Re: How to use llvm15 for building a package

2023-07-03 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 04/07/2023 05:24, Tom Stellard wrote: /usr/include/OpenImageIO/detail/fmt/core.h:1691:7: error: static assertion failed: Cannot format an argument. To make type T formattable provide a formatter specialization: https://fmt.dev/latest/api.html#udt This seems like a failure unrelated to clang

Re: How to use llvm15 for building a package

2023-07-03 Thread Tom Stellard
On 7/3/23 19:37, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: On 2023-07-03 17:08, Tom Stellard wrote: On 7/3/23 11:31, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: Hello team, I attempt to build openshadinglanguage with llvm15 as upstream has yet to support LLVM 16. Can someone have a pointed how to set a cmake parameter for llv

Re: How to use llvm15 for building a package

2023-07-03 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga
On 2023-07-03 17:08, Tom Stellard wrote: On 7/3/23 11:31, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: Hello team, I attempt to build openshadinglanguage with llvm15 as upstream has yet to support LLVM 16. Can someone have a pointed how to set a cmake parameter for llvm15 and its bitecode validation? See the

RE: cups-2.4.2-11.fc39.src.rpm depends on autoconf-2.71 or newer, not mentioned in .spec file, fails build

2023-07-03 Thread Douglas Kosovic
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 7:15AM +1000, Jan Pazdziora wrote: > On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 02:44:34PM +0300, ijaaskelai...@outlook.com wrote: > > Kind regards, The Improvement Skeleton. > > Please show the exact steps you use to build the cups package and the > exact error message you get. > > Technically

RE: PWG+OpenPrinting meetup 2023

2023-07-03 Thread Douglas Kosovic
Hi Zdenek, Regarding packaging pappl-retrofit and printer applications, looking at the pappl-retrofit based snaps from Till Kamppeter, I suspect the existing Fedora pappl package might need to be modified. For example, extract from ps-printer-app's snapcraft.yaml file which modifies pappl's de

Re: How to use llvm15 for building a package

2023-07-03 Thread Tom Stellard
On 7/3/23 11:31, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: Hello team, I attempt to build openshadinglanguage with llvm15 as upstream has yet to support LLVM 16. Can someone have a pointed how to set a cmake parameter for llvm15 and its bitecode validation? See the spec file on: https://src.fedoraproject.org

Re: F39 Change Proposal: Anaconda WebUI for Fedora Workstation by default (System-Wide)

2023-07-03 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Jul 3, 2023 at 6:36 PM Jiří Konečný wrote: > > Hi, see my replies below. > > 2. července 2023 23:56:59 SELČ, Demi Marie Obenour > napsal: > >On 6/27/23 05:00, Simon de Vlieger wrote: > >> On 6/27/23 10:40, Hans de Goede wrote: > >> > >> > Ok, so can you provide some instructions for how

Re: F39 Change Proposal: Anaconda WebUI for Fedora Workstation by default (System-Wide)

2023-07-03 Thread Jiří Konečný
Hi, see my replies below. 2. července 2023 23:56:59 SELČ, Demi Marie Obenour napsal: >On 6/27/23 05:00, Simon de Vlieger wrote: >> On 6/27/23 10:40, Hans de Goede wrote: >> >> > Ok, so can you provide some instructions for how to make this work ? >> I guess it would be something like add the

Re: F39 Change Proposal: Anaconda WebUI for Fedora Workstation by default (System-Wide)

2023-07-03 Thread Jiří Konečný
Hi 3. července 2023 18:57:39 SELČ, Michael Catanzaro napsal: >On Mon, Jul 3 2023 at 12:32:02 PM -0400, Demi Marie Obenour > wrote: >> Why is that? WebKitGTK+ is one of those packages that one should only >> ship if one is willing to take every update from upstream, but my >> understanding is t

Re: Orphaning packages (was LibreOffice packages)

2023-07-03 Thread Leon Fauster via devel
Am 03.07.23 um 18:07 schrieb Simon de Vlieger: On 7/3/23 13:46, Ralf Corsépius wrote: It is the core of the problem esp. big US companies tend to ignore. May-be you guys are not aware of there are tendencies to legally prohibit such "cloud solutions" in many countries? It's generally not so

How to use llvm15 for building a package

2023-07-03 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga
Hello team, I attempt to build openshadinglanguage with llvm15 as upstream has yet to support LLVM 16. Can someone have a pointed how to set a cmake parameter for llvm15 and its bitecode validation? See the spec file on: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/openshadinglanguage/blob/rawhide/f/o

Re: F39 Change Proposal: Anaconda WebUI for Fedora Workstation by default (System-Wide)

2023-07-03 Thread Lukáš Tyrychtr
Hello. And to add to the reasons, if the GTK4 bindings of webkit would be used, we would lose screen reader accessibility completely, see https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=227528. Regards, Lukáš Dne 03.07.2023 v 18:15 Simon de Vlieger napsal(a): On 7/3/23 17:18, Demi Marie Obenour wr

Re: F39 Change Proposal: Anaconda WebUI for Fedora Workstation by default (System-Wide)

