package itself to the
> > new stable branch too?
> >
> > It's bee
> This message is meant as a heads up because I am considering upgrading
> Xwayland to version 24.1.0 in Fedora 40.
+1 for this in f40.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorapr
> On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 4:31 PM Olivier Fourdan wrote:
>
> Not directly related, but hopefully not entirely off-topic:
> Are there plans to update the xorg-x11-server package itself to the
> new stable branch too?
>
> It's been stuck on the 1.20.14 release for a long time (on the last
> releas
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 2:02 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 15. 05. 24 13:31, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > I am saying that Python is bad example and nobody should follow it.
>
> I respectfully disagree. The LLVM maintainers think it is a good example worth
> following. So did the NodeJS maintainers. Nam
+1 for adding this to f40, nvidia-470xx goes EOL September 2024.
> This message is meant as a heads up because I am considering upgrading
> Xwayland to version 24.1.0 in Fedora 40.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 4:31 PM Olivier Fourdan wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Today was released Xwayland 24.1.0, a new stable branch of Xwayland.
Not directly related, but hopefully not entirely off-topic:
Are there plans to update the xorg-x11-server package itself to the
new stable branch too?
It's
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 8:31 AM Olivier Fourdan wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Today was released Xwayland 24.1.0, a new stable branch of Xwayland.
>
> That version brings quite a few improvements, among which is support for
> explicit GPU synchronization.
>
> This is required to enable explicit GPU sync
Hi all,
Today was released Xwayland 24.1.0, a new stable branch of Xwayland.
That version brings quite a few improvements, among which is support for
explicit GPU synchronization.
This is required to enable explicit GPU synchronization with the next
version of the NVIDIA proprietary graphics dri
Hi
I've now merged the side tag.
Three packages failed to build:
- bes: FTBFS due to multiple causes (lxml2, hdf5 incompatibilities,
incompatible-pointer-type errors, missing flex/bison BR - I gave up on
the hdf5 incompatibilities)
- python-fiona: Test failures related to the parquet file for
On Wed, May 15 2024 at 08:52:28 AM +00:00:00, Ian McInerney via devel
wrote:
What if I don't use GNOME search? I don't use the GNOME desktop, so I
don't want to have a random Firefox process running on my machine
that is doing absolutely nothing and just hogging resources. Is this
process only
Am 15.05.24 um 14:11 schrieb Tom Hughes via devel:
On 15/05/2024 13:06, Michael J Gruber wrote:
Is this used by Gnome search unconditionally? I might want to use Gnome
but not a background indexer/tracker/search engine. Threw me off back
then
when KDE introcuced something like that.
Go to "
On 15/05/2024 13:06, Michael J Gruber wrote:
Is this used by Gnome search unconditionally? I might want to use Gnome
but not a background indexer/tracker/search engine. Threw me off back then
when KDE introcuced something like that.
Go to "Search" in the Gnome settings and you can control whic
Vitaly Zaitsev via devel venit, vidit, dixit 2024-05-15 12:55:10:
> On 15/05/2024 10:52, Ian McInerney via devel wrote:
> > What if I don't use GNOME search? I don't use the GNOME desktop, so I don't
> > want to have a random Firefox process running on my machine that is doing
> > absolutely noth
On 15. 05. 24 13:31, Vít Ondruch wrote:
I am saying that Python is bad example and nobody should follow it.
I respectfully disagree. The LLVM maintainers think it is a good example worth
following. So did the NodeJS maintainers. Name-versioning all the components
makes things so much easier f
Dne 15. 05. 24 v 12:10 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
On 15. 05. 24 10:08, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 14. 05. 24 v 18:35 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
On 14. 05. 24 16:02, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 13. 05. 24 v 20:23 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
On 13. 05. 24 15:38, Vít Ondruch wrote:
And TBH, for me as a Fedora u
On Wed, 15 May 2024 at 04:09, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Every time I bring up such discussion, I am told "the reason it is
> called python3 and not python is well know" and yes, it is know to some,
> including me. But advocating for less experienced users. I advocating
> for users which are not ex
On 15/05/2024 10:52, Ian McInerney via devel wrote:
What if I don't use GNOME search? I don't use the GNOME desktop, so I don't
want to have a random Firefox process running on my machine that is doing
absolutely nothing and just hogging resources. Is this process only created
when something t
On 15. 05. 24 10:08, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 14. 05. 24 v 18:35 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
On 14. 05. 24 16:02, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 13. 05. 24 v 20:23 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
On 13. 05. 24 15:38, Vít Ondruch wrote:
And TBH, for me as a Fedora used with no special interest in Python, the
curr
On 15/05/2024 09:52, Ian McInerney via devel wrote:
Also, don't new enabled-by-default services need approval from either FESCO or
the Workstation WG according to the packaging docs
(https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/DefaultServices/)? I
know the page seems to focus on
What if I don't use GNOME search? I don't use the GNOME desktop, so I don't
want to have a random Firefox process running on my machine that is doing
absolutely nothing and just hogging resources. Is this process only created
when something tries to talk to it on the DBus socket, or is it always
It is still not late to introduce e.g. `%callaway_licenses` macro and
enclose the old licenses into such macro, to make it more obvious that
those licenses were not converted yet. This should have been done from
the start
Vít
Dne 13. 05. 24 v 23:41 Miroslav Suchý napsal(a):
Dne 13. 05
Dne 13. 05. 24 v 23:22 Nils Philippsen napsal(a):
On Mon, 2024-05-13 at 14:58 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Why would you push Gimp 3 into Fedora <= 40?
Why wouldn’t I? It’s technically feasible without really jumping
through hoops, and I don’t want to force users to upgrade the OS – or
wait for F
Dne 14. 05. 24 v 18:35 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
On 14. 05. 24 16:02, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 13. 05. 24 v 20:23 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
On 13. 05. 24 15:38, Vít Ondruch wrote:
And TBH, for me as a Fedora used with no special interest in
Python, the current Python versioning sucks hard. How am
Hello folks,
Firefox 126.0 for Fedora 40
(https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-eabe68b149) comes
with enabled DBus service.
It means there's a dedicated firefox process which may be run by DBus as
service (/usr/share/dbus-1/services/org.mozilla.firefox.service) and
provides o
Hi,
based on result from Fedora legal team, the license for openexr is now
modified from BSD-3-Clause to following format:
BSD-3-Clause WITH AdditionRef-OpenEXR-Additional-IP-Rights OR Apache-2.0
Best regards
Josef Ridky
Senior Software Engineer
Core Services Team
Red Hat Czech, s.r.o.
--
_
29 matches
Mail list logo
