Re: soname bump: libtraceevent and libtracefs

That's great Justin, thanks. John On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 5:01 PM Justin Forbes wrote: > On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 2:45 PM John Kacur wrote: > > > > There is a new tool that is dependent on these libs too. Also from > Daniel Bristot (rtla) > > tools/verification/rv > > > > I was wondering if we

Re: strange python3 mock error

Dne 17. 04. 23 v 17:55 Adam Williamson napsal(a): + %py3_build /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.XYSHTs: line 44: fg: no job control And that error in turn usually means there is a syntax error in the spec file. In this case I'd guess the package may be missing a build dependency on whatever package includes the

Re: F39 proposal: RPM 4.19 (System-Wide Change proposal)

https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/releases/tag/rpm-4.19.0-alpha ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.or

Re: F39 proposal: RPM 4.19 (System-Wide Change proposal)

https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/releases/tag/rpm-4.19.0-alphaf 5 days ago. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fed

Re: indent license corrected

On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 12:42 PM David Cantrell wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 04:49:13PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: > > A license of "indent" package was corrected from > > > > GPLv3+ and BSD and Verbatim > > > > to > > > > GPL-3.0-or-later AND BSD-3-Clause AND BSD-4.3TAHOE AND > > Lat

Re: soname bump: libtraceevent and libtracefs

On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 2:45 PM John Kacur wrote: > > There is a new tool that is dependent on these libs too. Also from Daniel > Bristot (rtla) > tools/verification/rv > > I was wondering if we could get this into rawhide? Yes, I will get it in before the 6.3 release next Monday, that way it wi

Re: soname bump: libtraceevent and libtracefs

There is a new tool that is dependent on these libs too. Also from Daniel Bristot (rtla) tools/verification/rv I was wondering if we could get this into rawhide? John Kacur On Sun, Apr 9, 2023 at 12:12 AM Zamir SUN wrote: > > On 4/5/23 23:49, Justin Forbes wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 5, 2023 at 5:0

Re: Auto-assign packager sponsors to tickets?

Jakub Kadlcik kirjoitti 17.4.2023 klo 18.53: I want to thank you all for the feedback. Everything was already mentioned in the discussion so I am not going to dig into details again. Just a quick summary for anyone who wants TL;DR for this thread: - I am not going to implement the original prop

Tuesday's FESCo Meeting *canceled* (2023-04-18)

I went through the ticket queue for FESCo and couldn't find any agenda items for tomorrow's meeting, so we can skip it and go for next week, April 25th. 👋 I'll chair that meeting for the group. 🪑 Just as a reminder if you need to put something on the agenda: * If you would like to add somet

UPDATED: Re: Upcoming Fedora Legal hackfest - converting to SPDX IDs

Time corrections from the original announcement: 14:00 - 18:00 UTC 10:00 - 14:00 EDT 16:00 - 20:00 CEST Thanks, On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 11:35:36AM -0400, David Cantrell wrote: > Fedora Legal will be conducting a hackfest on April 26, 2023 during a four > hour block. Information is on the SIGs c

F39 proposal: Remove standard storage option from Fedora EC2 images (Self-Contained Change proposal)

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CloudEC2ImagesNoStandardStorage This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved by the Fedora Engineering S

F39 proposal: Remove webkit2gtk-4.0 API Version (System-Wide Change proposal)

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remove_webkit2gtk-4.0_API_Version This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved by the Fedora Engineering

Re: indent license corrected

On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 04:49:13PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: > A license of "indent" package was corrected from > > GPLv3+ and BSD and Verbatim > > to > > GPL-3.0-or-later AND BSD-3-Clause AND BSD-4.3TAHOE AND > Latex2e-translated-notice. BSD-4.3TAHOE and Latex2e-translated-notice are

Re: Non-responsive maintainer - rkuska

Il 17/04/23 17:39, Jakub Kadlcik ha scritto: > Hello, > per the Non-responsive maintainer policy > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers > > I am sending this email. We (copr-sig) would like to (co)maintain the > python-flask-whooshee package but @r

Re: Auto-assign packager sponsors to tickets?

On 17/04/2023 17:53, Jakub Kadlcik wrote: - Instead, I am going to automatically open an issue in the package-sponsors tracker for new contributors after they receive fedora-review+ on their first ticket. LGTM now. Thank you for working on this. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycodin

Re: strange python3 mock error

On Mon, 2023-04-17 at 11:52 -0400, Scott Talbert wrote: > On Mon, 17 Apr 2023, Steve Dickson wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I'm getting a very strange mock error [1] on a package [2] > > that was recently ported to python 3. > > > > The package builds fine locally... only fails in a > > scratch bui

Re: Auto-assign packager sponsors to tickets?