2023-07-03 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Mon, Jul 3 2023 at 12:32:02 PM -0400, Demi Marie Obenour wrote: Why is that? WebKitGTK+ is one of those packages that one should only ship if one is willing to take every update from upstream, but my understanding is that WebKitGTK+ tries quite hard to make this easy. The set of packages t

Re: F39 Change Proposal: Anaconda WebUI for Fedora Workstation by default (System-Wide)

2023-07-03 Thread Demi Marie Obenour
On 7/3/23 12:30, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Mon, Jul 3 2023 at 06:15:43 PM +0200, Simon de Vlieger > wrote: >> Funnily enough it was switched explicitly from webkitgtk to Firefox >> for >> a reason I forget; I think it was related to disk size. Perhaps Martin >> or Jiri has more details to sh

Re: F39 Change Proposal: Anaconda WebUI for Fedora Workstation by default (System-Wide)

2023-07-03 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Mon, Jul 3 2023 at 06:15:43 PM +0200, Simon de Vlieger wrote: Funnily enough it was switched explicitly from webkitgtk to Firefox for a reason I forget; I think it was related to disk size. Perhaps Martin or Jiri has more details to share on that. It's because we're going to remove WebKitG

Re: F39 Change Proposal: Anaconda WebUI for Fedora Workstation by default (System-Wide)

2023-07-03 Thread Simon de Vlieger
On 7/3/23 17:18, Demi Marie Obenour wrote: Fair. I wonder how much of that memory use would go away if instead of using Firefox, the web content ran in an embedded WebKitGTK+ webview. Browser security is not a concern here because in this case the web content is trusted, and this would also all

Re: Minified JS and CSS in Node packages

2023-07-03 Thread Tom Hughes via devel
On 03/07/2023 17:09, Demi Marie Obenour wrote: On 7/3/23 11:59, Tom Hughes wrote: On 03/07/2023 16:41, Demi Marie Obenour wrote: Would it be possible to ensure that Node packages contain only actual source code, as in “the preferred form for making modifications” (quote from GNU GPL, I forget

Re: Minified JS and CSS in Node packages

2023-07-03 Thread Demi Marie Obenour
On 7/3/23 11:59, Tom Hughes wrote: > On 03/07/2023 16:41, Demi Marie Obenour wrote: > >> Would it be possible to ensure that Node packages contain only actual source >> code, as in “the preferred form for making modifications” (quote from GNU >> GPL, >> I forget which version)? > > The simple an

Re: LibreOffice packages

2023-07-03 Thread Owen Taylor
On Sun, Jul 2, 2023 at 5:01 PM Demi Marie Obenour wrote: > On 6/3/23 08:42, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 3 2023 at 10:26:07 AM -, John Iliopoulos < > jxftw2...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> While i completely understand why you do this i do think that it is > >> importan

Re: Orphaning packages (was LibreOffice packages)

2023-07-03 Thread Simon de Vlieger
On 7/3/23 13:46, Ralf Corsépius wrote: It is the core of the problem esp. big US companies tend to ignore. May-be you guys are not aware of there are tendencies to legally prohibit such "cloud solutions" in many countries? It's generally not so much 'legally prohibit' as 'data has to be kept

Re: Minified JS and CSS in Node packages

2023-07-03 Thread Tom Hughes via devel
On 03/07/2023 16:41, Demi Marie Obenour wrote: Would it be possible to ensure that Node packages contain only actual source code, as in “the preferred form for making modifications” (quote from GNU GPL, I forget which version)? The simple answer is maybe in principle but in practice it's very

Re: F39 Change Proposal: No custom Qt theming for Fedora Workstation (Self Contained)

2023-07-03 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Jul 3, 2023 at 10:16 AM Jan Grulich wrote: > > Hi, > > po 26. 6. 2023 v 19:26 odesílatel Fabio Valentini > napsal: >> >> On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 6:21 PM Aoife Moloney wrote: >> > >> >> (snip) >> >> > >> > == Detailed Description == >> > [https://github.com/FedoraQt/QGnomePlatform QGnome

Minified JS and CSS in Node packages

2023-07-03 Thread Demi Marie Obenour
Looking at the source to llparse reveals that it contains minified versions of lodash, source-map, js-yaml, diff, and snprintf-js. The corresponding source code also appears to be present, but my understanding of Fedora policy is that the minified versions should not be in a Fedora source package.

Re: F39 Change Proposal: Anaconda WebUI for Fedora Workstation by default (System-Wide)

2023-07-03 Thread Demi Marie Obenour
On 7/3/23 03:18, Simon de Vlieger wrote: > On 7/2/23 23:56, Demi Marie Obenour wrote: > >> Remote installation is not a solution to the memory bloat. It only >> pushes the problem to whatever machine the browser runs on, and it >> has significant and negative security implications. A solution >>

Re: Red Hat & Fedora -- largely stepping out of this ecosystem

2023-07-03 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 03. 07. 23 v 16:13 Leon Fauster via devel napsal(a): Am 03.07.23 um 00:41 schrieb Michael Catanzaro: On Sun, Jul 2 2023 at 08:33:46 AM -0700, Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez wrote: Hi Michael, We have been told repeatedly that "the source is there" in CentOS stream. The source for the ne

Re: CentOS Stream, RHEL, and Fedora [was Re: What is Fedora?]

