Hi Kevin,
Personally, I think this is a beta requirement.
>
IIUC the Fedora 41 Beta requirement is to successfully upgrade the system
from Fedora 40, as mentioned here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_upgrade_dnf_current_workstation.
So this still relates to the dnf4 package, which is
Hi Maxwell,
This contains an update to dnf 5.2.0 which has breaking API changes. I did
> not
> see these communicated anywhere and the Change Proposal did not mention
> that
> the update would include a major version bump at the same time as the
> switch to
> dnf5 as default.
>
You're right; we m
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 11:42:57AM GMT, Jan Kolarik wrote:
> Hello Michael,
>
> Does this mean that distro-upgrade from F41 to F42 is supposed to work
> > at F41 release time (ideally at beta time)?
> >
>
> Yes, the system-upgrade functionality should be available before the Fedora
> 41
> release
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 05:48:46AM GMT, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>
> There's also the effort of distribuiting and archiving a few
> additional gigabytes, putting up the links on the website and browsing
> through them, some additional time and and additional step that can
> fail during b
On 4/24/24 11:14 AM, Aoife Moloney wrote:
Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Drop_Mandatory_Requires_on_JRE
Announced -
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f41-change-proposal-drop-mandatory-requires-on-jre-system-wide/114186
[snip]
=== Context ===
Java packages are compiled
Hi Jan,
On Thu Apr 25, 2024 at 07:42 +0200, Jan Kolarik wrote:
> We've prepared a side-tag for testing Rawhide with dnf5 as the default
> package manager. Instructions for installing the packages from the side-tag
> can be found at the following link [1].
> [1] https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/upd
The side tag is nearly complete. I have finished rebuilding all of the
packages in “my” list for openexr except Blender (which I’ll tackle soon).
I discovered that an ABI-incompatible update was committed to the
Rawhide branch for OpenColorIO, but never built, about two months ago.
Since I nee
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20240424.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20240425.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:13
Upgraded packages: 92
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 34.48 KiB
Size of dropped packages
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 5:31 AM Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 at 12:32, Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 10:49 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 10:33:51PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 3:26 P
On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 at 12:32, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 10:49 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 10:33:51PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 3:26 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Apr
On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 10:49 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 10:33:51PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 3:26 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 04:57:40PM +0100, Aoife Moloney wrote:
> > > > Wiki -
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 02:19:36AM -, Matthew Krupcale wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I am interested in taking ownership of the unison package [1]. The
> most recent discussion on this topic of which I'm aware is from
> 2018-05 [2], which was attempting to bring all of the various unison
> versions [
Hello Michael,
Does this mean that distro-upgrade from F41 to F42 is supposed to work
> at F41 release time (ideally at beta time)?
>
Yes, the system-upgrade functionality should be available before the Fedora
41
release date. We're planning extensive testing for this, including a Fedora
Testing
Hi Mattia,
Yep, there's a dnf5-testing COPR that serves exactly this purpose:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/rpmsoftwaremanagement/dnf5-testing.
Jan
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 10:10 AM Mattia Verga via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Il 25/04/24 07:42, Jan Kolarik ha scrit
Jan Kolarik venit, vidit, dixit 2024-04-25 07:42:10:
> Hello everyone,
>
> We've prepared a side-tag for testing Rawhide with dnf5 as the default
> package manager. Instructions for installing the packages from the side-tag
> can be found at the following link [1].
>
> Please provide feedback in
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 2:18 AM Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez <
carlosrodrifernan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Actually, I see what the problem is.
>
> The task is for 2.69-8 [1], but the subtask runs for 2.69-3 first to
> then have a reference for the diff. So I guess it will work next time a
> new versio
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 2:12 AM Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez <
carlosrodrifernan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Siteshwar,
>
> Thank you for the report. The libcap subtask failed [1] for a known
> issue, which is present in libcap 2.69-3 in Fedora rawhide, but was
> already fixed two weeks ago. Fedora ra
Il 25/04/24 07:42, Jan Kolarik ha scritto:
> Hello everyone,
>
> We've prepared a side-tag for testing Rawhide with dnf5 as the default
> package manager. Instructions for installing the packages from the
> side-tag can be found at the following link [1].
>
> Please provide feedback in Bodhi or o
18 matches
Mail list logo
