On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 2:18 AM Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez < carlosrodrifernan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Actually, I see what the problem is. > > The task is for 2.69-8 [1], but the subtask runs for 2.69-3 first to > then have a reference for the diff. So I guess it will work next time a > new version of libcap goes out. > `koji latest-build f40 libcap` gives me: libcap-2.69-3.fc40 I used the mock profile from Fedora 41 to do the build, so probably that caused the build failure. > > [1] https://openscanhub.fedoraproject.org/task/83/ > > On 4/24/24 17:11, Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez wrote: > > Hi Siteshwar, > > > > Thank you for the report. The libcap subtask failed [1] for a known > > issue, which is present in libcap 2.69-3 in Fedora rawhide, but was > > already fixed two weeks ago. Fedora rawhide has 2.69-8, and I can > > confirm it is the case when I run the fedora:41 images. 2.69-8 should > > have been in the mirrors for more than one week. I'm surprised it wasn't > > picked up when this report was run. Will the report be rerun eventually > > with an updated version of Fedora 41? > > > > Thank you, > > Carlos R.F. > > > > [1] https://openscanhub.fedoraproject.org/task/135/log/stdout.log > > > > > > On 4/24/24 09:26, Siteshwar Vashisht wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> This is a follow up on my previous email[1] about OpenScanHub > >> Prototype for Fedora. > >> Thank you to those who have provided early feedback. Your help is > >> truly appreciated! > >> > >> I am writing this message to get feedback from the community on > >> possibly new defects identified by static analyzers in Core Critical > >> Path packages that have changed in Fedora 41. > >> > >> TLDR: This report[2] contains 14188 identified defects. Please review > >> the report and provide feedback. > >> > >> A mass scan was performed this week on the packages that have changed > >> in Fedora 41. This report[2] contains all the new defects that have > >> been identified in the core packages listed in Critical Path Packages. > >> Please review the report and fix or report any defects to upstream > >> that may be real bugs. Not all defects reported by OpenScanHub may be > >> actual bugs, so please verify reported defects before investing time > >> into fixing or reporting them. We hope this is helpful for the > >> packages you maintain and for the upstream projects. Questions can be > >> asked on the OpenScanHub mailing list[3]. If you want to see the full > >> logs of the scans, they are available on the tasks[4] page. User > >> documentation for performing a scan is available on the Fedora wiki[5]. > >> > >> If the feedback on this report is positive, there may be a possibility > >> of increasing the scope of scans to cover a wider range of packages. > >> > >> Please remember this is currently an early production stage for > >> OpenScanHub scanning. Constructive feedback is appreciated. Thank you! > >> > >> [1] > >> > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/OMKLJFW4VC242QSA7R4KMGI6IGBT3YLM/ > < > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/OMKLJFW4VC242QSA7R4KMGI6IGBT3YLM/ > > > >> > >> [2] https://svashisht.fedorapeople.org/f41-22-Apr-2024/ > >> <https://svashisht.fedorapeople.org/f41-22-Apr-2024/> > >> > >> [3] > >> > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/openscan...@lists.fedoraproject.org/ > < > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/openscan...@lists.fedoraproject.org/ > > > >> > >> [4] https://openscanhub.fedoraproject.org/task/ > >> <https://openscanhub.fedoraproject.org/task/> > >> > >> [5] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/OpenScanHub > >> <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/OpenScanHub> > >> > >> -- > >> _______________________________________________ > >> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > >> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > >> Fedora Code of Conduct: > >> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > >> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > >> List Archives: > >> > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > >> Do not reply to spam, report it: > >> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue > -- > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue >
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