I want to thank you all for the feedback. Everything was already mentioned in the discussion so I am not going to dig into details again. Just a quick summary for anyone who wants TL;DR for this thread: - I am not going to implement the original proposal or any variation of it - Instead, I am goi

Re: strange python3 mock error

On Mon, 17 Apr 2023, Steve Dickson wrote: Hello, I'm getting a very strange mock error [1] on a package [2] that was recently ported to python 3. The package builds fine locally... only fails in a scratch build... and that function that the error is c complaining about does not exist in the pa

Upcoming Fedora Legal hackfest - converting to SPDX IDs

Fedora Legal will be conducting a hackfest on April 26, 2023 during a four hour block. Information is on the SIGs calendar: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org/SIGs/2023/4/26/ We will be focusing on the ELN package set in Fedora and preparing pull requests for those packages to convert the Licens

Non-responsive maintainer - rkuska

Hello, per the Non-responsive maintainer policy https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers I am sending this email. We (copr-sig) would like to (co)maintain the python-flask-whooshee package but @rkuska can't give us permission because he lost access to

strange python3 mock error

Hello, I'm getting a very strange mock error [1] on a package [2] that was recently ported to python 3. The package builds fine locally... only fails in a scratch build... and that function that the error is c complaining about does not exist in the package... Not clear what to do... tia! stev

Re: Future of encryption in Fedora

On Thu, Apr 06, 2023 at 12:55:28PM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > There are a couple more disadvantages to using Discourse: > > * Several of the replies are lower-quality and are not contributing > to the conversation. That happens here too, of course. I think it's really a consequence of grea

Re: Future of encryption in Fedora

On Thu, Apr 06, 2023 at 12:56:55PM -0400, Owen Taylor wrote: > On the downside, spam limits on new posters have gotten in the way in some > cases, and people have had some trouble figuring out how to use the quoting > features, resulting in disconnected responses. I have bumped some of the default

Heads-up: USD 23.02 coming to Rawhide

Now that Blender 3.5 has landed, I can update the usd package in Rawhide to version 23.02[1]. I plan to build it in one week, 2023-04-24, or slightly later. The .so version is bumped (as with every release) and the monolithic library is renamed from libusd_usd_ms.so to libusd_ms.so. I am also

indent license corrected

A license of "indent" package was corrected from GPLv3+ and BSD and Verbatim to GPL-3.0-or-later AND BSD-3-Clause AND BSD-4.3TAHOE AND Latex2e-translated-notice. -- Petr signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- de

Re: Getting back the old Bugzilla bug entry form

Mea culpa. My understanding was that this would not impact the sorts of use cases that were broken. Clearly that's not the case. Regardless, this should have been better communicated and tested. I take full responsibility for that; I should know better. I'll work with the Bugzilla developers to ge

Re: Fedora 38 Workstation boot time and memory improvements

> On 2023-04-14 01:28, Michael J Gruber wrote: > > > The boot time improvements came from removing iscsi from the critical > path.  There's no longer a dependency on network-online in the path to > graphical.target. > > The memory improvements came from allowing packagekitd to shut down on idl

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20230417.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230416.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230417.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 266 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 143.20 KiB Size of dropped packages:0

Re: Getting back the old Bugzilla bug entry form

* Miro Hrončok: > Apparently, the RHEL 9 product still has the old form, so Fedor amust > have opted into this. I wonder, where was this change coordinated? How > did I miss it? It was coordinated here: Default Fedora bug creation to Guided bug entry

Re: Getting back the old Bugzilla bug entry form

On 17. 04. 23 9:19, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 17. 04. 23 8:40, Florian Weimer wrote: Guided bug filing in Bugzilla was rolled out today. Is there a way to get back the old entry form?  ... We have a workflow that generates links like this:     url_prefix = 'https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_b

Re: Getting back the old Bugzilla bug entry form

On 17. 04. 23 9:06, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 17. 04. 23 8:40, Florian Weimer wrote: Guided bug filing in Bugzilla was rolled out today. Is there a way to get back the old entry form?  It doesn't look it's possible, specifying ?format=FORMAT gives this error: | file error - cannot find file - | b

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

Re: Getting back the old Bugzilla bug entry form

On 17. 04. 23 8:40, Florian Weimer wrote: Guided bug filing in Bugzilla was rolled out today. Is there a way to get back the old entry form? ... We have a workflow that generates links like this: url_prefix = 'https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?' params = { 'short_des

Re: Getting back the old Bugzilla bug entry form

On 17. 04. 23 8:40, Florian Weimer wrote: Guided bug filing in Bugzilla was rolled out today. Is there a way to get back the old entry form? It doesn't look it's possible, specifying ?format=FORMAT gives this error: | file error - cannot find file - | bug/create/create-FORMATguided-Fedora.html