*This are the repos enabled here:* id do repo nome do repo fedora Fedora 39 - x86_64 fedora-cisco-openh264 Fedora 39 openh264 (From Cisco) - x86_64 google-chrome-beta google-chrome-beta rpmfusion-free RPM Fusion for Fedora 39 - Free rpmfusion-free-tainted RPM Fusion for Fedora 39 - Free tainted rpmfusion-free-updates RPM Fusion for Fedora 39 - Free - Updates rpmfusion-free-updates-testing RPM Fusion for Fedora 39 - Free - Test Updates rpmfusion-nonfree RPM Fusion for Fedora 39 - Nonfree rpmfusion-nonfree-updates RPM Fusion for Fedora 39 - Nonfree - Updates rpmfusion-nonfree-updates-testing RPM Fusion for Fedora 39 - Nonfree - Test Updates updates Fedora 39 - x86_64 - Updates updates-testing Fedora 39 - x86_64 - Test Updates
*This was the command used:* *sudo dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=40* *This was the output:* Erro: Problema: solicitações conflitantes - package libva-intel-media-driver-24.1.3-1.fc40.i686 from fedora conflicts with intel-media-driver provided by intel-media-driver-24.1.3-1.fc40.x86_64 from rpmfusion-nonfree - package libva-intel-media-driver-24.1.3-1.fc40.x86_64 from fedora conflicts with intel-media-driver provided by intel-media-driver-24.1.3-1.fc40.x86_64 from rpmfusion-nonfree - problema com o pacote instalado libva-2.20.0-2.fc39.x86_64 - libva-2.20.0-2.fc39.x86_64 from @System does not belong to a distupgrade repository *With this other command:* *sudo dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=40 --allowerasing --best* *I got this result:* Erro: Problema: solicitações conflitantes - package gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free-1.22.9-3.fc40.x86_64 from fedora requires libva.so.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package libva-intel-media-driver-24.1.3-1.fc40.x86_64 from fedora conflicts with intel-media-driver provided by intel-media-driver-24.1.3-1.fc40.x86_64 from rpmfusion-nonfree - package vlc-plugin-gstreamer-1:3.0.20-12.fc40.x86_64 from fedora requires gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free(x86-64), but none of the providers can be installed - não é possível instalar o melhor candidato para a tarefa - libva-2.20.0-2.fc39.x86_64 from @System does not belong to a distupgrade repository - gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free-1.22.9-1.fc39.x86_64 from @System does not belong to a distupgrade repository *But **then I removed gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free and run:* *sudo dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=40 --allowerasing --best --exclude=libva-intel-media-driver,gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free,vlc-plugin-gstreamer,libva* and the upgrade did proceed without errors. Now I'm on F40 KDE and all is working fine (already upgraded libva and reinstalled gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free) Em qua., 21 de fev. de 2024 às 04:12, Miroslav Suchý <msu...@redhat.com> escreveu: > Do you want to make Fedora 40 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time > and try to run: > > # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules > # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again > # This is last time we should do that :) > > sudo dnf module reset '*' > > dnf --releasever=40 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f40 \ > --enablerepo=updates-testing \ > $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo > --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \ > --assumeno distro-sync > > > This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal > potential problems. > > You may also run `dnf upgrade` before running this command. > > The `--assumeno` will just test the transaction, but does not make the > actual upgrade. > > > In case you hit dependency issues, please report it against the > appropriate package. > > Or against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in > Fedora 40. Please check existing reports against fedora-obsolete-packages > first: > > https://red.ht/2kuBDPu > > and also there is already bunch of "Fails to install" (F40FailsToInstall) > reports: > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=2231790&bug_id_type=anddependson&format=tvp&list_id=13416789 > > > Two notes: > > * you may want to run the same command with dnf5 to help test new dnf. Do > not forget to add --best otherwise DNF5 hides all problems. > > * this command found several issues on my workstation. One was issue with > teamd that you will likely hit too: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2263334 > > and there was few other with missing provides/obsoletes that I reported. > For convenience here is the relevant part of Fedora Guidelines: > > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#renaming-or-replacing-existing-packages > > > Thank you > Miroslav > -- > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue >
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
