Hot news:
I have started looking at Cavil - tool that audit the licensing info after each
commit.
The process of adding the licenses on list is still very slow recently.
Now lets dive into numbers:
Two weeks ago we had:
* 23365 spec files in Fedora
* 29583license tags in all spec files
*
Hello team,
Blender 4.0.1 failed to build on both aarch64 and ppc64le on the following
lines:
```
/builddir/build/BUILD/blender/intern/cycles/blender/attribute_convert.h:69:44:
error: cannot convert ‘ccl::float4’ to ‘float’
69 | return color_srgb_to_linear(make_float4(byte_to_floa
Dne 23. 11. 23 v 17:04 Petr Pisar napsal(a):
That's the glory automation which creates updates after finishing a build on
behalf of the user wihout ownership by the user.
Once there is such update created, you only can file a ticket against relengs
(or infra) to delete the update. Without admins
On Thu, 2023-11-23 at 20:40 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Mattia Verga via devel:
>
> > Il 23/11/23 16:40, Florian Weimer ha scritto:
> > > I've got an update that I don't see pushed to stable. How do I
> > > make
> > > sure that doesn't happen?
> > >
> > > As it's for rawhide, I didn't creat
On Thu, 2023-11-23 at 20:40 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Mattia Verga via devel:
>
> > Il 23/11/23 16:40, Florian Weimer ha scritto:
> > > I've got an update that I don't see pushed to stable. How do I make
> > > sure that doesn't happen?
> > >
> > > As it's for rawhide, I didn't create the
* Mattia Verga via devel:
> Il 23/11/23 16:40, Florian Weimer ha scritto:
>> I've got an update that I don't see pushed to stable. How do I make
>> sure that doesn't happen?
>>
>> As it's for rawhide, I didn't create the Bodhi update, and I don't see
>> an option to delete it.
>>
> There's no opt
On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 05:47:30PM +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> 23.11.23 um 14:48 schrieb Sandro:
> > [1] https://keepassxc.org/
> > [2] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/keepassxc
> > [3] https://www.keepassdx.com/
>
> Thanks for the info! I do not remember what the problem was exactly, but
Il 23/11/23 16:40, Florian Weimer ha scritto:
> I've got an update that I don't see pushed to stable. How do I make
> sure that doesn't happen?
>
> As it's for rawhide, I didn't create the Bodhi update, and I don't see
> an option to delete it.
>
There's no option to delete Bodhi updates. It can o
On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 4:40 PM Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> I've got an update that I don't see pushed to stable. How do I make
> sure that doesn't happen?
>
> As it's for rawhide, I didn't create the Bodhi update, and I don't see
> an option to delete it.
If it's still pending, do you have the op
Am 23.11.23 um 14:48 schrieb Sandro:
On 21-11-2023 10:56, Julian Sikorski wrote:
as the CVE (which was not even a problem with keepass in the first
place) leading to keepass retirement has been resolved in the
meantime, I would like to unretire the package. I have submitted a
re-review already
Dear all,
I am in the process of updating utf8cpp (a header only package)
from 3.2.5 to 4.0.2 in rawhide. No rebuilds are necessary immediately,
but I did rebuild all consumers in COPR[1]. Here are the results:
Dependent packages:
$ fedrq whatrequires --src --formatter name utf8cpp-devel
antlr4-pr
V Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 04:40:39PM +0100, Florian Weimer napsal(a):
> I've got an update that I don't see pushed to stable. How do I make
> sure that doesn't happen?
>
> As it's for rawhide, I didn't create the Bodhi update, and I don't see
> an option to delete it.
>
That's the glory automation
I've got an update that I don't see pushed to stable. How do I make
sure that doesn't happen?
As it's for rawhide, I didn't create the Bodhi update, and I don't see
an option to delete it.
Thanks,
Florian
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedora
On Wed, 22 Nov 2023 at 17:05, Tomasz Kłoczko
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to do something about this?🤔
>
>
There was a major cable cut to the ISP which houses pagure. This caused the
main line to go down, and only IPv6 on a secondary network was available.
[IPv4 was working for some people via
On 21-11-2023 10:56, Julian Sikorski wrote:
as the CVE (which was not even a problem with keepass in the first
place) leading to keepass retirement has been resolved in the meantime,
I would like to unretire the package. I have submitted a re-review already:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bu
On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 01:53:14PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 08:07:06AM -0800, Davide Cavalca wrote:
> > On 2023-11-21 04:34, Jiri Konecny wrote:
> > > Is Anaconda Initial Setup important for your project or workflow? What
> > > functionality is absolutely necessary for
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20231122.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20231123.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 5
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 68
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 3.29 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Hi,
There is an ongoing issue with systemd update breaking plenty of tests in
Fedora CI.
We are trying to resolve the issue. You can watch for status updates here:
https://status.testing-farm.io/issues/2023-11-23-public-ranch-systemd-selinux/
It is affecting a lot of installability tests, possi
18 matches
Mail list logo
