On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 09:45:49AM +0100, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> Am Di., 20. Feb. 2024 um 09:21 Uhr schrieb Loren M. Lang
> :
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 06:08:53AM -0300, Priscila Gutierres wrote:
> > > I created this post based on my own experience:
> > > https://dev.to/prinewgirl/a-recipe
On 2/22/24 17:28, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2024-02-22 at 15:32 -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
I've seeing:
INFO:anaconda.modules.payloads.payload.dnf.transaction_progress:Installed:
glibc-common-2.39.9000-
1.fc41.x86_64 1708040026
e4113ddcb7a4bf591492c0bf4644932b0dad7691ff19c65111751675336
Do you have a non ftp site?
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelin
On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 8:32 PM Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2024-01-28 at 20:14 +, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 28, 2024 at 7:54 PM Gary Buhrmaster
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 7:54 PM Aoife Moloney
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Wiki -> https://fedoraproject.org/wik
On Thu, 2024-02-22 at 16:28 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-02-22 at 15:32 -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > I've seeing:
> >
> > INFO:anaconda.modules.payloads.payload.dnf.transaction_progress:Ins
> > talled:
> > glibc-common-2.39.9000-
> > 1.fc41.x86_64 1708040026
> > e4113ddcb7a4bf
On Sun, 2024-01-28 at 20:14 +, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 28, 2024 at 7:54 PM Gary Buhrmaster
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 7:54 PM Aoife Moloney
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Wiki -> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Unify_bin_and_sbin
> > >
> >
> > One additional item to c
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 05:06:18 -
Ryan Bach via devel wrote:
> I don't see any info googling it.
It is WIP.
Official images doesn't work as Fedora kernels doesn't support
the display and WiFi yet.
I have an older KDE Remix image here:
ftp://pine.warpspeed.dk/nightly/pinetab2/PineTab2-KDE-F39.
On Thu, 2024-02-22 at 15:32 -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> I've seeing:
>
> INFO:anaconda.modules.payloads.payload.dnf.transaction_progress:Installed:
> glibc-common-2.39.9000-
> 1.fc41.x86_64 1708040026
> e4113ddcb7a4bf591492c0bf4644932b0dad7691ff19c65111751675336cb0c8
> INFO:anaconda.modules.pa
On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 04:46:23PM -0500, Christopher wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 4:01 PM Gary Buhrmaster
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 8:20 PM Christopher
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Are there any known issues right now for logging in to
> > > lists.fedoraproject.org or src.fedorapr
In accordance with FESCo policy[1], the following provenpackagers will
be submitted for removal in two weeks based on a lack of Koji builds
submitted in the last six months. If you received this directly, you
can reply off-list to indicate you should still be in the
provenpackager group.
Note that
On 21/02/2024 15:43, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following
packages
should be retired from Fedora 40 approximately one week before branching.
If you see a package that can be rebuilt, please do so.
Package (co)mai
On 13 Feb 2024, at 03:11, Maxwell G wrote:
>
>Package (co)maintainers Status
> Change
>
> 3proxy orphan 0 weeks
> ago
I've seeing:
INFO:anaconda.modules.payloads.payload.dnf.transaction_progress:Installed:
glibc-common-2.39.9000-
1.fc41.x86_64 1708040026
e4113ddcb7a4bf591492c0bf4644932b0dad7691ff19c65111751675336cb0c8
INFO:anaconda.modules.payloads.payload.dnf.transaction_progress:Installed:
bash-5.2.26-3.fc40.x8
On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 4:01 PM Gary Buhrmaster
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 8:20 PM Christopher
> wrote:
> >
> > Are there any known issues right now for logging in to
> > lists.fedoraproject.org or src.fedoraproject.org?
> > Do we have a page for known outages?
>
> https://status.fedora
On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 8:20 PM Christopher wrote:
>
> Are there any known issues right now for logging in to
> lists.fedoraproject.org or src.fedoraproject.org?
> Do we have a page for known outages?
https://status.fedoraproject.org/
It currently reports all systems operational
> I can log in
Are there any known issues right now for logging in to
lists.fedoraproject.org or src.fedoraproject.org?
Do we have a page for known outages?
I can log in to accounts.fedoraproject.org, so I know my password and 2FA
token still works, but not to src.f.o or lists.f.o.
I tried to disable my 2FA in t
Per the "Inactive packagers policy" [1], I've run the script and detected 164
inactive packagers. At the end of the email you can find the full list.
[1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_inactive_packagers/
I also need to apologize, as the first time I ran the script it miss
> Fedora 35 ^^ buildroot? Probably something to check.
My /etc/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64.cfg had the
`config_opts['releasever'] = '35'`.
I changed it to the `config_opts['releasever'] = '41'`.
As I still see the same error, it's not the root cause. But I need to
recover files the /etc/mock from t
Thanks to Benson Muite and Kai Hiller, the final package reviews
needed for the SoPlex and SCIP effort are done. The packages will be
built in these side tags:
f41-build-side-84341
f40-build-side-84343
There are several packages that take multiple hours to build, and must
be built serially due t
Dne 21. 02. 24 v 18:38 Jun Aruga (he / him) napsal(a):
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 6:09 PM Stephen Smoogen wrote:
On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 at 12:05, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Dne 21. 02. 24 v 17:38 Jun Aruga (he / him) napsal(a):
$ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --shell
--setenv=LC_MESSAGES=C.UT
V Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 02:28:18PM +1100, Ian Laurie napsal(a):
> I have my dnf configured with installonly_limit=6 and now and then find
> it useful to get rid of old kernels (for example after a move from
> Fedora n to n+1).
>
> I know in the early days of DNF5 you couldn't do this, but can you d
Am 21.02.24 um 18:50 schrieb Maxwell G:
Report started at 2024-02-21 17:04:45 UTC
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper re
On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 02:06:22PM +0800, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote:
> I realised a second open package review is
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2068718 (isocline)
> - it's a newer dep for pandoc (actually hslua-repl).
Done.
zbyszek
--
__
On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 10:21:50AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 12:32:45PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > So I think the whole issue can be solved by letting tools use
> > two keys for rawhide. The patch for mkosi was merged [1].
> > Should we do something simi
*This are the repos enabled here:*
id do repo nome do repo
fedora Fedora 39 - x86_64
fedora-cisco-openh264 Fedora 39 openh264 (From Cisco) - x86_64
google-chrome-beta google-chrome-beta
rpmfusion-free
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
ELN SIG on 2024-02-23 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat
The meeting will be about:
Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/10568/
--
___
devel ma
No issues here on my primary driver (with updates-testing enabled,
though), but did see some packages being downgraded:
Downgrading:
bind-libs x86_64 32:9.18.21-4.fc40
fedora 1.2 M
bind-license noarch 32:9.18.21-4.fc40
On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 12:41 AM Garry T. Williams
wrote:
> Problem 3: package network-scripts-ppp-2.5.0-3.fc39.x86_64 from @System
> requires network-scripts, but none of the providers can be installed
> - network-scripts-10.20-1.fc39.x86_64 from @System does not belong to a
> distupgrade re
Hi Jonathan!
On 2/13/24 16:47, Jonathan Lebon wrote:
Has it got fixed during the time? Or is there a new technology which
would do the trick for Silverblue and Fedora Linux alike?
Just a note: I would say "for Silverblue and traditional systems
alike" instead. Silverblue is part of Fedora Linux
29 matches
Mail list logo