2023-07-03 Thread Leon Fauster via devel
Am 03.07.23 um 02:00 schrieb Michael Catanzaro: On Sun, Jul 2 2023 at 06:27:48 PM -0400, Demi Marie Obenour wrote: What about stuff that is too urgent to wait on Red Hat QA?  There have been vulnerabilities (such as CVE-2013-0156 and Log4Shell) for which unauthenticated, fully automated, remote

Re: Red Hat & Fedora -- largely stepping out of this ecosystem

2023-07-03 Thread Leon Fauster via devel
Am 03.07.23 um 00:41 schrieb Michael Catanzaro: On Sun, Jul 2 2023 at 08:33:46 AM -0700, Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez wrote: Hi Michael, We have been told repeatedly that "the source is there" in CentOS stream. The source for the next minor version is there. I can see the scenario that RH

Re: Orphaning packages (was LibreOffice packages)

2023-07-03 Thread Ralf Corsépius
Am 01.07.23 um 14:28 schrieb Peter Robinson: On Sat, Jul 1, 2023 at 12:50 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: On 01/07/2023 13:36, Chris Adams wrote: A lot of the corporate world has gone to the "cloud" don't have to worry about local backups of important documents and spreadsheets, they

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20230703.n.0 changes

2023-07-03 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230702.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230703.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:3 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 3 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 18 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 105.86 KiB Size of dropped packages:0

Re: F39 Change Proposal: LibuserDeprecation (System Wide)

2023-07-03 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Monday, 26 June 2023 at 03:16, James Ralston wrote: [...] > To remove a user from a group: > > lgroupmod -m someuser somegroup [...] > But groupmod has no ability to remove a user from a group. [...] > For shadow-utils 4.10 or later, usermod has a new -r option, so it is > possible to const

Re: Non responsive maintainer check for @ilgrad

2023-07-03 Thread Ankur Sinha
FYI: also forwarded to the correct gmail address (I'd used org instead of com) On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 11:43:05 +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote: > Dear all, > > Would anyone know how to contact @ilgrad (Ilya Gradina)? They are one of > the original members of the neuro-sig packager group, but we've not > h

Non responsive maintainer check for @ilgrad

2023-07-03 Thread Ankur Sinha
Dear all, Would anyone know how to contact @ilgrad (Ilya Gradina)? They are one of the original members of the neuro-sig packager group, but we've not heard from them in quite a while now. I've filed a non-responsive check bug here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219364 Here are th

Next Open NeuroFedora Meeting: 1300 UTC on Monday, 03 July (today)

2023-07-03 Thread Ankur Sinha
Hello everyone, Please join us at the next Open NeuroFedora team meeting on Monday 03 July at 1300UTC in #fedora-neuro on Matrix or IRC (Libera.chat). The meeting is a public meeting, and open for everyone to attend. You can join us over: Matrix: https://matrix.to/#/#neuro:fedoraproject.org IRC:

Re: Orphaning packages (was LibreOffice packages)

2023-07-03 Thread Kalev Lember
On 7/3/23 09:23, Victor Toso wrote: On Sat, Jul 01, 2023 at 10:09:15PM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: Victor (CC'd), do you want to pick up grilo and grilo-plugins? Sure, I'll keep maintaining both in Fedora. Excellent! Can you click on the "Take" button at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gr

Re: LibreOffice packages

2023-07-03 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 03/07/2023 01:28, Michael Catanzaro wrote: OK, host shared libraries and flatpaked libraries will be loaded at the same time, but I really doubt that's going to be at all significant. Include dozens of bundled libraries here too. Only runtimes can use shared memory. They do consume signi

Re: F39 Change Proposal: No custom Qt theming for Fedora Workstation (Self Contained)

2023-07-03 Thread Jan Grulich
Hi, po 26. 6. 2023 v 19:26 odesílatel Fabio Valentini napsal: > On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 6:21 PM Aoife Moloney wrote: > > > > (snip) > > > > > == Detailed Description == > > [https://github.com/FedoraQt/QGnomePlatform QGnomePlatform] project is > > a Qt Platform Theme plugin. It reads GNOME conf

Re: Distro feature macros: a replacement for many %if rhel/fedora/amzn

2023-07-03 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Dne 02. 07. 23 v 23:15 Smith, Stewart via devel napsal(a): 3. Per distro package features (in some include file somewhere? Probably not the SPEC file itself… maybe an include to it?) In the Avahi example above, the WITH_PYTHON is distro dependent for some reason, but is local to the package, i

Re: F39 Change Proposal: Anaconda WebUI for Fedora Workstation by default (System-Wide)

2023-07-03 Thread Simon de Vlieger
On 7/2/23 23:56, Demi Marie Obenour wrote: Remote installation is not a solution to the memory bloat. It only pushes the problem to whatever machine the browser runs on, and it has significant and negative security implications. A solution here would be ensuring that the web UI uses no more RA