On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 11:23 AM Richard W.M. Jones <rjo...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 11:14:04AM +0100, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote: > > In about a week (after mass rebuild before branching), I'll start > > with bumping libavif in rawhide from 0.11.x to 1.0.3 > > ( https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ libavif/pull-request/2 , > > soname bump from 15 to 16). > > I'm confused .. Wouldn't it be better to do this after branching? > Otherwise you're introducing an SONAME bump into the stabilising > Fedora 40. > I would prefer to have this in F40 too (not to block gamescope rebases (which do require libavif >= 1.0) there for the lifetime of the F40 release), and, this isn't a big of a risky rebase in my opinion (there will be more impactful and riskier rebases coming far later in the cycle, such as LLVM rebase, again, in my opinion). -- Best regards / S pozdravem, František Zatloukal Senior Quality Engineer Red Hat
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
