I want to retake fbf-mukti-fonts and uniol-fonts of which i am the upstream
developer. I have lost my membership in packager group and I could not log in
the pkg maintenance systtem
On Monday, 25 December, 2023 at 05:10:57 pm IST, Neal Gompa
wrote:
On Mon, Dec 25, 2023 at 6:34 AM O
I've orphaned bes. I never really used it, and I don't think anything
depends on it in Fedora.
--
Orion Poplawski
he/him/his - surely the least important thing about me
IT Systems Manager 720-772-5637
NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchel
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 6:43 PM Maxwell G wrote:
>
> On Thu Jan 25, 2024 at 20:34 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > Hello.
>
> Hi Miro,
>
> Thanks for the announcement!
>
> > Now when python-flit-core has been split out of python-flit, I do no longer
> > have a use-case for python-flit and hence I ha
On Thu Jan 25, 2024 at 20:34 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hello.
Hi Miro,
Thanks for the announcement!
> Now when python-flit-core has been split out of python-flit, I do no longer
> have a use-case for python-flit and hence I have orphaned it.
For context, flit-core is the PEP 517 build backe
Sorry folks, that's my fault, I missed a (rather important) line to update
:(
I *think* it is correct now, but please tell me if there are still any
errors and I will readjust
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-40/f-40-key-tasks.html
Thank you Troy for your clarification, it really helped
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 7:00 AM wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> You are kindly invited to the meeting:
>ELN SIG on 2024-01-26 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern
>At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat
>
> The meeting will be about:
>
* Status of the mass-rebuild
* Status of the impending branch of
Hi folks! I want to apologize to packagers who have Rawhide updates
stuck on failed openQA tests, and provide an update.
There were two big problems today. First, the Server base disk image
used for some of the tests got regenerated (this happens weekly).
Unfortunately, this meant it got affec
Hello.
Now when python-flit-core has been split out of python-flit, I do no longer
have a use-case for python-flit and hence I have orphaned it.
$ repoquery -q --repo=rawhide{,-source} --whatrequires flit
python-perky-0:0.8.2-3.fc39.src
python-pydyf-0:0.8.0-1.fc40.src
python-pyrpm-0:0.14.1-3.f
>
> Is there a way to merge PR lists from multiple packages into a single
> backlog?
>
I don't know about Pagure, but you can make bespoke packager dashboards to
show whatever combination of packages/packagers/groups you like :-)
https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/custom
Cheers,
Chris
On 25. 01. 24 19:17, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Miroslav Suchý:
I want to point to nice feature of Pagure - it can show you PR where
you can act on:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/user/msuchy/requests?type=actionable&status=open
(your account icon -> My Pull Request -> PR I can act on)
Please ch
* Miroslav Suchý:
> I want to point to nice feature of Pagure - it can show you PR where
> you can act on:
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/user/msuchy/requests?type=actionable&status=open
>
> (your account icon -> My Pull Request -> PR I can act on)
>
> Please check it, maybe you will discover s
On Jan 24, 2024, at 11:07 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> During my work on SPDX migration I filed hundreds of pull request and as part
> of that work I always check if there is
> already open PRs for a package.
>
> It surprised me how many packages has open PR. I understand when there is
> open PR
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 7:07 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> I understood that it may happen that you miss the notification. Or postponed
> the work because you were busy and later
> forget about it... Lots of valid reasons.
While I am certainly not in favor of more
"Are we there yet?" emails, I won
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 08:07:03AM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> During my work on SPDX migration I filed hundreds of pull request and as
> part of that work I always check if there is already open PRs for a package.
>
> It surprised me how many packages has open PR. I understand when there is
>
On Wed, 2024-01-24 at 17:38 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> lmms thm
I fixed the build , I base it on opensuse packages
https://build.opensuse.org/package/rdiff/openSUSE:Backports:SLE-15-SP6/lmms?linkrev=base&rev=9
> lxc hguemar, sag
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 03:25:02PM +0100, Sandro wrote:
> On 24-01-2024 17:38, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > Dear maintainers.
> >
> > Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following
> > packages
> > should be retired from Fedora 40 approximately one week before branching.
>
>
>
On 24-01-2024 17:38, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Dear maintainers.
Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following
packages
should be retired from Fedora 40 approximately one week before branching.
yaksa zbyszek
I updated and build yaksa and c
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 10:56 PM Mamoru TASAKA
wrote:
> Richard Shaw wrote on 2024/01/25 12:43:
>
> See:
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/build-constraints-rpm-macros/blob/rawhide/f/macros.build-constraints
>
> The macro attemps to reduce parallel make jobs when the build needs
> more memor
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
ELN SIG on 2024-01-26 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat
The meeting will be about:
Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/10568/
--
___
devel ma
Antoine Zellmeyer via devel writes:
> Sorry for the late answer, It seems to be working :) I was able to import and
> install packages signed with this certificate.
Thanks for confirming that it works as expected. I've made a new
release of rpm-sequoia, which includes this fix. I expect that
d
Hi,
On Thursday, 2024-01-25 11:03:21 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> There's at least one known ICE on aarch64 for gcc-14 so I suggest
> checking if it looks related.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259937
Yes, very much, specifically
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 11:03:21 +
Peter Robinson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Tried twice, same error, aarch64 build bails out with
>
> There's at least one known ICE on aarch64 for gcc-14 so I suggest
> checking if it looks related.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259937
and I have o
Hi,
> Tried twice, same error, aarch64 build bails out with
There's at least one known ICE on aarch64 for gcc-14 so I suggest
checking if it looks related.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259937
> | 34:29.97 *** WARNING *** there are active plugins, do not report this as a
> bug u
Hi,
Tried twice, same error, aarch64 build bails out with
| 34:29.97 *** WARNING *** there are active plugins, do not report this as a
bug unless you can reproduce it without enabling any plugins.
| 34:29.97 Event| Plugins
| 34:29.97 PLUGIN_FINISH_UNIT |
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 11:23 AM Richard W.M. Jones
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 11:14:04AM +0100, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote:
> > In about a week (after mass rebuild before branching), I'll start
> > with bumping libavif in rawhide from 0.11.x to 1.0.3
> > ( https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 11:14:04AM +0100, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote:
> In about a week (after mass rebuild before branching), I'll start
> with bumping libavif in rawhide from 0.11.x to 1.0.3
> ( https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ libavif/pull-request/2 ,
> soname bump from 15 to 16).
I'm confuse
In about a week (after mass rebuild before branching), I'll start with
bumping libavif in rawhide from 0.11.x to 1.0.3 (
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libavif/pull-request/2 , soname bump
from 15 to 16). If I am not missing anything, it should mean ABI-only
change, so all the dependencies that
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 11:14:06AM -0300, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho
wrote:
> The zlib-ng-compat and minizip-ng-compat packages have been in Rawhide for
> more than a month.
> Considering things have been working well, we believe it's time to retire the
> zlib and minizip-compat packages.
>
28 matches
Mail list logo
