Non-responsive maintainer check for dagostinelli

Hi, I'm trying to reach the maintainer of fswatch [1]. fswatch will be a dependency of neovim 0.10 and I would like to get it updated to be prepared for the release. It looks like the maintainer is unresponsive. I've open the bugs [2] and [3]. [3] is the bug for this non-responsive maintainer c

Re: So you can't just copy 'sources' from one package to another?

On Fri, 2024-03-08 at 16:19 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > For mingw-* packages we (sometimes) have a separate package from the > native package, eg. libgcrypt vs mingw-libgcrypt.  Therefore two > different packages are sometimes built with the exact same sources. > > However I discovered copy

Fedora CoreOS Community Meeting Minutes 2024-03-27

Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting-1_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-03-27/fedora-coreos-meeting.2024-03-27-16.30.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot-raw.fedoraproject.org//meeting-1_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-03-27/fedora-coreos-meeting.2024-03-27-16.30.txt Log: https://meetbot.f

Re: [SPDX] Mass license change: Intro and change of "Bitstream Vera" to "Bitstream-Vera"

27. maaliskuuta 2024 12.59.11 GMT+02:00 Petr Pisar kirjoitti: >V Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 02:52:50PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý napsal(a): >> I have no strong opinion how to process with the case of  "MIT and BSD and >> Bitstream Vera and OFL". I think that converting it to " MIT and BSD and >> Bitstream

Re: some man pages have bugs, can't be grep'd

I wrote a very long time ago: >> I've been seeing this since clean installing Fedora 30. I don't recall >> ever seeing it before, including on a Fedora 29 -> Fedora 30 upgraded >> system (is now the clean installed system). >> [chris@flap ~]$ man rpm | grep -C 10 rpmverbosity >> :176: warning [p

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On 27. 03. 24 16:03, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 9:46 PM Miro Hrončok > wrote: On 25. 03. 24 7:48, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: > Also botan got orphaned despite the FTI going away >

Fedora 40 compose report: 20240327.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-40-20240326.n.0 NEW: Fedora-40-20240327.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 4 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 15 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 13.25 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of

Re: on dnf autoremove aggressive behaviour

On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 11:00 AM Germano Massullo wrote: > > I recently updated to F40 KDE, but Jami software [1] bundled Qt6 RPM > package messed up with system Qt6 (see later fix at [2]), so I had to run: > # dnf autoremove > # dnf reinstall $(rpm -qa) > > I have noticed an aggressive packaging

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 9:46 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 25. 03. 24 7:48, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: > > Also botan got orphaned despite the FTI going away > > [1] ;-( > > Could it be un-orphaned back? > > > [1] Seems FTI failed to close the b

on dnf autoremove aggressive behaviour

I recently updated to F40 KDE, but Jami software [1] bundled Qt6 RPM package messed up with system Qt6 (see later fix at [2]), so I had to run: # dnf autoremove # dnf reinstall $(rpm -qa) I have noticed an aggressive packaging removal behaviour from "dnf autoremove", indeed it removed various e

Re: Fedora Linux 40 Beta Released

Check outIndex of /compose/branched | | | | Index of /compose/branched | | | Leslie Satenstein On Wednesday, March 27, 2024 at 04:51:18 a.m. EDT, Barry wrote: > On 26 Mar 2024, at 15:09, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > I think it was being edited when you looked? > >

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20240327.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20240326.n.1 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20240327.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 3 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 55 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 7.95 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On 25. 03. 24 7:48, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: Also botan got orphaned despite the FTI going away [1] ;-( Could it be un-orphaned back? Yes, by clicking the *Take* button. [1] Seems FTI failed to close the bug fixed on 2024-03-07 It was

Re: openclonk: undefined reference to `zmemcpy'

Hi all. I'm seriously thinking to abandon 'openclonk' rpm. The project is currently unmaintained. On 08/03/24 16:01, Martin Gansser wrote: Hi, when compiling openclonk [1] on rawhide it fails with this error message [2]: /usr/bin/cmake -E cmake_link_script CMakeFiles/c4group.dir/link.txt --ver

Re: [SPDX] Mass license change: Intro and change of "Bitstream Vera" to "Bitstream-Vera"

V Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 02:52:50PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý napsal(a): > I have no strong opinion how to process with the case of  "MIT and BSD and > Bitstream Vera and OFL". I think that converting it to " MIT and BSD and > Bitstream-Vera and OFL" is probably best option. I.e. the License tag will > b

Re: [SPDX] Mass license change: Intro and change of "Bitstream Vera" to "Bitstream-Vera"

Dne 27. 03. 24 v 7:40 Miroslav Suchý napsal(a): Dne 26. 03. 24 v 6:00 odp. Artur Frenszek-Iwicki napsal(a): If we're going to introduce any kind of (semi-)automatic conversion of existing license tags, I think it'd be good to make "convert «and» and «or» to upper-case" part of the process. A.F

Re: Fedora Linux 40 Beta Released

> On 26 Mar 2024, at 15:09, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > I think it was being edited when you looked? > > It seems to have the details now? Or is there something missing? All there now. Original visible was just one line. Barry -- ___ devel mailing list

[Now Playing] Toolbx Test Day 2024-03-27

Hey Folks, Toolbx is now a blocker and pre-installed app for Fedora Workstation. The advent of Podman 5[0] can have a few complications with Toolbx's primary deliverables and workflow. To ensure a smooth transition, we are inviting testers to install latest version of Toolbx and Podman 5 in F40 a