V Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 02:52:50PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý napsal(a): > I have no strong opinion how to process with the case of "MIT and BSD and > Bitstream Vera and OFL". I think that converting it to " MIT and BSD and > Bitstream-Vera and OFL" is probably best option. I.e. the License tag will > become mixture of Callaway and SPDX. It will not make it valid SPDX formula > so it will still pop up as package to be fixed, but at least some work will > be done.
In other words, it will be a regression. Invalid by either system: $ license-validate 'MIT AND BSD AND Bitstream-Vera and OFL' Not a valid license string Run with -v option to see more information. $ license-validate --old 'MIT AND BSD AND Bitstream-Vera and OFL' Not a valid license string Run with -v option to see more information. I wouldn't do it. If you want to hint the packager, then open a pull request with the partial conversion. -- Petr
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
